ScorePirate
MENU
AT A GLANCE

In short: Cypress Lakes Spartans high school football (Katy, TX), 2026 season: 6-2. Last game: W 32-12 vs Cypress Creek on October 22, 2026. Next: at Cypress Woods, October 31, 2026. Schedule and results, player season stats, stat leaders, unit grades, ScorePirate ranking and the game-by-game log.

ScorePirate Individual Team Report
CYPRESS LAKES
CYPRESS LAKES 6-2
2026 SEASON
CYPRESS LAKES
AT A GLANCE — AS OF 10/27/2026
RECORD6-2 this season
LAST GAMEW 32-12 vs CYPRESS CREEK
NEXT GAMECYPRESS WOODS (10/31/2026)
UNIT GRADESPass Off 63.8 · Rush Off 62.3 · Pass Def 66.5 · Rush Def 70.9
ENROLLMENT3,256 STUDENTS (2023-24) · PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL
NUMBERS TO NOTE
#474
SP Strength Index (of 1252)
6-2
2026 record
+7.1
avg scoring margin, pts/gm
UNIT INDEX — GRADE (YDS VS AVG)
TEAMPASS ORUSH OPASS DRUSH D
CYPRESS LAKES63.8 (+15)62.3 (+17)66.5 (-28)70.9 (-45)
HEAD-TO-HEAD GAME LOG

STORYLINES

Next: at Cypress Woods, Sat 31 Oct. Matchup report: Cypress Lakes at Cypress Woods.

The battle on the ground could decide Cypress Lakes' next game, against Cypress Woods, and the recent returns favor Cypress Lakes. Cypress Lakes averaged 4.8 yards per carry (547 yards on 115 rushes) over its first 4 games (2-2), #740 in section in that timeframe. In the 4 games since that slow start (4-0), the Spartans have averaged 7.9 yards per carry (1,007 yards on 127 rushes), a 67% rise, #191 in section in that window. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Cypress Lakes' last 4 opponents have averaged 6.1 yards per carry, a #659 run defense in section on the season, against 5.5 yards per carry, #466 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (6.1 yards per carry), Cypress Lakes ran for 29% more per carry than those run defenses usually allow. Conversely, Cypress Woods' run defense has been one of section's better units in recent weeks. The Wildcats have allowed 3.3 yards per carry (395 yards on 120 rushes) over their last 4 games (3-1), #112 in section during that time. Those games came against some of the weaker rushing attacks in section (4.5 yards per carry on the season, which would rank #846). Against those norms, Cypress Woods held those rushing attacks 27% below their usual yards per carry. Overall, those opponents average an SP Strength Index rating that would rank #752 in section, a lower level of competition. Something has to give when Cypress Lakes' surging ground game meets one of section's better units in Cypress Woods'.

The number to watch when Cypress Lakes meets Cypress Woods is Cypress Lakes' giveaways. Cypress Lakes committed 1.8 giveaways per game over its first 4 games (2-2), #872 in section through those games. In the 4 games since that slow start (4-0), the Spartans have committed 0.8 giveaways per game, a 57% drop, #299 in section through that stretch. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Cypress Lakes' last 4 opponents have averaged 1.2 per game, a #638 defense in section on the season, against 0.9 per game, #844 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (1.2 per game), Cypress Lakes turned it over 37% less than those defenses usually force. Meanwhile, Cypress Woods' defense has been middle of the pack in recent weeks. The Wildcats have forced 0.8 takeaways per game over their last 4 games (3-1), #787 in section over that stretch. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of offenses in section (1.3 per game on the season, which would rank #668). Against those norms, Cypress Woods forced 41% fewer turnovers than those offenses usually give up. Overall, those opponents average an SP Strength Index rating that would rank #752 in section, a lower level of competition. Cypress Woods offers Cypress Lakes a fair measuring stick for whether the trend is real.

NOTES

The biggest shift in Cypress Lakes' season has come in its offense. Cypress Lakes averaged 5.4 yards per play (1,162 yards on 217 snaps) over its first 4 games (2-2), #807 in section within that period. In the 4 games since that slow start (4-0), the Spartans have averaged 7.7 yards per play (1,673 yards on 217 snaps), a 44% rise, #333 in section across those games. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Cypress Lakes' last 4 opponents have averaged 7.0 yards per play, a #684 defense in section on the season, against 6.1 yards per play, #349 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (7.0 yards per play), Cypress Lakes gained 10% more per snap than those defenses usually allow. On the season, Cypress Lakes ranks #595 in section in yards per play. That form gets a real test against Cypress Woods, whose defense ranks #147 in section (5.3 yards per play).

Cypress Lakes' run defense has come a long way since the season's early weeks. The Spartans allowed 4.9 yards per carry (589 yards on 121 rushes) over their first 4 games (2-2), #329 in section during those games. In the 4 games since that slow start (4-0), Cypress Lakes has allowed 3.0 yards per carry (261 yards on 88 rushes), a 39% drop, #79 in section during that period. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Cypress Lakes' last 4 opponents have averaged 5.1 yards per carry, a #726 rushing attack in section on the season, against 5.7 yards per carry, #559 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (5.1 yards per carry), Cypress Lakes held those rushing attacks 42% below their usual yards per carry. On the season, the Spartans rank #120 in section in run defense. Cypress Woods' ground game sits in the middle of the pack, #487 in section (6.0 yards per carry).

Something changed for Cypress Lakes' offense after its first 4 games. Cypress Lakes averaged 26.5 points per game over its first 4 games (2-2), #692 in section during that stretch. In the 4 games since that slow start (4-0), the Spartans have averaged 36.2 points per game, a 37% rise, #400 in section over that period. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Cypress Lakes' last 4 opponents have averaged 30.8 points per game, a #725 scoring defense in section on the season, against 26.2 points per game, #511 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (30.8 points per game), Cypress Lakes scored 18% more than those defenses usually allow. On the season, Cypress Lakes ranks #531 in section in scoring. That form gets a real test against Cypress Woods, whose defense ranks #141 in section (16.7 points per game).

Cypress Lakes' defense has allowed fewer points as the season has worn on. The Spartans allowed 29.0 points per game over their first 4 games (2-2), #637 in section over that timeframe. In the 4 games since that slow start (4-0), Cypress Lakes has allowed 19.5 points per game, a 33% drop, #312 in section over that span. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 28.5 points per game on the season. Measured against those opponents' norms (28.6 points per game), Cypress Lakes held those offenses 32% below what they usually score. On the season, the Spartans rank #416 in section in scoring defense. Cypress Woods' offense sits in the middle of the pack, #352 in section (36.4 points per game).

Cypress Lakes averaged 6.0 yards per pass attempt (615 yards on 102 attempts) over its first 4 games (2-2), #756 in section in that timeframe. Few teams started slower in this department, and few have turned it around as sharply since. In the 4 games since that slow start (4-0), the Spartans have averaged 7.4 yards per pass attempt (666 yards on 90 attempts), a 23% rise, #581 in section in that window. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Cypress Lakes' last 4 opponents have averaged 8.8 yards per attempt, a #797 pass defense in section on the season, against 6.9 yards per attempt, #310 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (8.8 yards per attempt), Cypress Lakes threw for 16% less per attempt than those pass defenses usually allow. So the improvement is real, but it still trails what those opponents usually give up. On the season, Cypress Lakes ranks #725 in section in passing. Cypress Woods' pass defense sits in the middle of the pack, #513 in section (7.6 yards per attempt).

TIDBITS (6 found)

• Club Cypress Lakes has won 4 straight, and a win would make it 5 in a row -- something they have not done in the 5 seasons on record.

• Club Cypress Lakes has gone 8 straight games forcing fewer than 3 turnovers (August 27, 2026 through October 22, 2026), going 6-2 over that stretch, a school-record 8 straight in the 5 seasons on record.

• Club Cypress Lakes has gone 5 straight games holding the opponent under 7.0 yards per play (September 18, 2026 through October 22, 2026), going 4-1 over that stretch, a school-record 5 straight in the 5 seasons on record.

• Club Cypress Lakes has gone 4 straight games rushing for 100+ yards (October 2, 2026 through October 22, 2026), going 4-0 over that stretch, a school-record 4 straight in the 5 seasons on record.

• Club Cypress Lakes has scored 145 points over its last 4 games (36.2 a game, October 2, 2026 through October 22, 2026) -- its most in a 4-game stretch on record.

• Player Jamerce Johnson has 24 tackles over his last 3 games (8.0 a game, September 3, 2026 through September 18, 2026) -- his most in a 3-game stretch on record.

SCHEDULE STRENGTH

Cypress Lakes has played a middle-of-the-road schedule in the pool so far (#658 of 1236), and what is left is a middle-of-the-road slate (#555 of 1145).

Schedule so far · 1 = hardest
#658 of 1236
avg opponent rating 0.5 over 8 games · 0 vs top-25 TX section
Schedule ahead · 1 = hardest
#555 of 1145
avg opponent rating 2.2 over 2 games · 0 vs top-25
Toughest game played
Cypress Falls
#156 in TX section · Oct 10 · W 21-18
Toughest game ahead
Cypress Woods
#383 in TX section · Oct 31
Freeman
W 19-14
Benjamin…
L 29-42
@Spring
W 44-24
@Langham …
L 14-36
Cypress …
W 54-17
@Cypress …
W 21-18
Cy-Fair
W 38-31
@Cypress …
W 32-12
@Cypress …Jersey V…
Each bar is one opponent, placed by where its rating ranks in this pool (tall and red = top 10; short and green = bottom half). Hatched bars are games still to play; the dashed line is today.
CL — STAT LEADERS
OFFENSE
PASSING LEADER
605PASS YDS
C-ATT44-93
COMP%47.3%
YPA6.5
TD6
INT4
QBR114.6
RUSHING LEADER
226RUSH YDS
CAR37
YPC6.1
RUSH TD0
REC1
REC YDS0
YPR0.0
REC TD0
RUSHING LEADER
84RUSH YDS
CAR12
YPC7.0
RUSH TD1
REC4
REC YDS25
YPR6.2
REC TD1
RECEIVING LEADER
206REC YDS
REC14
YPR14.7
REC TD0
RECEIVING LEADER
148REC YDS
REC8
YPR18.5
REC TD2
DEFENSE
TACKLES LEADER
33TCKL
TFL2
SACKS0
INT0
PD0
FF0
TACKLES LEADER
31TCKL
TFL3
SACKS1
INT0
PD0
FF0
TACKLES LEADER
26TCKL
TFL1
SACKS0
INT0
PD0
FF0
TFL LEADER
2TFL
TCKL18
SACKS2
INT0
PD0
FF0
TFL LEADER
1TFL
TCKL5
SACKS1
INT0
PD0
FF0
SACKS LEADER
1SACKS
TCKL9
TFL1
INT0
PD0
FF0
INTERCEPTIONS LEADER
1INT
TCKL0
TFL0
SACKS0
PD0
FF0
CL — WHAT CHANGED THIS WEEK

From the games on file through Sep 18.

REMAINING SCHEDULE

Most likely finish 7-3 · realistic range 7-3 to 8-2

Remaining schedule: 555th hardest of 1146 in the TX section (average opponent strength 2.2).

DateOpponentSP rankWin chance
10/31at Cypress Woods#383 of 125241%
11/06vs Jersey Village#792 of 125288%

Win chances are the site's own game projections where one is on file, otherwise the SP Strength Index gap with a small home edge. The realistic range covers 80% of outcomes (10th to 90th percentile).

Printable team sheetProgram historyOpen in Stat BoothWidget for your site
CL — PLAYER SEASON STATS — 2026

Every player with a stat on file, listed only where he has one. Open the arrow beside a name for his game-by-game line. Stats through the Sep 18 game; last updated Sep 29; roster and numbers checked Oct 27.

Click a column heading to sort. MIN hides players below that many attempts.
PASSING
NOPLAYERGPC/ATTCOMP %YDSYPATDINTQBR
6DARIUS WATSON444/9347.3%6056.564114.6
12MARCUS SMITH32/922.2%101.10031.6
TEAM TOTALS446/10245.1%6156.064107.3
RUSHING
NOPLAYERGPCARYDSYPCTD
4BRAYLEN DUGAR4372266.10
7BRYCE ARRINGTON412847.01
6DARIUS WATSON424743.12
20MARQUEZ RIMMER211655.90
5ARQUARIS CROWDER47243.40
8GABE SAMPSON12126.00
0JAMERCE JOHNSON4441.03
12MARCUS SMITH3510.20
16JOSE CAMPOS1100.00
3JOSIAH STEWART32-6-3.00
TEAM TOTALS41054844.66
RECEIVING
NOPLAYERGPRECYDSYPRTD
3JOSIAH STEWART31420614.70
13ERIC LIBERTY4814818.52
5ARQUARIS CROWDER4812515.62
15JAMIYAN CROWDER149423.51
16JOSE CAMPOS114343.00
7BRYCE ARRINGTON44256.21
8GABE SAMPSON1199.00
9DAVION GRIFFIN4331.00
12MARCUS SMITH3111.00
4BRAYLEN DUGAR4100.00
6DARIUS WATSON41-1-1.00
PLAYER #7541-5-5.00
TEAM TOTALS44764813.86
DEFENSE
NOPLAYERGPTCKLTFLSACKSINTINT YDSPDFF
32ISAIAH ANDERSON433200000
0JAMERCE JOHNSON431310000
9DAVION GRIFFIN426100000
10XAVIER BOUDREAUX418220000
13ERIC LIBERTY418001001
11AMIRE MOORE313000000
23LORNE MARTIN39110000
2CAMERON DUMES49000000
19ISIDRO JIMENEZ48000000
PLAYER #7548000000
18CAMRON BEARD35110000
1ANTHONY BRADLEY25000000
24AUGUSTUS WEBB14000000
55DARYLL SHELTON13000000
45JOSHUA RODRIGUEZ12000000
3JOSIAH STEWART32000000
99ANTONIO WILLIAMS11000000
54DRAYTON CARTER11000000
62FRANCISCO GUERRA11000000
22JADEN SOLE11000000
25KYMANI WALKER11000000
R. MELTON11000000
6DARIUS WATSON400013000
TEAM TOTALS420010523001
PROGRAM SNAPSHOT: CL

PROGRAM RECORD

SEASONRECORDPFPAPPG
20222-812235612.2
20233-720735320.7
20244-626731226.7
20256-633228727.7
20266-225119431.4
2022-2621-2923.6

UIL 6A · District 16

2026 district standings · full page · all Texas districts
#TeamDistOvrRankProj.Dist. ptsNext
1CYPRESS FALLS4-17-152 / 1561 (5.8-1.2)218-8710/29 vs CYPRESS RIDGE
2CYPRESS WOODS4-16-1110 / 3834 (4.8-2.2)168-7810/31 vs CYPRESS LAKES
3LANGHAM CREEK4-16-2112 / 3902 (5.4-1.6)160-10910/30 vs CY-FAIR
4CYPRESS LAKES4-16-2125 / 4743 (5.2-1.8)159-11410/31 vs CYPRESS WOODS
5CY-FAIR2-35-394 / 3005 (3.6-3.4)190-16210/30 vs LANGHAM CREEK
6CYPRESS RIDGE1-43-5243 / 11377 (1.0-6.0)72-25210/29 vs CYPRESS FALLS
7JERSEY VILLAGE1-41-7196 / 7926 (2.0-5.0)133-17710/30 vs CYPRESS CREEK
8CYPRESS CREEK0-50-8237 / 10548 (0.2-6.8)91-21210/30 vs JERSEY VILLAGE
Top 4 in the district make the playoffs (line under 4th). Ordered by district record, then overall record and district point margin; UIL tiebreakers (head-to-head) are applied by the district, not here. Rank = SP Strength Index place in the classification / in Texas. Proj. = projected district finish and record, playing out each remaining district game by the two teams' ratings. From the 2026 results on file · UIL 6A rankings · player leaders.
CL — 2026 SEASON SCHEDULE
DATEOPPONENTSITERESULTSCOREWIN%
08/27FREEMANvsW19-14
09/03BENJAMIN DAVISvsL29-42
09/12SPRINGatW44-24
09/18LANGHAM CREEKatL14-36
10/02CYPRESS RIDGEvsW54-17
10/10CYPRESS FALLSatW21-18
10/16CY-FAIRvsW38-31
10/22CYPRESS CREEKatW32-12
10/31CYPRESS WOODSatPROJ25-2941.4%
11/06JERSEY VILLAGEvsPROJ39-1588.1%
SEASON TO DATE6-22 REMAINING

SEASON OUTLOOK

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 1)

RECORD TO DATEMOST LIKELY FINALPROJECTED RECORD
Overall6-2 so far7-3 (54%)7.2-2.8
League4-1 so far4-1 (100%)4.0-1.0
CL — 2026 OVERALL AVERAGES
SPLITGPPPGOPP PPGYPGOPP YPGPLAYS/GOPP PLAYS/G
OVERALL831.424.2354.4295.654.253.6
HOME435.026.0445.8301.862.250.5
ROAD427.822.5263.0287.346.257.7

PPG/OPP PPG use every played game on file. YPG/PLAYS-PER-GAME columns only ever come from games with a full box score on file, which can be a smaller sample than GP -- see the coverage note below when that's the case for this team.

CL — 2026 TEAM GAME LOG
DATEOPPONENTRESULTPASS YDSRUSH YDSTOTAL YDSPASS ALWRUSH ALWTOTAL ALWSACKS ALWSACKSDEF INTTO FORCEDTO MAR
8/27vs. FreemanW 19-141861413271065816402000
9/3vs. Benjamin DavisL 29-421631072701873145010102+1
9/12@ SpringW 44-24254249503--------1120
9/18@ Langham CreekL 14-36125062972173141111-3
10/2vs. Cypress RidgeW 54-1719544664118358241------2+1
10/10@ Cypress FallsW 21-1810113323422562287------2+2
10/16vs. Cy-FairW 38-31226319545318-17301------10
10/22@ Cypress CreekW 32-12144109253103158261------2+1
AVERAGES160.1194.2354.4174.1121.4295.60.31.20.51.5+2 (season)

Averages use only games with that number on file (defense 7/8, sacks/INT 4/8, sacks allowed 3/8 games). SACKS ALW comes from the opponent's box score; TO FORCED is takeaways; TO MAR is takeaways minus giveaways, and its bottom cell is the season total. Dashes mean not on file.

UNIT INDEX

Pass Offense: grade 63.8/100 (+15 yds/gm vs average)

Rush Offense: grade 62.3/100 (+17 yds/gm vs average)

Pass Defense: grade 66.5/100 (-28 yds/gm vs average)

Rush Defense: grade 70.9/100 (-45 yds/gm vs average)

Unit grades: 0-100 league percentile, opponent-curved (two-way solve over current + past seasons, recency-weighted). Composite counts yardage, efficiency vs league YPA/YPC (50% tilt), and negative plays at sack=7yd, INT=45yd, TFL=4yd -- adjustable v1 constants.

OPPONENT TRACKER

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 2)

DATESITEOPPONENTTHEIR RECORDTHEIR PPG
2026-10-31atCYPRESS WOODS6-136.4
2026-11-06vsJERSEY VILLAGE1-720.5

LAST YEAR

CL finished 2025 at 6-6. Made the playoffs (2 postseason game(s) on file; exact round/result not available). Notable win: 21-12 over MAGNOLIA (MAGNOLIA finished 82% that season). Toughest loss: 14-21 to CYPRESS RANCH (7-point margin).

LAST SEASON: CL — 2025 GAME LOG
DATEOPPONENTRESULTRECORDPFPATOT YDSYDS ALLOWED
2025-08-29CYPRESS FALLSL0-12741N/AN/A
2025-09-04SPRINGW1-1360N/AN/A
2025-09-13BENJAMIN DAVISL1-22231N/AN/A
2025-09-19CYPRESS PARKW2-2570N/AN/A
2025-10-02WALLERL2-32154N/AN/A
2025-10-11CYPRESS WOODSW3-3360N/AN/A
2025-10-18CYPRESS RANCHL3-41421263325
2025-10-24BRIDGELANDL3-51644N/AN/A
2025-10-30LANGHAM CREEKW4-53323N/AN/A
2025-11-07CYPRESS SPRINGSW5-53817N/AN/A
2025-11-14MAGNOLIAW6-52112322158
2025-11-21COLLEGE PARKL6-61144N/AN/A
TOTALS12 GMS6-66-6332287585 (2)483 (2)

"N/A" stands in for a box score that does not have stats entered. A total followed by a count in parentheses covers only the games with that stat on file.

TALKING POINTS (15 storylines)
CL HAS PERFORMED BEST THIS DATA SET WHEN...

• CL holds its opponents under 100 rushing yards (.999), and has won 5 straight when doing so

• CL rushes for 100+ yards (.700), and has won 5 straight when doing so

• CL holds its opponents under 6.0 yards per play (.833), and has won 3 straight when doing so

• CL averages 8.0+ yards per attempt (.999), and has won 3 straight when doing so

• CL's defense has forced 1+ turnover in 7 straight games (09/03/2026-10/22/2026), going 5-2 over that stretch.

• CL holds its opponents under 98.5 rushing yards (CL's own median) (.999)

• CL holds its opponents under 3.5 yards per carry (CL's own median) (.999)

• CL's offense has averaged 0.7 giveaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 1.4 giveaways per game. (-52%)

• CL's defense has averaged 67.7 rush yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 127.5 rush yards per game. (-47%)

• CL's defense has averaged 215.3 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 168.4 pass yards per game. (+28%)

• CL's defense has averaged 20.3 points allowed per game over their last 3 games. Their 30-game average is 26.4 points allowed per game. (-23%)

• CL's defense has averaged 3.0 YPC over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 3.9 YPC. (-23%)

• CL averages 7.2+ yards per attempt (CL's own median) (.833)

• CL's offense has averaged 211.4 rush yards per game over their last 5 games. Their 13-game average is 173.9 rush yards per game. (+22%)

• CL rushes for 141.0+ yards (CL's own median) (.714)

MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 3)

CL -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(top 5 of 10 scored; vs 328 cached team(s))

#SIDECONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRKSCORE
1OFFTurnovers < 36-2.75031.4W50.853
2DEFYPP < 76-2.75020.1W40.785
3OFFRush Yds 100+7-3.70030.5W50.667
4DEFTurnovers < 36-3.66726.6W40.550
5OFFTurnovers 1+4-4.50032.2W30.455
WIN %: TWO-CONDITION COMBINATIONS (7 found, min 4 Gms each)

(of 15 combinations tried per team -- a combination is only shown when at least 4 real games on file satisfy both conditions at once)

--- CL ---

CONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRK
CL rushes for 100+ yards and is held under 200 passing yards5-2.71427.1W3
CL holds its opponents under 5.0 yards per carry and under 150 rushing yards5-1.83318.8W5
CL averages 5.0+ yards per carry on its way to 150+ rushing yards3-2.60036.6W3
CL averages 6.0+ yards per play behind 150+ rushing yards3-1.75042.2W3
CL holds its opponents under 150 rushing yards and under 200 passing yards3-1.75016.0W3
CL holds its opponents under 8.0 yards per attempt and under 5.0 yards per carry3-1.75020.0W1
CL holds its opponents under 6.0 yards per play and under 100 rushing yards4-0.99918.8W4
WIN % -- TAB-SEPARATED
TeamConditionRecordWin%PPG
CLRush Yds 100+ & Pass Yds < 2005-2.71427.1
CLYPC < 5.0 & Rush Yds < 1505-1.83318.8
CLYPC 5.0+ & Rush Yds 150+3-2.60036.6
CLYPP 6.0+ & Rush Yds 150+3-1.75042.2
CLRush Yds < 150 & Pass Yds < 2003-1.75016.0
CLYPA < 8.0 & YPC < 5.03-1.75020.0
CLYPP < 6.0 & Rush Yds < 1004-0.99918.8
CL — OFFENSE — 2024-26 (30 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+3-01.00034.3W3
YPA < 8.04-4.50027.0W3 19 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+2-1.66738.3W2
Pass Yds < 2005-5.50023.4W3 17 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+7-3.70030.5W5
Rush Yds < 1000-3.00014.7L3 17 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+3-2.60036.6W3
Rush Yds < 1504-4.50020.8W2 17 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+4-3.57134.9W4
YPC < 5.03-1.75018.8W1 19 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+3-1.75042.2W3
YPP < 6.04-3.57121.4W2 19 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+3-1.75042.2W3
YPP < 7.04-3.57121.4W2 19 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+4-4.50032.2W3
Turnovers < 12-01.00020.0W2 20 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 2+1-2.33330.3L1 20 games without this stat on file
Turnovers > 20-2.00023.5L2 20 games without this stat on file
CL — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2024-26 (30 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Scores <100-1.0008.0
Scores 10-191-7.12514.9
Scores 20-293-4.42923.7
Scores 30-397-2.77835.3
Scores 40+5-01.00047.8
CL — OFFENSE — 2026 (8 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+2-01.00041.0W2
YPA < 8.04-2.66728.2W3
Pass Yds 200+2-01.00041.0W2
Pass Yds < 2004-2.66728.2W3
Rush Yds 100+6-1.85733.9W5
Rush Yds < 1000-1.00014.0L1
Rush Yds 150+3-01.00045.3W3
Rush Yds < 1503-2.60023.0W2
YPC 5.0+4-1.80039.4W4
YPC < 5.02-1.66718.0W1
YPP 6.0+3-01.00045.3W3
YPP < 6.03-2.60023.0W2
YPP 7.0+3-01.00045.3W3
YPP < 7.03-2.60023.0W2
Turnovers 1+4-2.66735.2W3
Turnovers < 12-01.00020.0W2
Turnovers 2+1-1.50029.0L1
Turnovers > 20-1.00014.0L1
CL — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2026 (8 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Scores <10------
Scores 10-191-1.50016.5
Scores 20-291-1.50025.0
Scores 30-392-01.00035.0
Scores 40+2-01.00049.0
CL — DEFENSE — 2024-26 (30 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+2-2.50027.8W2
YPA < 8.04-2.66722.8W2 20 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+2-01.00024.5W2
Pass Yds < 2004-4.50024.9W2 20 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+1-4.20031.2W1
Rush Yds < 1005-01.00018.4W5 20 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+1-3.25033.8W1
Rush Yds < 1505-1.83318.8W5 20 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+1-2.33333.0W1
YPC < 5.05-2.71421.3W3 20 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+1-3.25031.2W1
YPP < 6.05-1.83320.5W3 20 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+0-2.00043.5L2
YPP < 7.06-2.75020.1W4 20 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+5-3.62528.1W4
Turnovers < 11-01.00014.0W1 21 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 2+4-1.80022.6W4 21 games without this stat on file
Turnovers > 2-------- 21 games without this stat on file
CL — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2024-26 (30 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Allows <103-01.0000.0
Allows 10-197-01.00014.9
Allows 20-294-3.57122.3
Allows 30-392-3.40032.6
Allows 40+0-8.00046.2
CL — DEFENSE — 2026 (8 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+2-1.66730.0W2
YPA < 8.03-1.75020.0W2 1 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+2-01.00024.5W2
Pass Yds < 2003-2.60024.2W2 1 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+1-2.33330.0W1
Rush Yds < 1004-01.00020.0W4 1 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+1-2.33330.0W1
Rush Yds < 1504-01.00020.0W4 1 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+1-1.50027.0W1
YPC < 5.04-1.80023.2W3 1 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+1-1.50029.5W1
YPP < 6.04-1.80022.2W3 1 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+0-1.00042.0L1
YPP < 7.05-1.83321.3W4 1 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+5-2.71425.7W4
Turnovers < 11-01.00014.0W1
Turnovers 2+4-1.80022.6W4
Turnovers > 2--------
CL — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2026 (8 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Allows <10------
Allows 10-194-01.00015.2
Allows 20-291-01.00024.0
Allows 30-391-1.50033.5
Allows 40+0-1.00042.0
ON THE BRINK

CYPRESS LAKES

• CYPRESS LAKES has won 4 straight (10/2/26–10/22/26). It has not reached 5 straight in the last 4 years of games on file (2023-present).

• CYPRESS LAKES has scored 30+ in 2 straight games (10/16/26–10/22/26). It has not reached 3 straight in the last 4 years of games on file (2023-present).

TAB-SEPARATED (paste into a spreadsheet)
TeamSideSplitGamesRecordWin%PPGStrk
CLOFFENSEYPA 8.0+33-01.00034.3W3
CLOFFENSEYPA < 8.084-4.50027.0W3
CLOFFENSEPass Yds 200+32-1.66738.3W2
CLOFFENSEPass Yds < 200105-5.50023.4W3
CLOFFENSERush Yds 100+107-3.70030.5W5
CLOFFENSERush Yds < 10030-3.00014.7L3
CLOFFENSERush Yds 150+53-2.60036.6W3
CLOFFENSERush Yds < 15084-4.50020.8W2
CLOFFENSEYPC 5.0+74-3.57134.9W4
CLOFFENSEYPC < 5.043-1.75018.8W1
CLOFFENSEYPP 6.0+43-1.75042.2W3
CLOFFENSEYPP < 6.074-3.57121.4W2
CLOFFENSEYPP 7.0+43-1.75042.2W3
CLOFFENSEYPP < 7.074-3.57121.4W2
CLOFFENSETurnovers 1+84-4.50032.2W3
CLOFFENSETurnovers < 122-01.00020.0W2
CLOFFENSETurnovers 2+31-2.33330.3L1
CLOFFENSETurnovers > 220-2.00023.5L2
CLOFFENSEScores <1010-1.0008.0L1
CLOFFENSEScores 10-1981-7.12514.9L1
CLOFFENSEScores 20-2973-4.42923.7W1
CLOFFENSEScores 30-3997-2.77835.3W6
CLOFFENSEScores 40+55-01.00047.8W5
CLDEFENSEYPA 8.0+42-2.50027.8W2
CLDEFENSEYPA < 8.064-2.66722.8W2
CLDEFENSEPass Yds 200+22-01.00024.5W2
CLDEFENSEPass Yds < 20084-4.50024.9W2
CLDEFENSERush Yds 100+51-4.20031.2W1
CLDEFENSERush Yds < 10055-01.00018.4W5
CLDEFENSERush Yds 150+41-3.25033.8W1
CLDEFENSERush Yds < 15065-1.83318.8W5
CLDEFENSEYPC 5.0+31-2.33333.0W1
CLDEFENSEYPC < 5.075-2.71421.3W3
CLDEFENSEYPP 6.0+41-3.25031.2W1
CLDEFENSEYPP < 6.065-1.83320.5W3
CLDEFENSEYPP 7.0+20-2.00043.5L2
CLDEFENSEYPP < 7.086-2.75020.1W4
CLDEFENSETurnovers 1+85-3.62528.1W4
CLDEFENSETurnovers < 111-01.00014.0W1
CLDEFENSETurnovers 2+54-1.80022.6W4
CLDEFENSEAllows <1033-01.0000.0W3
CLDEFENSEAllows 10-1977-01.00014.9W7
CLDEFENSEAllows 20-2974-3.57122.3W2
CLDEFENSEAllows 30-3952-3.40032.6W1
CLDEFENSEAllows 40+80-8.00046.2L8
STREAKS: CL (combined OFFENSE+DEFENSE)
SIDESPLITSTREAKDATESRECORD
DEFENSETurnovers 1+7 games09/03/2026 - 10/22/20265-2
DEFENSEYPP < 7.05 games09/18/2026 - 10/22/20264-1
OFFENSERush Yds 100+4 games10/02/2026 - 10/22/20264-0
DEFENSEYPP < 6.03 games10/10/2026 - 10/22/20263-0
STREAKS — ALL TEAMS
TeamSideSplitStreakDatesRecord
CLDEFENSETurnovers 1+7 games09/03/2026 - 10/22/20265-2
CLDEFENSEYPP < 7.05 games09/18/2026 - 10/22/20264-1
CLOFFENSERush Yds 100+4 games10/02/2026 - 10/22/20264-0
CLDEFENSEYPP < 6.03 games10/10/2026 - 10/22/20263-0
NOTABLE TRENDS (6 of 6 found, team |deviation| >= 20%, matchup |deviation| >= 20%)

CL OFFENSE

CL's offense has averaged 0.7 giveaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 1.4 giveaways per game. (-52%)

CL's offense has averaged 211.4 rush yards per game over their last 5 games. Their 13-game average is 173.9 rush yards per game. (+22%)

CL DEFENSE

CL's defense has averaged 67.7 rush yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 127.5 rush yards per game. (-47%)

CL's defense has averaged 215.3 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 168.4 pass yards per game. (+28%)

CL's defense has averaged 20.3 points allowed per game over their last 3 games. Their 30-game average is 26.4 points allowed per game. (-23%)

CL's defense has averaged 3.0 YPC over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 3.9 YPC. (-23%)

(moved to the Appendix, Data Export 1, to keep this section shorter -- the full spreadsheet-paste table is there unchanged)

APPENDIX

Full-length explanations and full-size data exports for the shortened notes and relocated tables referenced throughout this report, numbered in the order their pointers appear above.

Explanatory Notes

Note 1 -- SEASON OUTLOOK

Every remaining game is projected from schedule-adjusted ratings; already-played games carry their real result. Records are simulated distributions, not a single guess -- MOST LIKELY FINAL is the single most probable record and its own probability, PROJECTED RECORD is the season's expected win total expressed in record form (an average across every simulated outcome, so it can land on a fraction of a game).

Note 2 -- OPPONENT TRACKER -- why some cards have no record shown

Only meaningful for an opponent who is ALSO a tracked team in the library -- an opponent with no games on file here at all shows the date and site alone.

Note 3 -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS -- how a number is scored

Every split this report computes is scored on four weighted criteria and the top 5 per team are listed. In Cooper's own weighting order: (1) the WIN% attached to the condition, counted only when the condition has occurred at least 8 times -- a smaller sample is dropped outright, not discounted; (2) the PPG attached to it, with higher better on offense and lower better on defense, and each side normalized against its own kind so a defensive number competes with defensive numbers rather than against scoring averages; (3) how far the number sits from the OPPONENT's on the same condition, across win%, PPG and how often the condition happens at all; and (4) where it falls among every other team previously run through this workbook and cached. Criteria 1 and 2 measure how strong a number is; 3 and 4 measure how much it distinguishes this team. Weights: win_pct 40%, ppg 27%, matchup 20%, pool 13%. See important_numbers.py.

Full Data Exports

Data Export 1 -- TRENDS — TAB-SEPARATED (10 columns)

TeamSideTypeStatOpponentWindow/MeetingsValueBaselineGamesBaselineAvgDeviation
CLDEFENSEteamPass Yardslast 3215.310168.4+27.9%
CLDEFENSEteamPointslast 320.33026.4-23.1%
CLDEFENSEteamRush Yardslast 367.710127.5-46.9%
CLOFFENSEteamRush Yardslast 5211.413173.9+21.5%
CLOFFENSEteamTurnoverslast 30.7101.4-52.4%
CLDEFENSEteamYPClast 33.0103.9-22.7%
Report Produced by ScorePirate | Commitment and offer data sourced from 247Sports | GENERATED 10/27/2026 22:10