138 FBS programs, national scope

Situational Rankings

A composite efficiency rating built from 3rd/4th down conversion, explosive play rate, red zone TD%, and overall play success -- offense and defense, standardized and combined into one number. Click a column header to sort by any single metric instead.

2026 season · 138 teams with situational data on file
RKTEAMRATING ▾SUCC O ▾SUCC D ▾3RD O ▾3RD D ▾EXPL O ▾EXPL D ▾RZ TD O ▾RZ TD D ▾
1MIAMI (FL)+1.3853.3%35.4%54.7%34.4%20.4%12.9%74.4%40.0%
2NEBRASKA+1.3544.8%34.6%50.0%20.9%16.6%12.5%78.6%29.4%
3UTAH+1.1851.2%34.6%55.4%34.7%19.2%12.5%63.9%42.1%
4GEORGIA+1.1453.7%36.1%57.7%36.6%20.2%11.6%76.5%70.6%
5LSU+1.1151.2%35.4%54.3%32.4%17.9%12.6%71.7%50.0%
6INDIANA+0.9646.1%33.7%43.6%33.9%19.1%12.0%67.7%38.9%
7NORTHWESTERN+0.9650.6%42.5%48.8%38.8%23.0%13.8%69.7%39.1%
8OREGON ST.+0.9452.8%40.8%50.0%38.3%17.7%12.8%79.3%43.5%
9ARIZONA+0.9351.3%35.5%56.9%38.2%16.7%13.0%65.4%47.1%
10LOUISVILLE+0.9150.4%41.7%46.2%35.0%20.9%12.4%70.4%44.8%
11LIBERTY+0.9048.4%34.7%43.8%30.8%18.3%13.8%59.4%33.3%
12OHIO ST.+0.7850.3%34.8%45.9%37.8%18.5%11.7%62.9%53.3%
13UCLA+0.7747.2%33.3%47.4%26.4%16.0%13.8%62.9%52.6%
14NOTRE DAME+0.7551.1%36.1%47.1%40.3%13.9%9.0%65.5%46.2%
15TEXAS+0.7443.7%34.8%38.9%34.0%16.5%9.0%64.3%40.0%
16BYU+0.7351.2%39.0%55.3%41.0%17.4%11.2%73.3%66.7%
17WAKE FOREST+0.7049.3%43.0%50.0%43.1%18.8%9.7%67.6%50.0%
18SMU+0.6849.6%37.5%44.2%28.4%18.0%13.4%68.6%64.7%
19IOWA+0.6444.5%35.0%39.1%31.4%16.9%10.9%59.1%45.0%
20TOLEDO+0.6345.8%34.1%44.8%35.5%17.8%12.4%69.4%60.0%
21ALABAMA+0.6349.0%38.5%45.2%36.9%19.5%14.0%73.0%59.3%
22AIR FORCE+0.5850.7%39.9%53.5%35.5%15.1%13.3%61.3%52.4%
23JAMES MADISON+0.5747.0%36.5%37.9%38.1%17.0%12.2%70.7%44.4%
24KANSAS+0.5645.1%38.6%37.1%34.4%20.7%13.4%65.5%48.0%
25TCU+0.5444.0%34.6%43.2%32.6%16.1%11.4%50.0%42.9%

RATING is a computed z-score composite of the 8 situational-efficiency metrics to its right (this site's own methodology, not an official NCAA/CFP metric) -- roughly how many standard deviations above or below an average situational team this program is, averaging each metric's standardized score across the qualifying pool (defense/"allowed" columns flipped so a LOWER rate always scores better, same direction as RATING itself). Only teams with both offensive and defensive snaps on file this season are ranked. O/D columns are the underlying raw rates. Click a column header to sort.