UIL 5A Division 2 · District 9

2026 standings · all Texas districts
#TeamDistOvrRankProj.Dist. ptsNext
1MONTGOMERY6-09-019 / 1801 (6.6-0.4)303-5611/05 vs HUNTSVILLE
2HUNTSVILLE6-07-224 / 2492 (6.4-0.6)282-3411/05 vs MONTGOMERY
3LAKE CREEK4-27-223 / 2173 (4.9-2.1)213-12311/06 vs WEST FORK
4WEST FORK4-26-356 / 5744 (4.1-2.9)149-11511/06 vs LAKE CREEK
5KINGWOOD PARK2-43-667 / 6855 (2.6-4.4)109-16111/06 vs SPLENDORA
6SPLENDORA1-54-577 / 7657 (1.4-5.6)111-21311/06 vs KINGWOOD PARK
7PORTER1-53-682 / 7956 (1.9-5.1)47-15611/07 vs SPRING WOODS
8SPRING WOODS0-61-8111 / 11698 (0.1-6.9)16-37211/07 vs PORTER
Top 4 in the district make the playoffs (line under 4th). Ordered by district record, then overall record and district point margin; UIL tiebreakers (head-to-head) are applied by the district, not here. Rank = SP Strength Index place in the classification / in Texas. Proj. = projected district finish and record, playing out each remaining district game by the two teams' ratings. From the 2026 results on file · UIL 5A Division 2 rankings · player leaders.
SEARCHALL TEAMSLEAGUESRANKINGSRESULTSPROJECTIONSACCURACYGRAPH BUILDERSTAT FINDERDASHBOARD
CFB PIRATE · COLLEGE FOOTBALL