UIL 3A Division 2 · District 9

2026 standings · all Texas districts
#TeamDistOvrRankProj.Dist. ptsNext
1HOOKS5-06-317 / 3141 (6.0-0.0)286-18511/05 vs HUGHES SPRINGS
2DE KALB4-16-326 / 3912 (4.8-1.2)248-14411/06 vs NEW BOSTON
3NEW BOSTON4-15-455 / 6563 (4.2-1.8)157-14711/06 vs DE KALB
4REDWATER2-35-442 / 5254 (2.7-3.3)223-20411/06 vs DAINGERFIELD
5DAINGERFIELD2-32-758 / 6875 (2.3-3.7)198-20511/06 vs REDWATER
6HUGHES SPRINGS1-42-779 / 9886 (1.0-5.0)123-23911/05 vs HOOKS
7QUEEN CITY0-63-771 / 8897 (0.0-6.0)159-270
Top 4 in the district make the playoffs (line under 4th). Ordered by district record, then overall record and district point margin; UIL tiebreakers (head-to-head) are applied by the district, not here. Rank = SP Strength Index place in the classification / in Texas. Proj. = projected district finish and record, playing out each remaining district game by the two teams' ratings. From the 2026 results on file · UIL 3A Division 2 rankings · player leaders.
SEARCHALL TEAMSLEAGUESRANKINGSRESULTSPROJECTIONSACCURACYGRAPH BUILDERSTAT FINDERDASHBOARD
CFB PIRATE · COLLEGE FOOTBALL