In short: Harvard FCS college football, 2026 season: 6-0 (Ivy League). Last game: W 35-7 vs Princeton on October 24, 2026. Next: at Dartmouth, October 30, 2026. Schedule and results, player season stats, stat leaders, unit grades, the CFB Pirate rating and projections.
The number to watch when Harvard meets Dartmouth is Harvard's scoring. Harvard averaged 21.7 points per game over its first 3 games (3-0), #75 in FCS in that timeframe. In the 3 games since that slow start (3-0), the Crimson have averaged 35.3 points per game, a 63% rise, #19 in FCS in that window. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Harvard's last 3 opponents have averaged 24.1 points per game, a #44 scoring defense in FCS on the season, against 21.7 points per game, #27 for the first 3. Measured against those opponents' norms (24.1 points per game), Harvard scored 46% more than those defenses usually allow. Conversely, Dartmouth's defense has been one of FCS's better units in recent weeks. The Big Green have allowed 22.3 points per game over their last 3 games (2-1), #43 in FCS during that time. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of offenses in FCS (24.3 points per game on the season, which would rank #68). Against those norms, Dartmouth held those offenses 8% below what they usually score. Something has to give when Harvard's surging offense meets one of FCS's better units in Dartmouth's. Harvard is 4-0 this season when it scores 22 or more, and 2-0 when it doesn't.
The battle on the ground could decide Harvard's next game, against Dartmouth, and the recent returns favor Dartmouth. Harvard allowed 2.9 yards per carry (280 yards on 97 rushes) over its first 3 games (3-0), #7 in FCS through those games. In the 3 games since that hot start (3-0), the Crimson have allowed 4.5 yards per carry (472 yards on 104 rushes), a 57% rise, #80 in FCS through that stretch. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Harvard's last 3 opponents have averaged 4.4 yards per carry, a #53 rushing attack in FCS on the season, against 3.2 yards per carry, #111 for the first 3. Meanwhile, Dartmouth's ground game has been middle of the pack in recent weeks. The Big Green have averaged 4.3 yards per carry (468 yards on 110 rushes) over their last 3 games (2-1), #60 in FCS over that stretch. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of run defenses in FCS (4.1 yards per carry on the season, which would rank #49). Dartmouth offers Harvard a fair measuring stick for whether the trend is real. Up front, CFB Pirate's line ratings call it close: Harvard's front and Dartmouth's offensive line grade out about even.
NOTES
Harvard's red-zone defense looks worse on paper, but one afternoon is doing a lot of the work. Harvard allowed touchdowns on 46.2% of opponents' red-zone trips (6 of 13) on the season, #17 in FCS, but that number is dragged down by a 2-for-2 against Cornell on 10/10. In all other games, Harvard is at 36.4% of opponents' red-zone trips (4 of 11), a figure that would rank #4 in FCS. It came against one of FCS's better red-zone offenses (Cornell: 69.2%, #12 of 128). Against Dartmouth, Harvard draws one of the better red-zone offenses (70.6%, #11), so expect something closer to the 36.4% version.
The biggest shift in Harvard's season has come in its passing game. The Crimson averaged 6.3 yards per pass attempt (654 yards on 103 attempts) over their first 3 games (3-0), #81 in FCS within that period. In the 3 games since that slow start (3-0), Harvard has averaged 9.3 yards per pass attempt (835 yards on 90 attempts), a 46% rise, #8 in FCS across those games. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Harvard's last 3 opponents have averaged 7.7 yards per attempt, a #89 pass defense in FCS on the season, against 6.4 yards per attempt, #25 for the first 3. Measured against those opponents' norms (7.7 yards per attempt), Harvard threw for 21% more per attempt than those pass defenses usually allow. On the season, the Crimson rank #27 in FCS in passing. That form gets a real test against Dartmouth, whose pass defense ranks #32 in FCS (6.6 yards per attempt). Up front, CFB Pirate's line ratings give Harvard the edge: Harvard's offensive line grades +0.5 against Dartmouth's front at -3.0 (stuffed runs, sacks and early-down success, opponent-adjusted).
Harvard averaged 4.8 yards per play (1,028 yards on 213 snaps) over its first 3 games (3-0), #90 in FCS during those games. Few teams started slower in this department, and few have turned it around as sharply since. In the 3 games since that slow start (3-0), the Crimson have averaged 6.3 yards per play (1,232 yards on 195 snaps), a 31% rise, #24 in FCS during that period. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 5.4 yards per play on the season. Measured against those opponents' norms (5.5 yards per play), Harvard gained 14% more per snap than those defenses usually allow. On the season, Harvard ranks #58 in FCS in yards per play. Dartmouth's defense sits in the middle of the pack, #45 in FCS (5.4 yards per play). Up front, CFB Pirate's line ratings give Harvard the edge: Harvard's offensive line grades +0.5 against Dartmouth's front at -3.0 (stuffed runs, sacks and early-down success, opponent-adjusted).
Harvard's third-down offense has come a long way since the season's early weeks. The Crimson converted 41% of third downs (16-for-39) over their first 3 games (3-0), #43 in FCS during that stretch. In the 3 games since that slow start (3-0), Harvard has converted 51.5% of third downs (17-for-33), a 26% rise, #9 in FCS over that period. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 41.9% on the season. Measured against those opponents' norms (43%), Harvard converted third downs 20% more often than those defenses usually allow. On the season, the Crimson rank #17 in FCS in third-down offense. The trend lines up well against Dartmouth, whose third-down defense ranks just #119 of 129 (48.1%).
Something changed for Harvard's defense after its first 3 games. Harvard allowed 4.0 yards per play (775 yards on 196 snaps) over its first 3 games (3-0), #3 in FCS over that timeframe. In the 3 games since that hot start (3-0), the Crimson have allowed 4.8 yards per play (928 yards on 193 snaps), a 22% rise, #25 in FCS over that span. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Harvard's last 3 opponents have averaged 5.5 yards per play, a #59 offense in FCS on the season, against 4.9 yards per play, #99 for the first 3. Measured against those opponents' norms (5.5 yards per play), Harvard held those offenses 12% below their usual yards per snap. By that measure, the early pace looks more like the outlier than the recent one. On the season, Harvard ranks #5 in FCS in yards per play allowed. Dartmouth's offense sits in the middle of the pack, #64 in FCS (5.4 yards per play). Up front, CFB Pirate's line ratings call it close: Harvard's front and Dartmouth's offensive line grade out about even.
SCHEDULE STRENGTH
Harvard has played a middle-of-the-road schedule in the pool so far (#66 of 130), and what is left is a tougher-than-average slate (#50 of 129).
Schedule so far · 1 = hardest
#66 of 130
avg opponent rating +13.3 over 7 games · 0 vs top-25 FCS
Schedule ahead · 1 = hardest
#50 of 129
avg opponent rating +14.1 over 3 games · 1 vs top-25
@New Hamp… W 31-7@Brown W 14-10Colgate W 20-17@Cornell W 41-29Holy Cro… W 30-7Princeton W 35-7@DartmouthColumbia@PennYale
Each bar is one opponent, placed by where its rating ranks in this pool (tall and red = top 10; short and green = bottom half). Hatched bars are games still to play; the dashed line is today.
Every player with a stat on file, listed only where he has one. Open the arrow beside a name for his game-by-game line. Stats through the Oct 24 game; last updated Oct 25; roster and numbers checked Sep 17.
Click a column heading to sort. MIN hides players below that many attempts.
PPG/OPP PPG use every played game on file. YPG/PLAYS-PER-GAME columns only ever come from games with a full box score on file, which can be a smaller sample than GP -- see the coverage note below when that's the case for this team.
Averages use only games with that number on file. SACKS ALW comes from the opponent's box score; TO FORCED is takeaways; TO MAR is takeaways minus giveaways, and its bottom cell is the season total. Dashes mean not on file.
UNIT INDEX
Pass Offense: grade 74.9/100 (+40 yds/gm vs average)
Rush Offense: grade 50.1/100 (-5 yds/gm vs average)
Pass Defense: grade 85.0/100 (-43 yds/gm vs average)
Rush Defense: grade 60.2/100 (-14 yds/gm vs average)
Unit grades: 0-100 league percentile, adjusted for the opponents faced.
OPPONENT TRACKER
(full explanation: Appendix, Note 2)
DATE
SITE
OPPONENT
THEIR RECORD
THEIR PPG
2026-10-30
at
DARTMOUTH
3-3
22.3
2026-11-07
vs
COLUMBIA
4-2
25.7
2026-11-14
at
PENN
3-3
18.7
2026-11-21
vs
YALE
3-3
29.3
LAST YEAR
HAR finished 2025 at 9-2. Made the playoffs (1 postseason game(s) on file; exact round/result not available). Notable win: 31-10 over DARTMOUTH (DARTMOUTH finished 70% that season). Toughest loss: 28-45 to YALE (17-point margin).
• [CLUB] Harvard has won 6 straight, and a win would make it 7 in a row. The last time they won 7 or more in a row was 2025, a run of 9.
• [CLUB] Harvard has gone 31 straight games committing fewer than 3 turnovers (October 28, 2023 through October 24, 2026), going 26-5 over that stretch, a school-record 31 straight in the 5 seasons on record.
• [CLUB] Harvard has gone 12 straight games being held under 7.0 yards per play (October 25, 2025 through October 24, 2026), going 10-2 over that stretch, a school-record 12 straight in the 5 seasons on record.
• [CLUB] Harvard has gone 7 straight games holding the opponent under 200 passing yards (November 29, 2025 through October 24, 2026), going 6-1 over that stretch, a school-record 7 straight in the 5 seasons on record.
• [CLUB] Harvard has gone 4 straight games averaging 8.0+ yards per attempt (October 3, 2026 through October 24, 2026), going 4-0 over that stretch, matching the program record of 4 straight on record.
• [CLUB] Harvard is trying to start 7-0 for the 2nd time in 5 seasons on record (most recently 2025, when Harvard finished 9-2).
• [CLUB] Harvard is 19-0 all time when scoring 30-39 points in the games on file (19 such games).
• [CLUB] Harvard is 22-1 all time when rushing for 150+ yards. Harvard's last loss when rushing for 150+ yards was November 5, 2022 against Columbia (L, 20-21).
• [PLAYER] Charlie Smith has gone 6 straight games throwing a touchdown pass, the longest such streak of his career.
• [PLAYER] Charlie Smith has gone 5 straight games throwing for 200+ yards, the longest such streak of his career.
• [PLAYER] Xaviah Bascon has gone 8 straight games without rushing for 100+ yards. The last time he ran for 100+ yards was November 15, 2025 against Penn (W, 45-43) — 103 rushing yards.
• [PLAYER] Dj Gordon has gone 6 straight games without running for a touchdown. The last time he ran for a touchdown was October 25, 2025 against Princeton (W, 35-14) — 1 rushing TD.
• [PLAYER] Sean Line has gone 5 straight games without making 10 or more tackles. The last time he made 10 tackles was September 19, 2026 against New Hampshire (W, 31-7) — 10 tackles.
TALKING POINTS (15 storylines)
HAR HAS PERFORMED BEST THIS DATA SET WHEN...
• HAR averages 6.0+ yards per play (.999), and has won 27 straight when doing so
• HAR holds its opponents under 6.0 yards per play (.872), and has won 20 straight when doing so
• HAR rushes for 100+ yards (.872), and has won 4 straight when doing so
• HAR holds its opponents under 8.0 yards per attempt (.868), and has won 20 straight when doing so
• HAR's offense has failed to reach 5.0 YPC in 9 straight games (11/15/2025-10/24/2026), going 7-2 over that stretch.
• HAR's defense has limited opponents to under 200 pass yds in 7 straight games (11/29/2025-10/24/2026), going 6-1 over that stretch.
• HAR's defense has forced 1+ turnover in 7 straight games (11/29/2025-10/24/2026), going 6-1 over that stretch.
• HAR's defense has averaged 2.3 takeaways per game over their last 7 games. Their 47-game average is 1.4 takeaways per game. (+58%)
• HAR's offense has exceeded 200 pass yds in 5 straight games (09/25/2026-10/24/2026), going 5-0 over that stretch.
• HAR averages 8.0+ yards per attempt while throwing for 200+ yards
• HAR holds its opponents under 150 rushing yards while forcing 2+ takeaways
• HAR's offense has averaged 0.7 giveaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 47-game average is 1.2 giveaways per game. (-44%)
• HAR holds its opponents under 150 rushing yards and under 200 passing yards
• HAR's offense has exceeded 8.0 YPA in 4 straight games (10/03/2026-10/24/2026), going 4-0 over that stretch.
• HAR holds its opponents under 5.0 yards per carry and under 150 rushing yards
HAR — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2022-26 (47 Gms)
SPLIT
REC
WIN%
PPG
Scores <10
0-1
.000
7.0
Scores 10-19
2-4
.333
14.5
Scores 20-29
6-5
.545
25.5
Scores 30-39
19-0
1.000
33.9
Scores 40+
10-0
1.000
46.5
HAR — OFFENSE — 2026 (6 Gms)
SPLIT
REC
WIN%
PPG
STRK
YPA 8.0+
4-0
1.000
31.5
W4
YPA < 8.0
2-0
1.000
22.5
W2
Pass Yds 200+
5-0
1.000
28.0
W5
Pass Yds < 200
1-0
1.000
31.0
W1
Rush Yds 100+
4-0
1.000
34.2
W4
Rush Yds < 100
2-0
1.000
17.0
W2
Rush Yds 150+
2-0
1.000
30.5
W2
Rush Yds < 150
4-0
1.000
27.5
W4
YPC 5.0+
--
--
--
--
YPC < 5.0
6-0
1.000
28.5
W6
YPP 6.0+
4-0
1.000
31.5
W4
YPP < 6.0
2-0
1.000
22.5
W2
YPP 7.0+
--
--
--
--
YPP < 7.0
6-0
1.000
28.5
W6
Turnovers 1+
5-0
1.000
27.2
W5
Turnovers < 1
1-0
1.000
35.0
W1
Turnovers 2+
1-0
1.000
14.0
W1
Turnovers > 2
--
--
--
--
HAR — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2026 (6 Gms)
SPLIT
REC
WIN%
PPG
Scores <10
--
--
--
Scores 10-19
1-0
1.000
14.0
Scores 20-29
1-0
1.000
20.0
Scores 30-39
3-0
1.000
32.0
Scores 40+
1-0
1.000
41.0
HAR — DEFENSE — 2022-26 (47 Gms)
SPLIT
REC
WIN%
PPG
STRK
YPA 8.0+
4-5
.444
34.0
L3
YPA < 8.0
33-5
.868
17.3
W20
Pass Yds 200+
21-6
.778
23.9
L1
Pass Yds < 200
16-4
.800
15.9
W6
Rush Yds 100+
17-8
.680
25.4
W3
Rush Yds < 100
20-2
.909
14.9
W13
Rush Yds 150+
5-6
.455
31.9
W1
Rush Yds < 150
32-4
.889
17.0
W17
YPC 5.0+
4-1
.800
32.6
W1
YPC < 5.0
33-9
.786
19.1
W5
YPP 6.0+
3-5
.375
36.0
L3
YPP < 6.0
34-5
.872
17.3
W20
YPP 7.0+
2-1
.667
36.0
L1
YPP < 7.0
35-9
.795
19.5
W6
Turnovers 1+
29-5
.853
17.2
W6
Turnovers < 1
8-5
.615
29.2
L1
Turnovers 2+
19-3
.864
16.5
W5
Turnovers > 2
7-1
.875
12.0
W7
HAR — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2022-26 (47 Gms)
SPLIT
REC
WIN%
PPG
Allows <10
10-0
1.000
6.4
Allows 10-19
10-1
.909
13.4
Allows 20-29
14-3
.824
24.5
Allows 30-39
2-4
.333
32.8
Allows 40+
1-2
.333
46.7
HAR — DEFENSE — 2026 (6 Gms)
SPLIT
REC
WIN%
PPG
STRK
YPA 8.0+
--
--
--
--
YPA < 8.0
6-0
1.000
12.8
W6
Pass Yds 200+
--
--
--
--
Pass Yds < 200
6-0
1.000
12.8
W6
Rush Yds 100+
3-0
1.000
17.7
W3
Rush Yds < 100
3-0
1.000
8.0
W3
Rush Yds 150+
1-0
1.000
29.0
W1
Rush Yds < 150
5-0
1.000
9.6
W5
YPC 5.0+
1-0
1.000
29.0
W1
YPC < 5.0
5-0
1.000
9.6
W5
YPP 6.0+
--
--
--
--
YPP < 6.0
6-0
1.000
12.8
W6
YPP 7.0+
--
--
--
--
YPP < 7.0
6-0
1.000
12.8
W6
Turnovers 1+
6-0
1.000
12.8
W6
Turnovers < 1
--
--
--
--
Turnovers 2+
5-0
1.000
12.0
W5
Turnovers > 2
2-0
1.000
8.5
W2
HAR — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2026 (6 Gms)
SPLIT
REC
WIN%
PPG
Allows <10
3-0
1.000
7.0
Allows 10-19
2-0
1.000
13.5
Allows 20-29
1-0
1.000
29.0
Allows 30-39
--
--
--
Allows 40+
--
--
--
ON THE BRINK
HARVARD
• HARVARD has passed for 250+ in 4 straight games (10/3/26–10/24/26). It has not reached 5 straight in the last 4 years of games on file (2023-present).
• HARVARD has held the opponent under 14 in 2 straight games (10/17/26–10/24/26). It has not reached 3 straight in the last 4 years of games on file (2023-present).
• HARVARD has forced 2+ turnovers in 3 straight games (10/10/26–10/24/26). It has not forced 2+ turnovers in 4 straight since 9/20/25–10/10/25 (2025).
• HARVARD has won by 20+ in 2 straight games (10/17/26–10/24/26). It has not won by 20+ in 3 straight since 9/20/25–11/1/25 (2025).
HAR's defense has averaged 2.3 takeaways per game over their last 7 games. Their 47-game average is 1.4 takeaways per game. (+58%)
HAR's defense has averaged 4.5 YPC over their last 3 games. Their 47-game average is 3.3 YPC. (+35%)
HAR's defense has averaged 157.3 rush yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 47-game average is 118.0 rush yards per game. (+33%)
HAR's defense has averaged 14.0 points allowed per game over their last 5 games. Their 47-game average is 20.5 points allowed per game. (-32%)
HAR's defense has averaged 152.0 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 47-game average is 212.3 pass yards per game. (-28%)
(moved to the Appendix, Data Export 1, to keep this section shorter -- the full spreadsheet-paste table is there unchanged)
APPENDIX
Full-length explanations and full-size data exports for the shortened notes and relocated tables referenced throughout this report, numbered in the order their pointers appear above.
Explanatory Notes
Note 1 -- SEASON OUTLOOK
Every remaining game is projected from schedule-adjusted ratings; already-played games carry their real result. Records are simulated distributions, not a single guess -- MOST LIKELY FINAL is the single most probable record and its own probability, PROJECTED RECORD is the season's expected win total expressed in record form (an average across every simulated outcome, so it can land on a fraction of a game).
Note 2 -- OPPONENT TRACKER -- why some cards have no record shown
Only meaningful for an opponent who is ALSO a tracked team in the library -- an opponent with no games on file here at all shows the date and site alone.
Note 3 -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS -- how a number is scored
Every split this report computes is scored on how strong the number is and how much it sets this team apart from its opponent and the rest of the field, and the top 5 per team are listed. A condition needs at least 8 occurrences to count.
Full Data Exports
Data Export 1 -- TRENDS — TAB-SEPARATED (10 columns)
Where HARVARD sits among 130 FCS teams on the two Unit Index composites -- Offense Grade 62.5, Defense Grade 72.6.
POINTS ALLOWED / GAME: HARVARD VS THE FCS
HARVARD ranks #1 of 130 FCS teams in points allowed per game (12.8) -- a strength worth a look.
HARVARD: SP STRENGTH INDEX BY SEASON
The program's index across 4 seasons on file -- 5.2 in 2022 to 9.2 in 2025.
These graphs were chosen by the program from this season's most notable numbers. Build your own -- any stat against any other, for any mix of teams, seasons or players, with a JPEG download -- in the Graph Builder.
2.34 points per offensive possession (70 possessions on file, 2026)
Late & close (4th quarter or later, within one score): 40.0% success rate, 11.4% explosive play rate (35 snaps)
Down & Distance
Plays
Play-Type Mix
1 & short
4
rush 100%
1 & medium
8
rush 88%, pass 12%
1 & long
172
rush 51%, pass 48%, sack 1%
2 & short
17
rush 71%, pass 29%
2 & medium
47
pass 51%, rush 49%
2 & long
66
rush 50%, pass 47%, sack 3%
3 & short
22
rush 64%, pass 36%
3 & medium
25
pass 84%, rush 16%
3 & long
25
pass 64%, rush 28%, sack 8%
4 & short
9
rush 56%, pass 44%
4 & medium
1
pass 100%
4 & long
2
pass 50%, rush 50%
GARBAGE TIME PROFILE
4 of 6 games on file this season hit garbage time
Average margin: +15.7 final vs. +12.0 before garbage time — this team pads its margins (+3.7 pts/game)
Biggest swing: 14 points, vs. Princeton on 2026-10-24 (+28 final, +14 real)
See the Garbage Time Reality Check page for the full leaderboard. This is informational only — it never changes this team's ranking or projection elsewhere on the site.
ADVANCED PLAYER STATS
CHARLIE SMITH (QB): -0.28 EPA/dropback, 25.0% success rate, 20 dropbacks
Expected Points Added, averaged over every dropback (pass attempt or sack) that has a value on file. Positive means the play typically moved the team closer to scoring more than an average play in that situation would; negative means it cost expected points.
Inputs: Each play's EPA (from CFBD's own model for most FBS/FCS plays, or this project's own trained model for a smaller share of other games) averaged over the QB's dropbacks. The dropback count with an EPA value on file (not every play has one) is always shown alongside the rate, and boards require at least 20 such plays before a QB qualifies -- a thin sample was found live to distort rankings otherwise.
Passing Success Rate
The share of dropbacks that were 'successful' by a standard down-based yardstick, regardless of whether EPA is available for that play.
Inputs: Gained at least 50% of the yards needed on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, or the full distance (or a touchdown) on 3rd/4th -- computed from down, distance, yards gained and touchdown, all structured fields.
Rushing Success Rate
The same down-based success standard as passing success rate, applied to a player's carries.
Inputs: Down, distance, yards gained and touchdown on plays where this player was the ball carrier.
Receiving Success Rate
The same down-based success standard, applied to a player's targets (thrown to him, complete or not).
Inputs: Down, distance, yards gained and touchdown on plays where this player was the targeted receiver.
3rd Down Splits
How a player performed specifically on 3rd down plays this season -- success rate, touchdown rate, and the underlying counting stats, isolated from every other down.
Inputs: Every play on file where down = 3 and this player was involved (passer, rusher, receiver, or a tackle/sack/INT/fumble recovery on defense).
4th Down Splits
The same idea as 3rd Down Splits, isolated to 4th down plays -- the highest-leverage down in football.
Inputs: Every play on file where down = 4 and this player was involved.
Red Zone Splits
How a player performed once his team's offense (or the opponent's, for a defender) reached inside the 20-yard line.
Inputs: Every play on file within 20 yards of the goal line (`distance_to_goal <= 20`) this player was involved in. COVERAGE CAVEAT: true field position is only recorded for about a third of plays leaguewide, concentrated in FBS/FCS games -- a player whose games come from a source without it will show thin or missing red-zone splits even if he played plenty of red-zone snaps. This is a gap in the underlying play-by-play data, not a sign he didn't play there.
Final 2 Minutes of a Half
How a player performed in the last two minutes of either half -- the clock-management, high-pressure stretch at the end of the 2nd and 4th quarters.
Inputs: Every play on file in the 2nd or 4th quarter with 2:00 or less on the clock this player was involved in. Same field-position/clock coverage caveat as Red Zone Splits above -- roughly a third of plays leaguewide carry a usable clock reading, concentrated in FBS/FCS games.
What is "garbage time"?
A 7-tier rule (bigger lead required as the clock runs down) that flags plays happening in a game that is no longer competitive -- e.g. a 30+ point lead right after halftime, or a 12+ point lead inside the final 3 minutes.
Inputs: Quarter, game clock, and the score of both teams at the time of the play. Garbage-time plays are not thrown out -- they count for 35% of a normal play in every "garbage-time-adjusted" figure, so a player who pads stats once a game is decided shows up as such rather than being invisible.
Report Produced by ScorePirate | Commitment and offer data sourced from 247Sports | GENERATED
10/29/2026 11:12
