UIL 3A Division 2 · District 3

2026 standings · all Texas districts
#TeamDistOvrRankProj.Dist. ptsNext
1COAHOMA3-06-236 / 4861 (4.7-0.3)160-3110/30 vs GRAPE CREEK
2STANTON3-04-456 / 7252 (3.8-1.2)211-1310/30 vs CRANE
3CRANE2-16-261 / 8013 (3.3-1.7)95-7810/30 vs STANTON
4GRAPE CREEK1-21-792 / 11534 (1.6-3.4)76-10310/30 vs COAHOMA
5ALPINE0-32-694 / 11675 (1.0-4.0)48-16110/30 vs ANTHONY
6ANTHONY0-32-696 / 11906 (0.5-4.5)0-20410/30 vs ALPINE
Top 4 in the district make the playoffs (line under 4th). Ordered by district record, then overall record and district point margin; UIL tiebreakers (head-to-head) are applied by the district, not here. Rank = SP Strength Index place in the classification / in Texas. Proj. = projected district finish and record, playing out each remaining district game by the two teams' ratings. From the 2026 results on file · UIL 3A Division 2 rankings · player leaders.
SEARCHALL TEAMSLEAGUESRANKINGSRESULTSPROJECTIONSACCURACYGRAPH BUILDERSTAT FINDERDASHBOARD
CFB PIRATE · COLLEGE FOOTBALL