In short: Innovation Academy Sentinels high school football (Springfield, TN), 2026 season: 0-9. Last game: L 0-58 vs clay county on October 23, 2026. Next: vs Red Boiling Springs, October 29, 2026. Schedule and results, player season stats, stat leaders, unit grades, ScorePirate ranking and the game-by-game log.
| RECORD | 0-9 this season |
| LAST GAME | L 0-58 vs CLAY COUNTY |
| NEXT GAME | RED BOILING SPRINGS (10/29/2026) |
| UNIT GRADES | Pass Off 3.8 · Rush Off 3.2 · Pass Def 68.3 · Rush Def 3.5 |
| TEAM | PASS O | RUSH O | PASS D | RUSH D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INNOVATION ACADEMY | 3.8 (-131) | 3.2 (-159) | 68.3 (-30) | 3.5 (+162) |
Next: vs Red Boiling Springs, Thu 29 Oct. Matchup report: Red Boiling Springs at Innovation Academy.
The number to watch when Innovation Academy meets Red Boiling Springs is Innovation Academy's scoring defense. Innovation Academy allowed 41.8 points per game over its first 4 games (0-4), #73 in section in that timeframe. In the 5 games since that hot start (0-5), the Sentinels have allowed 50.6 points per game, a 21% rise, #81 in section in that window. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Innovation Academy's last 5 opponents have averaged 30.3 points per game, a #31 offense in section on the season, against 27.8 points per game, #36 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (30.3 points per game), Innovation Academy allowed 67% more than those offenses usually score. Meanwhile, Red Boiling Springs' offense has struggled in recent weeks. The Bulldogs have averaged 2.8 points per game over their last 5 games (0-5), #78 in section during that time. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of scoring defenses in section (20.5 points per game on the season, which would rank #35). Against those norms, Red Boiling Springs scored 86% less than those defenses usually allow. Overall, those opponents average an SP Strength Index rating that would rank #58 in section, a lower level of competition. Both units come in looking to get right, and whichever does first may decide the game.
Innovation Academy's ground game looks better on paper, but one afternoon is doing a lot of the work. Innovation Academy averaged 2.5 yards per carry (646 yards on 254 rushes) on the season, #65 in section, but that number is boosted by a 210-yard game on 39 rushes against lookout valley-chattanooga-tn on 9/11. In all other games, Innovation Academy is at 2.0 yards per carry (436 yards on 215 rushes), a figure that would rank #66 in section. Red Boiling Springs' run defense (11.8 yards per carry, #79 of 82) gives Innovation Academy a real chance to look like the season line again.
• Club Innovation Academy has lost 9 straight, and a loss would make it 10 in a row -- something they have not done in the 1 seasons on record.
From the games on file through Sep 25.
Every player with a stat on file, listed only where he has one. Open the arrow beside a name for his game-by-game line. Stats through the Sep 25 game; last updated Sep 30.
| PASSING | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | C/ATT | COMP % | YDS | YPA | TD | INT | QBR |
| S. MCINNIS | 6 | 16/42 | 38.1% | 118 | 2.8 | 0 | 4 | 42.6 | |
| C. KING | 3 | 0/1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| TEAM TOTALS | 6 | 16/43 | 37.2% | 118 | 2.7 | 0 | 4 | 41.7 | |
| RUSHING | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | CAR | YDS | YPC | TD |
| J. DUNN | 6 | 76 | 403 | 5.3 | 1 | |
| C. PERRY | 6 | 31 | 97 | 3.1 | 0 | |
| K. WHITE | 2 | 3 | -3 | -1.0 | 0 | |
| A. JUAREZ | 5 | 1 | -3 | -3.0 | 0 | |
| S. MCINNIS | 6 | 60 | -54 | -0.9 | 1 | |
| TEAM TOTALS | 6 | 171 | 440 | 2.6 | 2 | |
| RECEIVING | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | REC | YDS | YPR | TD |
| J. DUNN | 6 | 5 | 40 | 8.0 | 0 | |
| C. PERRY | 6 | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 0 | |
| K. WHITE | 2 | 5 | 26 | 5.2 | 0 | |
| G. MOSELEY | 2 | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 | |
| G. DORRIS | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | |
| TEAM TOTALS | 6 | 15 | 115 | 7.7 | 0 | |
| DEFENSE | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | TCKL | TFL | SACKS | INT | INT YDS | PD | FF |
| C. PERRY | 6 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| J. DUNN | 6 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| B. BANKS | 5 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| O. PARKER | 6 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| A. JUAREZ | 5 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| K. WHITE | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| S. MCINNIS | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| E. UMIPIG | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| N. MCDOUGALL | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| R. JONES | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| S. QUINTERO | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| I. LANE | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| C. KING | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| L. WHITE | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| B. PEREZ | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| G. MOSELEY | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| A. CORTEZ | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| J. HAWKINS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TEAM TOTALS | 6 | 139 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
PROGRAM RECORD
| SEASON | RECORD | PF | PA | PPG |
| 2026 | 0-9 | 12 | 420 | 1.3 |
| 2026 | 0-9 | 1.3 |
| DATE | OPPONENT | SITE | RESULT | SCORE | WIN% |
| 08/21 | VS. LIBERTY TECH MAGNET | vs | L | 0-42 | |
| 08/28 | GRUNDY COUNTY | vs | L | 0-50 | |
| 09/04 | VS. TROUSDALE COUNTY | vs | L | 0-55 | |
| 09/11 | VS. LOOKOUT VALLEY | vs | L | 0-20 | |
| 09/18 | @ CHEATHAM COUNTY CENTRAL | at | L | 6-63 | |
| 09/25 | ZION CHRISTIAN ACADEMY | at | L | 6-49 | |
| 10/05 | STEWART COUNTY | at | L | 0-41 | |
| 10/09 | JO BYRNS | at | L | 0-42 | |
| 10/23 | @ CLAY COUNTY* | at | L | 0-58 | |
| 10/29 | RED BOILING SPRINGS | vs | PROJ | 25-26 | 48.8% |
| SEASON TO DATE | 0-9 | 1 REMAINING |
SEASON OUTLOOK
(full explanation: Appendix, Note 1)
| RECORD TO DATE | MOST LIKELY FINAL | PROJECTED RECORD | |
| Overall | 0-9 so far | 0-10 (51%) | 0.5-9.5 |
| League | 0-2 so far | 0-2 (100%) | 0.0-2.0 |
| SPLIT | GP | PPG | OPP PPG | YPG | OPP YPG | PLAYS/G | OPP PLAYS/G |
| OVERALL | 9 | 1.3 | 46.7 | 88.9 | 330.0 | 35.9 | 24.0 |
| HOME | 4 | 0.0 | 41.8 | 82.0 | 311.5 | 37.0 | 19.5 |
| ROAD | 5 | 2.4 | 50.6 | 94.4 | 348.5 | 35.0 | 28.5 |
PPG/OPP PPG use every played game on file. YPG/PLAYS-PER-GAME columns only ever come from games with a full box score on file, which can be a smaller sample than GP -- see the coverage note below when that's the case for this team.
| DATE | OPPONENT | RESULT | PASS YDS | RUSH YDS | TOTAL YDS | PASS ALW | RUSH ALW | TOTAL ALW | SACKS ALW | SACKS | DEF INT | TO FORCED | TO MAR |
| 8/21 | vs. Liberty Tech Magnet | L 0-42 | 5 | 16 | 21 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 |
| 8/28 | vs. Grundy County | L 0-50 | 37 | 10 | 47 | 145 | 224 | 369 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9/4 | vs. Trousdale County | L 0-55 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 33 | 221 | 254 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 |
| 9/11 | vs. Lookout Valley | L 0-20 | 21 | 210 | 231 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 |
| 9/18 | @ Cheatham County Central | L 6-63 | 35 | 111 | 146 | 32 | 276 | 308 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 |
| 9/25 | @ Zion Christian Academy | L 6-49 | 3 | 81 | 84 | 74 | 315 | 389 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 10/5 | @ Stewart County | L 0-41 | 0 | 153 | 153 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 0 | -1 |
| 10/9 | @ Jo Byrns | L 0-42 | 28 | 11 | 39 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | +1 |
| 10/23 | @ Clay County | L 0-58 | 8 | 42 | 50 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 0 | -2 |
| AVERAGES | 17.1 | 71.8 | 88.9 | 71.0 | 259.0 | 330.0 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | -7 (season) |
Averages use only games with that number on file (defense 4/9, sacks/INT 6/9, sacks allowed 4/9 games). SACKS ALW comes from the opponent's box score; TO FORCED is takeaways; TO MAR is takeaways minus giveaways, and its bottom cell is the season total. Dashes mean not on file.
UNIT INDEX
Pass Offense: grade 3.8/100 (-131 yds/gm vs average)
Rush Offense: grade 3.2/100 (-159 yds/gm vs average)
Pass Defense: grade 68.3/100 (-30 yds/gm vs average)
Rush Defense: grade 3.5/100 (+162 yds/gm vs average)
Unit grades: 0-100 league percentile, opponent-curved (adjusted for the opponents faced).
OPPONENT TRACKER
(full explanation: Appendix, Note 2)
| DATE | SITE | OPPONENT | THEIR RECORD | THEIR PPG |
| 2026-10-29 | vs | RED BOILING SPRINGS | 0-9 | 4.2 |
• IA is held under 100 rushing yards (.000), but most recently lost to Clay County when doing so
• IA commits zero giveaways (.000), but most recently lost to Jo Byrns when doing so
• IA forces no takeaways (.000), but most recently lost to Clay County when doing so
• IA's offense has averaged 0.0 points scored per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 1.3 points scored per game. (-100%)
• IA's offense has failed to reach 8.0 YPA in 9 straight games (08/21/2026-10/23/2026), going 0-9 over that stretch.
• IA's offense has failed to reach 200 pass yds in 9 straight games (08/21/2026-10/23/2026), going 0-9 over that stretch.
• IA's offense has failed to reach 6.0 YPP in 9 straight games (08/21/2026-10/23/2026), going 0-9 over that stretch.
• IA's offense has failed to reach 7.0 YPP in 9 straight games (08/21/2026-10/23/2026), going 0-9 over that stretch.
• IA's offense has failed to reach 5.0 YPC in 5 straight games (09/18/2026-10/23/2026), going 0-5 over that stretch.
• IA's offense has averaged 1.2 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 2.3 YPA. (-49%)
• IA's offense has averaged 12.0 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 17.1 pass yards per game. (-30%)
• IA's defense has averaged 0.4 takeaways per game over their last 7 games. Their 9-game average is 0.3 takeaways per game. (+29%)
• IA's offense has averaged 1.4 giveaways per game over their last 5 games. Their 9-game average is 1.1 giveaways per game. (+26%)
• IA's offense has averaged 3.0 YPC over their last 5 games. Their 9-game average is 2.4 YPC. (+24%)
• IA's offense has averaged 88.6 rush yards per game over their last 7 games. Their 9-game average is 71.8 rush yards per game. (+23%)
(full explanation: Appendix, Note 3)
IA -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS
(top 5 of 8 scored; vs 1231 cached team(s))
| # | SIDE | CONDITION | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK | SCORE |
| 1 | OFF | YPC < 5 | 0-8 | .000 | 1.5 | L8 | 0.674 |
| 2 | OFF | YPP < 6 | 0-9 | .000 | 1.3 | L9 | 0.640 |
| 3 | OFF | YPP < 7 | 0-9 | .000 | 1.3 | L9 | 0.554 |
| 4 | OFF | YPA < 8 | 0-9 | .000 | 1.3 | L9 | 0.553 |
| 5 | OFF | Pass Yds < 200 | 0-9 | .000 | 1.3 | L9 | 0.528 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK |
| YPA 8.0+ | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| YPA < 8.0 | 0-9 | .000 | 1.3 | L9 |
| Pass Yds 200+ | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Pass Yds < 200 | 0-9 | .000 | 1.3 | L9 |
| Rush Yds 100+ | 0-3 | .000 | 2.0 | L3 |
| Rush Yds < 100 | 0-6 | .000 | 1.0 | L6 |
| Rush Yds 150+ | 0-2 | .000 | 0.0 | L2 |
| Rush Yds < 150 | 0-7 | .000 | 1.7 | L7 |
| YPC 5.0+ | 0-1 | .000 | 0.0 | L1 |
| YPC < 5.0 | 0-8 | .000 | 1.5 | L8 |
| YPP 6.0+ | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| YPP < 6.0 | 0-9 | .000 | 1.3 | L9 |
| YPP 7.0+ | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| YPP < 7.0 | 0-9 | .000 | 1.3 | L9 |
| Turnovers 1+ | 0-6 | .000 | 2.0 | L6 |
| Turnovers < 1 | 0-3 | .000 | 0.0 | L3 |
| Turnovers 2+ | 0-3 | .000 | 2.0 | L3 |
| Turnovers > 2 | 0-1 | .000 | 6.0 | L1 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG |
| Scores <10 | 0-9 | .000 | 1.3 |
| Scores 10-19 | -- | -- | -- |
| Scores 20-29 | -- | -- | -- |
| Scores 30-39 | -- | -- | -- |
| Scores 40+ | -- | -- | -- |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK | |
| YPA 8.0+ | 0-4 | .000 | 54.2 | L4 | |
| YPA < 8.0 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 5 games without this stat on file |
| Pass Yds 200+ | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
| Pass Yds < 200 | 0-4 | .000 | 54.2 | L4 | 5 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 100+ | 0-4 | .000 | 54.2 | L4 | |
| Rush Yds < 100 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 5 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 150+ | 0-4 | .000 | 54.2 | L4 | |
| Rush Yds < 150 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 5 games without this stat on file |
| YPC 5.0+ | 0-4 | .000 | 54.2 | L4 | |
| YPC < 5.0 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 5 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 6.0+ | 0-4 | .000 | 54.2 | L4 | |
| YPP < 6.0 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 5 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 7.0+ | 0-4 | .000 | 54.2 | L4 | |
| YPP < 7.0 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 5 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers 1+ | 0-3 | .000 | 48.7 | L3 | |
| Turnovers < 1 | 0-6 | .000 | 45.7 | L6 | |
| Turnovers 2+ | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
| Turnovers > 2 | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG |
| Allows <10 | -- | -- | -- |
| Allows 10-19 | -- | -- | -- |
| Allows 20-29 | 0-1 | .000 | 20.0 |
| Allows 30-39 | -- | -- | -- |
| Allows 40+ | 0-8 | .000 | 50.0 |
INNOVATION ACADEMY
• INNOVATION ACADEMY has allowed 30+ in 5 straight games (9/18/26–10/23/26). It has never reached 6 straight in the games on file, back to 2026.
• INNOVATION ACADEMY has been held under 100 rushing in 2 straight games (10/9/26–10/23/26). It has not been held under 100 rushing in 3 straight since 8/21/26–9/4/26 (2026).
| Team | Side | Split | Games | Record | Win% | PPG | Strk |
| IA | OFFENSE | YPA < 8.0 | 9 | 0-9 | .000 | 1.3 | L9 |
| IA | OFFENSE | Pass Yds < 200 | 9 | 0-9 | .000 | 1.3 | L9 |
| IA | OFFENSE | Rush Yds 100+ | 3 | 0-3 | .000 | 2.0 | L3 |
| IA | OFFENSE | Rush Yds < 100 | 6 | 0-6 | .000 | 1.0 | L6 |
| IA | OFFENSE | Rush Yds 150+ | 2 | 0-2 | .000 | 0.0 | L2 |
| IA | OFFENSE | Rush Yds < 150 | 7 | 0-7 | .000 | 1.7 | L7 |
| IA | OFFENSE | YPC 5.0+ | 1 | 0-1 | .000 | 0.0 | L1 |
| IA | OFFENSE | YPC < 5.0 | 8 | 0-8 | .000 | 1.5 | L8 |
| IA | OFFENSE | YPP < 6.0 | 9 | 0-9 | .000 | 1.3 | L9 |
| IA | OFFENSE | YPP < 7.0 | 9 | 0-9 | .000 | 1.3 | L9 |
| IA | OFFENSE | Turnovers 1+ | 6 | 0-6 | .000 | 2.0 | L6 |
| IA | OFFENSE | Turnovers < 1 | 3 | 0-3 | .000 | 0.0 | L3 |
| IA | OFFENSE | Turnovers 2+ | 3 | 0-3 | .000 | 2.0 | L3 |
| IA | OFFENSE | Turnovers > 2 | 1 | 0-1 | .000 | 6.0 | L1 |
| IA | OFFENSE | Scores <10 | 9 | 0-9 | .000 | 1.3 | L9 |
| IA | DEFENSE | YPA 8.0+ | 4 | 0-4 | .000 | 54.2 | L4 |
| IA | DEFENSE | Pass Yds < 200 | 4 | 0-4 | .000 | 54.2 | L4 |
| IA | DEFENSE | Rush Yds 100+ | 4 | 0-4 | .000 | 54.2 | L4 |
| IA | DEFENSE | Rush Yds 150+ | 4 | 0-4 | .000 | 54.2 | L4 |
| IA | DEFENSE | YPC 5.0+ | 4 | 0-4 | .000 | 54.2 | L4 |
| IA | DEFENSE | YPP 6.0+ | 4 | 0-4 | .000 | 54.2 | L4 |
| IA | DEFENSE | YPP 7.0+ | 4 | 0-4 | .000 | 54.2 | L4 |
| IA | DEFENSE | Turnovers 1+ | 3 | 0-3 | .000 | 48.7 | L3 |
| IA | DEFENSE | Turnovers < 1 | 6 | 0-6 | .000 | 45.7 | L6 |
| IA | DEFENSE | Allows 20-29 | 1 | 0-1 | .000 | 20.0 | L1 |
| IA | DEFENSE | Allows 40+ | 8 | 0-8 | .000 | 50.0 | L8 |
| SIDE | SPLIT | STREAK | DATES | RECORD |
| OFFENSE | YPA < 8.0 | 9 games | 08/21/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 0-9 |
| OFFENSE | Pass Yds < 200 | 9 games | 08/21/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 0-9 |
| OFFENSE | YPP < 6.0 | 9 games | 08/21/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 0-9 |
| OFFENSE | YPP < 7.0 | 9 games | 08/21/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 0-9 |
| OFFENSE | YPC < 5.0 | 5 games | 09/18/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 0-5 |
| Team | Side | Split | Streak | Dates | Record |
| IA | OFFENSE | YPA < 8.0 | 9 games | 08/21/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 0-9 |
| IA | OFFENSE | Pass Yds < 200 | 9 games | 08/21/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 0-9 |
| IA | OFFENSE | YPP < 6.0 | 9 games | 08/21/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 0-9 |
| IA | OFFENSE | YPP < 7.0 | 9 games | 08/21/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 0-9 |
| IA | OFFENSE | YPC < 5.0 | 5 games | 09/18/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 0-5 |
IA OFFENSE
IA's offense has averaged 0.0 points scored per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 1.3 points scored per game. (-100%)
IA's offense has averaged 1.2 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 2.3 YPA. (-49%)
IA's offense has averaged 12.0 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 17.1 pass yards per game. (-30%)
IA's offense has averaged 1.4 giveaways per game over their last 5 games. Their 9-game average is 1.1 giveaways per game. (+26%)
IA's offense has averaged 3.0 YPC over their last 5 games. Their 9-game average is 2.4 YPC. (+24%)
IA's offense has averaged 88.6 rush yards per game over their last 7 games. Their 9-game average is 71.8 rush yards per game. (+23%)
IA DEFENSE
IA's defense has averaged 0.4 takeaways per game over their last 7 games. Their 9-game average is 0.3 takeaways per game. (+29%)
(moved to the Appendix, Data Export 1, to keep this section shorter -- the full spreadsheet-paste table is there unchanged)
Full-length explanations and full-size data exports for the shortened notes and relocated tables referenced throughout this report, numbered in the order their pointers appear above.
Explanatory Notes
Note 1 -- SEASON OUTLOOK
Every remaining game is projected from schedule-adjusted ratings; already-played games carry their real result. Records are simulated distributions, not a single guess -- MOST LIKELY FINAL is the single most probable record and its own probability, PROJECTED RECORD is the season's expected win total expressed in record form (an average across every simulated outcome, so it can land on a fraction of a game).
Note 2 -- OPPONENT TRACKER -- why some cards have no record shown
Only meaningful for an opponent who is ALSO a tracked team in the library -- an opponent with no games on file here at all shows the date and site alone.
Note 3 -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS -- how a number is scored
Every split this report computes is scored on how strong the number is and how much it sets this team apart from its opponent and the rest of the field, and the top 5 per team are listed.
Full Data Exports
Data Export 1 -- TRENDS — TAB-SEPARATED (10 columns)
| Team | Side | Type | Stat | Opponent | Window/Meetings | Value | BaselineGames | BaselineAvg | Deviation |
| IA | OFFENSE | team | Pass Yards | last 3 | 12.0 | 9 | 17.1 | -29.9% | |
| IA | OFFENSE | team | Points | last 3 | 0.0 | 9 | 1.3 | -100.0% | |
| IA | OFFENSE | team | Rush Yards | last 7 | 88.6 | 9 | 71.8 | +23.4% | |
| IA | DEFENSE | team | Turnovers | last 7 | 0.4 | 9 | 0.3 | +28.6% | |
| IA | OFFENSE | team | Turnovers | last 5 | 1.4 | 9 | 1.1 | +26.0% | |
| IA | OFFENSE | team | YPA | last 3 | 1.2 | 9 | 2.3 | -48.7% | |
| IA | OFFENSE | team | YPC | last 5 | 3.0 | 9 | 2.4 | +24.2% |
