TEAM RANKINGSSTAT BOARDSHISTORICALPLAYERS OF THE WEEKBREAKOUTSUPSETSSCHEDULE DIFFICULTYLEAGUE RANKINGSPROJECTED VS ACTUAL WINSMEDIA PACKET
SP TOP 25 — STRENGTH INDEX — TAPPS Division II Score-only rating

Texas coverage: scores, projections and rankings for 1,236 teams this season; full box-score stats for 1,236.

RKTRENDLAST WKTEAMSCORERUN OPASS ORUN DPASS DP4PNEXT
1NEW—★ ALL SAINTS (8-2)34.9+79.7+93.9+150.2+116.1+14.1†—
2NEW— REGENTS (8-1)25.7+21.4+166.3+19.2+46.6+17.9—
3NEW—★ BROOK HILL (10-0)21.8+184.0+95.5+118.0+139.1+18.0—
4NEW— THE WOODLANDS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY (8-2)21.5-10.9+141.3+37.1-25.7-8.3—
5NEW— MIDLAND CHRISTIAN (6-4)20.0+5.9+166.1-2.7-30.7+12.4†—
6NEW— SECOND BAPTIST (7-3)12.5-45.7+95.5-70.8-31.4+4.3†—
7NEW— SOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL (5-5)11.3-47.9+93.3-17.4+15.8-10.2—
8NEW— HYDE PARK (7-3)10.6+17.5+153.9-9.7-17.3+7.5—
9NEW— FORT WORTH CHRISTIAN (3-7)8.9-8.1+84.6-6.3-19.6+5.5—
10NEW— GRACE COMMUNITY (6-4)6.6-14.4+47.4+53.5-150.9-1.1—
11NEW— GRAPEVINE FAITH CHRISTIAN (4-6)6.4-16.0+115.8-19.3-7.9+1.0—
12NEW— ST. JOSEPH (Victoria) (7-3)0.9-21.3-40.2+5.8-29.6+7.3†—
13NEW— CYPRESS CHRISTIAN (6-4)0.1+7.8-56.5-16.8-14.8-5.0—
14NEW— GRACE PREP (5-4)-1.1+38.1-18.1+30.4-56.7+1.1—
15NEW— MCKINNEY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY (5-5)-5.7-68.1+50.4-61.6-31.6-5.3†—
16NEW— ST. JOSEPH ACADEMY (Brownsville) (3-6)-8.3-76.9-46.6-59.9+6.9-3.6—
17NEW— FBCA (0-10)-8.8-84.5-0.1-179.7-99.5-17.0†—
18NEW— SAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN (2-8)-10.5-7.7-113.6-27.1-5.6-16.6†—
19NEW— BISHOP DUNNE (2-6)-12.0-10.5-45.1-63.6-9.5-5.4—
20NEW— ST. ANTHONY (San Antonio) (0-9)-28.7-117.9+9.1-64.8-37.0-17.4—

★ = top tier: the four unit grades average 85 or better with none below 75. RK is the row’s position under the current sort (Strength Index rank until you click a stat header, or on mobile the SORT BY menu; “Rank” restores it). TREND/LAST WK compare today’s Strength Index rank to the last completed calendar week’s; NEW means no prior-week snapshot exists yet for that team.

RUN O / PASS O — rushing and passing offense ratings: yards-equivalent per game above (or below) league average, not a 0–100 percentile. Each game’s yardage is converted to a yards-equivalent (efficiency vs. league average added, sacks and interceptions subtracted) and curved for the defense it came against — 200 yards on an elite pass defense rates higher than 200 on a poor one. Recent seasons weigh more. +90 means about ninety yards-equivalent per game better than an average unit.
RUN D / PASS D — the same yards-equivalent and curve applied to what a defense ALLOWED, shown as yards prevented per game, so that higher is better in all four columns. (The underlying rating is negative for a good defense — yards induced — and is what the SCORE arithmetic uses; only the sign shown here is flipped.)
P4P — pound-for-pound: SCORE minus the score a school of the same size is expected to produce, in points. Size is school enrollment (Wikipedia) where on file, else roster count (marked †); the size-expectation curve is fitted to this board and re-fits as enrollment coverage grows. +6.0 = six points better than a typical same-sized program. Enrollment on file for 13 of 20 teams.

SCORE is a point-margin strength index: 0.0 is a team of exactly average strength across every team the engine has rated (not just this section) -- projected as a pick’em against a hypothetical average opponent. A score of +10.0 projects as a 10-point favorite against that same average opponent; −10.0 projects as a 10-point underdog. Because this section’s own field skews a bit below that universe-wide average line, most section teams show negative scores even though they may be ranked highly within the section itself -- the SCORE compares a team to every rated team everywhere, the RK column compares it only to the rest of this section.

All four Unit Index boards below are opponent-adjusted for strength of competition — a team that piles up big offensive numbers against weak defenses (or allows big numbers to weak offenses) does not get an inflated grade for it. Grades come from a two-way solve across every game the engine has on file, correcting each side for who it actually played, not a plain season average.

RUN OFFENSE — TOP 10 · TAPPS DIVISION II
RKTRENDLAST WKTEAMGRADEYDS +/-
1NEW— BROOK HILL96.1+184.1
2NEW— ALL SAINTS82.7+79.7
3NEW— GRACE PREP70.6+38.2
4NEW— REGENTS64.2+21.4
5NEW— HYDE PARK62.6+17.7
6NEW— CYPRESS CHRISTIAN58.4+7.8
7NEW— MIDLAND CHRISTIAN57.8+6.0
8NEW— SAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN51.4-7.7
9NEW— FORT WORTH CHRISTIAN51.2-8.1
10NEW— BISHOP DUNNE50.1-10.5
PASS OFFENSE — TOP 10 · TAPPS DIVISION II
RKTRENDLAST WKTEAMGRADEYDS +/-
1NEW— REGENTS97.1+166.3
2NEW— MIDLAND CHRISTIAN97.0+166.1
3NEW— HYDE PARK96.2+153.5
4NEW— THE WOODLANDS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY95.2+141.4
5NEW— GRAPEVINE FAITH CHRISTIAN92.3+115.8
6NEW— SECOND BAPTIST88.8+95.5
7NEW— BROOK HILL88.8+95.4
8NEW— ALL SAINTS88.6+93.9
9NEW— SOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL88.4+93.3
10NEW— FORT WORTH CHRISTIAN86.6+84.6
RUN DEFENSE — TOP 10 · TAPPS DIVISION II
RKTRENDLAST WKTEAMGRADEYDS +/-
1NEW— ALL SAINTS97.7-150.2
2NEW— BROOK HILL94.0-118.0
3NEW— GRACE COMMUNITY74.5-53.6
4NEW— THE WOODLANDS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY67.4-37.1
5NEW— GRACE PREP64.0-30.4
6NEW— REGENTS58.4-19.2
7NEW— ST. JOSEPH (Victoria)51.6-5.8
8NEW— MIDLAND CHRISTIAN47.2+2.7
9NEW— FORT WORTH CHRISTIAN45.2+6.3
10NEW— HYDE PARK43.6+9.7
PASS DEFENSE — TOP 10 · TAPPS DIVISION II
RKTRENDLAST WKTEAMGRADEYDS +/-
1NEW— BROOK HILL98.9-139.1
2NEW— ALL SAINTS97.5-116.1
3NEW— REGENTS78.9-46.6
4NEW— SOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL59.1-15.8
5NEW— ST. JOSEPH ACADEMY (Brownsville)52.8-6.9
6NEW— SAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN43.3+5.7
7NEW— GRAPEVINE FAITH CHRISTIAN41.7+7.9
8NEW— BISHOP DUNNE38.9+12.1
9NEW— CYPRESS CHRISTIAN37.0+14.4
10NEW— HYDE PARK35.3+17.4

Plot any of these stats against each other in the GRAPH BUILDER →

Built 2026-11-05T04:35:55.

SEARCHALL TEAMSLEAGUESRANKINGSRESULTSPROJECTIONSACCURACYGRAPH BUILDERSTAT FINDERDASHBOARD
CFB PIRATE · COLLEGE FOOTBALL