ScorePirate
MENU
AT A GLANCE

In short: Cherokee Trail (5-6) at Grandview (8-3), October 15, 2026 (high school football). Final: Grandview 31, Cherokee Trail 7. The full report has the projection, unit grades, storylines, pregame notes, Big Game Watch, series history, season stats and both rosters.

SCOREPIRATE MATCHUP REPORT ·
CHEROKEE TRAIL (AWAY) AT GRANDVIEW (HOME)
CHEROKEE TRAIL 16.6  —  29.1 GRANDVIEW
GRANDVIEW 73.1% FAVORITES

Share this matchup Preview image Stats card (JPG)Instagram story
UNIT INDEX — GRADE (YDS VS AVG)
TEAMPASS ORUSH OPASS DRUSH D
CHEROKEE TRAIL87.0 (+86.8)41.4 (-29.7)39.1 (+11.3)67.2 (-36.8)
GRANDVIEW56.6 (-0.8)54.2 (-1.4)90.1 (-73.5)83.7 (-77.4)
CHEROKEE TRAIL AT GRANDVIEW
ADVANCED STATS PREVIEW · 2026 SEASON
RANKS VS CIF Southern Section · 432 teams DOWNLOAD CARD AS PDFDOWNLOAD AS JPEG
WIN PROB
26.9%
PROJ PTS
16.6
·
SP STRENGTH INDEX··
UNIT INDEX··
OFF··
DEF··
POINTS / GAME··
OFF··
DEF··
YARDS / GAME··
PASS··
RUSH··
YARDS ALLOWED / G··
PASS··
RUSH··
YARDS / PLAY··
OFF··
DEF··
TURNOVER MARGIN··
TAKEAWAYS··
GIVEAWAYS··
SACKS / GAME··
DEF MADE··
OFF ALLOWED··
PLAY CALLS (OFF)·
RUSH·
PLAYS FACED (DEF)·
RUSH·
CT OFF VS GRAN DEF
··RUSH YDS / G··
··YDS / CARRY··
··PASS YDS / G··
··YDS / ATTEMPT··
··POINTS / G··
··RUSH O / RUSH D INDEX··
··PASS O / PASS D INDEX··
··TURNOVERS LOST / FORCED··
··SACKS ALLOWED / MADE··
GRAN OFF VS CT DEF
··RUSH YDS / G··
··YDS / CARRY··
··PASS YDS / G··
··YDS / ATTEMPT··
··POINTS / G··
··RUSH O / RUSH D INDEX··
··PASS O / PASS D INDEX··
··TURNOVERS LOST / FORCED··
··SACKS ALLOWED / MADE··
WIN PROB
73.1%
PROJ PTS
29.1
·
··SP STRENGTH INDEX
··UNIT INDEX
··OFF
··DEF
··POINTS / GAME
··OFF
··DEF
··YARDS / GAME
··PASS
··RUSH
··YARDS ALLOWED / G
··PASS
··RUSH
··YARDS / PLAY
··OFF
··DEF
··TURNOVER MARGIN
··TAKEAWAYS
··GIVEAWAYS
··SACKS / GAME
··DEF MADE
··OFF ALLOWED
·PLAY CALLS (OFF)
·RUSH
·PLAYS FACED (DEF)
·RUSH

Rank chips: 1 = best in the pool; blue strong, red weak. Yardage and efficiency use games with a full box score on file; points and turnovers use every played game. Unit Index = opponent-adjusted 0-100 league percentile.

PROJECTION COMPONENTS
COMPONENTPOINTSWEIGHTCONTRIBUTION
Common Opponents-7.7632%-2.46
Strength-13.0720%-2.58
Efficiency+0.7318%+0.13
Own Margin-8.2216%-1.32
Head To Head-22.4214%-3.15
Garbage Time Margin--0%+0.00
EPA Efficiency--0%+0.00
What if he’s out?

Mark players out to re-project this game. Each value is how much of the margin that player is worth, from this season's data (his share of his team's win shares). Estimates — your selections change only your view.

PROJECTED TEAM YARDAGE
CATEGORYTEAMPROJECTED
PassingCHEROKEE TRAIL98.4
PassingGRANDVIEW183.1
RushingCHEROKEE TRAIL77.9
RushingGRANDVIEW138.3
TotalCHEROKEE TRAIL176.3
TotalGRANDVIEW321.4
PROJECTED BOX SCORE
CHEROKEE TRAIL — PASSING
PLAYERC/ATTCOMP %YDSYPATDINTQBR
BRYSON PETERSON15.8/27.058.6%98.43.60.90.695.4
CHEROKEE TRAIL — RUSHING
PLAYERCARYDSYPCTD
BRYSON PETERSON9.937.13.70.6
OWEN NEWELL9.026.93.00.3
DORIAN HARRIS6.813.92.00.1
TOTALS25.777.93.01.1
CHEROKEE TRAIL — RECEIVING
PLAYERRECYDSYPCTD
EVAN SMITH2.238.517.30.4
RJ STANLEY2.032.316.20.2
JORDAN MITCHELL1.527.618.00.3
TOTALS5.898.417.11.0
GRANDVIEW — PASSING
PLAYERC/ATTCOMP %YDSYPATDINTQBR
LANDER WISE7.6/13.855.0%115.58.41.10.2148.5
BLITZ MCCARTY4.6/10.245.5%67.56.60.90.1129.1
TOTALS12.2/24.051.0%183.17.62.00.3140.2
GRANDVIEW — RUSHING
PLAYERCARYDSYPCTD
CHRIS BLANKS16.276.84.70.8
NEELEIN SHEAD JR.6.533.05.10.1
LANDER WISE6.028.54.80.3
TOTALS28.7138.34.81.2
GRANDVIEW — RECEIVING
PLAYERRECYDSYPCTD
TIMOTHY ARNOLD III4.255.813.30.6
BLAKE RICHMEIER3.150.016.20.8
JAXSON FLORES2.739.114.70.9
MATTHEW SCHIMBERG4.638.28.20.0
TOTALS14.6183.112.52.3
PREGAME NOTES

The first meeting between these two hinged on a single stat: Cherokee Trail's pass defense. The Cougar allowed 12.2 yards per pass attempt (208 yards on 17 attempts) against Grandview on 10/15, well above their 6.2 mark in every other game this season. Cherokee Trail lost the game 31-7. A pass defense number closer to Cherokee Trail's norm would go a long way toward flipping the result this time.

The first meeting between these two hinged on a single stat: Grandview's passing. The Wolves averaged 12.2 yards per pass attempt (208 yards on 17 attempts) against Cherokee Trail on 10/15, well above their 6.2 mark in every other game this season. Grandview won the game 31-7. Repeating that kind of passing edge would put Grandview in a strong position to do it again.

Grandview allowed 3.2 yards per carry (513 yards on 160 rushes) over its first 5 games (4-1), #6 in section during that period. Few teams started faster in this department, and few have cooled off as sharply since. In the 6 games since that hot start (4-2), the Wolves have allowed 5.4 yards per carry (895 yards on 167 rushes), a 67% rise, #35 in section during that stretch. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 5.3 yards per carry on the season. On the season, Grandview ranks #20 in section in run defense. Cherokee Trail's ground game sits in the middle of the pack, #43 in section (5.1 yards per carry).

Something changed for Grandview's defense after the first 6 games of the season. The Wolves allowed 9.5 points per game over their first 6 games (5-1), #3 in section over that period. Over the stretch of 5 games that followed (3-2), Grandview has allowed 15.6 points per game, a 64% rise, #18 in section over that timeframe. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 26.5 points per game on the season. Measured against those opponents' norms (26.6 points per game), Grandview held those offenses 41% below what they usually score. By that measure, the early pace looks more like the outlier than the recent one. On the season, the Wolves rank #9 in section in scoring defense. Cherokee Trail's offense sits in the middle of the pack, #28 in section (28.5 points per game).

One of Grandview's shakiest areas lately has been its defense. Grandview forced 1.7 takeaways per game over its first 7 games (6-1), #22 in section over that span. Over the stretch of 4 games that followed (2-2), the Wolves have forced 0.5 takeaways per game, a 71% drop, #62 in section in that timeframe. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Grandview's last 4 opponents have averaged 1.0 per game, a #18 offense in section on the season, against 1.5 per game, #38 for the first 7. Measured against those opponents' norms (1.0 per game), Grandview forced 51% fewer turnovers than those offenses usually give up. Overall, those opponents have been strong teams: their average SP Strength Index rating would rank #15 in section. On the season, Grandview ranks #48 in section in takeaways. It won't get any easier against Cherokee Trail, whose ball security ranks #17 in section (1.0 per game).

Cherokee Trail's offense has gone quiet as the season has progressed. Cherokee Trail averaged 36.6 points per game over its first 7 games (4-3), #17 in section in that window. Over the stretch of 4 games that followed (1-3), the Cougar have averaged 14.2 points per game, a 61% drop, #58 in section during that time. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Cherokee Trail's last 4 opponents have averaged 23.8 points per game, a #36 scoring defense in section on the season, against 27.3 points per game, #44 for the first 7. Measured against those opponents' norms (23.8 points per game), Cherokee Trail scored 40% less than those defenses usually allow. Cherokee Trail was held to 14 points or fewer 2 times in those games, including 7 against ScorePirate CO section #6 Grandview on 10/15. On the season, Cherokee Trail ranks #28 in section in scoring. It won't get any easier against Grandview, whose defense ranks #9 in section (12.3 points per game).

BIG GAME WATCH

Players positioned for an outsized game because of this opponent: a player's share of his team's win shares, weighted by the tendencies of the team across from him. Only matchup-driven picks are shown.

Cherokee Trail

Nothing about this opponent moves one player ahead of the rest.

Grandview

Malcolm SmithDL7 sacks and 10 TFLCherokee Trail throws on 54% of its snaps, #10 of 69 in section; more dropbacks mean more chances to get home
Taitum Lucus ThompsonDB2 INT, 22 tacklesCherokee Trail throws on 54% of its snaps, #10 of 69 in section; more throws mean more balls to go get
MILESTONE WATCH

Cherokee Trail

  • Bryson Peterson needs 2 touchdown passes for 10 (averaging 2.7 a game)
STORYLINES

If there's one number to watch in this matchup, it's Cherokee Trail's scoring defense. Cherokee Trail allowed 10.0 points per game over its first 3 games (3-0), #10 in section in that timeframe. In the 8 games since that hot start (2-6), the Cougar have allowed 29.8 points per game, a 198% rise, #43 in section in that window. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Cherokee Trail's last 8 opponents have averaged 25.3 points per game, a #35 offense in section on the season, against 12.4 points per game, #66 for the first 3. Measured against those opponents' norms (25.3 points per game), Cherokee Trail allowed 17% more than those offenses usually score. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 8 opponents average a rating that would rank #22 in section, well above the first 3 (#54), so the dip has come against better teams overall. Meanwhile, Grandview's offense has struggled in recent weeks. The Wolves have averaged 19.6 points per game over their last 8 games (5-3), #51 in section during that time. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of scoring defenses in section (21.2 points per game on the season, which would rank #31). Against those norms, Grandview scored 7% less than those defenses usually allow. Both units come in looking to get right, and whichever does first may decide the game. Cherokee Trail is 4-0 this season when it holds opponents under 25, and 1-6 when it doesn't.

The battle on the ground has the potential to swing this matchup, with the recent returns favoring Grandview. Cherokee Trail allowed 2.2 yards per carry (209 yards on 95 rushes) over its first 4 games (3-1), #2 in section through those games. In the 7 games since that hot start (2-5), the Cougar have allowed 5.3 yards per carry (1,396 yards on 262 rushes), a 142% rise, #36 in section through that stretch. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Cherokee Trail's last 7 opponents have averaged 5.8 yards per carry, a #29 rushing attack in section on the season, against 3.5 yards per carry, #63 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (5.8 yards per carry), Cherokee Trail held those rushing attacks 9% below their usual yards per carry. By that measure, the early pace looks more like the outlier than the recent one. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 7 opponents average a rating that would rank #22 in section, well above the first 4 (#44), so the dip has come against better teams overall. Meanwhile, Grandview's ground game has been middle of the pack in recent weeks. The Wolves have averaged 4.7 yards per carry (1,097 yards on 232 rushes) over their last 7 games (4-3), #45 in section over that stretch. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of run defenses in section (4.7 yards per carry on the season, which would rank #25). Grandview offers Cherokee Trail a fair measuring stick for whether the trend is real.

The Cherokee Trail ball security of late is barely reminiscent of the one that began the season. Cherokee Trail committed 1.6 giveaways per game over its first 5 games (3-2), #36 in section within that period. In the 6 games since that slow start (2-4), the Cougar have committed 0.5 giveaways per game, a 69% drop, #5 in section across those games. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 1.2 per game on the season. Measured against those opponents' norms (1.3 per game), Cherokee Trail turned it over 61% less than those defenses usually force. Meanwhile, Grandview's defense has struggled in recent weeks. The Wolves have forced 0.8 takeaways per game over their last 6 games (4-2), #54 in section during those games. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of offenses in section (1.1 per game on the season, which would rank #25). Against those norms, Grandview forced 26% fewer turnovers than those offenses usually give up. On paper, that is a matchup that favors Cherokee Trail.

SERIES HISTORY — CT vs GRA
Prep this game in Stat BoothCHEROKEE TRAIL team sheetGRANDVIEW team sheet
TIDBITS (8 found)

• Club The last time Grandview went a game allowing 7.0+ yards per play was October 4, 2024 against Arapahoe (L, 13-25). Since then Grandview has gone 29 straight games holding the opponent under 7.0 yards per play, a school-record 29 straight in the 5 seasons on record.

• Club Grandview has gone 11 straight games committing fewer than 3 turnovers (August 21, 2026 through November 12, 2026), going 8-3 over that stretch, a school-record 11 straight in the 5 seasons on record.

• Player Malcolm Smith has 6 sacks over his last 3 games (2.0 a game, August 28, 2026 through September 18, 2026) -- his most in a 3-game stretch on record.

• Club Cherokee Trail has lost 2 straight, and a loss would make it 3 in a row. The last time they lost 3 or more in a row was 2022, a run of 4.

• Player Malcolm Smith has gone 3 straight games recording two or more tackles for loss, the longest such streak of his career.

• Player Quentin Dorsey has gone 2 straight games making 10 or more tackles, the longest such streak of his career.

• Club Cherokee Trail is 5-6 entering play against Grandview, its first 5-6 start through 11 games in the 5 seasons on record.

• Series Grandview leads the all-time series with Cherokee Trail 2-1, across 3 meetings dating to 2024.

CT — STAT LEADERS
FULL ROSTER ↓
OFFENSE
PASSING LEADER
769PASS YDS
C-ATT46-66
COMP%69.7%
YPA11.7
TD8
INT3
QBR198.5
RUSHING LEADER
240RUSH YDS
CAR32
YPC7.5
RUSH TD3
REC1
REC YDS3
YPR3.0
REC TD0
RUSHING LEADER
147RUSH YDS
CAR32
YPC4.6
RUSH TD1
REC0
REC YDS0
YPR--
REC TD0
RECEIVING LEADER
228REC YDS
REC9
YPR25.3
REC TD2
RECEIVING LEADER
219REC YDS
REC13
YPR16.8
REC TD2
DEFENSE
TACKLES LEADER
12TCKL
TFL0
SACKS0
INT0
PD2
FF1
TACKLES LEADER
12TCKL
TFL0
SACKS0
INT0
PD1
FF0
TACKLES LEADER
10TCKL
TFL2
SACKS0
INT1
PD0
FF0
TFL LEADER
1.5TFL
TCKL7
SACKS2
INT0
PD0
FF0
TFL LEADER
1.5TFL
TCKL3
SACKS2
INT0
PD0
FF0
SACKS LEADER
1SACKS
TCKL1
TFL1
INT0
PD0
FF0
INTERCEPTIONS LEADER
1INT
TCKL2
TFL0
SACKS0
PD0
FF0
GRA — STAT LEADERS
OFFENSE
PASSING LEADER
539PASS YDS
C-ATT43-79
COMP%54.4%
YPA6.8
TD5
INT1
QBR130.1
RUSHING LEADER
233RUSH YDS
CAR39
YPC6.0
RUSH TD1
REC4
REC YDS44
YPR11.0
REC TD0
RUSHING LEADER
142RUSH YDS
CAR30
YPC4.7
RUSH TD3
REC1
REC YDS0
YPR0.0
REC TD0
RECEIVING LEADER
194REC YDS
REC12
YPR16.2
REC TD3
RECEIVING LEADER
121REC YDS
REC9
YPR13.4
REC TD1
DEFENSE
TACKLES LEADER
33TCKL
TFL3
SACKS0
INT0
PD2
FF0
TACKLES LEADER
32TCKL
TFL5
SACKS2
INT0
PD0
FF0
TACKLES LEADER
25TCKL
TFL2
SACKS1
INT0
PD3
FF0
TFL LEADER
10TFL
TCKL20
SACKS7
INT0
PD0
FF0
TFL LEADER
7TFL
TCKL16
SACKS1
INT1
PD1
FF0
SACKS LEADER
2SACKS
TCKL11
TFL4
INT0
PD0
FF0
SACKS LEADER
2SACKS
TCKL7
TFL2
INT0
PD0
FF0
INTERCEPTIONS LEADER
2INT
TCKL22
TFL4
SACKS0
PD1
FF0
CHEROKEE TRAIL — 2026 SEASON SCHEDULE
DATEOPPONENTSITERESULTSCOREWIN%
08/28ARVADA WESTatW45-15
09/03VS. SMOKY HILLvsW56-8
09/10ROCKY MOUNTAINatW31-7
09/17EAGLECRESTatL27-29
09/24CHERRY CREEKvsL21-37
10/02MULLENvsW35-28
10/09ARAPAHOEatL41-43
10/15GRANDVIEWatL7-31
10/23NORTHFIELDvsW13-10
10/29CASTLE VIEWvsL16-32
11/06HERITAGEvsL21-28
SEASON RESULT5-6MADE PLAYOFFS

1 game(s) beyond a normal 10-game regular season are on file, confirming a postseason appearance -- but this library has no playoff-round/bracket source yet, so the exact round reached or final result is not available.

GRANDVIEW — 2026 SEASON SCHEDULE
DATEOPPONENTSITERESULTSCOREWIN%
08/21@ RIVERDALE RIDGEatW36-0
08/28LEGENDatW28-24
09/04FOUNTAIN-FORT CARSONvsW45-17
09/18ARAPAHOEatW26-0
09/25NORTHFIELDvsL6-10
10/01EAGLECRESTatW14-6
10/09MULLENatW40-17
10/15CHEROKEE TRAILvsW31-7
10/22REGIS JESUITvsL21-24
10/30CHERRY CREEKvsL0-17
11/12REGIS JESUITvsW19-13
SEASON RESULT8-3MADE PLAYOFFS

1 game(s) beyond a normal 10-game regular season are on file, confirming a postseason appearance -- but this library has no playoff-round/bracket source yet, so the exact round reached or final result is not available.

COLLEGE BOUND

CT (1)

PLAYERPOSCLASSCOMMITTED TORATING
#1 CRISTIAN MBAMARAHCBSr.Northwestern3-star

Commitments per 247Sports, limited to players on each team's current roster.

TALKING POINTS (14 storylines)
CT IS LIKELIEST TO BEAT GRA IF...

• CT averages 7.0+ yards per play (.800)

• CT forces 1+ takeaways (.625), but most recently lost to Heritage when doing so

• CT holds GRA under 8.0 yards per attempt (.625), but most recently lost to Heritage when doing so

GRA IS LIKELIEST TO BEAT CT IF...

• GRA rushes for 100+ yards (.875)

• GRA averages 6.0+ yards per play (.999), and has won 5 straight when doing so

• GRA commits zero giveaways (.999), and has won 5 straight when doing so

• GRA's defense has limited opponents to under 6.0 YPP in 11 straight games (08/21/2026-11/12/2026), going 8-3 over that stretch.

• GRA's defense has limited opponents to under 7.0 YPP in 11 straight games (08/21/2026-11/12/2026), going 8-3 over that stretch.

• GRA's defense has averaged 0.3 takeaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 1.3 takeaways per game. (-74%)

• CT's defense has conceded 100+ rush yds in 7 straight games (09/24/2026-11/06/2026), going 2-5 over that stretch.

• CT's offense has averaged 0.3 giveaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 1.0 giveaways per game. (-67%)

• GRA's defense has limited opponents to under 8.0 YPA in 6 straight games (10/01/2026-11/12/2026), going 4-2 over that stretch.

• CT's defense has averaged 228.8 rush yards per game over their last 5 games. Their 11-game average is 145.9 rush yards per game. (+57%)

• CT's defense has averaged 73.0 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 157.7 pass yards per game. (-54%)

• CT's offense has failed to reach 8.0 YPA in 5 straight games (10/09/2026-11/06/2026), going 1-4 over that stretch.

MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 2)

CT -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(top 5 of 8 scored; vs 3107 cached team(s))

#SIDECONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRKSCORE
1DEFTurnovers 1+5-3.62519.6L20.789
2DEFYPA < 85-3.62521.4L20.782
3DEFYPP < 75-4.55622.2L20.649
4DEFYPP < 65-4.55622.2L20.609
5OFFTurnovers < 35-5.50028.6L20.548

GRA -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(top 5 of 15 scored; vs 3107 cached team(s))

#SIDECONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRKSCORE
1OFFRush Yds 100+7-1.87530.8W10.874
2DEFYPA < 87-2.77812.0W10.636
3DEFPass Yds < 2007-3.70011.8W10.579
4OFFTurnovers < 27-2.77825.1W10.542
5DEFYPP < 78-3.72712.3W10.533
OPPONENT STRENGTH (best-effort)

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 3)

CT: 1 of 11 game(s) came against a tracked opponent; that opponent's own win% averaged .727 across those game(s).

GRA: 1 of 11 game(s) came against a tracked opponent; that opponent's own win% averaged .455 across those game(s).

WIN %: TWO-CONDITION COMBINATIONS (14 found, min 4 Gms each)

(of 15 combinations tried per team -- a combination is only shown when at least 4 real games on file satisfy both conditions at once)

--- CT ---

CONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRK
CT holds its opponents under 6.0 yards per play while forcing 2+ takeaways4-3.57118.4L2
CT holds its opponents under 5.0 yards per carry and under 150 rushing yards4-2.66719.8L1
CT averages 8.0+ yards per attempt while throwing for 200+ yards3-2.60031.8W1
CT holds its opponents under 8.0 yards per attempt and under 5.0 yards per carry4-1.80018.0L1
CT holds its opponents under 150 rushing yards while forcing 2+ takeaways3-2.60018.2L2
CT throws for 200+ yards despite being held under 100 rushing yards1-3.25029.5L2
CT averages 5.0+ yards per carry on its way to 150+ rushing yards2-2.50033.8L2
CT holds its opponents under 150 rushing yards and under 200 passing yards3-1.75020.8L1
CT holds its opponents under 6.0 yards per play and under 100 rushing yards3-1.75014.8L1

--- GRA ---

CONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRK
GRA rushes for 100+ yards and is held under 200 passing yards5-1.83331.2W1
GRA holds its opponents under 8.0 yards per attempt and under 5.0 yards per carry5-1.83313.0W1
GRA holds its opponents under 5.0 yards per carry and under 150 rushing yards5-1.83310.7W2
GRA holds its opponents under 150 rushing yards and under 200 passing yards4-1.8009.4W1
GRA averages 5.0+ yards per carry on its way to 150+ rushing yards4-0.99929.0W4
WIN % -- TAB-SEPARATED
TeamConditionRecordWin%PPG
CTYPP < 6.0 & Turnovers 2+4-3.57118.4
CTYPC < 5.0 & Rush Yds < 1504-2.66719.8
CTYPA 8.0+ & Pass Yds 200+3-2.60031.8
CTYPA < 8.0 & YPC < 5.04-1.80018.0
CTRush Yds < 150 & Turnovers 2+3-2.60018.2
CTPass Yds 200+ & Rush Yds < 1001-3.25029.5
CTYPC 5.0+ & Rush Yds 150+2-2.50033.8
CTRush Yds < 150 & Pass Yds < 2003-1.75020.8
CTYPP < 6.0 & Rush Yds < 1003-1.75014.8
GRARush Yds 100+ & Pass Yds < 2005-1.83331.2
GRAYPA < 8.0 & YPC < 5.05-1.83313.0
GRAYPC < 5.0 & Rush Yds < 1505-1.83310.7
GRARush Yds < 150 & Pass Yds < 2004-1.8009.4
GRAYPC 5.0+ & Rush Yds 150+4-0.99929.0
PREGAME NOTES

The next meeting brings together Cherokee Trail (5-6 this season) and Grandview (8-3). The SP Strength Index has Cherokee Trail at #29 and Grandview at #6 of 69 in the CO section. Grandview leads the recent series 1-0 over the last 1 meetings. In the most recent meeting, on October 15, 2026, Grandview pulled away 31-7.

Having dropped 5 of its last 7 entering play, Cherokee Trail's ball security has been the team's calling card (committed no more than one giveaway in 7 straight games, 2-5 in that stretch). Last time out, though, the Cougar fell to Heritage 28-21. In the process of winning 4 of its last 7 entering play, Grandview's pass defense has been the team's calling card (held its opponents under 200 passing yards in 9 of its last 10, 7-3 in that stretch). That carried into last time out, the Wolves handling Regis Jesuit 19-13.

The matchup within the matchup pairs Cherokee Trail's ball security with Grandview's takeaway production. Cherokee Trail has turned the ball over only 4 times in the Cougar's last 7 games, never committing more than one giveaway in a game — the Cougar have gone 2-5 in that stretch. The matchup when the two meet lines up in Cherokee Trail's favor. Grandview has managed just 4 takeaways in the Wolves' last 5 games — the Wolves have gone 3-2 in that stretch.

STORYLINES

WEAKNESS VS. STRENGTH — Cherokee Trail has an uncomfortable assignment when the two meet. Cherokee Trail's rush defense has been a real vulnerability over the Cougar's last 5 games. The defense has conceded 100+ rushing yards in 5 straight games, averaging 228.8 rushing yards allowed per game (including a high of 301 in that span vs. Heritage). That is 143% above the Cougar's baseline of 94.0 yards per game over the 9 games prior — a dramatic jump; the Cougar have gone 1-4 in that stretch. Across the line, Grandview's rushing offense has been playing at a high level over the Wolves' last 5 games. The ground game has eclipsed 200 rushing yards in 3 of the 5 games while averaging 186.8 rushing yards per game (including a high of 280 in that span vs. Regis Jesuit). That is 50% above the Wolves' baseline of 124.4 yards per game over the 9 games prior — a dramatic jump; the Wolves have gone 3-2 in that stretch.

ONE-SIDED — Grandview's pass defense has been playing at a high level over the Wolves' last 10 games. The defense has held its opponents under 200 passing yards in 9 of the 10 games while averaging 116.1 passing yards allowed per game (including a low of 53 in that span vs. Cherokee Trail). That is 39% below the Wolves' baseline of 191.0 yards per game over the 4 games prior — a dramatic drop; the Wolves have gone 7-3 in that stretch. When the two meet, that trend meets Cherokee Trail. Cherokee Trail has averaged 192.4 yards per game on the other side of that matchup across its games on file.

ONE-SIDED — Cherokee Trail's pass defense has been playing at a high level over the Cougar's last 5 games. The defense has held its opponents under 200 passing yards in 4 of the 5 games while averaging 94.8 passing yards allowed per game (including a low of 42 in that span vs. Northfield). That is 52% below the Cougar's baseline of 195.6 yards per game over the 9 games prior — a dramatic drop; the Cougar have gone 1-4 in that stretch. When the two meet, that trend meets Grandview. Grandview has averaged 138.3 yards per game on the other side of that matchup across its games on file.

ONE-SIDED — Grandview's pass rush has been playing at a high level over the Wolves' last 5 games, dating back to last season. The defense has recorded 3+ sacks in 4 of the 5 games while averaging 4.8 sacks per game (including a high of 8 in that span vs. Riverdale Ridge). That is 140% above the Wolves' baseline of 2.0 per game over the 3 games prior — a dramatic jump; the Wolves have gone 4-1 in that stretch. When the two meet, that trend meets Cherokee Trail.

CT — OFFENSE (11 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+4-2.66735.8W1
YPA < 8.01-4.20019.6L2
Pass Yds 200+3-5.37529.6L3
Pass Yds < 2002-1.66725.3W1
Rush Yds 100+3-3.50030.3L3
Rush Yds < 1002-3.40026.2L1
Rush Yds 150+2-2.50033.8L2
Rush Yds < 1503-4.42925.4L2
YPC 5.0+3-3.50030.3L3
YPC < 5.02-3.40026.2L1
YPP 6.0+4-3.57133.7L1
YPP < 6.01-3.25019.2L1
YPP 7.0+4-1.80038.8W1
YPP < 7.01-5.16719.8L2
Turnovers 1+2-5.28626.9L5
Turnovers < 13-1.75031.2L1
Turnovers 2+2-1.66734.3L1
Turnovers > 20-1.00027.0L1
GRA — OFFENSE (11 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+3-01.00031.7W3
YPA < 8.05-3.62521.4W1
Pass Yds 200+2-01.00029.5W2
Pass Yds < 2006-3.66723.0W1
Rush Yds 100+7-1.87530.8W1
Rush Yds < 1001-2.3336.7L1
Rush Yds 150+4-01.00029.0W4
Rush Yds < 1504-3.57121.4L2
YPC 5.0+5-1.83330.3W1
YPC < 5.03-2.60016.8L1
YPP 6.0+5-01.00032.6W5
YPP < 6.03-3.50017.2L2
YPP 7.0+2-01.00035.5W2
YPP < 7.06-3.66721.7W1
Turnovers 1+3-3.50021.0L2
Turnovers < 15-01.00028.0W5
Turnovers 2+1-1.50020.0L1
Turnovers > 2--------
CT — DEFENSE (11 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+0-3.00032.3L3
YPA < 8.05-3.62521.4L2
Pass Yds 200+1-3.25026.0L3
Pass Yds < 2004-3.57123.4L2
Rush Yds 100+2-5.28629.9L2
Rush Yds < 1003-1.75014.8L1
Rush Yds 150+1-3.25028.0L1
Rush Yds < 1504-3.57122.3L1
YPC 5.0+1-4.20029.8L1
YPC < 5.04-2.66719.8L1
YPP 6.0+0-2.00034.0L2
YPP < 6.05-4.55622.2L2
YPP 7.0+0-2.00034.0L2
YPP < 7.05-4.55622.2L2
Turnovers 1+5-3.62519.6L2
Turnovers < 10-3.00037.0L3
Turnovers 2+4-3.57118.4L2
Turnovers > 21-01.0007.0W1
GRA — DEFENSE (11 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+1-1.50013.5L1
YPA < 8.07-2.77812.0W1
Pass Yds 200+1-01.00017.0W1
Pass Yds < 2007-3.70011.8W1
Rush Yds 100+5-3.62513.1L2
Rush Yds < 1003-01.00010.0W3
Rush Yds 150+3-2.60014.2L2
Rush Yds < 1505-1.83310.7W2
YPC 5.0+2-1.66710.0L1
YPC < 5.06-2.75013.1W1
YPP 6.0+--------
YPP < 6.08-3.72712.3W1
YPP 7.0+--------
YPP < 7.08-3.72712.3W1
Turnovers 1+6-2.75012.2L1
Turnovers < 12-1.66712.3W1
Turnovers 2+3-01.00011.3W3
Turnovers > 22-01.0008.5W2
CT — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION (11 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Scores <100-1.0007.0
Scores 10-191-1.50014.5
Scores 20-290-3.00023.0
Scores 30-392-01.00033.0
Scores 40+2-1.66747.3
CT — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION (11 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Allows <102-01.0007.5
Allows 10-192-01.00012.5
Allows 20-291-2.33328.3
Allows 30-390-3.00033.3
Allows 40+0-1.00043.0
GRA — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION (11 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Scores <100-2.0003.0
Scores 10-192-01.00016.5
Scores 20-292-1.66725.0
Scores 30-392-01.00033.5
Scores 40+2-01.00042.5
GRA — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION (11 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Allows <104-01.0003.2
Allows 10-193-2.60014.8
Allows 20-291-1.50024.0
Allows 30-39------
Allows 40+------
ON THE BRINK

CHEROKEE TRAIL

• CHEROKEE TRAIL has forced 2+ turnovers in 3 straight games (10/23/26–11/6/26). It has not forced 2+ turnovers in 4 straight since 8/28/26–9/17/26 (2026).

TAB-SEPARATED (paste into a spreadsheet)
TeamSideSplitGamesRecordWin%PPGStrk
CTOFFENSEYPA 8.0+64-2.66735.8W1
CTOFFENSEYPA < 8.051-4.20019.6L2
CTOFFENSEPass Yds 200+83-5.37529.6L3
CTOFFENSEPass Yds < 20032-1.66725.3W1
CTOFFENSERush Yds 100+63-3.50030.3L3
CTOFFENSERush Yds < 10052-3.40026.2L1
CTOFFENSERush Yds 150+42-2.50033.8L2
CTOFFENSERush Yds < 15073-4.42925.4L2
CTOFFENSEYPC 5.0+63-3.50030.3L3
CTOFFENSEYPC < 5.052-3.40026.2L1
CTOFFENSEYPP 6.0+74-3.57133.7L1
CTOFFENSEYPP < 6.041-3.25019.2L1
CTOFFENSEYPP 7.0+54-1.80038.8W1
CTOFFENSEYPP < 7.061-5.16719.8L2
CTOFFENSETurnovers 1+72-5.28626.9L5
CTOFFENSETurnovers < 143-1.75031.2L1
CTOFFENSETurnovers 2+32-1.66734.3L1
CTOFFENSETurnovers > 210-1.00027.0L1
CTOFFENSEScores <1010-1.0007.0L1
CTOFFENSEScores 10-1921-1.50014.5L1
CTOFFENSEScores 20-2930-3.00023.0L3
CTOFFENSEScores 30-3922-01.00033.0W2
CTOFFENSEScores 40+32-1.66747.3L1
CTDEFENSEYPA 8.0+30-3.00032.3L3
CTDEFENSEYPA < 8.085-3.62521.4L2
CTDEFENSEPass Yds 200+41-3.25026.0L3
CTDEFENSEPass Yds < 20074-3.57123.4L2
CTDEFENSERush Yds 100+72-5.28629.9L2
CTDEFENSERush Yds < 10043-1.75014.8L1
CTDEFENSERush Yds 150+41-3.25028.0L1
CTDEFENSERush Yds < 15074-3.57122.3L1
CTDEFENSEYPC 5.0+51-4.20029.8L1
CTDEFENSEYPC < 5.064-2.66719.8L1
CTDEFENSEYPP 6.0+20-2.00034.0L2
CTDEFENSEYPP < 6.095-4.55622.2L2
CTDEFENSEYPP 7.0+20-2.00034.0L2
CTDEFENSEYPP < 7.095-4.55622.2L2
CTDEFENSETurnovers 1+85-3.62519.6L2
CTDEFENSETurnovers < 130-3.00037.0L3
CTDEFENSETurnovers 2+74-3.57118.4L2
CTDEFENSETurnovers > 211-01.0007.0W1
CTDEFENSEAllows <1022-01.0007.5W2
CTDEFENSEAllows 10-1922-01.00012.5W2
CTDEFENSEAllows 20-2931-2.33328.3L1
CTDEFENSEAllows 30-3930-3.00033.3L3
CTDEFENSEAllows 40+10-1.00043.0L1
GRAOFFENSEYPA 8.0+33-01.00031.7W3
GRAOFFENSEYPA < 8.085-3.62521.4W1
GRAOFFENSEPass Yds 200+22-01.00029.5W2
GRAOFFENSEPass Yds < 20096-3.66723.0W1
GRAOFFENSERush Yds 100+87-1.87530.8W1
GRAOFFENSERush Yds < 10031-2.3336.7L1
GRAOFFENSERush Yds 150+44-01.00029.0W4
GRAOFFENSERush Yds < 15074-3.57121.4L2
GRAOFFENSEYPC 5.0+65-1.83330.3W1
GRAOFFENSEYPC < 5.053-2.60016.8L1
GRAOFFENSEYPP 6.0+55-01.00032.6W5
GRAOFFENSEYPP < 6.063-3.50017.2L2
GRAOFFENSEYPP 7.0+22-01.00035.5W2
GRAOFFENSEYPP < 7.096-3.66721.7W1
GRAOFFENSETurnovers 1+63-3.50021.0L2
GRAOFFENSETurnovers < 155-01.00028.0W5
GRAOFFENSETurnovers 2+21-1.50020.0L1
GRAOFFENSEScores <1020-2.0003.0L2
GRAOFFENSEScores 10-1922-01.00016.5W2
GRAOFFENSEScores 20-2932-1.66725.0L1
GRAOFFENSEScores 30-3922-01.00033.5W2
GRAOFFENSEScores 40+22-01.00042.5W2
GRADEFENSEYPA 8.0+21-1.50013.5L1
GRADEFENSEYPA < 8.097-2.77812.0W1
GRADEFENSEPass Yds 200+11-01.00017.0W1
GRADEFENSEPass Yds < 200107-3.70011.8W1
GRADEFENSERush Yds 100+85-3.62513.1L2
GRADEFENSERush Yds < 10033-01.00010.0W3
GRADEFENSERush Yds 150+53-2.60014.2L2
GRADEFENSERush Yds < 15065-1.83310.7W2
GRADEFENSEYPC 5.0+32-1.66710.0L1
GRADEFENSEYPC < 5.086-2.75013.1W1
GRADEFENSEYPP < 6.0118-3.72712.3W1
GRADEFENSEYPP < 7.0118-3.72712.3W1
GRADEFENSETurnovers 1+86-2.75012.2L1
GRADEFENSETurnovers < 132-1.66712.3W1
GRADEFENSETurnovers 2+33-01.00011.3W3
GRADEFENSETurnovers > 222-01.0008.5W2
GRADEFENSEAllows <1044-01.0003.2W4
GRADEFENSEAllows 10-1953-2.60014.8W1
GRADEFENSEAllows 20-2921-1.50024.0L1
STREAKS: CT (combined OFFENSE+DEFENSE)
SIDESPLITSTREAKDATESRECORD
DEFENSERush Yds 100+7 games09/24/2026 - 11/06/20262-5
OFFENSEYPA < 8.05 games10/09/2026 - 11/06/20261-4
OFFENSEYPP < 7.05 games10/09/2026 - 11/06/20261-4
OFFENSERush Yds < 1503 games10/23/2026 - 11/06/20261-2
DEFENSEYPA < 8.03 games10/23/2026 - 11/06/20261-2
DEFENSEPass Yds < 2003 games10/23/2026 - 11/06/20261-2
DEFENSEYPP < 6.03 games10/23/2026 - 11/06/20261-2
DEFENSEYPP < 7.03 games10/23/2026 - 11/06/20261-2
DEFENSETurnovers 1+3 games10/23/2026 - 11/06/20261-2
DEFENSETurnovers 2+3 games10/23/2026 - 11/06/20261-2
STREAKS: GRA (combined OFFENSE+DEFENSE)
SIDESPLITSTREAKDATESRECORD
DEFENSEYPP < 6.011 games08/21/2026 - 11/12/20268-3
DEFENSEYPP < 7.011 games08/21/2026 - 11/12/20268-3
DEFENSEYPA < 8.06 games10/01/2026 - 11/12/20264-2
DEFENSEPass Yds < 2004 games10/15/2026 - 11/12/20262-2
OFFENSEYPA < 8.03 games10/22/2026 - 11/12/20261-2
OFFENSEPass Yds < 2003 games10/22/2026 - 11/12/20261-2
OFFENSEYPP < 7.03 games10/22/2026 - 11/12/20261-2
STREAKS — ALL TEAMS
TeamSideSplitStreakDatesRecord
CTDEFENSERush Yds 100+7 games09/24/2026 - 11/06/20262-5
CTOFFENSEYPA < 8.05 games10/09/2026 - 11/06/20261-4
CTOFFENSEYPP < 7.05 games10/09/2026 - 11/06/20261-4
CTOFFENSERush Yds < 1503 games10/23/2026 - 11/06/20261-2
CTDEFENSEYPA < 8.03 games10/23/2026 - 11/06/20261-2
CTDEFENSEPass Yds < 2003 games10/23/2026 - 11/06/20261-2
CTDEFENSEYPP < 6.03 games10/23/2026 - 11/06/20261-2
CTDEFENSEYPP < 7.03 games10/23/2026 - 11/06/20261-2
CTDEFENSETurnovers 1+3 games10/23/2026 - 11/06/20261-2
CTDEFENSETurnovers 2+3 games10/23/2026 - 11/06/20261-2
GRADEFENSEYPP < 6.011 games08/21/2026 - 11/12/20268-3
GRADEFENSEYPP < 7.011 games08/21/2026 - 11/12/20268-3
GRADEFENSEYPA < 8.06 games10/01/2026 - 11/12/20264-2
GRADEFENSEPass Yds < 2004 games10/15/2026 - 11/12/20262-2
GRAOFFENSEYPA < 8.03 games10/22/2026 - 11/12/20261-2
GRAOFFENSEPass Yds < 2003 games10/22/2026 - 11/12/20261-2
GRAOFFENSEYPP < 7.03 games10/22/2026 - 11/12/20261-2
MATCHUP CONFLICT POINTS: CT vs GRA

Each pair of rows above is tinted by the gap between the two teams' win% in that scenario, judged for the HOME team (the bottom row):

GRAY = negligible gap (.000-.050)

PURPLE = solid gap (.051-.150)

GREEN = big gap (.151+), favoring the home team

RED = big gap (.151+), against the home team

CT OFFENSE vs GRA DEFENSE

100 RUSH YDS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTOFFOVER63-3.50030.3L3
GRADEFOVER85-3.62513.1L2
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTOFFUNDER52-3.40026.2L1
GRADEFUNDER33-01.00010.0W3
150 RUSH YDS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTOFFOVER42-2.50033.8L2
GRADEFOVER53-2.60014.2L2
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTOFFUNDER73-4.42925.4L2
GRADEFUNDER65-1.83310.7W2
YPC 5.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTOFFOVER63-3.50030.3L3
GRADEFOVER32-1.66710.0L1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTOFFUNDER52-3.40026.2L1
GRADEFUNDER86-2.75013.1W1
YPA 8.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTOFFOVER64-2.66735.8W1
GRADEFOVER21-1.50013.5L1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTOFFUNDER51-4.20019.6L2
GRADEFUNDER97-2.77812.0W1
200 PASS YDS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTOFFOVER83-5.37529.6L3
GRADEFOVER11-01.00017.0W1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTOFFUNDER32-1.66725.3W1
GRADEFUNDER107-3.70011.8W1
0 TURNOVERS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTOFFZERO43-1.75031.2L1
GRADEFZERO32-1.66712.3W1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTOFFOVER72-5.28626.9L5
GRADEFOVER86-2.75012.2L1
2+ TURNOVERS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTOFFOVER32-1.66734.3L1
GRADEFOVER33-01.00011.3W3
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTOFFUNDER83-5.37526.2L2
GRADEFUNDER85-3.62512.6W1
>2 TURNOVERS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTOFFOVER10-1.00027.0L1
GRADEFOVER22-01.0008.5W2
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTOFFUNDER105-5.50028.6L2
GRADEFUNDER96-3.66713.1W1
YPP 6.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTOFFUNDER41-3.25019.2L1
GRADEFUNDER118-3.72712.3W1
YPP 7.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTOFFUNDER61-5.16719.8L2
GRADEFUNDER118-3.72712.3W1

GRA OFFENSE vs CT DEFENSE

100 RUSH YDS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTDEFOVER72-5.28629.9L2
GRAOFFOVER87-1.87530.8W1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTDEFUNDER43-1.75014.8L1
GRAOFFUNDER31-2.3336.7L1
150 RUSH YDS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTDEFOVER41-3.25028.0L1
GRAOFFOVER44-01.00029.0W4
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTDEFUNDER74-3.57122.3L1
GRAOFFUNDER74-3.57121.4L2
YPC 5.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTDEFOVER51-4.20029.8L1
GRAOFFOVER65-1.83330.3W1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTDEFUNDER64-2.66719.8L1
GRAOFFUNDER53-2.60016.8L1
YPA 8.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTDEFOVER30-3.00032.3L3
GRAOFFOVER33-01.00031.7W3
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTDEFUNDER85-3.62521.4L2
GRAOFFUNDER85-3.62521.4W1
200 PASS YDS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTDEFOVER41-3.25026.0L3
GRAOFFOVER22-01.00029.5W2
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTDEFUNDER74-3.57123.4L2
GRAOFFUNDER96-3.66723.0W1
0 TURNOVERS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTDEFZERO30-3.00037.0L3
GRAOFFZERO55-01.00028.0W5
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTDEFOVER85-3.62519.6L2
GRAOFFOVER63-3.50021.0L2
2+ TURNOVERS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTDEFOVER74-3.57118.4L2
GRAOFFOVER21-1.50020.0L1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTDEFUNDER41-3.25034.8L2
GRAOFFUNDER97-2.77825.1W1
>2 TURNOVERS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTDEFUNDER104-6.40026.1L2
GRAOFFUNDER118-3.72724.2W1
YPP 6.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTDEFOVER20-2.00034.0L2
GRAOFFOVER55-01.00032.6W5
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTDEFUNDER95-4.55622.2L2
GRAOFFUNDER63-3.50017.2L2
YPP 7.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTDEFOVER20-2.00034.0L2
GRAOFFOVER22-01.00035.5W2
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CTDEFUNDER95-4.55622.2L2
GRAOFFUNDER96-3.66721.7W1

(moved to the Appendix, Data Export 1, to keep this section shorter -- the full spreadsheet-paste table is there unchanged)

NOTABLE TRENDS (20 of 20 found, team |deviation| >= 20%, matchup |deviation| >= 20%)

CT OFFENSE

CT's offense has averaged 0.3 giveaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 1.0 giveaways per game. (-67%)

CT's offense has averaged 16.7 points scored per game over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 28.5 points scored per game. (-41%)

CT's offense has averaged 5.6 YPA over their last 5 games. Their 11-game average is 8.8 YPA. (-36%)

CT's offense has averaged 5.2 YPP over their last 5 games. Their 11-game average is 7.0 YPP. (-26%)

CT's offense has averaged 4.0 YPC over their last 7 games. Their 11-game average is 5.1 YPC. (-21%)

CT's offense has averaged 92.3 rush yards per game over their last 7 games. Their 11-game average is 116.5 rush yards per game. (-21%)

GRA OFFENSE

GRA's offense has averaged 13.3 points scored per game over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 24.2 points scored per game. (-45%)

GRA's offense has averaged 1.0 giveaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 0.7 giveaways per game. (+37%)

GRA's offense has averaged 186.8 rush yards per game over their last 5 games. Their 11-game average is 155.5 rush yards per game. (+20%)

CT DEFENSE

CT's defense has averaged 228.8 rush yards per game over their last 5 games. Their 11-game average is 145.9 rush yards per game. (+57%)

CT's defense has averaged 73.0 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 157.7 pass yards per game. (-54%)

CT's defense has averaged 4.1 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 6.4 YPA. (-35%)

CT's defense has averaged 1.0 takeaways per game over their last 7 games. Their 11-game average is 1.5 takeaways per game. (-35%)

CT's defense has averaged 5.4 YPC over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 4.2 YPC. (+30%)

CT's defense has averaged 29.9 points allowed per game over their last 7 games. Their 11-game average is 24.4 points allowed per game. (+23%)

GRA DEFENSE

GRA's defense has averaged 0.3 takeaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 1.3 takeaways per game. (-74%)

GRA's defense has averaged 18.0 points allowed per game over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 12.3 points allowed per game. (+47%)

GRA's defense has averaged 162.3 rush yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 128.0 rush yards per game. (+27%)

GRA's defense has averaged 4.8 YPA over their last 5 games. Their 11-game average is 6.4 YPA. (-24%)

GRA's defense has averaged 5.0 YPC over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 4.2 YPC. (+21%)

(moved to the Appendix, Data Export 2, to keep this section shorter -- the full spreadsheet-paste table is there unchanged)

APPENDIX

Full-length explanations and full-size data exports for the shortened notes and relocated tables referenced throughout this report, numbered in the order their pointers appear above.

Explanatory Notes

Note 1 -- GAME PROJECTION -- FULL DETAIL (report pages 1-2)

Library-native projection: computed directly from the game library (slate_projection.SlateEngine), not the Excel workbook engine. This section does not yet include: an outside Strength Index cross-check (computer/CCCAA rankings -- workbook-only).

Note 2 -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS -- how a number is scored

Every split this report computes is scored on how strong the number is and how much it sets this team apart from its opponent and the rest of the field, and the top 5 per team are listed. A condition needs at least 8 occurrences to count.

Note 3 -- OPPONENT STRENGTH (best-effort) -- why this is often empty

Only meaningful for a game against an opponent who is ALSO a tracked team on this workbook -- with just a couple of teams tracked, that's rare (mainly a direct matchup between them, if this run covers both); every other opponent has no win% on file here at all, so most of a team's schedule simply has no strength data to show.

Full Data Exports

Data Export 1 -- MATCHUP CONFLICTS — TAB-SEPARATED (13 columns)

Team1Side1Split1Record1Win%1PPG1Team2Side2Split2Record2Win%2PPG2Relevance
GRAOFFENSEYPP < 7.06-3.66721.7CTDEFENSEYPP 7.0+0-2.00034.00.667
CTOFFENSEPass Yds < 2002-1.66725.3GRADEFENSEPass Yds 200+1-01.00017.00.667
GRAOFFENSETurnovers < 15-01.00028.0CTDEFENSETurnovers 1+5-3.62519.60.625
GRAOFFENSERush Yds 100+7-1.87530.8CTDEFENSERush Yds < 1003-1.75014.80.625
GRAOFFENSEYPA 8.0+3-01.00031.7CTDEFENSEYPA < 8.05-3.62521.40.625
GRAOFFENSEYPA < 8.05-3.62521.4CTDEFENSEYPA 8.0+0-3.00032.30.625
GRAOFFENSERush Yds 150+4-01.00029.0CTDEFENSERush Yds < 1504-3.57122.30.571
GRAOFFENSEPass Yds 200+2-01.00029.5CTDEFENSEPass Yds < 2004-3.57123.40.571
GRAOFFENSEYPP 6.0+5-01.00032.6CTDEFENSEYPP < 6.05-4.55622.20.556
GRAOFFENSEYPP 7.0+2-01.00035.5CTDEFENSEYPP < 7.05-4.55622.20.556
CTOFFENSEYPP 7.0+4-1.80038.8GRADEFENSEYPP < 7.08-3.72712.30.527
GRAOFFENSEYPC 5.0+5-1.83330.3CTDEFENSEYPC < 5.04-2.66719.80.500
CTOFFENSETurnovers < 13-1.75031.2GRADEFENSETurnovers 1+6-2.75012.20.500
CTOFFENSERush Yds 100+3-3.50030.3GRADEFENSERush Yds < 1003-01.00010.00.500
GRAOFFENSETurnovers 1+3-3.50021.0CTDEFENSETurnovers < 10-3.00037.00.500
GRAOFFENSEYPP < 6.03-3.50017.2CTDEFENSEYPP 6.0+0-2.00034.00.500
CTOFFENSEYPA 8.0+4-2.66735.8GRADEFENSEYPA < 8.07-2.77812.00.444
GRAOFFENSEPass Yds < 2006-3.66723.0CTDEFENSEPass Yds 200+1-3.25026.00.417
GRAOFFENSEYPC < 5.03-2.60016.8CTDEFENSEYPC 5.0+1-4.20029.80.400
GRAOFFENSERush Yds < 1001-2.3336.7CTDEFENSERush Yds 100+2-5.28629.90.381
CTOFFENSETurnovers 1+2-5.28626.9GRADEFENSETurnovers < 12-1.66712.30.381
CTOFFENSERush Yds 150+2-2.50033.8GRADEFENSERush Yds < 1505-1.83310.70.333
CTOFFENSEPass Yds 200+3-5.37529.6GRADEFENSEPass Yds < 2007-3.70011.80.325
GRAOFFENSERush Yds < 1504-3.57121.4CTDEFENSERush Yds 150+1-3.25028.00.321
CTOFFENSEYPA < 8.01-4.20019.6GRADEFENSEYPA 8.0+1-1.50013.50.300
CTOFFENSEYPP 6.0+4-3.57133.7GRADEFENSEYPP < 6.08-3.72712.30.299
CTOFFENSEYPC < 5.02-3.40026.2GRADEFENSEYPC 5.0+2-1.66710.00.267
CTOFFENSEYPC 5.0+3-3.50030.3GRADEFENSEYPC < 5.06-2.75013.10.250
CTOFFENSERush Yds < 1002-3.40026.2GRADEFENSERush Yds 100+5-3.62513.10.225
CTOFFENSERush Yds < 1503-4.42925.4GRADEFENSERush Yds 150+3-2.60014.20.171

Data Export 2 -- TRENDS — TAB-SEPARATED (10 columns)

TeamSideTypeStatOpponentWindow/MeetingsValueBaselineGamesBaselineAvgDeviation
CTDEFENSEteamPass Yardslast 373.011157.7-53.7%
CTDEFENSEteamPointslast 729.91124.4+22.5%
CTOFFENSEteamPointslast 316.71128.5-41.4%
CTDEFENSEteamRush Yardslast 5228.811145.9+56.8%
CTOFFENSEteamRush Yardslast 792.311116.5-20.8%
CTDEFENSEteamTurnoverslast 71.0111.5-35.3%
CTOFFENSEteamTurnoverslast 30.3111.0-66.7%
CTDEFENSEteamYPAlast 34.1116.4-35.5%
CTOFFENSEteamYPAlast 55.6118.8-36.1%
CTDEFENSEteamYPClast 35.4114.2+29.6%
CTOFFENSEteamYPClast 74.0115.1-21.4%
CTOFFENSEteamYPPlast 55.2117.0-26.5%
GRADEFENSEteamPointslast 318.01112.3+46.7%
GRAOFFENSEteamPointslast 313.31124.2-44.9%
GRADEFENSEteamRush Yardslast 3162.311128.0+26.8%
GRAOFFENSEteamRush Yardslast 5186.811155.5+20.2%
GRADEFENSEteamTurnoverslast 30.3111.3-73.8%
GRAOFFENSEteamTurnoverslast 31.0110.7+37.5%
GRADEFENSEteamYPAlast 54.8116.4-24.2%
GRADEFENSEteamYPClast 35.0114.2+20.6%
CT — ROSTER (85) 26-27
#NAMEPOSCLASS
QUARTERBACKS
7BRYSON PETERSON
PASS 46/66 · 69.7% · 769 YDS · 11.7 YPA · 8 TD · 3 INT · 256.3/G
RUSH 8 CAR · 90 YDS · 11.2 YPC · 1 TD · 30.0/G
QBJr.
16TAVIAN HUGHES
PASS 1/1 · 100.0% · 4 YDS · 4.0 YPA · 0 TD · 0 INT · 4.0/G
QBJr.
RUNNING BACKS
3OWEN NEWELL
RUSH 32 CAR · 240 YDS · 7.5 YPC · 3 TD · 80.0/G
REC 1 REC · 3 YDS · 3.0 YPC · 0 TD · 1.0/G
RBJr.
25DORIAN HARRIS
RUSH 32 CAR · 147 YDS · 4.6 YPC · 1 TD · 49.0/G
RBSr.
29LANGSTON GRIFFEN
RUSH 3 CAR · 0 YDS · 0.0 YPC · 0 TD · 0.0/G
RBSo.
RECEIVERS & TIGHT ENDS
5RJ STANLEY
REC 13 REC · 219 YDS · 16.8 YPC · 2 TD · 73.0/G
WRJr.
8EVAN SMITH
REC 10 REC · 155 YDS · 15.5 YPC · 3 TD · 51.7/G
WRJr.
18ZAY THOMAS
REC 5 REC · 44 YDS · 8.8 YPC · 1 TD · 22.0/G
WRSr.
81JORDAN MITCHELL
REC 9 REC · 228 YDS · 25.3 YPC · 2 TD · 76.0/G
WRSr.
OFFENSIVE LINE
55BRANDON RODRIGUEZ
DEF 3 TKL · 3.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
OLSr.
DEFENSIVE LINE
10RYAN AYRES
DEF 3 TKL · 3.0 TKL/G · 2 TFL · 1.5 SACKS · 0 INT
DLJr.
11ETHAN ESHETU
DEF 7 TKL · 7.0 TKL/G · 2 TFL · 1.5 SACKS · 0 INT
DLJr.
15AB ZURAGAIT
DEF 5 TKL · 5.0 TKL/G · 1 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLJr.
58CHRISTIAN TAUOA
DEF 1 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 1 TFL · 1.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLSr.
63LUCAS WEINAND
DEF 1 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 1 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLJr.
65EJ MILLER
DEF 2 TKL · 2.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLSr.
LINEBACKERS
9NICO MAVROMAT
DEF 8 TKL · 8.0 TKL/G · 1 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
LBSr.
13ADRYELE MARTINEZ
DEF 2 TKL · 2.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
LBJr.
22KAEDEN SHRIVER
DEF 10 TKL · 10.0 TKL/G · 1 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
LBJr.
35CAMDEN CARTER
DEF 2 TKL · 2.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 1 INT
LBSo.
DEFENSIVE BACKS
1CRISTIAN MBAMARAH
REC 1 REC · 35 YDS · 35.0 YPC · 0 TD · 11.7/G
DEF 6 TKL · 2.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBSr.
2EVANS MENSAH JR
DEF 3 TKL · 3.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBJr.
6CORBIN COLE
DEF 10 TKL · 5.0 TKL/G · 2 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 1 INT
DBSr.
12LEVI MANGNALL
DEF 12 TKL · 6.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBJr.
14JOHN PERRY
DEF 2 TKL · 2.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBSr.
21ELIJAH HALL
DEF 12 TKL · 4.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBSr.
27RYDER DERRICK
DEF 1 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBJr.
Report Produced by ScorePirate | Commitment and offer data sourced from 247Sports | GENERATED 11/14/2026 08:53