In short: Morgan County Bulldogs high school football (Madison, GA), 2026 season: 3-5. Last game: L 35-49 vs Hart County on October 23, 2026. Next: vs Lumpkin County, October 30, 2026. Schedule and results, player season stats, stat leaders, unit grades, ScorePirate ranking and the game-by-game log.
| RECORD | 3-5 this season |
| LAST GAME | L 35-49 vs HART COUNTY |
| NEXT GAME | LUMPKIN COUNTY (10/30/2026) |
| UNIT GRADES | Pass Off 68.2 · Rush Off 73.1 · Pass Def 5.6 · Rush Def 47.0 |
| ENROLLMENT | 3,496 STUDENTS |
| TEAM | PASS O | RUSH O | PASS D | RUSH D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MORGAN COUNTY | 68.2 (+26) | 73.1 (+45) | 5.6 (+98) | 47.0 (+3) |
Next: vs Lumpkin County, Fri 30 Oct. Matchup report: Lumpkin County at Morgan County.
The number to watch when Morgan County meets Lumpkin County is Morgan County's scoring defense. Morgan County allowed 19.7 points per game over its first 3 games (2-1), #171 in section in that timeframe. In the 5 games since that hot start (1-4), the Bulldogs have allowed 37.4 points per game, a 90% rise, #385 in section in that window. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Morgan County's last 5 opponents have averaged 29.4 points per game, a #154 offense in section on the season, against 23.7 points per game, #251 for the first 3. Measured against those opponents' norms (29.4 points per game), Morgan County allowed 27% more than those offenses usually score. Meanwhile, Lumpkin County's offense has been middle of the pack in recent weeks. The Indians have averaged 25.2 points per game over their last 5 games (2-3), #228 in section during that time. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of scoring defenses in section (24.0 points per game on the season, which would rank #214). Lumpkin County offers Morgan County a fair measuring stick for whether the trend is real. Morgan County is 3-0 this season when it holds opponents under 30, and 0-5 when it doesn't.
The battle on the ground could decide Morgan County's next game, against Lumpkin County, and the recent returns favor Morgan County. Morgan County averaged 4.6 yards per carry (856 yards on 186 rushes) over its first 4 games (2-2), #314 in section through those games. In the 4 games since that slow start (1-3), the Bulldogs have averaged 5.8 yards per carry (890 yards on 154 rushes), a 26% rise, #198 in section through that stretch. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Morgan County's last 4 opponents have averaged 4.5 yards per carry, a #76 run defense in section on the season, against 5.7 yards per carry, #229 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (4.5 yards per carry), Morgan County ran for 29% more per carry than those run defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #134 in section, well above the first 4 (#218), which makes the improvement more impressive. Meanwhile, Lumpkin County's run defense has been middle of the pack in recent weeks. The Indians have allowed 6.5 yards per carry (785 yards on 121 rushes) over their last 4 games (1-3), #300 in section over that stretch. Those games came against some of the weaker rushing attacks in section (4.9 yards per carry on the season, which would rank #307). Against those norms, Lumpkin County allowed 34% more per carry than those rushing attacks usually gain. Overall, those opponents average an SP Strength Index rating that would rank #116 in section, a strong slate. Lumpkin County offers Morgan County a fair measuring stick for whether the trend is real.
The biggest shift in Morgan County's season has come in its offense. Morgan County averaged 19.8 points per game over its first 4 games (2-2), #291 in section within that period. In the 4 games since that slow start (1-3), the Bulldogs have averaged 31.5 points per game, a 59% rise, #157 in section across those games. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 23.7 points per game on the season. Measured against those opponents' norms (24.5 points per game), Morgan County scored 29% more than those defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #134 in section, well above the first 4 (#218), which makes the improvement more impressive. On the season, Morgan County ranks #218 in section in scoring. Lumpkin County's defense sits in the middle of the pack, #305 in section (28.4 points per game). Morgan County is 1-3 this season when it scores 29 or more, and 2-2 when it doesn't.
Morgan County's pass defense from the opening weeks has gone missing since. The Bulldogs allowed 7.6 yards per pass attempt (722 yards on 95 attempts) over their first 5 games (3-2), #204 in section during those games. Over the stretch of 3 games that followed (0-3), Morgan County has allowed 11.1 yards per pass attempt (930 yards on 84 attempts), a 46% rise, #365 in section during that period. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Morgan County's last 3 opponents have averaged 8.3 yards per attempt, a #188 passing attack in section on the season, against 6.8 yards per attempt, #290 for the first 5. Measured against those opponents' norms (8.3 yards per attempt), Morgan County allowed 34% more per attempt than those passing attacks usually gain. On the season, the Bulldogs rank #345 in section in pass defense. Lumpkin County's passing game sits in the middle of the pack, #143 in section (8.8 yards per attempt).
Morgan County averaged 5.6 yards per play (1,326 yards on 237 snaps) over its first 4 games (2-2), #284 in section during that stretch. Few teams started slower in this department, and few have turned it around as sharply since. In the 4 games since that slow start (1-3), the Bulldogs have averaged 7.0 yards per play (1,641 yards on 236 snaps), a 24% rise, #183 in section over that period. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 6.4 yards per play on the season. Measured against those opponents' norms (6.1 yards per play), Morgan County gained 14% more per snap than those defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #134 in section, well above the first 4 (#218), which makes the improvement more impressive. On the season, Morgan County ranks #245 in section in yards per play. Lumpkin County's defense sits in the middle of the pack, #313 in section (7.2 yards per play).
Something changed for Morgan County's defense after the first 5 games of the season. The Bulldogs allowed 6.8 yards per play (1,412 yards on 208 snaps) over their first 5 games (3-2), #264 in section over that timeframe. Over the stretch of 3 games that followed (0-3), Morgan County has allowed 8.4 yards per play (1,450 yards on 172 snaps), a 24% rise, #347 in section over that span. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Morgan County's last 3 opponents have averaged 6.7 yards per play, a #203 offense in section on the season, against 6.1 yards per play, #264 for the first 5. Measured against those opponents' norms (6.7 yards per play), Morgan County allowed 27% more per snap than those offenses usually gain. On the season, the Bulldogs rank #346 in section in yards per play allowed. Lumpkin County's offense sits in the middle of the pack, #147 in section (7.3 yards per play).
• Club Morgan County has lost 3 straight, and a loss would make it 4 in a row -- something they have not done in the 3 seasons on record.
Morgan County has played a tougher-than-average schedule in the pool so far (#127 of 466), and what is left is a tougher-than-average slate (#119 of 396).
From the games on file through Sep 25.
Every player with a stat on file, listed only where he has one. Open the arrow beside a name for his game-by-game line. Stats through the Sep 25 game; last updated Oct 22.
| PASSING | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | C/ATT | COMP % | YDS | YPA | TD | INT | QBR |
| G. BRASWELL | 3 | 27/36 | 75.0% | 297 | 8.2 | 3 | 3 | 155.1 | |
| C. WESLEY | 3 | 3/9 | 33.3% | 105 | 11.7 | 1 | 0 | 168.0 | |
| TEAM TOTALS | 3 | 30/45 | 66.7% | 402 | 8.9 | 4 | 3 | 157.7 | |
| RUSHING | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | CAR | YDS | YPC | TD |
| C. WESLEY | 3 | 36 | 305 | 8.5 | 3 | |
| A. CORRIAS | 3 | 56 | 240 | 4.3 | 1 | |
| N. FAULKNER | 2 | 12 | 64 | 5.3 | 0 | |
| A. LAWRENCE | 3 | 19 | 50 | 2.6 | 0 | |
| G. SMITH | 1 | 1 | 24 | 24.0 | 0 | |
| B. O'NEAL | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | |
| D. HARRIS | 1 | 2 | -3 | -1.5 | 0 | |
| G. BRASWELL | 3 | 11 | -31 | -2.8 | 0 | |
| TEAM TOTALS | 3 | 138 | 650 | 4.7 | 4 | |
| RECEIVING | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | REC | YDS | YPR | TD |
| C. WESLEY | 3 | 7 | 98 | 14.0 | 2 | |
| D. HARRIS | 1 | 2 | 85 | 42.5 | 1 | |
| K. MORRIS | 3 | 4 | 72 | 18.0 | 0 | |
| G. SMITH | 1 | 2 | 48 | 24.0 | 0 | |
| B. O'NEAL | 3 | 5 | 28 | 5.6 | 0 | |
| Z. RUSSELL | 3 | 2 | 26 | 13.0 | 0 | |
| A. LAWRENCE | 3 | 3 | 18 | 6.0 | 1 | |
| A. CORRIAS | 3 | 2 | 18 | 9.0 | 0 | |
| N. FAULKNER | 2 | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | |
| P. HARDIN | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | |
| M. AINSLIE | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | |
| TEAM TOTALS | 3 | 30 | 402 | 13.4 | 4 | |
| DEFENSE | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | TCKL | TFL | SACKS | INT | INT YDS | PD | FF |
| Q. RUFFIN | 3 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| A. LAWRENCE | 3 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| C. WESLEY | 3 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| R. BAILEY | 3 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Y. SINGH | 2 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| S. BARTLETT | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| J. THOMAS | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |
| N. RIVERS | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Z. RUSSELL | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| G. DICKINSON | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| G. SMITH | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| E. LEWIS | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| E. MOSS | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| J. PETERS | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| B. BUTLER | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| B. O'NEAL | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| G. BRASWELL | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| H. MITCHELL | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| M. SCHULZE | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| O. STINNETT | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| T. THOMAS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| TEAM TOTALS | 3 | 119 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | |
PROGRAM RECORD
| SEASON | RECORD | PF | PA | PPG |
| 2024 | 1-0 | 35 | 32 | 35.0 |
| 2025 | 2-0 | 85 | 22 | 42.5 |
| 2026 | 3-5 | 205 | 246 | 25.6 |
| 2024-26 | 6-5 | 29.5 |
| DATE | OPPONENT | SITE | RESULT | SCORE | WIN% |
| 08/21 | MADISON COUNTY | vs | W | 28-13 | |
| 08/28 | EASTSIDE | at | W | 24-10 | |
| 09/04 | OCONEE COUNTY | vs | L | 15-36 | |
| 09/11 | MOUNTAIN VIEW | at | L | 12-35 | |
| 09/25 | HEBRON CHRISTIAN | vs | W | 30-26 | |
| 10/02 | ELBERT COUNTY | at | L | 32-44 | |
| 10/16 | FRANKLIN COUNTY | vs | L | 29-33 | |
| 10/23 | HART COUNTY | at | L | 35-49 | |
| 10/30 | LUMPKIN COUNTY | vs | PROJ | 30-28 | 53.6% |
| 11/06 | STEPHENS COUNTY | at | PROJ | 16-39 | 12.6% |
| SEASON TO DATE | 3-5 | 2 REMAINING |
SEASON OUTLOOK
(full explanation: Appendix, Note 1)
| RECORD TO DATE | MOST LIKELY FINAL | PROJECTED RECORD | |
| Overall | 3-5 so far | 4-6 (50%) | 4.1-5.9 |
| League | 1-3 so far | 1-3 (100%) | 1.0-3.0 |
| SPLIT | GP | PPG | OPP PPG | YPG | OPP YPG | PLAYS/G | OPP PLAYS/G |
| OVERALL | 8 | 25.6 | 30.8 | 370.9 | 357.8 | 59.1 | 47.5 |
| HOME | 4 | 25.5 | 27.0 | 405.5 | 330.8 | 59.8 | 47.0 |
| ROAD | 4 | 25.8 | 34.5 | 336.2 | 384.8 | 58.5 | 48.0 |
PPG/OPP PPG use every played game on file. YPG/PLAYS-PER-GAME columns only ever come from games with a full box score on file, which can be a smaller sample than GP -- see the coverage note below when that's the case for this team.
| DATE | OPPONENT | RESULT | PASS YDS | RUSH YDS | TOTAL YDS | PASS ALW | RUSH ALW | TOTAL ALW | SACKS ALW | SACKS | DEF INT | TO FORCED | TO MAR |
| 8/21 | vs. Madison County | W 28-13 | 172 | 188 | 360 | 21 | 187 | 208 | -- | -- | -- | 0 | -2 |
| 8/28 | @ Eastside | W 24-10 | 65 | 270 | 335 | 174 | 47 | 221 | -- | -- | -- | 0 | 0 |
| 9/4 | vs. Oconee County | L 15-36 | 155 | 258 | 413 | 78 | 210 | 288 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 |
| 9/11 | @ Mountain View | L 12-35 | 78 | 140 | 218 | 308 | 45 | 353 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 |
| 9/25 | vs. Hebron Christian | W 30-26 | 127 | 229 | 356 | 141 | 201 | 342 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 |
| 10/2 | @ Elbert County | L 32-44 | 173 | 144 | 317 | 198 | 210 | 408 | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 0 |
| 10/16 | vs. Franklin County | L 29-33 | 125 | 368 | 493 | 306 | 179 | 485 | -- | -- | -- | 0 | 0 |
| 10/23 | @ Hart County | L 35-49 | 326 | 149 | 475 | 426 | 131 | 557 | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -1 |
| AVERAGES | 152.6 | 218.2 | 370.9 | 206.5 | 151.2 | 357.8 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | -7 (season) |
Averages use only games with that number on file (sacks/INT 3/8, sacks allowed 3/8 games). SACKS ALW comes from the opponent's box score; TO FORCED is takeaways; TO MAR is takeaways minus giveaways, and its bottom cell is the season total. Dashes mean not on file.
UNIT INDEX
Pass Offense: grade 68.2/100 (+26 yds/gm vs average)
Rush Offense: grade 73.1/100 (+45 yds/gm vs average)
Pass Defense: grade 5.6/100 (+98 yds/gm vs average)
Rush Defense: grade 47.0/100 (+3 yds/gm vs average)
Unit grades: 0-100 league percentile, adjusted for the opponents faced.
OPPONENT TRACKER
(full explanation: Appendix, Note 2)
| DATE | SITE | OPPONENT | THEIR RECORD | THEIR PPG |
| 2026-10-30 | vs | LUMPKIN COUNTY | 5-3 | 29.6 |
| 2026-11-06 | at | STEPHENS COUNTY | 5-3 | 31.4 |
LAST YEAR
MC finished 2025 at 2-0. Missed playoffs. Notable win: 56-14 over WESTSIDE (WESTSIDE finished 27% that season).
| DATE | OPPONENT | RESULT | RECORD | PF | PA | TOT YDS | YDS ALLOWED |
| 2025-09-26 | WESTSIDE | W | 1-0 | 56 | 14 | 402 | 207 |
| 2025-11-14 | WESTSIDE | W | 2-0 | 29 | 8 | 392 | 358 |
| TOTALS | 2 GMS | 2-0 | 2-0 | 85 | 22 | 794 | 565 |
• MC holds its opponents under 7.0 yards per play (.999), and has won 3 straight when doing so
• MC holds its opponents under 8.0 yards per attempt (.800), but most recently lost to Elbert County when doing so
• MC averages 5.0+ yards per carry (.714), but most recently lost to Franklin County when doing so
• MC averages 6.0+ yards per play (.714), but most recently lost to Hart County when doing so
• MC's offense has exceeded 100 rush yds in 11 straight games (09/26/2024-10/23/2026), going 6-5 over that stretch.
• MC holds its opponents under 7.2 yards per play (MC's own median) (.999)
• MC's defense has averaged 310.0 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 193.1 pass yards per game. (+61%)
• MC's defense has averaged 0.3 takeaways per game over their last 7 games. Their 11-game average is 0.6 takeaways per game. (-55%)
• MC's defense has averaged 42.0 points allowed per game over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 27.3 points allowed per game. (+54%)
• MC averages 5.3+ yards per carry (MC's own median) (.833)
• MC's defense has conceded 100+ rush yds in 4 straight games (09/25/2026-10/23/2026), going 1-3 over that stretch.
• MC's defense has conceded 5.0+ YPC in 4 straight games (09/25/2026-10/23/2026), going 1-3 over that stretch.
• MC is 3-0 (.999) when it wins the turnover battle
• MC's defense has averaged 483.3 total yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 360.5 total yards per game. (+34%)
• MC's defense has averaged 10.9 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 8.4 YPA. (+31%)
(full explanation: Appendix, Note 3)
MC -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS
(top 5 of 10 scored; vs 284 cached team(s))
| # | SIDE | CONDITION | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK | SCORE |
| 1 | OFF | YPA 8+ | 6-3 | .667 | 30.9 | L2 | 0.770 |
| 2 | OFF | Turnovers < 2 | 5-3 | .625 | 30.9 | L2 | 0.761 |
| 3 | DEF | Turnovers < 3 | 6-5 | .545 | 27.3 | L3 | 0.692 |
| 4 | OFF | Turnovers < 3 | 6-5 | .545 | 29.5 | L3 | 0.590 |
| 5 | OFF | Rush Yds 100+ | 6-5 | .545 | 29.5 | L3 | 0.554 |
(of 15 combinations tried per team -- a combination is only shown when at least 4 real games on file satisfy both conditions at once)
--- MC ---
| CONDITION | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK |
| MC rushes for 100+ yards and is held under 200 passing yards | 4-4 | .500 | 24.9 | L2 |
| MC averages 5.0+ yards per carry on its way to 150+ rushing yards | 3-2 | .600 | 25.4 | L1 |
| MC averages 6.0+ yards per play behind 150+ rushing yards | 3-1 | .750 | 29.0 | L1 |
| Team | Condition | Record | Win% | PPG |
| MC | Rush Yds 100+ & Pass Yds < 200 | 4-4 | .500 | 24.9 |
| MC | YPC 5.0+ & Rush Yds 150+ | 3-2 | .600 | 25.4 |
| MC | YPP 6.0+ & Rush Yds 150+ | 3-1 | .750 | 29.0 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK |
| YPA 8.0+ | 6-3 | .667 | 30.9 | L2 |
| YPA < 8.0 | 0-2 | .000 | 23.5 | L2 |
| Pass Yds 200+ | 2-1 | .667 | 42.0 | L1 |
| Pass Yds < 200 | 4-4 | .500 | 24.9 | L2 |
| Rush Yds 100+ | 6-5 | .545 | 29.5 | L3 |
| Rush Yds < 100 | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Rush Yds 150+ | 4-2 | .667 | 25.8 | L1 |
| Rush Yds < 150 | 2-3 | .400 | 34.0 | L3 |
| YPC 5.0+ | 5-2 | .714 | 31.1 | L1 |
| YPC < 5.0 | 1-3 | .250 | 26.8 | L3 |
| YPP 6.0+ | 5-2 | .714 | 34.6 | L2 |
| YPP < 6.0 | 1-3 | .250 | 20.8 | L3 |
| YPP 7.0+ | 3-2 | .600 | 36.8 | L2 |
| YPP < 7.0 | 3-3 | .500 | 23.5 | L1 |
| Turnovers 1+ | 3-4 | .429 | 26.7 | L2 |
| Turnovers < 1 | 3-1 | .750 | 34.5 | L1 |
| Turnovers 2+ | 1-2 | .333 | 26.0 | L2 |
| Turnovers > 2 | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG |
| Scores <10 | -- | -- | -- |
| Scores 10-19 | 0-2 | .000 | 13.5 |
| Scores 20-29 | 3-1 | .750 | 27.5 |
| Scores 30-39 | 2-2 | .500 | 33.0 |
| Scores 40+ | 1-0 | 1.000 | 56.0 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK |
| YPA 8.0+ | 3-3 | .500 | 26.3 | L2 |
| YPA < 8.0 | 0-2 | .000 | 23.5 | L2 |
| Pass Yds 200+ | 0-1 | .000 | 35.0 | L1 |
| Pass Yds < 200 | 3-4 | .429 | 24.3 | L2 |
| Rush Yds 100+ | 3-5 | .375 | 25.6 | L3 |
| Rush Yds < 100 | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Rush Yds 150+ | 3-2 | .600 | 25.2 | L1 |
| Rush Yds < 150 | 0-3 | .000 | 26.3 | L3 |
| YPC 5.0+ | 2-2 | .500 | 24.5 | L1 |
| YPC < 5.0 | 1-3 | .250 | 26.8 | L3 |
| YPP 6.0+ | 2-2 | .500 | 30.5 | L2 |
| YPP < 6.0 | 1-3 | .250 | 20.8 | L3 |
| YPP 7.0+ | 0-2 | .000 | 32.0 | L2 |
| YPP < 7.0 | 3-3 | .500 | 23.5 | L1 |
| Turnovers 1+ | 2-4 | .333 | 25.3 | L2 |
| Turnovers < 1 | 1-1 | .500 | 26.5 | L1 |
| Turnovers 2+ | 1-2 | .333 | 26.0 | L2 |
| Turnovers > 2 | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG |
| Scores <10 | -- | -- | -- |
| Scores 10-19 | 0-2 | .000 | 13.5 |
| Scores 20-29 | 2-1 | .667 | 27.0 |
| Scores 30-39 | 1-2 | .333 | 32.3 |
| Scores 40+ | -- | -- | -- |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK |
| YPA 8.0+ | 2-4 | .333 | 28.5 | L4 |
| YPA < 8.0 | 4-1 | .800 | 25.8 | L1 |
| Pass Yds 200+ | 2-3 | .400 | 27.8 | L3 |
| Pass Yds < 200 | 4-2 | .667 | 26.8 | L1 |
| Rush Yds 100+ | 4-4 | .500 | 30.1 | L3 |
| Rush Yds < 100 | 2-1 | .667 | 19.7 | L1 |
| Rush Yds 150+ | 4-3 | .571 | 27.4 | L2 |
| Rush Yds < 150 | 2-2 | .500 | 27.0 | L2 |
| YPC 5.0+ | 3-4 | .429 | 33.3 | L3 |
| YPC < 5.0 | 3-1 | .750 | 16.8 | L1 |
| YPP 6.0+ | 4-5 | .444 | 30.3 | L3 |
| YPP < 6.0 | 2-0 | 1.000 | 13.5 | W2 |
| YPP 7.0+ | 3-5 | .375 | 30.9 | L5 |
| YPP < 7.0 | 3-0 | 1.000 | 17.7 | W3 |
| Turnovers 1+ | 3-2 | .600 | 29.4 | L2 |
| Turnovers < 1 | 3-3 | .500 | 25.5 | L1 |
| Turnovers 2+ | 2-0 | 1.000 | 23.0 | W2 |
| Turnovers > 2 | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG |
| Allows <10 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 8.0 |
| Allows 10-19 | 3-0 | 1.000 | 12.3 |
| Allows 20-29 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 26.0 |
| Allows 30-39 | 1-3 | .250 | 34.0 |
| Allows 40+ | 0-2 | .000 | 46.5 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK |
| YPA 8.0+ | 1-4 | .200 | 32.6 | L4 |
| YPA < 8.0 | 2-1 | .667 | 27.7 | L1 |
| Pass Yds 200+ | 0-3 | .000 | 39.0 | L3 |
| Pass Yds < 200 | 3-2 | .600 | 25.8 | L1 |
| Rush Yds 100+ | 2-4 | .333 | 33.5 | L3 |
| Rush Yds < 100 | 1-1 | .500 | 22.5 | L1 |
| Rush Yds 150+ | 2-3 | .400 | 30.4 | L2 |
| Rush Yds < 150 | 1-2 | .333 | 31.3 | L2 |
| YPC 5.0+ | 2-4 | .333 | 33.5 | L3 |
| YPC < 5.0 | 1-1 | .500 | 22.5 | L1 |
| YPP 6.0+ | 2-5 | .286 | 33.3 | L3 |
| YPP < 6.0 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 13.0 | W1 |
| YPP 7.0+ | 1-5 | .167 | 34.5 | L5 |
| YPP < 7.0 | 2-0 | 1.000 | 19.5 | W2 |
| Turnovers 1+ | 0-2 | .000 | 46.5 | L2 |
| Turnovers < 1 | 3-3 | .500 | 25.5 | L1 |
| Turnovers 2+ | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Turnovers > 2 | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG |
| Allows <10 | -- | -- | -- |
| Allows 10-19 | 2-0 | 1.000 | 11.5 |
| Allows 20-29 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 26.0 |
| Allows 30-39 | 0-3 | .000 | 34.7 |
| Allows 40+ | 0-2 | .000 | 46.5 |
MORGAN COUNTY
• MORGAN COUNTY has allowed 400+ total yards in 3 straight games (10/2/26–10/23/26). It has not reached 4 straight in the last 3 years of games on file (2024-present).
• MORGAN COUNTY has allowed 250+ passing in 2 straight games (10/16/26–10/23/26). It has not reached 3 straight in the last 3 years of games on file (2024-present).
• MORGAN COUNTY has lost 3 straight (10/2/26–10/23/26). It has not reached 4 straight in the last 3 years of games on file (2024-present).
• MORGAN COUNTY has allowed 30+ in 3 straight games (10/2/26–10/23/26). It has not reached 4 straight in the last 3 years of games on file (2024-present).
| Team | Side | Split | Games | Record | Win% | PPG | Strk |
| MC | OFFENSE | YPA 8.0+ | 9 | 6-3 | .667 | 30.9 | L2 |
| MC | OFFENSE | YPA < 8.0 | 2 | 0-2 | .000 | 23.5 | L2 |
| MC | OFFENSE | Pass Yds 200+ | 3 | 2-1 | .667 | 42.0 | L1 |
| MC | OFFENSE | Pass Yds < 200 | 8 | 4-4 | .500 | 24.9 | L2 |
| MC | OFFENSE | Rush Yds 100+ | 11 | 6-5 | .545 | 29.5 | L3 |
| MC | OFFENSE | Rush Yds 150+ | 6 | 4-2 | .667 | 25.8 | L1 |
| MC | OFFENSE | Rush Yds < 150 | 5 | 2-3 | .400 | 34.0 | L3 |
| MC | OFFENSE | YPC 5.0+ | 7 | 5-2 | .714 | 31.1 | L1 |
| MC | OFFENSE | YPC < 5.0 | 4 | 1-3 | .250 | 26.8 | L3 |
| MC | OFFENSE | YPP 6.0+ | 7 | 5-2 | .714 | 34.6 | L2 |
| MC | OFFENSE | YPP < 6.0 | 4 | 1-3 | .250 | 20.8 | L3 |
| MC | OFFENSE | YPP 7.0+ | 5 | 3-2 | .600 | 36.8 | L2 |
| MC | OFFENSE | YPP < 7.0 | 6 | 3-3 | .500 | 23.5 | L1 |
| MC | OFFENSE | Turnovers 1+ | 7 | 3-4 | .429 | 26.7 | L2 |
| MC | OFFENSE | Turnovers < 1 | 4 | 3-1 | .750 | 34.5 | L1 |
| MC | OFFENSE | Turnovers 2+ | 3 | 1-2 | .333 | 26.0 | L2 |
| MC | OFFENSE | Scores 10-19 | 2 | 0-2 | .000 | 13.5 | L2 |
| MC | OFFENSE | Scores 20-29 | 4 | 3-1 | .750 | 27.5 | L1 |
| MC | OFFENSE | Scores 30-39 | 4 | 2-2 | .500 | 33.0 | L2 |
| MC | OFFENSE | Scores 40+ | 1 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 56.0 | W1 |
| MC | DEFENSE | YPA 8.0+ | 6 | 2-4 | .333 | 28.5 | L4 |
| MC | DEFENSE | YPA < 8.0 | 5 | 4-1 | .800 | 25.8 | L1 |
| MC | DEFENSE | Pass Yds 200+ | 5 | 2-3 | .400 | 27.8 | L3 |
| MC | DEFENSE | Pass Yds < 200 | 6 | 4-2 | .667 | 26.8 | L1 |
| MC | DEFENSE | Rush Yds 100+ | 8 | 4-4 | .500 | 30.1 | L3 |
| MC | DEFENSE | Rush Yds < 100 | 3 | 2-1 | .667 | 19.7 | L1 |
| MC | DEFENSE | Rush Yds 150+ | 7 | 4-3 | .571 | 27.4 | L2 |
| MC | DEFENSE | Rush Yds < 150 | 4 | 2-2 | .500 | 27.0 | L2 |
| MC | DEFENSE | YPC 5.0+ | 7 | 3-4 | .429 | 33.3 | L3 |
| MC | DEFENSE | YPC < 5.0 | 4 | 3-1 | .750 | 16.8 | L1 |
| MC | DEFENSE | YPP 6.0+ | 9 | 4-5 | .444 | 30.3 | L3 |
| MC | DEFENSE | YPP < 6.0 | 2 | 2-0 | 1.000 | 13.5 | W2 |
| MC | DEFENSE | YPP 7.0+ | 8 | 3-5 | .375 | 30.9 | L5 |
| MC | DEFENSE | YPP < 7.0 | 3 | 3-0 | 1.000 | 17.7 | W3 |
| MC | DEFENSE | Turnovers 1+ | 5 | 3-2 | .600 | 29.4 | L2 |
| MC | DEFENSE | Turnovers < 1 | 6 | 3-3 | .500 | 25.5 | L1 |
| MC | DEFENSE | Turnovers 2+ | 2 | 2-0 | 1.000 | 23.0 | W2 |
| MC | DEFENSE | Allows <10 | 1 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 8.0 | W1 |
| MC | DEFENSE | Allows 10-19 | 3 | 3-0 | 1.000 | 12.3 | W3 |
| MC | DEFENSE | Allows 20-29 | 1 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 26.0 | W1 |
| MC | DEFENSE | Allows 30-39 | 4 | 1-3 | .250 | 34.0 | L3 |
| MC | DEFENSE | Allows 40+ | 2 | 0-2 | .000 | 46.5 | L2 |
| SIDE | SPLIT | STREAK | DATES | RECORD |
| OFFENSE | Rush Yds 100+ | 11 games | 09/26/2024 - 10/23/2026 | 6-5 |
| DEFENSE | YPP 6.0+ | 7 games | 08/28/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 2-5 |
| DEFENSE | Rush Yds 100+ | 4 games | 09/25/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 1-3 |
| DEFENSE | YPC 5.0+ | 4 games | 09/25/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 1-3 |
| DEFENSE | YPP 7.0+ | 3 games | 10/02/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 0-3 |
| Team | Side | Split | Streak | Dates | Record |
| MC | OFFENSE | Rush Yds 100+ | 11 games | 09/26/2024 - 10/23/2026 | 6-5 |
| MC | DEFENSE | YPP 6.0+ | 7 games | 08/28/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 2-5 |
| MC | DEFENSE | Rush Yds 100+ | 4 games | 09/25/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 1-3 |
| MC | DEFENSE | YPC 5.0+ | 4 games | 09/25/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 1-3 |
| MC | DEFENSE | YPP 7.0+ | 3 games | 10/02/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 0-3 |
MC DEFENSE
MC's defense has averaged 310.0 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 193.1 pass yards per game. (+61%)
MC's defense has averaged 0.3 takeaways per game over their last 7 games. Their 11-game average is 0.6 takeaways per game. (-55%)
MC's defense has averaged 42.0 points allowed per game over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 27.3 points allowed per game. (+54%)
MC's defense has averaged 483.3 total yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 360.5 total yards per game. (+34%)
MC's defense has averaged 10.9 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 11-game average is 8.4 YPA. (+31%)
(moved to the Appendix, Data Export 1, to keep this section shorter -- the full spreadsheet-paste table is there unchanged)
Full-length explanations and full-size data exports for the shortened notes and relocated tables referenced throughout this report, numbered in the order their pointers appear above.
Explanatory Notes
Note 1 -- SEASON OUTLOOK
Every remaining game is projected from schedule-adjusted ratings; already-played games carry their real result. Records are simulated distributions, not a single guess -- MOST LIKELY FINAL is the single most probable record and its own probability, PROJECTED RECORD is the season's expected win total expressed in record form (an average across every simulated outcome, so it can land on a fraction of a game).
Note 2 -- OPPONENT TRACKER -- why some cards have no record shown
Only meaningful for an opponent who is ALSO a tracked team in the library -- an opponent with no games on file here at all shows the date and site alone.
Note 3 -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS -- how a number is scored
Every split this report computes is scored on how strong the number is and how much it sets this team apart from its opponent and the rest of the field, and the top 5 per team are listed. A condition needs at least 8 occurrences to count.
Full Data Exports
Data Export 1 -- TRENDS — TAB-SEPARATED (10 columns)
| Team | Side | Type | Stat | Opponent | Window/Meetings | Value | BaselineGames | BaselineAvg | Deviation |
| MC | DEFENSE | team | Pass Yards | last 3 | 310.0 | 11 | 193.1 | +60.5% | |
| MC | DEFENSE | team | Points | last 3 | 42.0 | 11 | 27.3 | +54.0% | |
| MC | DEFENSE | team | Total Yards | last 3 | 483.3 | 11 | 360.5 | +34.1% | |
| MC | DEFENSE | team | Turnovers | last 7 | 0.3 | 11 | 0.6 | -55.1% | |
| MC | DEFENSE | team | YPA | last 3 | 10.9 | 11 | 8.4 | +30.8% |
