ScorePirate
MENU
AT A GLANCE

In short: Jim Ned Indians high school football (Tuscola, TX), 2026 season: 2-6. Last game: W 65-0 vs Lamesa on October 23, 2026. Next: vs Clyde, October 30, 2026. Schedule and results, player season stats, stat leaders, unit grades, ScorePirate ranking and the game-by-game log.

ScorePirate Individual Team Report
JIM NED
JIM NED 2-6
2026 SEASON
JIM NED
AT A GLANCE — AS OF 10/29/2026
RECORD2-6 this season
LAST GAMEW 65-0 vs LAMESA
NEXT GAMECLYDE (10/30/2026)
UNIT GRADESPass Off 74.3 · Rush Off 37.3 · Pass Def 57.9 · Rush Def 79.3
NUMBERS TO NOTE
#584
SP Strength Index (of 1252)
2-6
2026 record
-4.1
avg scoring margin, pts/gm
UNIT INDEX — GRADE (YDS VS AVG)
TEAMPASS ORUSH OPASS DRUSH D
JIM NED74.3 (+41)37.3 (-37)57.9 (-15)79.3 (-65)
HEAD-TO-HEAD GAME LOG

STORYLINES

Next: vs Clyde, Fri 30 Oct. Matchup report: Clyde at Jim Ned.

The turnover battle could decide Jim Ned's next game, against Clyde, and the recent returns favor Jim Ned. Jim Ned forced 0.8 takeaways per game over its first 4 games (0-4), #829 in section in that timeframe. In the 4 games since that slow start (2-2), the Indians have forced 3.2 takeaways per game, a 333% rise, #20 in section in that window. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Jim Ned's last 4 opponents have averaged 1.8 per game, a #999 offense in section on the season, against 1.2 per game, #580 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (1.8 per game), Jim Ned forced 79% more turnovers than those offenses usually give up. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #580 in section, well below the first 4 (#213), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. Conversely, Clyde's ball security has been one of section's better units in recent weeks. The Bulldogs have committed 0.2 giveaways per game over their last 4 games (4-0), #66 in section during that time. Those games came against some of the better defenses in section (1.5 per game on the season, which would rank #395). Against those norms, Clyde turned it over 84% less than those defenses usually force. Overall, those opponents average an SP Strength Index rating that would rank #948 in section, a lower level of competition. Something has to give when Jim Ned's surging defense meets one of section's better units in Clyde's.

The number to watch when Jim Ned meets Clyde is Jim Ned's scoring. Jim Ned averaged 9.8 points per game over its first 4 games (0-4), #1174 in section through those games. In the 4 games since that slow start (2-2), the Indians have averaged 41.2 points per game, a 323% rise, #286 in section through that stretch. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Jim Ned's last 4 opponents have averaged 39.0 points per game, a #1002 scoring defense in section on the season, against 24.8 points per game, #449 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (39.0 points per game), Jim Ned scored 6% more than those defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #580 in section, well below the first 4 (#213), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. Conversely, Clyde's defense has been one of section's better units in recent weeks. The Bulldogs have allowed 16.8 points per game over their last 4 games (4-0), #226 in section over that stretch. Those games came against some of the weaker offenses in section (20.4 points per game on the season, which would rank #924). Against those norms, Clyde held those offenses 18% below what they usually score. Overall, those opponents average an SP Strength Index rating that would rank #948 in section, a lower level of competition. Something has to give when Jim Ned's surging offense meets one of section's better units in Clyde's. Jim Ned is 2-1 this season when it scores 20 or more, and 0-5 when it doesn't.

NOTES

The biggest shift in Jim Ned's season has come in its passing game. Jim Ned averaged 5.2 yards per pass attempt (506 yards on 97 attempts) over its first 4 games (0-4), #847 in section within that period. In the 4 games since that slow start (2-2), the Indians have averaged 10.7 yards per pass attempt (1,002 yards on 94 attempts), a 104% rise, #193 in section across those games. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Jim Ned's last 4 opponents have averaged 10.0 yards per attempt, a #996 pass defense in section on the season, against 7.5 yards per attempt, #489 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (10.0 yards per attempt), Jim Ned threw for 6% more per attempt than those pass defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #580 in section, well below the first 4 (#213), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. On the season, Jim Ned ranks #529 in section in passing. Clyde's pass defense sits in the middle of the pack, #435 in section (7.4 yards per attempt).

The Indians averaged 4.4 yards per play (981 yards on 224 snaps) over their first 4 games (0-4), #928 in section during those games. Few teams started slower in this department, and few have turned it around as sharply since. In the 4 games since that slow start (2-2), Jim Ned has averaged 7.5 yards per play (1,601 yards on 214 snaps), a 71% rise, #373 in section during that period. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Jim Ned's last 4 opponents have averaged 8.0 yards per play, a #929 defense in section on the season, against 6.3 yards per play, #425 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (8.0 yards per play), Jim Ned gained 6% less per snap than those defenses usually allow. So the improvement is real, but it still trails what those opponents usually give up. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #580 in section, well below the first 4 (#213), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. On the season, the Indians rank #748 in section in yards per play. Clyde's defense sits in the middle of the pack, #377 in section (6.1 yards per play).

Jim Ned's defense has come a long way since the season's early weeks. Jim Ned allowed 39.8 points per game over its first 5 games (0-5), #1031 in section during that stretch. Over the stretch of 3 games that followed (2-1), the Indians have allowed 12.7 points per game, a 68% drop, #157 in section over that period. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Jim Ned's last 3 opponents have averaged 28.6 points per game, a #653 offense in section on the season, against 36.3 points per game, #359 for the first 5. Measured against those opponents' norms (28.6 points per game), Jim Ned held those offenses 56% below what they usually score. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 3 opponents average a rating that would rank #754 in section, well below the first 5 (#187), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. Only Sweetwater broke through in that span, putting up 32 on 10/16. On the season, Jim Ned ranks #675 in section in scoring defense. That form gets a real test against Clyde, whose offense ranks #12 in section (55.8 points per game).

Something changed for Jim Ned's ground game after its first 4 games. The Indians averaged 3.7 yards per carry (475 yards on 127 rushes) over their first 4 games (0-4), #907 in section over that timeframe. In the 4 games since that slow start (2-2), Jim Ned has averaged 5.0 yards per carry (599 yards on 120 rushes), a 33% rise, #639 in section over that span. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Jim Ned's last 4 opponents have averaged 6.4 yards per carry, a #744 run defense in section on the season, against 5.5 yards per carry, #482 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (6.4 yards per carry), Jim Ned ran for 22% less per carry than those run defenses usually allow. So the improvement is real, but it still trails what those opponents usually give up. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #580 in section, well below the first 4 (#213), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. On the season, the Indians rank #876 in section in rushing. Clyde's run defense sits in the middle of the pack, #366 in section (5.2 yards per carry).

TIDBITS (4 found)

• Club Jim Ned has gone 4 straight games forcing 1+ turnover (September 25, 2026 through October 23, 2026), going 2-2 over that stretch, a school-record 4 straight in the 5 seasons on record.

• Club Jim Ned is 17-0 all time when scoring 40+ points in the games on file (17 such games).

• Club Jim Ned has allowed 172 points over its last 6 games (28.7 a game, September 11, 2026 through October 23, 2026) -- its most in a 6-game stretch on record.

• Club Jim Ned has scored 138 points over its last 3 games (46.0 a game, October 9, 2026 through October 23, 2026) -- its 4th-highest 3-game total on record; the most is 162, from October 25, 2024 through November 8, 2024.

JN — STAT LEADERS
OFFENSE
PASSING LEADER
506PASS YDS
C-ATT47-97
COMP%48.5%
YPA5.2
TD3
INT4
QBR94.2
RUSHING LEADER
213RUSH YDS
CAR48
YPC4.4
RUSH TD0
REC3
REC YDS46
YPR15.3
REC TD0
RUSHING LEADER
169RUSH YDS
CAR47
YPC3.6
RUSH TD1
REC3
REC YDS10
YPR3.3
REC TD0
RECEIVING LEADER
145REC YDS
REC13
YPR11.2
REC TD2
RECEIVING LEADER
121REC YDS
REC9
YPR13.4
REC TD0
DEFENSE
TACKLES LEADER
31TCKL
TFL0
SACKS0
INT1
PD1
FF0
TACKLES LEADER
30TCKL
TFL2
SACKS0
INT0
PD0
FF0
TACKLES LEADER
28TCKL
TFL4
SACKS0
INT0
PD0
FF0
TFL LEADER
3TFL
TCKL16
SACKS0
INT0
PD0
FF0
TFL LEADER
2TFL
TCKL24
SACKS0
INT0
PD1
FF0
SACKS LEADER
1SACKS
TCKL11
TFL1
INT1
PD0
FF0
INTERCEPTIONS LEADER
1INT
TCKL9
TFL0
SACKS0
PD0
FF0
JN — WHAT CHANGED THIS WEEK

From the games on file through Sep 25.

REMAINING SCHEDULE

Most likely finish 3-7 · realistic range 2-8 to 4-6

Remaining schedule: 494th hardest of 1146 in the TX section (average opponent strength 3.9).

DateOpponentSP rankWin chance
10/30vs Clyde#159 of 125217%
11/06at Compass Academy#953 of 125280%

Win chances are the site's own game projections where one is on file, otherwise the SP Strength Index gap with a small home edge. The realistic range covers 80% of outcomes (10th to 90th percentile).

Printable team sheetProgram historyOpen in Stat BoothWidget for your site
JN — PLAYER SEASON STATS — 2026

Every player with a stat on file, listed only where he has one. Open the arrow beside a name for his game-by-game line. Stats through the Sep 25 game; last updated Oct 29; roster and numbers checked Oct 27.

Click a column heading to sort. MIN hides players below that many attempts.
PASSING
NOPLAYERGPC/ATTCOMP %YDSYPATDINTQBR
11JACKSON BEARD549/10148.5%5395.34498.5
17TUCKER DEAL58/1747.1%19811.611152.5
TEAM TOTALS557/11848.3%7376.255106.3
RUSHING
NOPLAYERGPCARYDSYPCTD
27COLE CHITTUM5712884.12
22KAILEB GARCIA4482134.40
22KAILEB GARCIA116674.20
9TRUETT SCOTT410454.50
11JACKSON BEARD523401.70
17TUCKER DEAL57284.01
TEAM TOTALS51756813.93
RECEIVING
NOPLAYERGPRECYDSYPRTD
2BRAXTON POWELL41724914.64
1NATE HOLBROOK31015615.60
7CASON CUMBY556913.81
12KINSLER WILSON466410.70
88JACOB FORD336421.30
8TYLER MORROW545914.81
22KAILEB GARCIA434615.30
22KAILEB GARCIA112323.00
23STETSON MANSKE311111.00
27COLE CHITTUM53103.30
33TALAN TILLMAN2166.00
TEAM TOTALS55475714.06
DEFENSE
NOPLAYERGPTCKLTFLSACKSINTINT YDSPDFF
7CASON CUMBY535001020
17TUCKER DEAL530500000
22KAILEB GARCIA430200000
3COLSON BAIRD526200030
24KAI MCCLENDON525000000
9TRUETT SCOTT418300000
27COLE CHITTUM516000000
8TYLER MORROW513001000
69JOE ANGEL CONTRERAS411111000
2BRAXTON POWELL410001000
50GUNER BEASLEY57100010
61BEDE BROWNING46000000
12KINSLER WILSON45000011
35DARIK SESSUMS34000000
1NATE HOLBROOK34000000
58TY HOLGUIN24000000
20BRYSON MOORE23000000
68KYLE SPRINGER33000000
31CASON HUTCHESON22000000
69JOE ANGEL CONTRERAS12000000
6KAITHEN GARCIA12000000
21ETHAN MILLER11000000
16IAN DIETZ11000000
88JACOB FORD31000000
23STETSON MANSKE31000000
33TALAN TILLMAN21000000
TEAM TOTALS52611414071
PROGRAM SNAPSHOT: JN

PROGRAM RECORD

SEASONRECORDPFPAPPG
20227-428219925.6
20237-328019028.0
20248-438419032.0
202510-238019931.7
20262-620423725.5
2022-2634-1928.9
TEAM HISTORY

1 UIL state title · 1 state final loss · 1 title-game MVP

YEARHONOR
2020UIL STATE 3A D1 CHAMPION (def. Hallettsville 29-28)
UIL STATE TITLE GAME DEFENSIVE MVP (3A D1): XAVIER WISHERT (LB)
2003UIL STATE 2A D1 RUNNER-UP (lost to San Augustine 28-7)

State championship games and title-game MVPs: UIL Fall Almanac 2025-26. League finishes: no league schedule on file yet, so none is claimed.

UIL 3A Division 1 · District 2

2026 district standings · full page · all Texas districts
#TeamDistOvrRankProj.Dist. ptsNext
1CLYDE3-08-011 / 1591 (4.5-0.5)209-4610/30 vs JIM NED
2SWEETWATER3-06-226 / 2522 (4.3-0.7)153-4710/30 vs KERMIT
3JIM NED2-12-654 / 5843 (3.0-2.0)138-3810/30 vs CLYDE
4COMPASS ACADEMY1-22-678 / 9534 (1.7-3.3)40-12610/30 vs LAMESA
5KERMIT0-31-782 / 9916 (0.5-4.5)39-14410/30 vs SWEETWATER
6LAMESA0-31-783 / 9935 (0.9-4.1)52-23010/30 vs COMPASS ACADEMY
Top 4 in the district make the playoffs (line under 4th). Ordered by district record, then overall record and district point margin; UIL tiebreakers (head-to-head) are applied by the district, not here. Rank = SP Strength Index place in the classification / in Texas. Proj. = projected district finish and record, playing out each remaining district game by the two teams' ratings. From the 2026 results on file · UIL 3A Division 1 rankings · player leaders.
JN — 2026 SEASON SCHEDULE
DATEOPPONENTSITERESULTSCOREWIN%
08/28GREENWOODatL12-39
09/04LLANOvsL7-26
09/11WALLvsL13-49
09/18PEASTERatL7-35
09/25MIDLAND CHRISTIANatL27-50
10/09KERMITvsW59-6
10/16SWEETWATERatL14-32
10/23LAMESAvsW65-0
10/30CLYDEvsPROJ21-4017.4%
11/06COMPASS ACADEMYatPROJ35-1879.8%
SEASON TO DATE2-62 REMAINING

SEASON OUTLOOK

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 1)

RECORD TO DATEMOST LIKELY FINALPROJECTED RECORD
Overall2-6 so far3-7 (68%)3.0-7.0
League2-1 so far2-1 (100%)2.0-1.0
JN — 2026 OVERALL AVERAGES
SPLITGPPPGOPP PPGYPGOPP YPGPLAYS/GOPP PLAYS/G
OVERALL825.529.6322.8321.854.845.0
HOME436.020.2353.2319.551.545.2
ROAD415.039.0292.2331.058.044.0

PPG/OPP PPG use every played game on file. YPG/PLAYS-PER-GAME columns only ever come from games with a full box score on file, which can be a smaller sample than GP -- see the coverage note below when that's the case for this team.

JN — 2026 TEAM GAME LOG
DATEOPPONENTRESULTPASS YDSRUSH YDSTOTAL YDSPASS ALWRUSH ALWTOTAL ALWSACKS ALWSACKSDEF INTTO FORCEDTO MAR
8/28@ GreenwoodL 12-3992127219--------111-1
9/4vs. LlanoL 7-26173942678627536140110
9/11vs. WallL 13-4911610622234411145510110
9/18@ PeasterL 7-351251482732251063310000-3
9/25@ Midland ChristianL 27-50231206437------------2+1
10/9vs. KermitW 59-6292180472187153340------4+4
10/16@ SweetwaterL 14-3218555240------------2+1
10/23vs. LamesaW 65-02941584522795122------5+1
AVERAGES188.5134.2322.8173.8148.0321.81.70.20.82.0+3 (season)

Averages use only games with that number on file (defense 5/8, sacks/INT 4/8, sacks allowed 3/8 games). SACKS ALW comes from the opponent's box score; TO FORCED is takeaways; TO MAR is takeaways minus giveaways, and its bottom cell is the season total. Dashes mean not on file.

UNIT INDEX

Pass Offense: grade 74.3/100 (+41 yds/gm vs average)

Rush Offense: grade 37.3/100 (-37 yds/gm vs average)

Pass Defense: grade 57.9/100 (-15 yds/gm vs average)

Rush Defense: grade 79.3/100 (-65 yds/gm vs average)

Unit grades: 0-100 league percentile, adjusted for the opponents faced.

OPPONENT TRACKER

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 2)

DATESITEOPPONENTTHEIR RECORDTHEIR PPG
2026-10-30vsCLYDE8-055.8
2026-11-06atCOMPASS ACADEMY2-619.2

LAST YEAR

JN finished 2025 at 10-2. Made the playoffs (2 postseason game(s) on file; exact round/result not available). Notable win: 23-22 over TRINITY LEADERSHIP (TRINITY LEADERSHIP finished 80% that season). Toughest loss: 7-27 to PARADISE (20-point margin).

LAST SEASON: JN — 2025 GAME LOG
DATEOPPONENTRESULTRECORDPFPATOT YDSYDS ALLOWED
2025-08-29ESTACADOW1-04221N/AN/A
2025-09-05TRINITY LEADERSHIPW2-02322N/AN/A
2025-09-12WALLL2-1024185358
2025-09-19JACKSBOROW3-12313N/AN/A
2025-09-26HOLLIDAYW4-14821N/AN/A
2025-10-10COMANCHEW5-1563N/AN/A
2025-10-24SAN ANGELO TEXAS LEADERSHIP CHARTER ACADEMYW6-1500N/AN/A
2025-10-31CLYDEW7-14134N/AN/A
2025-11-07SWEETWATERW8-1247N/AN/A
2025-11-14BOYDW9-1427N/AN/A
2025-11-21BUSHLANDW10-12420N/AN/A
2025-11-28PARADISEL10-2727228297
TOTALS12 GMS10-210-2380199413 (2)655 (2)

"N/A" stands in for a box score that does not have stats entered. A total followed by a count in parentheses covers only the games with that stat on file.

TALKING POINTS (15 storylines)
JN HAS PERFORMED BEST THIS DATA SET WHEN...

• JN throws for 200+ yards (.667), and has won 2 straight when doing so

• JN rushes for 150+ yards (.667), and has won 2 straight when doing so

• JN averages 5.0+ yards per carry (.667), and has won 2 straight when doing so

• JN averages 8.0+ yards per attempt (.500), and has won 2 straight when doing so

• JN's defense has averaged 3.7 takeaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 8-game average is 2.0 takeaways per game. (+83%)

• JN's offense has averaged 11.5 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 12-game average is 7.5 YPA. (+53%)

• JN's offense has averaged 46.0 points scored per game over their last 3 games. Their 32-game average is 30.2 points scored per game. (+52%)

• JN's offense has averaged 257.0 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 12-game average is 170.9 pass yards per game. (+50%)

• JN's offense has averaged 8.2 YPP over their last 3 games. Their 12-game average is 5.5 YPP. (+50%)

• JN's defense has averaged 28.4 points allowed per game over their last 10 games. Their 32-game average is 19.6 points allowed per game. (+45%)

• JN's defense has averaged 107.0 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 178.8 pass yards per game. (-40%)

• JN's defense has forced 1+ turnover in 4 straight games (09/25/2026-10/23/2026), going 2-2 over that stretch.

• JN's defense has forced 2+ turnovers in 4 straight games (09/25/2026-10/23/2026), going 2-2 over that stretch.

• JN's offense has averaged 5.4 YPC over their last 3 games. Their 12-game average is 4.0 YPC. (+36%)

• JN's defense has averaged 5.0 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 7.8 YPA. (-35%)

MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 3)

JN -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(top 5 of 8 scored; vs 839 cached team(s))

#SIDECONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRKSCORE
1OFFTurnovers 1+1-8.11119.6W10.900
2OFFTurnovers < 31-8.11118.1L10.765
3OFFYPP < 70-10.00011.8L100.226
4OFFYPC < 50-9.00010.4L90.221
5OFFYPP < 60-8.0008.4L80.203
WIN %: TWO-CONDITION COMBINATIONS (2 found, min 4 Gms each)

(of 15 combinations tried per team -- a combination is only shown when at least 4 real games on file satisfy both conditions at once)

--- JN ---

CONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRK
JN rushes for 100+ yards and is held under 200 passing yards0-4.00014.0L4
JN holds its opponents under 5.0 yards per carry and under 150 rushing yards1-3.25021.8W1
WIN % -- TAB-SEPARATED
TeamConditionRecordWin%PPG
JNRush Yds 100+ & Pass Yds < 2000-4.00014.0
JNYPC < 5.0 & Rush Yds < 1501-3.25021.8
JN — OFFENSE — 2024-26 (32 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+2-2.50043.8W2
YPA < 8.00-8.0008.4L8 20 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+2-1.66750.3W2
Pass Yds < 2000-9.00010.1L9 20 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+2-5.28629.6W2
Rush Yds < 1000-5.0007.0L5 20 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+2-1.66750.3W2
Rush Yds < 1500-9.00010.1L9 20 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+2-1.66749.3W2
YPC < 5.00-9.00010.4L9 20 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+2-2.50043.8W2
YPP < 6.00-8.0008.4L8 20 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+2-01.00062.0W2
YPP < 7.00-10.00011.8L10 20 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+1-8.11119.6W1
Turnovers < 11-1.50029.5W1 21 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 2+1-4.20023.0W1 21 games without this stat on file
Turnovers > 21-1.50036.0W1 21 games without this stat on file
JN — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2024-26 (32 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Scores <100-6.0005.8
Scores 10-191-4.20013.2
Scores 20-294-2.66724.2
Scores 30-392-01.00036.5
Scores 40+13-01.00049.9
JN — OFFENSE — 2026 (8 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+2-1.66750.3W2
YPA < 8.00-5.00010.6L5
Pass Yds 200+2-1.66750.3W2
Pass Yds < 2000-5.00010.6L5
Rush Yds 100+2-4.33330.5W2
Rush Yds < 1000-2.00010.5L2
Rush Yds 150+2-1.66750.3W2
Rush Yds < 1500-5.00010.6L5
YPC 5.0+2-01.00062.0W2
YPC < 5.00-6.00013.3L6
YPP 6.0+2-1.66750.3W2
YPP < 6.00-5.00010.6L5
YPP 7.0+2-01.00062.0W2
YPP < 7.00-6.00013.3L6
Turnovers 1+1-6.14320.7W1
Turnovers < 11-01.00059.0W1
Turnovers 2+1-2.33328.0W1
Turnovers > 21-1.50036.0W1
JN — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2026 (8 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Scores <100-2.0007.0
Scores 10-190-3.00013.0
Scores 20-290-1.00027.0
Scores 30-39------
Scores 40+2-01.00062.0
JN — DEFENSE — 2024-26 (32 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+1-4.20028.6W1
YPA < 8.01-3.25014.8W1 23 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+0-5.00032.0L5
Pass Yds < 2002-2.50010.5W2 23 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+1-5.16725.0W1
Rush Yds < 1001-2.33317.3W1 23 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+1-2.33314.0W1
Rush Yds < 1501-5.16726.7W1 23 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+1-3.25026.2W1
YPC < 5.01-4.20019.4W1 23 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+1-4.20028.0W1
YPP < 6.01-3.25015.5W1 23 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+0-3.00036.7L3
YPP < 7.02-4.33315.3W2 23 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+2-5.28628.9W1
Turnovers < 10-1.00035.0L1 24 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 2+2-2.50022.0W1 24 games without this stat on file
Turnovers > 22-01.0003.0W2 24 games without this stat on file
JN — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2024-26 (32 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Allows <109-01.0004.0
Allows 10-193-3.50012.8
Allows 20-296-4.60023.4
Allows 30-391-3.25035.0
Allows 40+1-2.33346.3
JN — DEFENSE — 2026 (8 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+1-3.25029.0W1
YPA < 8.01-01.0000.0W1 3 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+0-2.00042.0L2
Pass Yds < 2002-1.66710.7W2 3 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+1-3.25029.0W1
Rush Yds < 1001-01.0000.0W1 3 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+1-1.50016.0W1
Rush Yds < 1501-2.33328.0W1 3 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+1-2.33327.0W1
YPC < 5.01-1.50017.5W1 3 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+1-3.25029.0W1
YPP < 6.01-01.0000.0W1 3 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+0-3.00036.7L3
YPP < 7.02-01.0003.0W2 3 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+2-5.28628.9W1
Turnovers < 10-1.00035.0L1
Turnovers 2+2-2.50022.0W1
Turnovers > 22-01.0003.0W2
JN — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2026 (8 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Allows <102-01.0003.0
Allows 10-19------
Allows 20-290-1.00026.0
Allows 30-390-3.00035.3
Allows 40+0-2.00049.5
ON THE BRINK

JIM NED

• JIM NED has forced 2+ turnovers in 4 straight games (9/25/26–10/23/26). It has not reached 5 straight in the last 4 years of games on file (2023-present).

TAB-SEPARATED (paste into a spreadsheet)
TeamSideSplitGamesRecordWin%PPGStrk
JNOFFENSEYPA 8.0+42-2.50043.8W2
JNOFFENSEYPA < 8.080-8.0008.4L8
JNOFFENSEPass Yds 200+32-1.66750.3W2
JNOFFENSEPass Yds < 20090-9.00010.1L9
JNOFFENSERush Yds 100+72-5.28629.6W2
JNOFFENSERush Yds < 10050-5.0007.0L5
JNOFFENSERush Yds 150+32-1.66750.3W2
JNOFFENSERush Yds < 15090-9.00010.1L9
JNOFFENSEYPC 5.0+32-1.66749.3W2
JNOFFENSEYPC < 5.090-9.00010.4L9
JNOFFENSEYPP 6.0+42-2.50043.8W2
JNOFFENSEYPP < 6.080-8.0008.4L8
JNOFFENSEYPP 7.0+22-01.00062.0W2
JNOFFENSEYPP < 7.0100-10.00011.8L10
JNOFFENSETurnovers 1+91-8.11119.6W1
JNOFFENSETurnovers < 121-1.50029.5W1
JNOFFENSETurnovers 2+51-4.20023.0W1
JNOFFENSETurnovers > 221-1.50036.0W1
JNOFFENSEScores <1060-6.0005.8L6
JNOFFENSEScores 10-1951-4.20013.2L4
JNOFFENSEScores 20-2964-2.66724.2L1
JNOFFENSEScores 30-3922-01.00036.5W2
JNOFFENSEScores 40+1313-01.00049.9W13
JNDEFENSEYPA 8.0+51-4.20028.6W1
JNDEFENSEYPA < 8.041-3.25014.8W1
JNDEFENSEPass Yds 200+50-5.00032.0L5
JNDEFENSEPass Yds < 20042-2.50010.5W2
JNDEFENSERush Yds 100+61-5.16725.0W1
JNDEFENSERush Yds < 10031-2.33317.3W1
JNDEFENSERush Yds 150+31-2.33314.0W1
JNDEFENSERush Yds < 15061-5.16726.7W1
JNDEFENSEYPC 5.0+41-3.25026.2W1
JNDEFENSEYPC < 5.051-4.20019.4W1
JNDEFENSEYPP 6.0+51-4.20028.0W1
JNDEFENSEYPP < 6.041-3.25015.5W1
JNDEFENSEYPP 7.0+30-3.00036.7L3
JNDEFENSEYPP < 7.062-4.33315.3W2
JNDEFENSETurnovers 1+72-5.28628.9W1
JNDEFENSETurnovers < 110-1.00035.0L1
JNDEFENSETurnovers 2+42-2.50022.0W1
JNDEFENSETurnovers > 222-01.0003.0W2
JNDEFENSEAllows <1099-01.0004.0W9
JNDEFENSEAllows 10-1963-3.50012.8W1
JNDEFENSEAllows 20-29106-4.60023.4L2
JNDEFENSEAllows 30-3941-3.25035.0L3
JNDEFENSEAllows 40+31-2.33346.3L2
STREAKS: JN (combined OFFENSE+DEFENSE)
SIDESPLITSTREAKDATESRECORD
DEFENSETurnovers 1+4 games09/25/2026 - 10/23/20262-2
DEFENSETurnovers 2+4 games09/25/2026 - 10/23/20262-2
STREAKS — ALL TEAMS
TeamSideSplitStreakDatesRecord
JNDEFENSETurnovers 1+4 games09/25/2026 - 10/23/20262-2
JNDEFENSETurnovers 2+4 games09/25/2026 - 10/23/20262-2
NOTABLE TRENDS (13 of 13 found, team |deviation| >= 20%, matchup |deviation| >= 20%)

JN OFFENSE

JN's offense has averaged 11.5 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 12-game average is 7.5 YPA. (+53%)

JN's offense has averaged 46.0 points scored per game over their last 3 games. Their 32-game average is 30.2 points scored per game. (+52%)

JN's offense has averaged 257.0 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 12-game average is 170.9 pass yards per game. (+50%)

JN's offense has averaged 8.2 YPP over their last 3 games. Their 12-game average is 5.5 YPP. (+50%)

JN's offense has averaged 5.4 YPC over their last 3 games. Their 12-game average is 4.0 YPC. (+36%)

JN's offense has averaged 388.0 total yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 12-game average is 291.2 total yards per game. (+33%)

JN's offense has averaged 149.4 rush yards per game over their last 5 games. Their 12-game average is 120.2 rush yards per game. (+24%)

JN DEFENSE

JN's defense has averaged 3.7 takeaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 8-game average is 2.0 takeaways per game. (+83%)

JN's defense has averaged 28.4 points allowed per game over their last 10 games. Their 32-game average is 19.6 points allowed per game. (+45%)

JN's defense has averaged 107.0 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 178.8 pass yards per game. (-40%)

JN's defense has averaged 5.0 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 7.8 YPA. (-35%)

JN's defense has averaged 231.0 total yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 308.2 total yards per game. (-25%)

JN's defense has averaged 5.5 YPC over their last 7 games. Their 9-game average is 4.5 YPC. (+20%)

(moved to the Appendix, Data Export 1, to keep this section shorter -- the full spreadsheet-paste table is there unchanged)

APPENDIX

Full-length explanations and full-size data exports for the shortened notes and relocated tables referenced throughout this report, numbered in the order their pointers appear above.

Explanatory Notes

Note 1 -- SEASON OUTLOOK

Every remaining game is projected from schedule-adjusted ratings; already-played games carry their real result. Records are simulated distributions, not a single guess -- MOST LIKELY FINAL is the single most probable record and its own probability, PROJECTED RECORD is the season's expected win total expressed in record form (an average across every simulated outcome, so it can land on a fraction of a game).

Note 2 -- OPPONENT TRACKER -- why some cards have no record shown

Only meaningful for an opponent who is ALSO a tracked team in the library -- an opponent with no games on file here at all shows the date and site alone.

Note 3 -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS -- how a number is scored

Every split this report computes is scored on how strong the number is and how much it sets this team apart from its opponent and the rest of the field, and the top 5 per team are listed. A condition needs at least 8 occurrences to count.

Full Data Exports

Data Export 1 -- TRENDS — TAB-SEPARATED (10 columns)

TeamSideTypeStatOpponentWindow/MeetingsValueBaselineGamesBaselineAvgDeviation
JNDEFENSEteamPass Yardslast 3107.09178.8-40.1%
JNOFFENSEteamPass Yardslast 3257.012170.9+50.4%
JNDEFENSEteamPointslast 1028.43219.6+45.2%
JNOFFENSEteamPointslast 346.03230.2+52.1%
JNOFFENSEteamRush Yardslast 5149.412120.2+24.2%
JNDEFENSEteamTotal Yardslast 3231.09308.2-25.1%
JNOFFENSEteamTotal Yardslast 3388.012291.2+33.3%
JNDEFENSEteamTurnoverslast 33.782.0+83.3%
JNDEFENSEteamYPAlast 35.097.8-35.3%
JNOFFENSEteamYPAlast 311.5127.5+52.9%
JNDEFENSEteamYPClast 75.594.5+20.4%
JNOFFENSEteamYPClast 35.4124.0+35.9%
JNOFFENSEteamYPPlast 38.2125.5+50.0%
Report Produced by ScorePirate | Commitment and offer data sourced from 247Sports | GENERATED 10/29/2026 01:14