FCS Playoff Picture

Who's in, who's out, and who's on the bubble for the 24-team FCS field -- recomputed live from this site's own national rating and conference data.

If the season ended today. 24-team field: one automatic bid per eligible conference champion (13 conferences on file: Big Sky, CAA, Ivy League, MEAC, MVFC, NEC, OVC/Big South, Patriot, Pioneer, SoCon, Southland, SWAC, United Athletic) + 11 at-large teams by this site's own rankings (half record vs. schedule, half power rating). Top 8 overall get a national seed and a first-round bye; the rest are paired with same-conference protection only (see methodology note -- this library has no travel-distance data for FCS teams, so the real geographic-pairing rule isn't modeled). Every round below is simulated forward to a projected national champion -- a matchup marked "ADVANCES (seed default)" means there isn't enough completed-game data yet to project it, so the better seed carries forward without a fabricated score.

Top 8 National Seeds · First-Round Bye

First Round (Unseeded)

vs
PROJECTED: TENNESSEE TECH 44–12
TENNESSEE TECH proj. final 9–3 (48%) · ALABAMA A&M proj. final 9–3 (39%)
vs
PROJECTED: NORTH DAKOTA 58–0
NORTH DAKOTA proj. final 8–4 (46%) · CENTRAL CONN. ST. proj. final 7–4 (35%)
vs
PROJECTED: AUSTIN PEAY 44–7
AUSTIN PEAY proj. final 9–3 (46%) · DAYTON proj. final 9–2 (45%)
vs
PROJECTED: ILLINOIS ST. 35–20
ILLINOIS ST. proj. final 8–4 (42%) · SOUTH CAROLINA ST. proj. final 9–3 (43%)
vs
PROJECTED: CAMPBELL 29–26
CAMPBELL proj. final 9–3 (38%) · SOUTHEAST MO. ST. proj. final 8–4 (36%)
vs
PROJECTED: MONTANA 32–23
MONTANA proj. final 8–4 (49%) · LEHIGH proj. final 9–3 (44%)
vs
PROJECTED: LAMAR UNIVERSITY 26–25
LAMAR UNIVERSITY proj. final 8–4 (43%) · ABILENE CHRISTIAN proj. final 6–6 (45%)
vs
PROJECTED: MERCER 34–25
MERCER proj. final 9–3 (41%) · MONMOUTH proj. final 9–3 (47%)

Second Round

vs
PROJECTED: SFA 31–24
SFA proj. final 12–0 (45%) · MERCER proj. final 9–3 (41%)
vs
PROJECTED: MONTANA ST. 46–9
MONTANA ST. proj. final 11–2 (42%) · LAMAR UNIVERSITY proj. final 8–4 (43%)
vs
PROJECTED: TARLETON ST. 34–28
TARLETON ST. proj. final 12–0 (42%) · MONTANA proj. final 8–4 (49%)
vs
PROJECTED: SOUTH DAKOTA 48–9
SOUTH DAKOTA proj. final 8–4 (43%) · CAMPBELL proj. final 9–3 (38%)
vs
PROJECTED: YOUNGSTOWN ST. 32–26
YOUNGSTOWN ST. proj. final 8–3 (47%) · ILLINOIS ST. proj. final 8–4 (42%)
vs
PROJECTED: SOUTH DAKOTA ST. 34–19
SOUTH DAKOTA ST. proj. final 9–3 (43%) · AUSTIN PEAY proj. final 9–3 (46%)
vs
PROJECTED: NORTH DAKOTA 32–27
NORTHERN ARIZ. proj. final 9–3 (42%) · NORTH DAKOTA proj. final 8–4 (46%)
vs
PROJECTED: HARVARD 27–25
HARVARD proj. final 9–1 (43%) · TENNESSEE TECH proj. final 9–3 (48%)

Quarterfinals

vs
PROJECTED: SFA 31–22
SFA proj. final 12–0 (45%) · HARVARD proj. final 9–1 (43%)
vs
PROJECTED: SOUTH DAKOTA 32–28
SOUTH DAKOTA proj. final 8–4 (43%) · YOUNGSTOWN ST. proj. final 8–3 (47%)
vs
PROJECTED: SOUTH DAKOTA ST. 28–28
TARLETON ST. proj. final 12–0 (42%) · SOUTH DAKOTA ST. proj. final 9–3 (43%)
vs
PROJECTED: MONTANA ST. 33–25
MONTANA ST. proj. final 11–2 (42%) · NORTH DAKOTA proj. final 8–4 (46%)

Semifinals

vs
PROJECTED: SFA 30–26
SFA proj. final 12–0 (45%) · SOUTH DAKOTA proj. final 8–4 (43%)
vs
PROJECTED: MONTANA ST. 30–25
MONTANA ST. proj. final 11–2 (42%) · SOUTH DAKOTA ST. proj. final 9–3 (43%)

Championship

vs
PROJECTED: MONTANA ST. 32–25
SFA proj. final 12–0 (45%) · MONTANA ST. proj. final 11–2 (42%)

Champion

Full Resume (24-Team Field)

RANKTEAMRATINGSOSQUALIFIED AS
1 BYESFA (8-0)32.412.9Southland champion
2 BYEMONTANA ST. (7-1)38.717.1Big Sky champion
3 BYETARLETON ST. (8-0)32.212.0United Athletic champion
4 BYESOUTH DAKOTA (7-2)31.320.5At-large
5 BYEYOUNGSTOWN ST. (6-2)29.822.6At-large
6 BYESOUTH DAKOTA ST. (6-2)37.816.6MVFC champion
7 BYENORTHERN ARIZ. (6-2)24.224.9At-large
8 BYEHARVARD (6-0)25.612.8Ivy League champion
9TENNESSEE TECH (7-1)24.915.1SoCon champion
10NORTH DAKOTA (6-3)32.019.8At-large
11AUSTIN PEAY (7-2)26.515.6At-large
12ILLINOIS ST. (6-2)29.712.2At-large
13CAMPBELL (7-1)12.813.9At-large
14MONTANA (5-3)31.319.6At-large
15LAMAR UNIVERSITY (6-2)18.215.7At-large
16MERCER (6-2)26.013.2At-large
17MONMOUTH (6-2)19.113.6CAA champion
18ABILENE CHRISTIAN (4-4)24.725.5At-large
19LEHIGH (6-2)23.011.7Patriot champion
20SOUTHEAST MO. ST. (5-3)17.918.9OVC (Big South-OVC) champion
21SOUTH CAROLINA ST. (6-2)18.71.6MEAC champion
22DAYTON (6-1)6.6-0.8Pioneer champion
23CENTRAL CONN. ST. (4-3)7.711.3NEC champion
24ALABAMA A&M (6-2)5.4-1.3SWAC champion

On the Bubble

TEAMRATINGSOS
--ETSU (6-2)19.511.8Next in line
--UNI (3-4)20.527.8Next in line
--UC DAVIS (5-3)23.216.3Next in line
--SOUTHERN ILL. (4-5)24.822.9Next in line

Ranking and seeding use the same record-plus-power blend as /rankings. RATING/SOS use the same joint national solve and plain average-opponent-rating as the FBS CFP page. "Conference champion" is a joint-simulation PROJECTION of each conference's remaining schedule (same methodology as the CFP page's own "Conference champion" note -- see there for the full explanation), not simply today's best record; still a disclosed proxy, since no title-game result is tracked in this library. First-round pairing applies same-conference protection via a best-effort swap, not an exhaustive solve, and does NOT model the real committee's geographic/travel-distance rule -- this library has no location data for FCS teams to do that with. Second Round byes-vs-winners pairing is this site's own disclosed assignment (best bye faces the closest-ranked unseeded pairing's winner, not necessarily the single strongest unseeded team's own game) -- not a claim to the real committee's actual draw.