ScorePirate
MENU
AT A GLANCE

In short: Foothill Knights high school football (Santa Ana, CA), 2026 season: 4-5 in the Epsilon League. Last game: W 35-13 vs Tesoro on October 23, 2026. Next: vs Aliso Niguel, October 30, 2026. Schedule and results, player season stats, stat leaders, unit grades, ScorePirate ranking and the game-by-game log.

ScorePirate Individual Team Report
FOOTHILL
FOOTHILL 4-5
2026 SEASON
FOOTHILL
AT A GLANCE — AS OF 10/30/2026
RECORD4-5 this season
LAST GAMEW 35-13 vs TESORO
NEXT GAMEALISO NIGUEL (10/30/2026)
UNIT GRADESPass Off 46.6 · Rush Off 54.9 · Pass Def 48.3 · Rush Def 57.7
LEAGUEEPSILON
ENROLLMENT2,126 STUDENTS (2024-25) · PUBLIC
NUMBERS TO NOTE
#110
SP Strength Index (of 431)
4-5
2026 record
-6.0
avg scoring margin, pts/gm
UNIT INDEX — GRADE (YDS VS AVG)
TEAMPASS ORUSH OPASS DRUSH D
FOOTHILL46.6 (-22)54.9 (+0)48.3 (-2)57.7 (-18)
HEAD-TO-HEAD GAME LOG

STORYLINES

Next: vs Aliso Niguel, Fri 30 Oct. Matchup report: Aliso Niguel at Foothill.

The number to watch when Foothill meets Aliso Niguel is Foothill's scoring. Foothill averaged 13.7 points per game over its first 6 games (2-4), #344 in CIF-SS in that timeframe. Over the stretch of 3 games that followed (2-1), the Knights have averaged 32.3 points per game, a 137% rise, #112 in CIF-SS in that window. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Foothill's last 3 opponents have averaged 27.6 points per game, a #271 scoring defense in CIF-SS on the season, against 15.7 points per game, #77 for the first 6. Measured against those opponents' norms (27.6 points per game), Foothill scored 17% more than those defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 3 opponents average a rating that would rank #124 in CIF-SS, well below the first 6 (#55), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. Meanwhile, Aliso Niguel's defense has struggled in recent weeks. The Wolverines have allowed 38.3 points per game over their last 3 games (0-3), #344 in CIF-SS during that time. Those games came against some of the better offenses in CIF-SS (30.7 points per game on the season, which would rank #117). Against those norms, Aliso Niguel allowed 25% more than those offenses usually score. Overall, those opponents average an SP Strength Index rating that would rank #60 in CIF-SS, a strong slate. On paper, that is a matchup that favors Foothill. Foothill is 1-1 this season when it scores 29 or more, and 3-4 when it doesn't.

The turnover battle could decide Foothill's next game, against Aliso Niguel, and the recent returns favor Aliso Niguel. Foothill forced 2.0 takeaways per game over its first 5 games (2-3), #57 in CIF-SS through those games. Over the stretch of 4 games that followed (2-2), the Knights have forced 0.2 takeaways per game, an 88% drop, #365 in CIF-SS through that stretch. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 1.0 per game on the season. Measured against those opponents' norms (1.1 per game), Foothill forced 77% fewer turnovers than those offenses usually give up. Overall, those opponents have been strong teams: their average SP Strength Index rating would rank #91 in CIF-SS. Meanwhile, Aliso Niguel's ball security has been middle of the pack in recent weeks. The Wolverines have committed 1.5 giveaways per game over their last 4 games (1-3), #238 in CIF-SS over that stretch. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of defenses in CIF-SS (1.3 per game on the season, which would rank #210). Against those norms, Aliso Niguel turned it over 17% more than those defenses usually force. Overall, those opponents average an SP Strength Index rating that would rank #91 in CIF-SS, a strong slate. Aliso Niguel offers Foothill a fair measuring stick for whether the trend is real.

NOTES

The biggest worry in Foothill's season has been the direction of its pass defense. Foothill allowed 6.7 yards per pass attempt (493 yards on 74 attempts) over its first 5 games (2-3), #125 in CIF-SS within that period. Over the stretch of 4 games that followed (2-2), the Knights have allowed 11.1 yards per pass attempt (873 yards on 79 attempts), a 66% rise, #332 in CIF-SS across those games. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 8.7 yards per attempt on the season. Measured against those opponents' norms (8.7 yards per attempt), Foothill allowed 27% more per attempt than those passing attacks usually gain. Overall, those opponents have been strong teams: their average SP Strength Index rating would rank #91 in CIF-SS. On the season, Foothill ranks #279 in CIF-SS in pass defense. Aliso Niguel's passing game, #355 of 377 (4.5 yards per attempt), could be the get-right matchup Foothill needs.

The Knights averaged 5.1 yards per pass attempt (480 yards on 95 attempts) over their first 4 games (1-3), #316 in CIF-SS during those games. Few teams started slower in this department, and few have turned it around as sharply since. In the 5 games since that slow start (3-2), Foothill has averaged 7.5 yards per pass attempt (652 yards on 87 attempts), a 48% rise, #196 in CIF-SS during that period. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Foothill's last 5 opponents have averaged 8.1 yards per attempt, a #230 pass defense in CIF-SS on the season, against 6.7 yards per attempt, #98 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (8.1 yards per attempt), Foothill threw for 8% less per attempt than those pass defenses usually allow. So the improvement is real, but it still trails what those opponents usually give up. On the season, the Knights rank #291 in CIF-SS in passing. Aliso Niguel's pass defense sits in the middle of the pack, #147 in CIF-SS (7.1 yards per attempt).

Foothill's defense from the opening weeks has gone missing since. Foothill allowed 21.6 points per game over its first 5 games (2-3), #184 in CIF-SS during that stretch. Over the stretch of 4 games that followed (2-2), the Knights have allowed 31.2 points per game, a 45% rise, #285 in CIF-SS over that period. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 26.0 points per game on the season. Measured against those opponents' norms (26.9 points per game), Foothill allowed 16% more than those offenses usually score. Overall, those opponents have been strong teams: their average SP Strength Index rating would rank #91 in CIF-SS. On the season, Foothill ranks #242 in CIF-SS in scoring defense. Aliso Niguel's offense, #324 of 404 (16.6 points per game), could be the get-right matchup Foothill needs. Foothill is 4-0 this season when it holds opponents under 17, and 0-5 when it doesn't.

Something changed for Foothill's ball security after its first 4 games. The Knights committed 2.2 giveaways per game over their first 4 games (1-3), #352 in CIF-SS over that timeframe. In the 5 games since that slow start (3-2), Foothill has committed 1.4 giveaways per game, a 38% drop, #214 in CIF-SS over that span. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Foothill's last 5 opponents have averaged 1.3 per game, a #210 defense in CIF-SS on the season, against 1.2 per game, #242 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (1.3 per game), Foothill turned it over 8% more than those defenses usually force. So the improvement is real, but it still trails what those opponents usually give up. On the season, the Knights rank #315 in CIF-SS in giveaways. Aliso Niguel's defense sits in the middle of the pack, #178 in CIF-SS (1.4 per game).

Foothill's defense has given up chunk yardage as the season has progressed. Foothill allowed 5.9 yards per play (1,092 yards on 185 snaps) over its first 5 games (2-3), #140 in CIF-SS in that timeframe. Over the stretch of 4 games that followed (2-2), the Knights have allowed 7.9 yards per play (1,575 yards on 200 snaps), a 33% rise, #280 in CIF-SS in that window. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 6.8 yards per play on the season. Measured against those opponents' norms (6.9 yards per play), Foothill allowed 15% more per snap than those offenses usually gain. Overall, those opponents have been strong teams: their average SP Strength Index rating would rank #91 in CIF-SS. On the season, Foothill ranks #232 in CIF-SS in yards per play allowed. Aliso Niguel's offense, #345 of 380 (4.6 yards per play), could be the get-right matchup Foothill needs.

TIDBITS (10 found)

• Club Foothill has won 2 straight, and a win would make it 3 in a row. The last time they won 3 or more in a row was 2022, a run of 3.

• Club Foothill is 46-1 all time when holding the opponent under 10 points. Foothill's last loss when holding the opponent under 10 points was October 6, 2006 against Santa Margarita (L, 6-7).

• Club Foothill has gone 4 straight games allowing 6.0+ yards per play (October 2, 2026 through October 23, 2026), going 2-2 over that stretch, the program's longest such streak since 2025 (8 games).

• Club Foothill has gone 4 straight games forcing fewer than 2 turnovers (October 2, 2026 through October 23, 2026), going 2-2 over that stretch, the program's longest such streak since 2026 (14 games).

• Player Ford Wooton has 3 touchdown catches over his last 3 games (1.0 a game, October 9, 2026 through October 23, 2026) -- his most in a 3-game stretch on record.

• Player Quinn Mulkerin has 33 tackles over his last 3 games (11.0 a game, October 9, 2026 through October 23, 2026) -- his most in a 3-game stretch on record.

• Player Anthony Luna has 35 tackles over his last 3 games (11.7 a game, October 9, 2026 through October 23, 2026) -- his most in a 3-game stretch on record.

• Player Jesse Martinez has 25 tackles over his last 3 games (8.3 a game, October 9, 2026 through October 23, 2026) -- his most in a 3-game stretch on record.

• Player Gavin Fenton has gone 3 straight games running for a touchdown, the longest such streak of his career.

• Player Fysher Jamieson has gone 2 straight games throwing a touchdown pass, the longest such streak of his career.

SCHEDULE STRENGTH

Foothill has played one of the toughest schedules in the pool so far (#49 of 405).

Schedule so far · 1 = hardest
#49 of 405
avg opponent rating 18.9 over 10 games · 2 vs top-25 CIF-SS
Schedule ahead
—
no games left on file
Toughest game played
Tustin
#14 in CIF-SS · Aug 28 · L 0-35
Laguna H…
L 21-31
@Tustin
L 0-35
Norte Vi…
W 23-7
@El Modena
L 10-28
Cypress
W 21-7
@Newport …
L 7-48
Trabuco …
L 42-49
Brea Oli…
W 20-15
@Tesoro
W 35-13
Aliso Ni…
Each bar is one opponent, placed by where its rating ranks in this pool (tall and red = top 10; short and green = bottom half). Hatched bars are games still to play; the dashed line is today.
MILESTONE WATCH

Foothill

  • Andrew Katnik needs 6 tackles for 50 (averaging 5.5 a game)
  • Ben Mason needs 6 tackles for 50 (averaging 5.5 a game)
  • Trey Cowdell needs 6 tackles for 50 (averaging 4.9 a game)
FOO — STAT LEADERS
FULL ROSTER ↓
OFFENSE
PASSING LEADER
1039PASS YDS
C-ATT85-171
COMP%49.7%
YPA6.1
TD7
INT6
QBR107.2
RUSHING LEADER
799RUSH YDS
CAR148
YPC5.4
RUSH TD10
REC11
REC YDS98
YPR8.9
REC TD0
RUSHING LEADER
216RUSH YDS
CAR36
YPC6.0
RUSH TD4
REC11
REC YDS162
YPR14.7
REC TD2
RECEIVING LEADER
390REC YDS
REC25
YPR15.6
REC TD5
RECEIVING LEADER
193REC YDS
REC19
YPR10.2
REC TD0
DEFENSE
TACKLES LEADER
78TCKL
TFL6
SACKS0
INT1
PD0
FF0
TACKLES LEADER
63TCKL
TFL6
SACKS2
INT0
PD0
FF0
TACKLES LEADER
56TCKL
TFL7
SACKS2
INT0
PD0
FF0
TFL LEADER
4TFL
TCKL44
SACKS1
INT0
PD0
FF0
TFL LEADER
3TFL
TCKL44
SACKS0
INT2
PD0
FF0
SACKS LEADER
2SACKS
TCKL9
TFL3
INT0
PD0
FF0
INTERCEPTIONS LEADER
2INT
TCKL41
TFL0
SACKS0
PD0
FF0
FOO — WHAT CHANGED THIS WEEK

From the games on file through Oct 23.

REMAINING SCHEDULE

Most likely finish 5-5 · realistic range 4-6 to 5-5

Remaining schedule: 129th hardest of 302 in the CIF-Southern Section (average opponent strength 8.6).

DateOpponentSP rankWin chance
10/30vs Aliso Niguel#170 of 43160%

Win chances are the site's own game projections where one is on file, otherwise the SP Strength Index gap with a small home edge. The realistic range covers 80% of outcomes (10th to 90th percentile).

Printable team sheetProgram historyOpen in Stat BoothWidget for your site
FOO — PLAYER SEASON STATS — 2026

Every player with a stat on file, listed only where he has one. Open the arrow beside a name for his game-by-game line. Stats through the Oct 23 game; last updated Oct 25; roster and numbers checked Sep 10.

Click a column heading to sort. MIN hides players below that many attempts.
PASSING
NOPLAYERGPC/ATTCOMP %YDSYPATDINTQBR
7FYSHER JAMIESON885/17149.7%1,0396.176107.2
12HUDSON BOWMAN38/1172.7%938.512137.4
TEAM TOTALS993/18251.1%1,1326.288109.1
RUSHING
NOPLAYERGPCARYDSYPCTD
2AIDAN FARAJ91487995.410
13GAVIN FENTON8362166.04
14FORD WOOTON958116.20
7FYSHER JAMIESON841641.62
8CHRISTIAN RAMIREZ25214.20
22GRAHAM HENZE26183.00
28JACK SILVA13134.30
36JACK SILBERMAN1144.00
12HUDSON BOWMAN3810.10
30ETHAN PEREZ41-10-10.00
TEAM TOTALS92541,2074.816
RECEIVING
NOPLAYERGPRECYDSYPRTD
14FORD WOOTON92539015.65
17PETER THATCHER81919310.20
13GAVIN FENTON81116214.72
2AIDAN FARAJ911988.90
30ETHAN PEREZ499710.81
20LINCOLN BECK13196.30
44JACKSON TIPRE32136.50
8CHRISTIAN RAMIREZ211010.00
TEAM TOTALS98198212.18
DEFENSE
NOPLAYERGPTCKLTFLSACKSINTINT YDSPDFF
4QUINN MULKERIN978601000
5ANTHONY LUNA963620000
42JESSE MARTINEZ956720000
6ANDREW KATNIK844410000
3BEN MASON844302000
56TREY COWDELL944100000
14FORD WOOTON941002000
16AARON STRAPP828001002
11COOPER DAVIS523001000
17PETER THATCHER819201000
52RYAN MEDINA715100000
21JOHN NISSON614000000
48TRISTON GAILEY610000000
85DAVID MAILLET49320000
75HOLDEN FREY38000000
13GAVIN FENTON84000000
76JAYDEN ISLAS23000000
24MARCUS CARASA23000000
54JD FORSYTH12000000
80JEREMY LAMENDOLA22000000
65NATE CORTEZ22000000
32BRADLEY EMBREY11000000
62BRYCE SLATON11000000
44JACKSON TIPRE31000000
26JOSH GRACE11000000
78JULIAN OLAYA11000000
34NOAH FOX11000000
15RAINEN LALUAN11000000
31REMY VIZCARRA11000000
TEAM TOTALS95203378002
PROGRAM SNAPSHOT: FOO

PROGRAM RECORD

SEASONRECORDPFPAPPG
20041-0352535.0
20050-1172117.0
20069-334419228.7
20079-339825333.2
20081-1636331.5
20092-820330820.3
20105-620823718.9
20118-537224628.6
20125-01703534.0
20133-1677016.8
20148-425026420.8
20156-422914622.9
20165-623325321.2
20171-914332114.3
20184-719728117.9
201911-134111028.4
20203-31097618.2
20212-0721336.0
20224-617625517.6
20237-541733834.8
20247-639144130.1
20252-712528313.9
20264-517923319.9
2004-26107-9123.9
TEAM HISTORY

1 CIF-SS title · 2 CIF-SS runner-up finishes · 1 CIF-SS Player of the Year · 1 league title

YEARHONOR
2023Crestview LEAGUE CHAMPION (2-1 in league, shared with VILLA PARK, YORBA LINDA)
2002CIF-SS Div. VI RUNNER-UP (lost to Los Altos 27-10)
CIF-SS Offensive Player of the Year (VI): MIKE LITI
1983CIF-SS Southern RUNNER-UP (lost to El Modena 10-7)
1981CIF-SS Southern CHAMPION (def. El Modena)

Section and state results and Players of the Year: CIF-SS Record Book. League finishes judged from league schedules on file (2022-2025 seasons); earlier league titles are not on file.

FOO — 2026 SEASON SCHEDULE
DATEOPPONENTSITERESULTSCOREWIN%
08/21LAGUNA HILLSvsL21-31
08/28TUSTINatL0-35
09/03NORTE VISTAvsW23-7
09/11EL MODENAatL10-28
09/18CYPRESSvsW21-7
10/02NEWPORT HARBORatL7-48
10/09TRABUCO HILLSvsL42-49
10/15BREA OLINDAvsW20-15
10/23TESOROatW35-13
10/30ALISO NIGUELvsPROJ27-2260.1%
SEASON TO DATE4-51 REMAINING

SEASON OUTLOOK

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 1)

RECORD TO DATEMOST LIKELY FINALPROJECTED RECORD
Overall4-5 so far5-5 (60%)4.6-5.4
League2-2 so far2-2 (100%)2.0-2.0
FOO — 2026 OVERALL AVERAGES
SPLITGPPPGOPP PPGYPGOPP YPGPLAYS/GOPP PLAYS/G
OVERALL919.925.9259.9333.448.448.1
HOME525.421.8291.4330.249.851.8
ROAD413.031.0220.5338.746.842.0

PPG/OPP PPG use every played game on file. YPG/PLAYS-PER-GAME columns only ever come from games with a full box score on file, which can be a smaller sample than GP -- see the coverage note below when that's the case for this team.

FOO — 2026 TEAM GAME LOG
DATEOPPONENTRESULTPASS YDSRUSH YDSTOTAL YDSPASS ALWRUSH ALWTOTAL ALWSACKS ALWSACKSDEF INTTO FORCEDTO MAR
8/21vs. Laguna HillsL 21-31982383362142334474201+1
8/28@ TustinL 0-3514955204------7000-2
9/3vs. Norte VistaW 23-7118128246382052430111+1
9/11@ El ModenaL 10-281151342491081342423124-3
9/18vs. CypressW 21-7144121265133271602144+3
10/2@ Newport HarborL 7-482868963012365371000-1
10/9vs. Trabuco HillsL 42-49249973462141994132100-4
10/15vs. Brea OlindaW 20-1513812626418720138800100
10/23@ TesoroW 35-13932403331716623701010
AVERAGES125.8134.1259.9170.8162.6333.42.10.80.91.2-5 (season)

Averages use only games with that number on file (defense 8/9 games). SACKS ALW comes from the opponent's box score; TO FORCED is takeaways; TO MAR is takeaways minus giveaways, and its bottom cell is the season total. Dashes mean not on file.

UNIT INDEX

Pass Offense: grade 46.6/100 (-22 yds/gm vs average)

Rush Offense: grade 54.9/100 (+0 yds/gm vs average)

Pass Defense: grade 48.3/100 (-2 yds/gm vs average)

Rush Defense: grade 57.7/100 (-18 yds/gm vs average)

Unit grades: 0-100 league percentile, adjusted for the opponents faced.

OPPONENT TRACKER

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 2)

DATESITEOPPONENTTHEIR RECORDTHEIR PPG
2026-10-30vsALISO NIGUEL2-716.6

LAST YEAR

FOO finished 2025 at 2-7. Missed playoffs. Notable win: 31-13 over EL DORADO (EL DORADO finished 40% that season). Toughest loss: 7-13 to MARINA (6-point margin).

LAST SEASON: FOO — 2025 GAME LOG
DATEOPPONENTRESULTRECORDPFPATOT YDSYDS ALLOWED
2025-08-21MARINAL0-1713242354
2025-08-29TUSTINL0-204477442
2025-09-12TROYL0-32149416431
2025-09-19CAPISTRANO VALLEYL0-4742142418
2025-10-04CREAN LUTHERANL0-51440168555
2025-10-10LAGUNA HILLSW1-52421352355
2025-10-17HUNTINGTON BEACHL1-61421201291
2025-10-24EL DORADOW2-63113383151
2025-10-30LA HABRAL2-7740147431
TOTALS9 GMS2-72-712528321283428
TALKING POINTS (15 storylines)
FOO HAS PERFORMED BEST THIS DATA SET WHEN...

• FOO holds its opponents under 200 passing yards (.688), and has won 3 straight when doing so

• FOO rushes for 100+ yards (.565), and has won 3 straight when doing so

• FOO throws for 200+ yards (.857), but most recently lost to Trabuco Hills when doing so

• FOO holds its opponents under 100 rushing yards (.778), and has won 3 straight when doing so

• FOO's offense has averaged 2.0 giveaways per game over their last 7 games. Their 31-game average is 1.2 giveaways per game. (+72%)

• FOO's defense has averaged 0.3 takeaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 31-game average is 1.1 takeaways per game. (-70%)

• FOO's offense has averaged 9.6 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 31-game average is 6.6 YPA. (+46%)

• FOO's offense has averaged 32.3 points scored per game over their last 3 games. Their 31-game average is 22.4 points scored per game. (+44%)

• FOO averages 5.8+ yards per attempt (FOO's own median) (.688)

• FOO's defense has conceded 6.0+ YPP in 4 straight games (10/02/2026-10/23/2026), going 2-2 over that stretch.

• FOO holds its opponents under 197.0 passing yards (FOO's own median) (.667)

• FOO holds its opponents under 6.0 yards per carry (FOO's own median) (.667)

• FOO averages 5.5+ yards per play (FOO's own median) (.625)

• FOO's defense has averaged 11.0 YPA over their last 5 games. Their 30-game average is 8.7 YPA. (+26%)

• FOO's offense has averaged 6.9 YPP over their last 3 games. Their 31-game average is 5.6 YPP. (+24%)

MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 3)

FOO -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(top 5 of 35 scored; vs 664 cached team(s))

#SIDECONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRKSCORE
1OFFRush Yds 150+8-3.72732.5W10.793
2DEFPass Yds < 20011-5.68824.1W30.778
3DEFRush Yds < 1007-2.77821.9W30.773
4DEFYPP < 66-3.66719.6W10.731
5DEFYPC < 57-3.70023.5W30.724
WIN %: TWO-CONDITION COMBINATIONS (12 found, min 4 Gms each)

(of 15 combinations tried per team -- a combination is only shown when at least 4 real games on file satisfy both conditions at once)

--- FOO ---

CONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRK
FOO rushes for 100+ yards and is held under 200 passing yards7-10.41222.0W3
FOO averages 5.0+ yards per carry on its way to 150+ rushing yards7-3.70032.7W1
FOO holds its opponents under 5.0 yards per carry and under 150 rushing yards7-3.70023.5W3
FOO averages 6.0+ yards per play behind 150+ rushing yards6-2.75035.6W2
FOO rushes for 150+ yards but stays under 8.0 yards per attempt4-3.57128.4L1
FOO holds its opponents under 150 rushing yards and under 200 passing yards6-1.85718.0W2
FOO holds its opponents under 6.0 yards per play and under 100 rushing yards4-1.80015.0W2
FOO averages 6.0+ yards per play while committing zero giveaways3-2.60037.2L1
FOO holds its opponents under 150 rushing yards while forcing 2+ takeaways3-2.60025.8W1
FOO averages 8.0+ yards per attempt while throwing for 200+ yards3-1.75041.5L1
FOO holds its opponents under 8.0 yards per attempt and under 5.0 yards per carry3-1.75018.0W3
FOO holds its opponents under 6.0 yards per play while forcing 2+ takeaways3-1.75020.8W1
WIN % -- TAB-SEPARATED
TeamConditionRecordWin%PPG
FOORush Yds 100+ & Pass Yds < 2007-10.41222.0
FOOYPC 5.0+ & Rush Yds 150+7-3.70032.7
FOOYPC < 5.0 & Rush Yds < 1507-3.70023.5
FOOYPP 6.0+ & Rush Yds 150+6-2.75035.6
FOORush Yds 150+ & YPA < 8.04-3.57128.4
FOORush Yds < 150 & Pass Yds < 2006-1.85718.0
FOOYPP < 6.0 & Rush Yds < 1004-1.80015.0
FOOYPP 6.0+ & Turnovers < 13-2.60037.2
FOORush Yds < 150 & Turnovers 2+3-2.60025.8
FOOYPA 8.0+ & Pass Yds 200+3-1.75041.5
FOOYPA < 8.0 & YPC < 5.03-1.75018.0
FOOYPP < 6.0 & Turnovers 2+3-1.75020.8
FOO — OFFENSE — 2024-26 (31 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+5-2.71435.4W1
YPA < 8.08-16.33318.6W1
Pass Yds 200+6-1.85738.9L1
Pass Yds < 2007-17.29217.6W2
Rush Yds 100+13-10.56526.3W3
Rush Yds < 1000-8.00011.4L8
Rush Yds 150+8-3.72732.5W1
Rush Yds < 1505-15.25016.9W1
YPC 5.0+8-6.57128.0W1
YPC < 5.05-12.29417.8W1
YPP 6.0+7-5.58332.9W1
YPP < 6.06-13.31615.8W1
YPP 7.0+5-1.83339.3L1
YPP < 7.08-17.32018.4W2
Turnovers 1+6-13.31619.9W1
Turnovers < 17-5.58326.3W2
Turnovers 2+2-7.22221.0L3
Turnovers > 20-3.00024.3L3
FOO — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2024-26 (31 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Scores <100-6.0004.7
Scores 10-190-5.00013.2
Scores 20-296-5.54523.5
Scores 30-395-1.83333.8
Scores 40+2-1.66746.3
FOO — OFFENSE — 2026 (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+2-1.66733.3W1
YPA < 8.02-4.33313.2W1
Pass Yds 200+0-1.00042.0L1
Pass Yds < 2004-4.50017.1W2
Rush Yds 100+4-2.66721.7W3
Rush Yds < 1000-3.00016.3L3
Rush Yds 150+1-1.50028.0W1
Rush Yds < 1503-4.42917.6W1
YPC 5.0+1-1.50028.0W1
YPC < 5.03-4.42917.6W1
YPP 6.0+1-1.50038.5W1
YPP < 6.03-4.42914.6W1
YPP 7.0+0-1.00042.0L1
YPP < 7.04-4.50017.1W2
Turnovers 1+2-4.33319.2W1
Turnovers < 12-1.66721.3W2
Turnovers 2+0-3.00017.3L3
Turnovers > 20-2.00026.0L2
FOO — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2026 (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Scores <100-2.0003.5
Scores 10-190-1.00010.0
Scores 20-293-1.75021.2
Scores 30-391-01.00035.0
Scores 40+0-1.00042.0
FOO — DEFENSE — 2024-26 (31 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+7-12.36834.5W2
YPA < 8.06-5.54524.3L1 1 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+2-12.14338.4L12
Pass Yds < 20011-5.68824.1W3 1 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+6-15.28634.5W1
Rush Yds < 1007-2.77821.9W3 1 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+6-12.33334.4W1
Rush Yds < 1507-5.58325.2W2 1 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+6-14.30034.4W1
YPC < 5.07-3.70023.5W3 1 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+7-14.33335.5W2
YPP < 6.06-3.66719.6W1 1 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+5-11.31237.4W1
YPP < 7.08-6.57123.1W1 1 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+8-9.47129.2W2
Turnovers < 15-9.35732.9W1
Turnovers 2+5-3.62530.0W1
Turnovers > 23-3.50028.0W1
FOO — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2024-26 (31 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Allows <102-01.0007.0
Allows 10-194-1.80013.6
Allows 20-293-3.50024.2
Allows 30-393-4.42934.7
Allows 40+1-10.09144.3
FOO — DEFENSE — 2026 (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+2-2.50026.8W2
YPA < 8.02-2.50022.8L1 1 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+0-3.00042.7L3
Pass Yds < 2004-1.80014.0W3 1 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+2-4.33329.7W1
Rush Yds < 1002-01.00010.0W2 1 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+2-3.40030.0W1
Rush Yds < 1502-1.66716.0W2 1 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+2-4.33329.7W1
YPC < 5.02-01.00010.0W2 1 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+2-3.40031.2W2
YPP < 6.02-1.66714.0W1 1 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+1-2.33331.3W1
YPP < 7.03-2.60020.8W1 1 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+3-2.60017.2W2
Turnovers < 11-3.25036.8W1
Turnovers 2+1-1.50017.5W1
Turnovers > 21-1.50017.5W1
FOO — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2026 (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Allows <102-01.0007.0
Allows 10-192-01.00014.0
Allows 20-290-1.00028.0
Allows 30-390-2.00033.0
Allows 40+0-2.00048.5
ON THE BRINK

FOOTHILL

• FOOTHILL is one loss from falling to 4-6 through 10 games — for the first time since 2022. It has happened in 2 of 14 seasons on file.

TAB-SEPARATED (paste into a spreadsheet)
TeamSideSplitGamesRecordWin%PPGStrk
FOOOFFENSEYPA 8.0+75-2.71435.4W1
FOOOFFENSEYPA < 8.0248-16.33318.6W1
FOOOFFENSEPass Yds 200+76-1.85738.9L1
FOOOFFENSEPass Yds < 200247-17.29217.6W2
FOOOFFENSERush Yds 100+2313-10.56526.3W3
FOOOFFENSERush Yds < 10080-8.00011.4L8
FOOOFFENSERush Yds 150+118-3.72732.5W1
FOOOFFENSERush Yds < 150205-15.25016.9W1
FOOOFFENSEYPC 5.0+148-6.57128.0W1
FOOOFFENSEYPC < 5.0175-12.29417.8W1
FOOOFFENSEYPP 6.0+127-5.58332.9W1
FOOOFFENSEYPP < 6.0196-13.31615.8W1
FOOOFFENSEYPP 7.0+65-1.83339.3L1
FOOOFFENSEYPP < 7.0258-17.32018.4W2
FOOOFFENSETurnovers 1+196-13.31619.9W1
FOOOFFENSETurnovers < 1127-5.58326.3W2
FOOOFFENSETurnovers 2+92-7.22221.0L3
FOOOFFENSETurnovers > 230-3.00024.3L3
FOOOFFENSEScores <1060-6.0004.7L6
FOOOFFENSEScores 10-1950-5.00013.2L5
FOOOFFENSEScores 20-29116-5.54523.5W3
FOOOFFENSEScores 30-3965-1.83333.8W5
FOOOFFENSEScores 40+32-1.66746.3L1
FOODEFENSEYPA 8.0+197-12.36834.5W2
FOODEFENSEYPA < 8.0116-5.54524.3L1
FOODEFENSEPass Yds 200+142-12.14338.4L12
FOODEFENSEPass Yds < 2001611-5.68824.1W3
FOODEFENSERush Yds 100+216-15.28634.5W1
FOODEFENSERush Yds < 10097-2.77821.9W3
FOODEFENSERush Yds 150+186-12.33334.4W1
FOODEFENSERush Yds < 150127-5.58325.2W2
FOODEFENSEYPC 5.0+206-14.30034.4W1
FOODEFENSEYPC < 5.0107-3.70023.5W3
FOODEFENSEYPP 6.0+217-14.33335.5W2
FOODEFENSEYPP < 6.096-3.66719.6W1
FOODEFENSEYPP 7.0+165-11.31237.4W1
FOODEFENSEYPP < 7.0148-6.57123.1W1
FOODEFENSETurnovers 1+178-9.47129.2W2
FOODEFENSETurnovers < 1145-9.35732.9W1
FOODEFENSETurnovers 2+85-3.62530.0W1
FOODEFENSETurnovers > 263-3.50028.0W1
FOODEFENSEAllows <1022-01.0007.0W2
FOODEFENSEAllows 10-1954-1.80013.6W3
FOODEFENSEAllows 20-2963-3.50024.2L2
FOODEFENSEAllows 30-3973-4.42934.7L2
FOODEFENSEAllows 40+111-10.09144.3L9
STREAKS: FOO (combined OFFENSE+DEFENSE)
SIDESPLITSTREAKDATESRECORD
DEFENSEYPP 6.0+4 games10/02/2026 - 10/23/20262-2
STREAKS — ALL TEAMS
TeamSideSplitStreakDatesRecord
FOODEFENSEYPP 6.0+4 games10/02/2026 - 10/23/20262-2
NOTABLE TRENDS (7 of 7 found, team |deviation| >= 20%, matchup |deviation| >= 20%)

FOO OFFENSE

FOO's offense has averaged 2.0 giveaways per game over their last 7 games. Their 31-game average is 1.2 giveaways per game. (+72%)

FOO's offense has averaged 9.6 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 31-game average is 6.6 YPA. (+46%)

FOO's offense has averaged 32.3 points scored per game over their last 3 games. Their 31-game average is 22.4 points scored per game. (+44%)

FOO's offense has averaged 6.9 YPP over their last 3 games. Their 31-game average is 5.6 YPP. (+24%)

FOO DEFENSE

FOO's defense has averaged 0.3 takeaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 31-game average is 1.1 takeaways per game. (-70%)

FOO's defense has averaged 11.0 YPA over their last 5 games. Their 30-game average is 8.7 YPA. (+26%)

FOO's defense has averaged 23.9 points allowed per game over their last 7 games. Their 31-game average is 30.9 points allowed per game. (-23%)

(moved to the Appendix, Data Export 1, to keep this section shorter -- the full spreadsheet-paste table is there unchanged)

APPENDIX

Full-length explanations and full-size data exports for the shortened notes and relocated tables referenced throughout this report, numbered in the order their pointers appear above.

Explanatory Notes

Note 1 -- SEASON OUTLOOK

Every remaining game is projected from schedule-adjusted ratings; already-played games carry their real result. Records are simulated distributions, not a single guess -- MOST LIKELY FINAL is the single most probable record and its own probability, PROJECTED RECORD is the season's expected win total expressed in record form (an average across every simulated outcome, so it can land on a fraction of a game).

Note 2 -- OPPONENT TRACKER -- why some cards have no record shown

Only meaningful for an opponent who is ALSO a tracked team in the library -- an opponent with no games on file here at all shows the date and site alone.

Note 3 -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS -- how a number is scored

Every split this report computes is scored on how strong the number is and how much it sets this team apart from its opponent and the rest of the field, and the top 5 per team are listed. A condition needs at least 8 occurrences to count.

Full Data Exports

Data Export 1 -- TRENDS — TAB-SEPARATED (10 columns)

TeamSideTypeStatOpponentWindow/MeetingsValueBaselineGamesBaselineAvgDeviation
FOODEFENSEteamPointslast 723.93130.9-22.7%
FOOOFFENSEteamPointslast 332.33122.4+44.2%
FOODEFENSEteamTurnoverslast 30.3311.1-70.5%
FOOOFFENSEteamTurnoverslast 72.0311.2+72.2%
FOODEFENSEteamYPAlast 511.0308.7+26.1%
FOOOFFENSEteamYPAlast 39.6316.6+45.7%
FOOOFFENSEteamYPPlast 36.9315.6+24.3%
STATISTICAL STORIES

FOOTHILL (SANTA ANA): OFFENSE VS DEFENSE, 2026

Where FOOTHILL (SANTA ANA) sits among 399 section teams on the two Unit Index composites -- Offense Grade 53.4, Defense Grade 53.5.

TURNOVER MARGIN / GAME: FOOTHILL (SANTA ANA) VS THE SECTION

FOOTHILL (SANTA ANA) ranks #298 of 332 section teams in turnover margin per game (-1.00) -- a weakness worth a look.

FOOTHILL (SANTA ANA): SP STRENGTH INDEX BY SEASON

The program's index across 5 seasons on file -- 16.0 in 2022 to 8.7 in 2026.

These graphs were chosen by the program from this season's most notable numbers. Build your own -- any stat against any other, for any mix of teams, seasons or players, with a JPEG download -- in the Graph Builder.

FOO — ROSTER (66) 26-27
#NAMEPOSCLASS
QUARTERBACKS
7FYSHER JAMIESON
PASS 85/171 · 49.7% · 1,039 YDS · 6.1 YPA · 7 TD · 6 INT · 129.9/G
RUSH 41 CAR · 64 YDS · 1.6 YPC · 2 TD · 8.0/G
QBSr.
12HUDSON BOWMAN
PASS 8/11 · 72.7% · 93 YDS · 8.5 YPA · 1 TD · 2 INT · 31.0/G
RUSH 8 CAR · 1 YDS · 0.1 YPC · 0 TD · 0.3/G
QBJr.
RUNNING BACKS
2AIDAN FARAJ
RUSH 148 CAR · 799 YDS · 5.4 YPC · 10 TD · 88.8/G
REC 11 REC · 98 YDS · 8.9 YPC · 0 TD · 10.9/G
RBSr.
8CHRISTIAN RAMIREZ
RUSH 5 CAR · 21 YDS · 4.2 YPC · 0 TD · 10.5/G
REC 1 REC · 10 YDS · 10.0 YPC · 0 TD · 5.0/G
RBSr.
13GAVIN FENTON
RUSH 36 CAR · 216 YDS · 6.0 YPC · 4 TD · 27.0/G
REC 11 REC · 162 YDS · 14.7 YPC · 2 TD · 20.2/G
DEF 4 TKL · 0.5 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
RBSr.
36JACK SILBERMAN
RUSH 1 CAR · 4 YDS · 4.0 YPC · 0 TD · 4.0/G
RBJr.
RECEIVERS & TIGHT ENDS
6ANDREW KATNIK
DEF 44 TKL · 5.5 TKL/G · 4 TFL · 1.0 SACKS · 0 INT
TEJr.
11COOPER DAVIS
DEF 23 TKL · 4.6 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 1 INT
WRJr.
14FORD WOOTON
RUSH 5 CAR · 81 YDS · 16.2 YPC · 0 TD · 9.0/G
REC 25 REC · 390 YDS · 15.6 YPC · 5 TD · 43.3/G
DEF 41 TKL · 4.6 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 2 INT
WRJr.
15RAINEN LALUAN
DEF 1 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
WRSr.
17PETER THATCHER
REC 19 REC · 193 YDS · 10.2 YPC · 0 TD · 24.1/G
DEF 19 TKL · 2.4 TKL/G · 2 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 1 INT
WRJr.
20LINCOLN BECK
REC 3 REC · 19 YDS · 6.3 YPC · 0 TD · 19.0/G
WRJr.
22GRAHAM HENZE
RUSH 6 CAR · 18 YDS · 3.0 YPC · 0 TD · 9.0/G
WRJr.
28JACK SILVA
RUSH 3 CAR · 13 YDS · 4.3 YPC · 0 TD · 13.0/G
WRJr.
30ETHAN PEREZ
RUSH 1 CAR · -10 YDS · -10.0 YPC · 0 TD · -2.5/G
REC 9 REC · 97 YDS · 10.8 YPC · 1 TD · 24.2/G
WRSo.
44JACKSON TIPRE
REC 2 REC · 13 YDS · 6.5 YPC · 0 TD · 4.3/G
DEF 1 TKL · 0.3 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
TEJr.
85DAVID MAILLET
DEF 9 TKL · 2.2 TKL/G · 3 TFL · 2.0 SACKS · 0 INT
TESr.
OFFENSIVE LINE
65NATE CORTEZ
DEF 2 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
OLSr.
DEFENSIVE LINE
52RYAN MEDINA
DEF 15 TKL · 2.1 TKL/G · 1 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DTSr.
54JD FORSYTH
DEF 2 TKL · 2.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLJr.
56TREY COWDELL
DEF 44 TKL · 4.9 TKL/G · 1 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLSr.
62BRYCE SLATON
DEF 1 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLJr.
75HOLDEN FREY
DEF 8 TKL · 2.7 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLSr.
76JAYDEN ISLAS
DEF 3 TKL · 1.5 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLJr.
78JULIAN OLAYA
DEF 1 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLJr.
80JEREMY LAMENDOLA
DEF 2 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLJr.
LINEBACKERS
4QUINN MULKERIN
DEF 78 TKL · 8.7 TKL/G · 6 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 1 INT
LBSr.
5ANTHONY LUNA
DEF 63 TKL · 7.0 TKL/G · 6 TFL · 2.0 SACKS · 0 INT
LBSr.
26JOSH GRACE
DEF 1 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
LBJr.
31REMY VIZCARRA
DEF 1 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
LBJr.
42JESSE MARTINEZ
DEF 56 TKL · 6.2 TKL/G · 7 TFL · 2.0 SACKS · 0 INT
LBSr.
48TRISTON GAILEY
DEF 10 TKL · 1.7 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
LBJr.
DEFENSIVE BACKS
3BEN MASON
DEF 44 TKL · 5.5 TKL/G · 3 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 2 INT
DBSr.
16AARON STRAPP
DEF 28 TKL · 3.5 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 1 INT
DBSr.
21JOHN NISSON
DEF 14 TKL · 2.3 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBSr.
24MARCUS CARASA
DEF 3 TKL · 1.5 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBJr.
32BRADLEY EMBREY
DEF 1 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBJr.
SPECIAL TEAMS
34NOAH FOX
DEF 1 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
KSr.
Report Produced by ScorePirate | Commitment and offer data sourced from 247Sports | GENERATED 10/30/2026 11:30