In short: Kermit Yellow Jackets high school football (Kermit, TX), 2026 season: 1-8. Last game: L 7-62 vs Sweetwater on October 30, 2026. Next: vs Lamesa, November 6, 2026. Schedule and results, player season stats, stat leaders, unit grades, ScorePirate ranking and the game-by-game log.
| RECORD | 1-8 this season |
| LAST GAME | L 7-62 vs SWEETWATER |
| NEXT GAME | LAMESA (11/06/2026) |
| UNIT GRADES | Pass Off 55.8 · Rush Off 48.3 · Pass Def 39.8 · Rush Def 20.1 |
| TEAM | PASS O | RUSH O | PASS D | RUSH D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KERMIT | 55.8 (-2) | 48.3 (-14) | 39.8 (+10) | 20.1 (+65) |
Next: vs Lamesa, Fri 6 Nov. Matchup report: Lamesa at Kermit.
The turnover battle could decide Kermit's next game, against Lamesa, and the recent returns favor Lamesa. Kermit committed 1.4 giveaways per game over its first 5 games (1-4), #686 in section in that timeframe. Over the stretch of 4 games that followed (0-4), the Yellow Jackets have committed 3.5 giveaways per game, a 150% rise, #1196 in section in that window. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Kermit's last 4 opponents have averaged 1.9 per game, a #187 defense in section on the season, against 1.4 per game, #443 for the first 5. Measured against those opponents' norms (1.9 per game), Kermit turned it over 80% more than those defenses usually force. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #480 in section, well above the first 5 (#727), so the dip has come against better teams overall. Meanwhile, Lamesa's defense has been middle of the pack in recent weeks. The Golden Tornadoes have forced 1.0 takeaways per game over their last 4 games (0-4), #585 in section during that time. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of offenses in section (1.4 per game on the season, which would rank #750). Against those norms, Lamesa forced 27% fewer turnovers than those offenses usually give up. Lamesa offers Kermit a fair measuring stick for whether the trend is real.
The number to watch when Kermit meets Lamesa is Kermit's scoring defense. Kermit allowed 29.5 points per game over its first 4 games (1-3), #664 in section through those games. In the 5 games since that hot start (0-5), the Yellow Jackets have allowed 49.6 points per game, a 68% rise, #1128 in section through that stretch. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Kermit's last 5 opponents have averaged 37.9 points per game, a #307 offense in section on the season, against 29.7 points per game, #597 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (37.9 points per game), Kermit allowed 31% more than those offenses usually score. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 5 opponents average a rating that would rank #479 in section, well above the first 4 (#791), so the dip has come against better teams overall. Meanwhile, Lamesa's offense has struggled in recent weeks. The Golden Tornadoes have averaged 18.0 points per game over their last 5 games (0-5), #952 in section over that stretch. Those games came against some of the better scoring defenses in section (23.9 points per game on the season, which would rank #399). Against those norms, Lamesa scored 25% less than those defenses usually allow. Both units come in looking to get right, and whichever does first may decide the game.
The biggest worry in Kermit's season has been the direction of its offense. Kermit averaged 28.0 points per game over its first 4 games (1-3), #635 in section within that period. In the 5 games since that hot start (0-5), the Yellow Jackets have averaged 11.8 points per game, a 58% drop, #1096 in section across those games. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Kermit's last 5 opponents have averaged 25.4 points per game, a #474 scoring defense in section on the season, against 27.7 points per game, #573 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (25.4 points per game), Kermit scored 54% less than those defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 5 opponents average a rating that would rank #479 in section, well above the first 4 (#791), so the dip has come against better teams overall. Kermit was held to 14 points or fewer 4 times in those games, including 6 against Jim Ned on 10/9. On the season, Kermit ranks #970 in section in scoring. Lamesa's defense, #1215 of 1235 (56.0 points per game), could be the get-right matchup Kermit needs.
Kermit's defense from the opening weeks has gone missing since. The Yellow Jackets forced 2.0 takeaways per game over their first 4 games (1-3), #196 in section during those games. In the 5 games since that hot start (0-5), Kermit has forced 1.0 takeaways per game, a 50% drop, #625 in section during that period. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 1.3 per game on the season. Measured against those opponents' norms (1.3 per game), Kermit forced 23% fewer turnovers than those offenses usually give up. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 5 opponents average a rating that would rank #479 in section, well above the first 4 (#791), so the dip has come against better teams overall. On the season, the Yellow Jackets rank #443 in section in takeaways. Lamesa's ball security sits in the middle of the pack, #911 in section (1.6 per game).
Something changed for Kermit's offense after the first 5 games of the season. Kermit averaged 7.3 yards per play (1,655 yards on 227 snaps) over its first 5 games (1-4), #412 in section during that stretch. Over the stretch of 4 games that followed (0-4), the Yellow Jackets have averaged 4.6 yards per play (824 yards on 178 snaps), a 37% drop, #849 in section over that period. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Kermit's last 4 opponents have averaged 6.3 yards per play, a #429 defense in section on the season, against 7.2 yards per play, #733 for the first 5. Measured against those opponents' norms (6.3 yards per play), Kermit gained 27% less per snap than those defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #480 in section, well above the first 5 (#727), so the dip has come against better teams overall. On the season, Kermit ranks #690 in section in yards per play. Lamesa's defense, #1199 of 1234 (11.5 yards per play), could be the get-right matchup Kermit needs.
One of Kermit's shakiest areas lately has been its ground game. The Yellow Jackets averaged 6.3 yards per carry (1,005 yards on 159 rushes) over their first 6 games (1-5), #419 in section over that timeframe. Over the stretch of 3 games that followed (0-3), Kermit has averaged 3.7 yards per carry (305 yards on 83 rushes), a 42% drop, #789 in section over that span. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Kermit's last 3 opponents have averaged 5.1 yards per carry, a #348 run defense in section on the season, against 6.4 yards per carry, #728 for the first 6. Measured against those opponents' norms (5.1 yards per carry), Kermit ran for 29% less per carry than those run defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 3 opponents average a rating that would rank #444 in section, well above the first 6 (#704), so the dip has come against better teams overall. On the season, the Yellow Jackets rank #632 in section in rushing. Lamesa's run defense, #1120 of 1234 (8.8 yards per carry), could be the get-right matchup Kermit needs.
Kermit's passing game has misfired through the air as the season has progressed. Kermit averaged 8.5 yards per pass attempt (603 yards on 71 attempts) over its first 4 games (1-3), #392 in section in that timeframe. In the 5 games since that hot start (0-5), the Yellow Jackets have averaged 6.2 yards per pass attempt (566 yards on 92 attempts), a 28% drop, #761 in section in that window. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Kermit's last 5 opponents have averaged 7.3 yards per attempt, a #427 pass defense in section on the season, against 9.2 yards per attempt, #855 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (7.3 yards per attempt), Kermit threw for 16% less per attempt than those pass defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 5 opponents average a rating that would rank #479 in section, well above the first 4 (#791), so the dip has come against better teams overall. On the season, Kermit ranks #649 in section in passing. Lamesa's pass defense, #1218 of 1234 (14.8 yards per attempt), could be the get-right matchup Kermit needs.
• Club Kermit has lost 5 straight, and a loss would make it 6 in a row. The last time they lost 6 or more in a row was 2022, a run of 14.
• Club Kermit has allowed 206 points over its last 4 games (51.5 a game, October 9, 2026 through October 30, 2026) -- its 4th-highest 4-game total on record; the most is 234, from November 10, 2022 through September 15, 2023.
DATA WARNING: KERMIT OFFENSIVE STATS FOR 10/30/2026 GAME @ SWEETWATER* MISSING
All stat areas in this report are subject to change as box scores are updated.
From the games on file through Oct 30.
Every player with a stat on file, listed only where he has one. Open the arrow beside a name for his game-by-game line. Stats through the Oct 30 game; last updated Oct 31; roster and numbers checked Oct 27.
| PASSING | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | C/ATT | COMP % | YDS | YPA | TD | INT | QBR |
| 8 | ABEL MUNIZ | 9 | 70/149 | 47.0% | 1,104 | 7.4 | 9 | 6 | 121.1 |
| 9 | BLAKELY MARTINEZ | 6 | 2/10 | 20.0% | 33 | 3.3 | 0 | 1 | 27.7 |
| 21 | AALIJAH NAVARRETTE | 9 | 2/4 | 50.0% | 32 | 8.0 | 1 | 0 | 199.7 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 9 | 74/163 | 45.4% | 1,169 | 7.2 | 10 | 7 | 117.3 | |
| RUSHING | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | CAR | YDS | YPC | TD |
| 24 | RICHARD STALLINGS | 7 | 82 | 530 | 6.5 | 3 |
| 8 | ABEL MUNIZ | 9 | 72 | 404 | 5.6 | 3 |
| 20 | URIJAH STALLINGS | 7 | 30 | 188 | 6.3 | 2 |
| 1 | RUBEN HERNANDEZ | 9 | 23 | 114 | 5.0 | 4 |
| 25 | STAVION DAWSON | 8 | 9 | 67 | 7.4 | 0 |
| 10 | JAMARCUS HAYES | 9 | 7 | 17 | 2.4 | 0 |
| 21 | AALIJAH NAVARRETTE | 9 | 8 | 14 | 1.8 | 0 |
| 5 | IAN BEJARANO | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| 9 | BLAKELY MARTINEZ | 6 | 10 | -24 | -2.4 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 9 | 242 | 1,310 | 5.4 | 12 | |
| RECEIVING | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | REC | YDS | YPR | TD |
| 2 | KEATON THOMAS | 9 | 33 | 578 | 17.5 | 6 |
| 10 | JAMARCUS HAYES | 9 | 28 | 396 | 14.1 | 2 |
| 21 | AALIJAH NAVARRETTE | 9 | 7 | 72 | 10.3 | 1 |
| 5 | IAN BEJARANO | 8 | 2 | 30 | 15.0 | 0 |
| 24 | RICHARD STALLINGS | 7 | 6 | 28 | 4.7 | 0 |
| 15 | CONNOR DUNLAP | 4 | 1 | 20 | 20.0 | 0 |
| 6 | JEREMIAH WATTS | 5 | 1 | 20 | 20.0 | 0 |
| 20 | URIJAH STALLINGS | 7 | 3 | 14 | 4.7 | 0 |
| 88 | ETHAN QUIROZ | 3 | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 1 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 9 | 82 | 1,170 | 14.3 | 10 | |
| DEFENSE | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | TCKL | TFL | SACKS | INT | INT YDS | PD | FF |
| 1 | RUBEN HERNANDEZ | 9 | 62 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | AALIJAH NAVARRETTE | 9 | 61 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 54 | 2 | 0 |
| 5 | IAN BEJARANO | 8 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 44 | KALEB THOMPSON | 9 | 38 | 5 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | KEATON THOMAS | 9 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| 11 | SEBASTIAN CAMUNEZ | 8 | 33 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | URIJAH STALLINGS | 7 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | JAMARCUS HAYES | 9 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| 24 | RICHARD STALLINGS | 7 | 20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 6 | JEREMIAH WATTS | 5 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 94 | IVAN FUENTES | 8 | 18 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | STAVION DAWSON | 8 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 3 | JORDEN NORTON | 6 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| 62 | BENJI ARCINIAGA | 5 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | OSCAR URIAS | 4 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 75 | ISAEL MARQUEZ | 6 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 52 | DANNY MUNIZ | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | DANIEL HERNANDEZ | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 9 | BLAKELY MARTINEZ | 6 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 66 | ALEJANDRO ACOSTA | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | CRUZ SANCHEZ | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 69 | ABEL URIAS | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | CONNOR DUNLAP | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 88 | ETHAN QUIROZ | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 56 | FABIAN NAVARETTE | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 79 | MARC GLOVER | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | ABEL MUNIZ | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 77 | DECLAN PIPKIN | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 50 | JULIAN ALVARADO | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 9 | 481 | 34 | 8.5 | 8 | 54 | 17 | 6 | |
PROGRAM RECORD
| SEASON | RECORD | PF | PA | PPG |
| 2022 | 4-6 | 211 | 296 | 21.1 |
| 2023 | 0-9 | 208 | 416 | 23.1 |
| 2024 | 2-8 | 225 | 435 | 22.5 |
| 2025 | 2-7 | 146 | 373 | 16.2 |
| 2026 | 1-8 | 171 | 366 | 19.0 |
| 2022-26 | 9-38 | 20.4 |
1 state final loss
| YEAR | HONOR |
| 1950 | UIL STATE 1A RUNNER-UP (lost to Wharton 13-9) |
State championship games and title-game MVPs: UIL Fall Almanac 2025-26. League finishes: no league schedule on file yet, so none is claimed.
| # | Team | Dist | Ovr | Rank | Proj. | Dist. pts | Next |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SWEETWATER | 4-0 | 7-2 | 27 / 264 | 2 (4.3-0.7) | 215-54 | 11/06 vs CLYDE |
| 2 | CLYDE | 3-0 | 8-0 | 9 / 159 | 1 (4.6-0.4) | 209-46 | 10/30 vs JIM NED |
| 3 | JIM NED | 2-1 | 2-6 | 54 / 579 | 3 (3.0-2.0) | 138-38 | 10/30 vs CLYDE |
| 4 | COMPASS ACADEMY | 1-2 | 2-6 | 78 / 958 | 4 (1.7-3.3) | 40-126 | 10/30 vs LAMESA |
| 5 | LAMESA | 0-3 | 1-7 | 82 / 996 | 5 (0.9-4.1) | 52-230 | 10/30 vs COMPASS ACADEMY |
| 6 | KERMIT | 0-4 | 1-8 | 85 / 1007 | 6 (0.5-4.5) | 46-206 | 11/06 vs LAMESA |
| DATE | OPPONENT | SITE | RESULT | SCORE | WIN% |
| 08/27 | IRAAN | at | L | 24-30 | |
| 09/04 | CRANE | vs | L | 34-40 | |
| 09/11 | COAHOMA | vs | L | 20-34 | |
| 09/18 | ALPINE | vs | W | 34-14 | |
| 09/25 | MCCAMEY | at | L | 13-42 | |
| 10/09 | JIM NED | at | L | 6-59 | |
| 10/16 | COMPASS ACADEMY | vs | L | 20-26 | |
| 10/23 | CLYDE | at | L | 13-59 | |
| 10/30 | SWEETWATER | at | L | 7-62 | |
| 11/06 | LAMESA | vs | PROJ | 34-31 | 56.8% |
| SEASON TO DATE | 1-8 | 1 REMAINING |
SEASON OUTLOOK
(full explanation: Appendix, Note 1)
| RECORD TO DATE | MOST LIKELY FINAL | PROJECTED RECORD | |
| Overall | 1-8 so far | 2-8 (56%) | 1.6-8.4 |
| League | 0-4 so far | 0-4 (100%) | 0.0-4.0 |
| SPLIT | GP | PPG | OPP PPG | YPG | OPP YPG | PLAYS/G | OPP PLAYS/G |
| OVERALL | 9 | 19.0 | 40.7 | 294.2 | 371.0 | 45.1 | 47.2 |
| HOME | 4 | 27.0 | 28.5 | 350.8 | 314.0 | 48.0 | 48.0 |
| ROAD | 5 | 12.6 | 50.4 | 237.8 | 428.0 | 42.2 | 46.5 |
PPG/OPP PPG use every played game on file. YPG/PLAYS-PER-GAME columns only ever come from games with a full box score on file, which can be a smaller sample than GP -- see the coverage note below when that's the case for this team.
Box-score coverage behind YPG/PLAYS-PER-GAME: Overall 8/9 game(s), Home 4/4 game(s), Road 4/5 game(s).
| DATE | OPPONENT | RESULT | PASS YDS | RUSH YDS | TOTAL YDS | PASS ALW | RUSH ALW | TOTAL ALW | SACKS ALW | SACKS | DEF INT | TO FORCED | TO MAR |
| 8/27 | @ Iraan | L 24-30 | 77 | 62 | 139 | -- | -- | -- | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | +3 |
| 9/4 | vs. Crane | L 34-40 | 282 | 157 | 439 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 9/11 | vs. Coahoma | L 20-34 | 112 | 176 | 288 | 152 | 265 | 417 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -1 |
| 9/18 | vs. Alpine | W 34-14 | 132 | 335 | 467 | 125 | 86 | 211 | -- | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 9/25 | @ McCamey | L 13-42 | 200 | 122 | 322 | 124 | 260 | 384 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 10/9 | @ Jim Ned | L 6-59 | 187 | 153 | 340 | 292 | 180 | 472 | -- | -- | -- | 0 | -4 |
| 10/16 | vs. Compass Academy | L 20-26 | 46 | 163 | 209 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 2 | -2 |
| 10/23 | @ Clyde | L 13-59 | 55 | 95 | 150 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 0 | 1 | -2 |
| 10/30 | @ Sweetwater | L 7-62 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| AVERAGES | 136.4 | 157.9 | 294.2 | 173.2 | 197.8 | 371.0 | 4.0 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.5 | -6 (season) |
Averages use only games with that number on file (offense 8/9, defense 4/9, sacks/INT 6/9, sacks allowed 3/9, turnovers 8/9 games). SACKS ALW comes from the opponent's box score; TO FORCED is takeaways; TO MAR is takeaways minus giveaways, and its bottom cell is the season total. Dashes mean not on file.
UNIT INDEX
Pass Offense: grade 55.8/100 (-2 yds/gm vs average)
Rush Offense: grade 48.3/100 (-14 yds/gm vs average)
Pass Defense: grade 39.8/100 (+10 yds/gm vs average)
Rush Defense: grade 20.1/100 (+65 yds/gm vs average)
Unit grades: 0-100 league percentile, adjusted for the opponents faced.
OPPONENT TRACKER
(full explanation: Appendix, Note 2)
| DATE | SITE | OPPONENT | THEIR RECORD | THEIR PPG |
| 2026-11-06 | vs | LAMESA | 1-7 | 18.0 |
LAST YEAR
KER finished 2025 at 2-7. Missed playoffs. Notable win: 54-0 over VAN HORN (VAN HORN finished 11% that season). Toughest loss: 13-41 to PECOS (28-point margin).
| DATE | OPPONENT | RESULT | RECORD | PF | PA | TOT YDS | YDS ALLOWED |
| 2025-08-29 | POST | L | 0-1 | 6 | 37 | N/A | N/A |
| 2025-09-12 | COAHOMA | L | 0-2 | 0 | 51 | N/A | N/A |
| 2025-09-19 | PECOS | L | 0-3 | 13 | 41 | N/A | N/A |
| 2025-09-26 | VAN HORN | W | 1-3 | 54 | 0 | N/A | N/A |
| 2025-10-10 | BIG SPRING | L | 1-4 | 14 | 49 | N/A | N/A |
| 2025-10-24 | LAMESA | L | 1-5 | 0 | 49 | N/A | N/A |
| 2025-10-31 | DENVER CITY | L | 1-6 | 19 | 65 | N/A | N/A |
| 2025-11-07 | BROWNFIELD | W | 2-6 | 33 | 14 | N/A | N/A |
| 2025-11-13 | DALHART | L | 2-7 | 7 | 67 | N/A | N/A |
| TOTALS | 9 GMS | 2-7 | 2-7 | 146 | 373 | N/A | N/A |
"N/A" stands in for a box score that does not have stats entered. A total followed by a count in parentheses covers only the games with that stat on file.
• KER averages 7.0+ yards per play (.250), but most recently lost to Mccamey when doing so
• KER commits fewer than 2 giveaways (.250), but most recently lost to Mccamey when doing so
• KER averages 8.0+ yards per attempt (.250), but most recently lost to Jim Ned when doing so
• KER rushes for 150+ yards (.200), but most recently lost to Compass Academy when doing so
• KER's offense has averaged 50.5 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 8-game average is 136.4 pass yards per game. (-63%)
• KER's offense has averaged 3.1 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 8-game average is 7.2 YPA. (-57%)
• KER's offense has averaged 3.5 giveaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 8-game average is 2.2 giveaways per game. (+56%)
• KER's offense has averaged 11.8 points scored per game over their last 5 games. Their 28-game average is 19.4 points scored per game. (-39%)
• KER's offense has averaged 179.5 total yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 8-game average is 294.2 total yards per game. (-39%)
• KER's offense has averaged 4.2 YPP over their last 3 games. Their 8-game average is 6.4 YPP. (-34%)
• KER's defense has averaged 1.0 takeaways per game over their last 5 games. Their 8-game average is 1.5 takeaways per game. (-33%)
• KER rushes for 155.0+ yards (KER's own median) (.250)
• KER averages 5.7+ yards per carry (KER's own median) (.250)
• KER averages 7.0+ yards per play (KER's own median) (.250)
• KER averages 7.9+ yards per attempt (KER's own median) (.250)
(full explanation: Appendix, Note 3)
KER -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS
(top 1 of 1 scored; vs 129 cached team(s))
| # | SIDE | CONDITION | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK | SCORE |
| 1 | OFF | Turnovers 1+ | 1-7 | .125 | 20.5 | L4 | 0.500 |
(of 15 combinations tried per team -- a combination is only shown when at least 4 real games on file satisfy both conditions at once)
--- KER ---
| CONDITION | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK |
| KER averages 5.0+ yards per carry on its way to 150+ rushing yards | 1-4 | .200 | 22.8 | L2 |
| KER rushes for 100+ yards and is held under 200 passing yards | 1-3 | .250 | 20.0 | L2 |
| KER averages 6.0+ yards per play behind 150+ rushing yards | 1-3 | .250 | 23.5 | L1 |
| Team | Condition | Record | Win% | PPG |
| KER | YPC 5.0+ & Rush Yds 150+ | 1-4 | .200 | 22.8 |
| KER | Rush Yds 100+ & Pass Yds < 200 | 1-3 | .250 | 20.0 |
| KER | YPP 6.0+ & Rush Yds 150+ | 1-3 | .250 | 23.5 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK | |
| YPA 8.0+ | 1-3 | .250 | 21.8 | L2 | |
| YPA < 8.0 | 0-4 | .000 | 19.2 | L4 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| Pass Yds 200+ | 0-2 | .000 | 23.5 | L2 | |
| Pass Yds < 200 | 1-5 | .167 | 19.5 | L3 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 100+ | 1-5 | .167 | 21.2 | L3 | |
| Rush Yds < 100 | 0-2 | .000 | 18.5 | L2 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 150+ | 1-4 | .200 | 22.8 | L2 | |
| Rush Yds < 150 | 0-3 | .000 | 16.7 | L3 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| YPC 5.0+ | 1-5 | .167 | 21.2 | L3 | |
| YPC < 5.0 | 0-2 | .000 | 18.5 | L2 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 6.0+ | 1-4 | .200 | 21.4 | L2 | |
| YPP < 6.0 | 0-3 | .000 | 19.0 | L3 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 7.0+ | 1-3 | .250 | 25.2 | L1 | |
| YPP < 7.0 | 0-4 | .000 | 15.8 | L4 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers 1+ | 1-7 | .125 | 20.5 | L4 | |
| Turnovers < 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 20 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers 2+ | 0-4 | .000 | 14.8 | L4 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers > 2 | 0-4 | .000 | 14.8 | L4 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG |
| Scores <10 | 0-8 | .000 | 4.8 |
| Scores 10-19 | 0-8 | .000 | 15.6 |
| Scores 20-29 | 0-5 | .000 | 21.0 |
| Scores 30-39 | 3-2 | .600 | 34.4 |
| Scores 40+ | 2-0 | 1.000 | 51.0 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK | |
| YPA 8.0+ | 1-3 | .250 | 21.8 | L2 | |
| YPA < 8.0 | 0-4 | .000 | 19.2 | L4 | 1 games without this stat on file |
| Pass Yds 200+ | 0-2 | .000 | 23.5 | L2 | |
| Pass Yds < 200 | 1-5 | .167 | 19.5 | L3 | 1 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 100+ | 1-5 | .167 | 21.2 | L3 | |
| Rush Yds < 100 | 0-2 | .000 | 18.5 | L2 | 1 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 150+ | 1-4 | .200 | 22.8 | L2 | |
| Rush Yds < 150 | 0-3 | .000 | 16.7 | L3 | 1 games without this stat on file |
| YPC 5.0+ | 1-5 | .167 | 21.2 | L3 | |
| YPC < 5.0 | 0-2 | .000 | 18.5 | L2 | 1 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 6.0+ | 1-4 | .200 | 21.4 | L2 | |
| YPP < 6.0 | 0-3 | .000 | 19.0 | L3 | 1 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 7.0+ | 1-3 | .250 | 25.2 | L1 | |
| YPP < 7.0 | 0-4 | .000 | 15.8 | L4 | 1 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers 1+ | 1-7 | .125 | 20.5 | L4 | |
| Turnovers < 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers 2+ | 0-4 | .000 | 14.8 | L4 | 1 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers > 2 | 0-4 | .000 | 14.8 | L4 | 1 games without this stat on file |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG |
| Scores <10 | 0-2 | .000 | 6.5 |
| Scores 10-19 | 0-2 | .000 | 13.0 |
| Scores 20-29 | 0-3 | .000 | 21.3 |
| Scores 30-39 | 1-1 | .500 | 34.0 |
| Scores 40+ | -- | -- | -- |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK | |
| YPA 8.0+ | 0-2 | .000 | 50.5 | L2 | |
| YPA < 8.0 | 1-1 | .500 | 24.0 | W1 | 24 games without this stat on file |
| Pass Yds 200+ | 0-1 | .000 | 59.0 | L1 | |
| Pass Yds < 200 | 1-2 | .333 | 30.0 | L1 | 24 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 100+ | 0-3 | .000 | 45.0 | L3 | |
| Rush Yds < 100 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 14.0 | W1 | 24 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 150+ | 0-3 | .000 | 45.0 | L3 | |
| Rush Yds < 150 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 14.0 | W1 | 24 games without this stat on file |
| YPC 5.0+ | 0-3 | .000 | 45.0 | L3 | |
| YPC < 5.0 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 14.0 | W1 | 24 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 6.0+ | 0-3 | .000 | 45.0 | L3 | |
| YPP < 6.0 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 14.0 | W1 | 24 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 7.0+ | 0-2 | .000 | 50.5 | L2 | |
| YPP < 7.0 | 1-1 | .500 | 24.0 | W1 | 24 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers 1+ | 1-6 | .143 | 35.0 | L3 | |
| Turnovers < 1 | 0-1 | .000 | 59.0 | L1 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers 2+ | 0-3 | .000 | 30.0 | L3 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers > 2 | 0-1 | .000 | 30.0 | L1 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG |
| Allows <10 | 2-0 | 1.000 | 1.5 |
| Allows 10-19 | 3-0 | 1.000 | 15.3 |
| Allows 20-29 | 0-1 | .000 | 26.0 |
| Allows 30-39 | 0-4 | .000 | 35.0 |
| Allows 40+ | 0-18 | .000 | 53.3 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK | |
| YPA 8.0+ | 0-2 | .000 | 50.5 | L2 | |
| YPA < 8.0 | 1-1 | .500 | 24.0 | W1 | 5 games without this stat on file |
| Pass Yds 200+ | 0-1 | .000 | 59.0 | L1 | |
| Pass Yds < 200 | 1-2 | .333 | 30.0 | L1 | 5 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 100+ | 0-3 | .000 | 45.0 | L3 | |
| Rush Yds < 100 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 14.0 | W1 | 5 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 150+ | 0-3 | .000 | 45.0 | L3 | |
| Rush Yds < 150 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 14.0 | W1 | 5 games without this stat on file |
| YPC 5.0+ | 0-3 | .000 | 45.0 | L3 | |
| YPC < 5.0 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 14.0 | W1 | 5 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 6.0+ | 0-3 | .000 | 45.0 | L3 | |
| YPP < 6.0 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 14.0 | W1 | 5 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 7.0+ | 0-2 | .000 | 50.5 | L2 | |
| YPP < 7.0 | 1-1 | .500 | 24.0 | W1 | 5 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers 1+ | 1-6 | .143 | 35.0 | L3 | |
| Turnovers < 1 | 0-1 | .000 | 59.0 | L1 | 1 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers 2+ | 0-3 | .000 | 30.0 | L3 | 1 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers > 2 | 0-1 | .000 | 30.0 | L1 | 1 games without this stat on file |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG |
| Allows <10 | -- | -- | -- |
| Allows 10-19 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 14.0 |
| Allows 20-29 | 0-1 | .000 | 26.0 |
| Allows 30-39 | 0-2 | .000 | 32.0 |
| Allows 40+ | 0-5 | .000 | 52.4 |
KERMIT
• KERMIT has been held under 14 in 2 straight games (10/23/26–10/30/26). It has not been held under 14 in 3 straight since 11/14/24–9/19/25 (2025). It has reached 3 straight 2 times in the last 4 years and has reached a high of 4 straight (2025) in that span.
• KERMIT has lost by 20+ in 2 straight games (10/23/26–10/30/26). It has not lost by 20+ in 3 straight since 10/10/25–10/31/25 (2025). It has reached 3 straight 4 times in the last 4 years and has reached a high of 4 straight (2024) in that span.
• KERMIT has lost 5 straight (9/25/26–10/30/26). It has not lost 6 straight since 8/25/23–9/20/24 (2024).
• KERMIT has allowed 30+ in 2 straight games (10/23/26–10/30/26). It has not allowed 30+ in 3 straight since 11/13/25–9/11/26 (2026). It has reached 3 straight 6 times in the last 4 years and has reached a high of 7 straight (2023) in that span.
| Team | Side | Split | Games | Record | Win% | PPG | Strk |
| KER | OFFENSE | YPA 8.0+ | 4 | 1-3 | .250 | 21.8 | L2 |
| KER | OFFENSE | YPA < 8.0 | 4 | 0-4 | .000 | 19.2 | L4 |
| KER | OFFENSE | Pass Yds 200+ | 2 | 0-2 | .000 | 23.5 | L2 |
| KER | OFFENSE | Pass Yds < 200 | 6 | 1-5 | .167 | 19.5 | L3 |
| KER | OFFENSE | Rush Yds 100+ | 6 | 1-5 | .167 | 21.2 | L3 |
| KER | OFFENSE | Rush Yds < 100 | 2 | 0-2 | .000 | 18.5 | L2 |
| KER | OFFENSE | Rush Yds 150+ | 5 | 1-4 | .200 | 22.8 | L2 |
| KER | OFFENSE | Rush Yds < 150 | 3 | 0-3 | .000 | 16.7 | L3 |
| KER | OFFENSE | YPC 5.0+ | 6 | 1-5 | .167 | 21.2 | L3 |
| KER | OFFENSE | YPC < 5.0 | 2 | 0-2 | .000 | 18.5 | L2 |
| KER | OFFENSE | YPP 6.0+ | 5 | 1-4 | .200 | 21.4 | L2 |
| KER | OFFENSE | YPP < 6.0 | 3 | 0-3 | .000 | 19.0 | L3 |
| KER | OFFENSE | YPP 7.0+ | 4 | 1-3 | .250 | 25.2 | L1 |
| KER | OFFENSE | YPP < 7.0 | 4 | 0-4 | .000 | 15.8 | L4 |
| KER | OFFENSE | Turnovers 1+ | 8 | 1-7 | .125 | 20.5 | L4 |
| KER | OFFENSE | Turnovers 2+ | 4 | 0-4 | .000 | 14.8 | L4 |
| KER | OFFENSE | Turnovers > 2 | 4 | 0-4 | .000 | 14.8 | L4 |
| KER | OFFENSE | Scores <10 | 8 | 0-8 | .000 | 4.8 | L8 |
| KER | OFFENSE | Scores 10-19 | 8 | 0-8 | .000 | 15.6 | L8 |
| KER | OFFENSE | Scores 20-29 | 5 | 0-5 | .000 | 21.0 | L5 |
| KER | OFFENSE | Scores 30-39 | 5 | 3-2 | .600 | 34.4 | W1 |
| KER | OFFENSE | Scores 40+ | 2 | 2-0 | 1.000 | 51.0 | W2 |
| KER | DEFENSE | YPA 8.0+ | 2 | 0-2 | .000 | 50.5 | L2 |
| KER | DEFENSE | YPA < 8.0 | 2 | 1-1 | .500 | 24.0 | W1 |
| KER | DEFENSE | Pass Yds 200+ | 1 | 0-1 | .000 | 59.0 | L1 |
| KER | DEFENSE | Pass Yds < 200 | 3 | 1-2 | .333 | 30.0 | L1 |
| KER | DEFENSE | Rush Yds 100+ | 3 | 0-3 | .000 | 45.0 | L3 |
| KER | DEFENSE | Rush Yds < 100 | 1 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 14.0 | W1 |
| KER | DEFENSE | Rush Yds 150+ | 3 | 0-3 | .000 | 45.0 | L3 |
| KER | DEFENSE | Rush Yds < 150 | 1 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 14.0 | W1 |
| KER | DEFENSE | YPC 5.0+ | 3 | 0-3 | .000 | 45.0 | L3 |
| KER | DEFENSE | YPC < 5.0 | 1 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 14.0 | W1 |
| KER | DEFENSE | YPP 6.0+ | 3 | 0-3 | .000 | 45.0 | L3 |
| KER | DEFENSE | YPP < 6.0 | 1 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 14.0 | W1 |
| KER | DEFENSE | YPP 7.0+ | 2 | 0-2 | .000 | 50.5 | L2 |
| KER | DEFENSE | YPP < 7.0 | 2 | 1-1 | .500 | 24.0 | W1 |
| KER | DEFENSE | Turnovers 1+ | 7 | 1-6 | .143 | 35.0 | L3 |
| KER | DEFENSE | Turnovers < 1 | 1 | 0-1 | .000 | 59.0 | L1 |
| KER | DEFENSE | Turnovers 2+ | 3 | 0-3 | .000 | 30.0 | L3 |
| KER | DEFENSE | Turnovers > 2 | 1 | 0-1 | .000 | 30.0 | L1 |
| KER | DEFENSE | Allows <10 | 2 | 2-0 | 1.000 | 1.5 | W2 |
| KER | DEFENSE | Allows 10-19 | 3 | 3-0 | 1.000 | 15.3 | W3 |
| KER | DEFENSE | Allows 20-29 | 1 | 0-1 | .000 | 26.0 | L1 |
| KER | DEFENSE | Allows 30-39 | 4 | 0-4 | .000 | 35.0 | L4 |
| KER | DEFENSE | Allows 40+ | 18 | 0-18 | .000 | 53.3 | L18 |
| Team | Side | Split | Streak | Dates | Record |
KER OFFENSE
KER's offense has averaged 50.5 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 8-game average is 136.4 pass yards per game. (-63%)
KER's offense has averaged 3.1 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 8-game average is 7.2 YPA. (-57%)
KER's offense has averaged 3.5 giveaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 8-game average is 2.2 giveaways per game. (+56%)
KER's offense has averaged 11.8 points scored per game over their last 5 games. Their 28-game average is 19.4 points scored per game. (-39%)
KER's offense has averaged 179.5 total yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 8-game average is 294.2 total yards per game. (-39%)
KER's offense has averaged 4.2 YPP over their last 3 games. Their 8-game average is 6.4 YPP. (-34%)
KER DEFENSE
KER's defense has averaged 1.0 takeaways per game over their last 5 games. Their 8-game average is 1.5 takeaways per game. (-33%)
(moved to the Appendix, Data Export 1, to keep this section shorter -- the full spreadsheet-paste table is there unchanged)
Full-length explanations and full-size data exports for the shortened notes and relocated tables referenced throughout this report, numbered in the order their pointers appear above.
Explanatory Notes
Note 1 -- SEASON OUTLOOK
Every remaining game is projected from schedule-adjusted ratings; already-played games carry their real result. Records are simulated distributions, not a single guess -- MOST LIKELY FINAL is the single most probable record and its own probability, PROJECTED RECORD is the season's expected win total expressed in record form (an average across every simulated outcome, so it can land on a fraction of a game).
Note 2 -- OPPONENT TRACKER -- why some cards have no record shown
Only meaningful for an opponent who is ALSO a tracked team in the library -- an opponent with no games on file here at all shows the date and site alone.
Note 3 -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS -- how a number is scored
Every split this report computes is scored on how strong the number is and how much it sets this team apart from its opponent and the rest of the field, and the top 5 per team are listed. A condition needs at least 8 occurrences to count.
Full Data Exports
Data Export 1 -- TRENDS — TAB-SEPARATED (10 columns)
| Team | Side | Type | Stat | Opponent | Window/Meetings | Value | BaselineGames | BaselineAvg | Deviation |
| KER | OFFENSE | team | Pass Yards | last 3 | 50.5 | 8 | 136.4 | -63.0% | |
| KER | OFFENSE | team | Points | last 5 | 11.8 | 28 | 19.4 | -39.0% | |
| KER | OFFENSE | team | Total Yards | last 3 | 179.5 | 8 | 294.2 | -39.0% | |
| KER | DEFENSE | team | Turnovers | last 5 | 1.0 | 8 | 1.5 | -33.3% | |
| KER | OFFENSE | team | Turnovers | last 3 | 3.5 | 8 | 2.2 | +55.6% | |
| KER | OFFENSE | team | YPA | last 3 | 3.1 | 8 | 7.2 | -57.2% | |
| KER | OFFENSE | team | YPP | last 3 | 4.2 | 8 | 6.4 | -34.1% |