ScorePirate
MENU
AT A GLANCE

In short: Silsbee Tigers high school football (Silsbee, TX), 2026 season: 7-2. Last game: W 35-28 vs Hardin-Jefferson on October 30, 2026. Next: at Shepherd, November 6, 2026. Schedule and results, player season stats, stat leaders, unit grades, ScorePirate ranking and the game-by-game log.

ScorePirate Individual Team Report
SILSBEE
SILSBEE 7-2
2026 SEASON
SILSBEE
AT A GLANCE — AS OF 11/02/2026
RECORD7-2 this season
LAST GAMEW 35-28 vs HARDIN-JEFFERSON
NEXT GAMESHEPHERD (11/06/2026)
UNIT GRADESPass Off 64.9 · Rush Off 62.6 · Pass Def 77.9 · Rush Def 58.5
ENROLLMENT825 STUDENTS (2023-24) · PUBLIC
NUMBERS TO NOTE
#149
SP Strength Index (of 1252)
7-2
2026 record
+17.0
avg scoring margin, pts/gm
UNIT INDEX — GRADE (YDS VS AVG)
TEAMPASS ORUSH OPASS DRUSH D
SILSBEE64.9 (+18)62.6 (+18)77.9 (-45)58.5 (-20)
HEAD-TO-HEAD GAME LOG

STORYLINES

Next: at Shepherd, Fri 6 Nov. Matchup report: Silsbee at Shepherd.

The number to watch when Silsbee meets Shepherd is Silsbee's scoring defense. Silsbee allowed 16.8 points per game over its first 4 games (3-1), #166 in section in that timeframe. In the 5 games since that hot start (4-1), the Tigers have allowed 28.0 points per game, a 67% rise, #594 in section in that window. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Silsbee's last 5 opponents have averaged 32.3 points per game, a #500 offense in section on the season, against 27.0 points per game, #706 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (32.3 points per game), Silsbee held those offenses 13% below what they usually score. By that measure, the early pace looks more like the outlier than the recent one. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 5 opponents average a rating that would rank #259 in section, well above the first 4 (#521), so the dip has come against better teams overall. Meanwhile, Shepherd's offense has been middle of the pack in recent weeks. The Pirates have averaged 28.0 points per game over their last 5 games (3-2), #660 in section during that time. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of scoring defenses in section (28.8 points per game on the season, which would rank #643). Shepherd offers Silsbee a fair measuring stick for whether the trend is real. Silsbee is 6-1 this season when it holds opponents under 31, and 1-1 when it doesn't.

NOTES

The biggest shift in Silsbee's season has come in its passing game. Silsbee averaged 7.4 yards per pass attempt (625 yards on 84 attempts) over its first 5 games (4-1), #561 in section through those games. Over the stretch of 4 games that followed (3-1), the Tigers have averaged 9.3 yards per pass attempt (661 yards on 71 attempts), a 25% rise, #311 in section through that stretch. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Silsbee's last 4 opponents have averaged 8.3 yards per attempt, a #678 pass defense in section on the season, against 7.6 yards per attempt, #503 for the first 5. Measured against those opponents' norms (8.3 yards per attempt), Silsbee threw for 12% more per attempt than those pass defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #236 in section, well above the first 5 (#496), which makes the improvement more impressive. On the season, Silsbee ranks #469 in section in passing. The trend lines up well against Shepherd, whose pass defense ranks just #1100 of 1234 (11.1 yards per attempt).

Silsbee's offense from the opening weeks has gone missing since. The Tigers averaged 44.0 points per game over their first 6 games (5-1), #144 in section over that stretch. Over the stretch of 3 games that followed (2-1), Silsbee has averaged 32.0 points per game, a 27% drop, #519 in section within that period. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Silsbee's last 3 opponents have averaged 20.5 points per game, a #271 scoring defense in section on the season, against 26.5 points per game, #521 for the first 6. Measured against those opponents' norms (20.5 points per game), Silsbee scored 56% more than those defenses usually allow. By that measure, the early pace looks more like the outlier than the recent one. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 3 opponents average a rating that would rank #140 in section, well above the first 6 (#526), so the dip has come against better teams overall. On the season, the Tigers rank #239 in section in scoring. It won't get any easier against Shepherd, whose defense ranks #261 in section (20.2 points per game).

Something changed for Silsbee's ground game after the first 6 games of the season. Silsbee averaged 6.4 yards per carry (1,318 yards on 206 rushes) over its first 6 games (5-1), #406 in section across those games. Over the stretch of 3 games that followed (2-1), the Tigers have averaged 4.7 yards per carry (433 yards on 92 rushes), a 26% drop, #658 in section during those games. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Silsbee's last 3 opponents have averaged 4.9 yards per carry, a #296 run defense in section on the season, against 6.7 yards per carry, #815 for the first 6. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 3 opponents average a rating that would rank #140 in section, well above the first 6 (#526), so the dip has come against better teams overall. On the season, Silsbee ranks #524 in section in rushing. It won't get any easier against Shepherd, whose run defense ranks #112 in section (4.0 yards per carry).

Silsbee's run defense has been run over as the season has developed. The Tigers allowed 6.0 yards per carry (837 yards on 140 rushes) over their first 6 games (5-1), #637 in section during that period. Over the stretch of 3 games that followed (2-1), Silsbee has allowed 7.0 yards per carry (664 yards on 95 rushes), a 17% rise, #752 in section during that stretch. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Silsbee's last 3 opponents have averaged 6.3 yards per carry, a #442 rushing attack in section on the season, against 5.1 yards per carry, #731 for the first 6. Measured against those opponents' norms (6.3 yards per carry), Silsbee allowed 11% more per carry than those rushing attacks usually gain. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 3 opponents average a rating that would rank #140 in section, well above the first 6 (#526), so the dip has come against better teams overall. On the season, the Tigers rank #722 in section in run defense. It won't get any easier against Shepherd, whose ground game ranks #181 in section (7.7 yards per carry).

Silsbee's offense has gained fewer yards per snap as the season has worn on. Silsbee averaged 7.0 yards per play (2,099 yards on 299 snaps) over its first 6 games (5-1), #473 in section over that period. Over the stretch of 3 games that followed (2-1), the Tigers have averaged 6.1 yards per play (938 yards on 154 snaps), a 13% drop, #595 in section over that timeframe. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Silsbee's last 3 opponents have averaged 6.1 yards per play, a #352 defense in section on the season, against 7.2 yards per play, #715 for the first 6. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 3 opponents average a rating that would rank #140 in section, well above the first 6 (#526), so the dip has come against better teams overall. On the season, Silsbee ranks #551 in section in yards per play. Shepherd's defense sits in the middle of the pack, #650 in section (7.0 yards per play).

TIDBITS (10 found)

• Club Silsbee has won 2 straight, and a win would make it 3 in a row. The last time they won 3 or more in a row was 2026, a run of 3.

• Club Silsbee has gone 8 straight games committing fewer than 3 turnovers (September 4, 2026 through October 30, 2026), going 6-2 over that stretch, a school-record 8 straight in the 5 seasons on record.

• Club Silsbee is 27-1 all time when scoring 40+ points. Silsbee's last loss when scoring 40+ points was December 2, 2022 against Cuero (L, 56-58).

• Club Silsbee has allowed 96 points over its last 3 games (32.0 a game, October 16, 2026 through October 30, 2026) -- its 5th-highest 3-game total on record; the most is 106, from September 19, 2025 through October 10, 2025.

• Player Sedrick Matthews Jr. has gone 9 straight games throwing a touchdown pass, the longest such streak of his career.

• Player Corde Wilson has 4 sacks over his last 3 games (1.3 a game, October 9, 2026 through October 23, 2026) -- his most in a 3-game stretch on record.

• Player Hunter Hollyfield has 3 sacks over his last 3 games (1.0 a game, October 16, 2026 through October 30, 2026) -- his most in a 3-game stretch on record.

• Player Jaden Hicks has 40 tackles over his last 3 games (13.3 a game, August 28, 2026 through October 23, 2026) -- his most in a 3-game stretch on record.

• Player Haegyn Morris has gone 2 straight games rushing for 100+ yards, the longest such streak of his career.

• Player Haegyn Morris has gone 2 straight games running for a touchdown, the longest such streak of his career.

MILESTONE WATCH

Silsbee

  • Carter Horton needs 1 tackle for 50 (averaging 6.1 a game)
  • Hunter Hollyfield needs 2 tackles for 75 (averaging 8.1 a game)
  • Haegyn Morris needs 27 rushing yards for 500 (averaging 67.6 a game)
  • Sedrick Matthews Jr. needs 1 touchdown pass for 20 (averaging 2.1 a game)
  • Jamarcus Barnes needs 4 tackles for 50 (averaging 5.8 a game)
  • Jaden Hicks needs 10 tackles for 50 (averaging 13.3 a game)
SIL — STAT LEADERS
OFFENSE
PASSING LEADER
1172PASS YDS
C-ATT83-139
COMP%59.7%
YPA8.4
TD19
INT1
QBR174.2
RUSHING LEADER
570RUSH YDS
CAR66
YPC8.6
RUSH TD4
REC0
REC YDS0
YPR--
REC TD0
RUSHING LEADER
473RUSH YDS
CAR84
YPC5.6
RUSH TD7
REC8
REC YDS37
YPR4.6
REC TD0
RECEIVING LEADER
517REC YDS
REC29
YPR17.8
REC TD11
RECEIVING LEADER
240REC YDS
REC16
YPR15.0
REC TD2
DEFENSE
TACKLES LEADER
73TCKL
TFL12
SACKS4
INT1
PD0
FF0
TACKLES LEADER
58TCKL
TFL15
SACKS1
INT0
PD0
FF1
TACKLES LEADER
49TCKL
TFL10
SACKS1
INT0
PD0
FF1
TFL LEADER
8TFL
TCKL41
SACKS5
INT0
PD0
FF2
TFL LEADER
7TFL
TCKL33
SACKS0
INT0
PD0
FF1
SACKS LEADER
2SACKS
TCKL40
TFL3
INT0
PD1
FF0
SACKS LEADER
1SACKS
TCKL29
TFL5
INT0
PD0
FF0
INTERCEPTIONS LEADER
2INT
TCKL8
TFL0
SACKS0
PD0
FF0
SIL — WHAT CHANGED THIS WEEK

From the games on file through Oct 30.

REMAINING SCHEDULE

Most likely finish 8-2 · realistic range 7-3 to 8-2

Remaining schedule: 384th hardest of 994 in the TX section (average opponent strength 6.5).

DateOpponentSP rankWin chance
11/06at Shepherd#467 of 125274%

Win chances are the site's own game projections where one is on file, otherwise the SP Strength Index gap with a small home edge. The realistic range covers 80% of outcomes (10th to 90th percentile).

Printable team sheetProgram historyOpen in Stat BoothWidget for your site
SIL — PLAYER SEASON STATS — 2026

Every player with a stat on file, listed only where he has one. Open the arrow beside a name for his game-by-game line. Stats through the Oct 30 game; last updated Oct 31; roster and numbers checked Oct 27.

Click a column heading to sort. MIN hides players below that many attempts.
PASSING
NOPLAYERGPC/ATTCOMP %YDSYPATDINTQBR
14SEDRICK MATTHEWS JR.983/13959.7%1,1728.4191174.2
13BEAU BREEDEN23/1225.0%1109.21296.2
8HAEGYN MORRIS71/333.3%41.301-22.1
15BRENDON HUGHES70/10.0%00.0000.0
TEAM TOTALS987/15556.1%1,2868.3204163.2
RUSHING
NOPLAYERGPCARYDSYPCTD
26ASHFORD MCKINNEY8665708.64
8HAEGYN MORRIS7844735.67
3CARTER HOWARD5432696.34
18CORDE WILSON8312257.32
19LONDON TYLER616915.72
2KERION ROBINSON914141.01
13BEAU BREEDEN27314.40
82DERRICK JONES212525.01
22KENNETH MCKINNEY122311.51
4CHI'DARIUS DAVIS311222.00
15BRENDON HUGHES73217.00
21HUNTER HOLLYFIELD93165.30
4CHI'DARIUS DAVIS2362.00
10WYATT WILLIAMSON9100.00
7BRAYLEN JOHNSON84-1-0.20
14SEDRICK MATTHEWS JR.925-55-2.22
TEAM TOTALS93011,7575.824
RECEIVING
NOPLAYERGPRECYDSYPRTD
1RJ WILLIAMS92951717.811
10WYATT WILLIAMSON91624015.02
15BRENDON HUGHES71321016.22
0HUDSYN MORRIS6813717.12
3CARTER HOWARD545714.22
8HAEGYN MORRIS78374.60
21HUNTER HOLLYFIELD923618.00
18CORDE WILSON84358.80
2KERION ROBINSON9188.00
11PEYTON GRISHAM2188.00
6JESTYN JACKSON7111.01
TEAM TOTALS9871,28614.820
DEFENSE
NOPLAYERGPTCKLTFLSACKSINTINT YDSPDFF
21HUNTER HOLLYFIELD9731241700
23CASHTON ERVIN8581510001
55CARTER HORTON8491010001
27JAMARCUS BARNES846400000
18CORDE WILSON841850002
2KERION ROBINSON940320010
25JADEN HICKS340200000
8HAEGYN MORRIS733700001
52BRAYLON RELEFORD729510000
19LONDON TYLER629101401
33JEFFERY PEMBERTON628200001
5PEYTON SELLS8260013700
6JESTYN JACKSON723410002
38OAKLEY BLACK619000000
3CARTER HOWARD517300000
11PEYTON GRISHAM210210000
20KAYDEN WEATHINGTON310000000
44DEREK SMITH28200000
0HUDSYN MORRIS68100000
7BRAYLEN JOHNSON880023100
26ASHFORD MCKINNEY88000001
82DERRICK JONES27100000
80JOSHUA LAWSON57000000
68LANDEN WREN27000000
16LAYTON MEGUESS36001000
62SEBASTIAN HENRY22100000
4CHI'DARIUS DAVIS32000000
4CHI'DARIUS DAVIS21000000
28MICKEY VANDERDOES11000000
17STEPHEN GATLIN11000000
10WYATT WILLIAMSON91000000
TEAM TOTALS96388316679110
PROGRAM SNAPSHOT: SIL

PROGRAM RECORD

SEASONRECORDPFPAPPG
202213-165123646.5
202312-148624037.4
20249-439231930.2
20258-441425834.5
20267-236020740.0
2022-2649-1237.8
WEEK WRAP-UP

Silsbee beat Hardin-Jefferson 35-28 at home on Friday, October 30, its 2nd straight win. Silsbee split 290 yards between 183 on the ground and 107 through the air, and the defense turned a 341-yard night for Hardin-Jefferson into 28 points.

Haegyn Morris ran 21 times for 125 yards and 2 touchdowns. Sedrick Matthews Jr. completed 8 of 13 for 107 yards and a touchdown and ran 3 times for -16 yards. Brendon Hughes caught 3 passes for 57 yards and a touchdown.

For Hardin-Jefferson, D'corian Warren completed 4 of 8 for 40 yards, ran 18 times for 145 yards and 2 touchdowns and caught 1 pass for 65 yards and a touchdown; Eric Pitre Jr. completed 1 of 1 for 33 yards and a touchdown and ran 10 times for 66 yards.

Silsbee is 7-2, #149 TX section. Up next: at Shepherd, Fri Nov 6.

Final + team statsFinal + top performersScoreboard + takeaways

Download a graphic to share:

Final + team statsFinal + top performersScoreboard + takeaways

UIL 4A Division 2 · District 10

2026 district standings · full page · all Texas districts
#TeamDistOvrRankProj.Dist. ptsNext
1WEST ORANGE-STARK4-07-27 / 361 (4.9-0.1)182-7911/06 vs HARDIN-JEFFERSON
2SILSBEE3-17-217 / 1492 (3.9-1.1)155-11011/06 vs SHEPHERD
3HAMSHIRE-FANNETT2-27-28 / 443 (3.0-2.0)139-10011/06 vs JASPER
4SHEPHERD2-26-341 / 4674 (2.1-2.9)90-11411/06 vs SILSBEE
5HARDIN-JEFFERSON1-34-540 / 4665 (1.1-3.9)112-14511/06 vs WEST ORANGE-STARK
6JASPER0-42-755 / 6906 (0.0-5.0)54-18411/06 vs HAMSHIRE-FANNETT
Top 4 in the district make the playoffs (line under 4th). Ordered by district record, then overall record and district point margin; UIL tiebreakers (head-to-head) are applied by the district, not here. Rank = SP Strength Index place in the classification / in Texas. Proj. = projected district finish and record, playing out each remaining district game by the two teams' ratings. From the 2026 results on file · UIL 4A Division 2 rankings · player leaders.
SIL — 2026 SEASON SCHEDULE
DATEOPPONENTSITERESULTSCOREWIN%
08/28VIDORvsW42-39
09/04WORTHINGatW51-0
09/11NEDERLANDatL24-28
09/18BRIDGE CITYatW39-0
09/25STAFFORDvsW49-30
10/09JASPERvsW59-14
10/16WEST ORANGE-STARKatL30-38
10/23HAMSHIRE-FANNETTvsW31-30
10/30HARDIN-JEFFERSONvsW35-28
11/06SHEPHERDatPROJ35-2273.9%
SEASON TO DATE7-21 REMAINING

SEASON OUTLOOK

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 1)

RECORD TO DATEMOST LIKELY FINALPROJECTED RECORD
Overall7-2 so far8-2 (74%)7.7-2.3
League3-1 so far3-1 (100%)3.0-1.0
SIL — 2026 OVERALL AVERAGES
SPLITGPPPGOPP PPGYPGOPP YPGPLAYS/GOPP PLAYS/G
OVERALL940.023.0337.4346.750.348.1
HOME543.228.2368.6360.850.049.4
ROAD436.016.5298.5311.550.845.0

PPG/OPP PPG use every played game on file. YPG/PLAYS-PER-GAME columns only ever come from games with a full box score on file, which can be a smaller sample than GP -- see the coverage note below when that's the case for this team.

SIL — 2026 TEAM GAME LOG
DATEOPPONENTRESULTPASS YDSRUSH YDSTOTAL YDSPASS ALWRUSH ALWTOTAL ALWSACKS ALWSACKSDEF INTTO FORCEDTO MAR
8/28vs. VidorW 42-39240184424333643970200-3
9/4@ WorthingW 51-079163242--------202+2
9/11@ NederlandL 24-2818083263--------111+1
9/18@ Bridge CityW 39-07631739343751180033+3
9/25vs. StaffordW 49-30502963463202305500202+1
10/9vs. JasperW 59-14156275431601682280322+2
10/16@ West Orange-StarkL 30-382029429613137450502020
10/23vs. Hamshire-FannettW 31-30196156352201872882400-2
10/30vs. Hardin-JeffersonW 35-2810718329013820334100000
AVERAGES142.9194.6337.4132.3214.4346.70.31.80.71.3+4 (season)

Averages use only games with that number on file (defense 7/9, sacks allowed 7/9 games). SACKS ALW comes from the opponent's box score; TO FORCED is takeaways; TO MAR is takeaways minus giveaways, and its bottom cell is the season total. Dashes mean not on file.

UNIT INDEX

Pass Offense: grade 64.9/100 (+18 yds/gm vs average)

Rush Offense: grade 62.6/100 (+18 yds/gm vs average)

Pass Defense: grade 77.9/100 (-45 yds/gm vs average)

Rush Defense: grade 58.5/100 (-20 yds/gm vs average)

Unit grades: 0-100 league percentile, adjusted for the opponents faced.

OPPONENT TRACKER

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 2)

DATESITEOPPONENTTHEIR RECORDTHEIR PPG
2026-11-06atSHEPHERD6-330.9

LAST YEAR

SIL finished 2025 at 8-4. Made the playoffs (2 postseason game(s) on file; exact round/result not available). Notable win: 41-20 over HAMSHIRE-FANNETT (HAMSHIRE-FANNETT finished 64% that season). Toughest loss: 30-33 to WEST ORANGE-STARK (3-point margin).

LAST SEASON: SIL — 2025 GAME LOG
DATEOPPONENTRESULTRECORDPFPATOT YDSYDS ALLOWED
2025-08-29VIDORW1-04015N/AN/A
2025-09-05LITTLE CYPRESS-MAURICEVILLEW2-02414N/AN/A
2025-09-12NEDERLANDW3-02713N/AN/A
2025-09-19WEST BROOKL3-11449N/AN/A
2025-09-26HITCHCOCKL3-21637N/AN/A
2025-10-10HAMSHIRE-FANNETTW4-241208214
2025-10-17TARKINGTONW5-2636N/AN/A
2025-10-24WEST ORANGE-STARKL5-33033N/AN/A
2025-10-31JASPERW6-34914N/AN/A
2025-11-07SHEPHERDW7-3480N/AN/A
2025-11-13SWEENYW8-34827N/AN/A
2025-11-21LA VEGAL8-41430N/AN/A
TOTALS12 GMS8-48-44142588 (1)214 (1)

"N/A" stands in for a box score that does not have stats entered. A total followed by a count in parentheses covers only the games with that stat on file.

TALKING POINTS (15 storylines)
SIL HAS PERFORMED BEST THIS DATA SET WHEN...

• SIL averages 5.0+ yards per carry (.999), and has won 7 straight when doing so

• SIL holds its opponents under 7.0 yards per play (.999), and has won 6 straight when doing so

• SIL averages 6.0+ yards per play (.999), and has won 6 straight when doing so

• SIL holds its opponents under 8.0 yards per attempt (.999), and has won 5 straight when doing so

• SIL's offense has averaged 1.3 giveaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 0.8 giveaways per game. (+67%)

• SIL's defense has averaged 0.7 takeaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 1.3 takeaways per game. (-50%)

• SIL averages 6.9+ yards per play (SIL's own median) (.999)

• SIL averages 5.9+ yards per carry (SIL's own median) (.999)

• SIL's defense has averaged 32.0 points allowed per game over their last 3 games. Their 34-game average is 23.1 points allowed per game. (+39%)

• SIL's offense has averaged 5.9 YPC over their last 10 games. Their 11-game average is 4.3 YPC. (+37%)

• SIL's offense has averaged 200.8 rush yards per game over their last 5 games. Their 18-game average is 149.2 rush yards per game. (+35%)

• SIL rushes for 154.0+ yards (SIL's own median) (.778)

• SIL's defense has averaged 7.3 YPC over their last 5 games. Their 9-game average is 5.8 YPC. (+26%)

• SIL holds its opponents under 7.0 yards per attempt (SIL's own median) (.999)

• SIL holds its opponents under 5.1 yards per carry (SIL's own median) (.999)

MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 3)

SIL -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(top 5 of 6 scored; vs 456 cached team(s))

#SIDECONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRKSCORE
1OFFTurnovers < 37-2.77839.9W20.878
2DEFTurnovers < 36-2.75025.9W20.737
3OFFRush Yds 150+7-3.70036.6W70.636
4OFFRush Yds 100+7-4.63635.2W70.565
5OFFPass Yds < 2007-7.50030.0W50.363
WIN %: TWO-CONDITION COMBINATIONS (5 found, min 4 Gms each)

(of 15 combinations tried per team -- a combination is only shown when at least 4 real games on file satisfy both conditions at once)

--- SIL ---

CONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRK
SIL rushes for 100+ yards and is held under 200 passing yards6-4.60034.5W6
SIL averages 5.0+ yards per carry on its way to 150+ rushing yards7-0.99943.7W7
SIL averages 6.0+ yards per play behind 150+ rushing yards6-0.99942.8W6
SIL holds its opponents under 8.0 yards per attempt and under 5.0 yards per carry4-0.99916.0W4
SIL averages 6.0+ yards per play while committing zero giveaways4-0.99946.0W4
WIN % -- TAB-SEPARATED
TeamConditionRecordWin%PPG
SILRush Yds 100+ & Pass Yds < 2006-4.60034.5
SILYPC 5.0+ & Rush Yds 150+7-0.99943.7
SILYPP 6.0+ & Rush Yds 150+6-0.99942.8
SILYPA < 8.0 & YPC < 5.04-0.99916.0
SILYPP 6.0+ & Turnovers < 14-0.99946.0
SIL — OFFENSE — 2024-26 (34 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+4-01.00041.8W4
YPA < 8.04-3.57133.4L1 23 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+3-1.75035.0L1
Pass Yds < 2007-7.50030.0W5 16 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+7-4.63635.2W7
Rush Yds < 1003-4.42924.7L2 16 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+7-3.70036.6W7
Rush Yds < 1503-5.37524.2L2 16 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+7-01.00043.7W7
YPC < 5.01-3.25023.8L2 23 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+6-01.00042.8W6
YPP < 6.02-3.40028.8L1 23 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+5-01.00045.2W5
YPP < 7.03-3.50029.2W1 23 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+3-1.75038.0W1
Turnovers < 15-1.83341.5W3 24 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 2+2-1.66734.3W1 24 games without this stat on file
Turnovers > 21-01.00042.0W1 24 games without this stat on file
SIL — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2024-26 (34 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Scores <100-1.0000.0
Scores 10-190-5.00013.6
Scores 20-295-2.71425.4
Scores 30-394-2.66733.7
Scores 40+15-01.00047.9
SIL — OFFENSE — 2026 (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+4-01.00041.8W4
YPA < 8.03-2.60038.6L1
Pass Yds 200+1-1.50036.0L1
Pass Yds < 2006-1.85741.1W5
Rush Yds 100+7-01.00043.7W7
Rush Yds < 1000-2.00027.0L2
Rush Yds 150+7-01.00043.7W7
Rush Yds < 1500-2.00027.0L2
YPC 5.0+7-01.00043.7W7
YPC < 5.00-2.00027.0L2
YPP 6.0+6-01.00042.8W6
YPP < 6.01-2.33334.3L1
YPP 7.0+5-01.00045.2W5
YPP < 7.02-2.50033.5W1
Turnovers 1+3-1.75038.0W1
Turnovers < 14-1.80041.6W3
Turnovers 2+2-1.66734.3W1
Turnovers > 21-01.00042.0W1
SIL — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2026 (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Scores <10------
Scores 10-19------
Scores 20-290-1.00024.0
Scores 30-393-1.75033.8
Scores 40+4-01.00050.2
SIL — DEFENSE — 2024-26 (34 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+2-2.50032.8W1
YPA < 8.05-01.00020.6W5 25 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+2-1.66731.7W2
Pass Yds < 2005-1.83323.2W1 25 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+4-2.66730.7W1
Rush Yds < 1003-01.00016.7W3 25 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+4-1.80029.8W1
Rush Yds < 1503-1.75021.2W3 25 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+3-2.60034.0W1
YPC < 5.04-01.00016.0W4 25 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+3-2.60034.0W1
YPP < 6.04-01.00016.0W4 25 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+1-2.33334.3L1
YPP < 7.06-01.00021.8W6 25 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+4-2.66718.3L1
Turnovers < 13-01.00032.3W3 25 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 2+4-1.80016.4L1 25 games without this stat on file
Turnovers > 21-01.0000.0W1 25 games without this stat on file
SIL — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2024-26 (34 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Allows <106-01.0002.5
Allows 10-199-01.00014.2
Allows 20-295-1.83324.5
Allows 30-393-6.33334.1
Allows 40+1-3.25046.8
SIL — DEFENSE — 2026 (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+2-1.66732.0W1
YPA < 8.04-01.00020.8W4 2 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+2-01.00030.0W2
Pass Yds < 2004-1.80023.8W1 2 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+4-1.80029.8W1
Rush Yds < 1002-01.00015.0W2 2 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+4-1.80029.8W1
Rush Yds < 1502-01.00015.0W2 2 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+3-1.75033.8W1
YPC < 5.03-01.00014.7W3 2 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+3-1.75033.8W1
YPP < 6.03-01.00014.7W3 2 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+1-1.50034.0L1
YPP < 7.05-01.00022.2W5 2 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+4-2.66718.3L1
Turnovers < 13-01.00032.3W3
Turnovers 2+4-1.80016.4L1
Turnovers > 21-01.0000.0W1
SIL — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2026 (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Allows <102-01.0000.0
Allows 10-191-01.00014.0
Allows 20-291-1.50028.0
Allows 30-393-1.75034.2
Allows 40+------
ON THE BRINK

SILSBEE

• SILSBEE has played a one-score game in 3 straight games (10/16/26–10/30/26). It has not reached 4 straight in the last 4 years of games on file (2023-present).

• SILSBEE has scored 30+ in 6 straight games (9/18/26–10/30/26). It has not reached 7 straight in the last 4 years of games on file (2023-present).

• SILSBEE has had a 100-yard rusher in 2 straight games (10/23/26–10/30/26). It has not had a 100-yard rusher in 3 straight since 9/18/26–10/9/26 (2026).

TAB-SEPARATED (paste into a spreadsheet)
TeamSideSplitGamesRecordWin%PPGStrk
SILOFFENSEYPA 8.0+44-01.00041.8W4
SILOFFENSEYPA < 8.074-3.57133.4L1
SILOFFENSEPass Yds 200+43-1.75035.0L1
SILOFFENSEPass Yds < 200147-7.50030.0W5
SILOFFENSERush Yds 100+117-4.63635.2W7
SILOFFENSERush Yds < 10073-4.42924.7L2
SILOFFENSERush Yds 150+107-3.70036.6W7
SILOFFENSERush Yds < 15083-5.37524.2L2
SILOFFENSEYPC 5.0+77-01.00043.7W7
SILOFFENSEYPC < 5.041-3.25023.8L2
SILOFFENSEYPP 6.0+66-01.00042.8W6
SILOFFENSEYPP < 6.052-3.40028.8L1
SILOFFENSEYPP 7.0+55-01.00045.2W5
SILOFFENSEYPP < 7.063-3.50029.2W1
SILOFFENSETurnovers 1+43-1.75038.0W1
SILOFFENSETurnovers < 165-1.83341.5W3
SILOFFENSETurnovers 2+32-1.66734.3W1
SILOFFENSETurnovers > 211-01.00042.0W1
SILOFFENSEScores <1010-1.0000.0L1
SILOFFENSEScores 10-1950-5.00013.6L5
SILOFFENSEScores 20-2975-2.71425.4L1
SILOFFENSEScores 30-3964-2.66733.7W2
SILOFFENSEScores 40+1515-01.00047.9W15
SILDEFENSEYPA 8.0+42-2.50032.8W1
SILDEFENSEYPA < 8.055-01.00020.6W5
SILDEFENSEPass Yds 200+32-1.66731.7W2
SILDEFENSEPass Yds < 20065-1.83323.2W1
SILDEFENSERush Yds 100+64-2.66730.7W1
SILDEFENSERush Yds < 10033-01.00016.7W3
SILDEFENSERush Yds 150+54-1.80029.8W1
SILDEFENSERush Yds < 15043-1.75021.2W3
SILDEFENSEYPC 5.0+53-2.60034.0W1
SILDEFENSEYPC < 5.044-01.00016.0W4
SILDEFENSEYPP 6.0+53-2.60034.0W1
SILDEFENSEYPP < 6.044-01.00016.0W4
SILDEFENSEYPP 7.0+31-2.33334.3L1
SILDEFENSEYPP < 7.066-01.00021.8W6
SILDEFENSETurnovers 1+64-2.66718.3L1
SILDEFENSETurnovers < 133-01.00032.3W3
SILDEFENSETurnovers 2+54-1.80016.4L1
SILDEFENSETurnovers > 211-01.0000.0W1
SILDEFENSEAllows <1066-01.0002.5W6
SILDEFENSEAllows 10-1999-01.00014.2W9
SILDEFENSEAllows 20-2965-1.83324.5W1
SILDEFENSEAllows 30-3993-6.33334.1W1
SILDEFENSEAllows 40+41-3.25046.8L2
STREAKS — ALL TEAMS
TeamSideSplitStreakDatesRecord
NOTABLE TRENDS (7 of 7 found, team |deviation| >= 20%, matchup |deviation| >= 20%)

SIL OFFENSE

SIL's offense has averaged 1.3 giveaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 0.8 giveaways per game. (+67%)

SIL's offense has averaged 5.9 YPC over their last 10 games. Their 11-game average is 4.3 YPC. (+37%)

SIL's offense has averaged 200.8 rush yards per game over their last 5 games. Their 18-game average is 149.2 rush yards per game. (+35%)

SIL's offense has averaged 168.3 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 18-game average is 140.2 pass yards per game. (+20%)

SIL DEFENSE

SIL's defense has averaged 0.7 takeaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 1.3 takeaways per game. (-50%)

SIL's defense has averaged 32.0 points allowed per game over their last 3 games. Their 34-game average is 23.1 points allowed per game. (+39%)

SIL's defense has averaged 7.3 YPC over their last 5 games. Their 9-game average is 5.8 YPC. (+26%)

(moved to the Appendix, Data Export 1, to keep this section shorter -- the full spreadsheet-paste table is there unchanged)

APPENDIX

Full-length explanations and full-size data exports for the shortened notes and relocated tables referenced throughout this report, numbered in the order their pointers appear above.

Explanatory Notes

Note 1 -- SEASON OUTLOOK

Every remaining game is projected from schedule-adjusted ratings; already-played games carry their real result. Records are simulated distributions, not a single guess -- MOST LIKELY FINAL is the single most probable record and its own probability, PROJECTED RECORD is the season's expected win total expressed in record form (an average across every simulated outcome, so it can land on a fraction of a game).

Note 2 -- OPPONENT TRACKER -- why some cards have no record shown

Only meaningful for an opponent who is ALSO a tracked team in the library -- an opponent with no games on file here at all shows the date and site alone.

Note 3 -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS -- how a number is scored

Every split this report computes is scored on how strong the number is and how much it sets this team apart from its opponent and the rest of the field, and the top 5 per team are listed. A condition needs at least 8 occurrences to count.

Full Data Exports

Data Export 1 -- TRENDS — TAB-SEPARATED (10 columns)

TeamSideTypeStatOpponentWindow/MeetingsValueBaselineGamesBaselineAvgDeviation
SILOFFENSEteamPass Yardslast 3168.318140.2+20.1%
SILDEFENSEteamPointslast 332.03423.1+38.8%
SILOFFENSEteamRush Yardslast 5200.818149.2+34.6%
SILDEFENSEteamTurnoverslast 30.791.3-50.0%
SILOFFENSEteamTurnoverslast 31.3100.8+66.7%
SILDEFENSEteamYPClast 57.395.8+26.4%
SILOFFENSEteamYPClast 105.9114.3+37.1%
STATISTICAL STORIES

SILSBEE: SP STRENGTH INDEX BY SEASON

The program's index across 5 seasons on file -- 14.9 in 2022 to 6.1 in 2026.

These graphs were chosen by the program from this season's most notable numbers. Build your own -- any stat against any other, for any mix of teams, seasons or players, with a JPEG download -- in the Graph Builder.

Report Produced by ScorePirate | Commitment and offer data sourced from 247Sports | GENERATED 11/02/2026 16:00