In short: Crosby Cougars high school football (Crosby, TX), 2026 season: 4-4. Last game: L 24-30 vs Summer Creek on October 23, 2026. Next: vs Atascocita, October 30, 2026. Schedule and results, player season stats, stat leaders, unit grades, ScorePirate ranking and the game-by-game log.
| RECORD | 4-4 this season |
| LAST GAME | L 24-30 vs SUMMER CREEK |
| NEXT GAME | ATASCOCITA (10/30/2026) |
| UNIT GRADES | Pass Off 63.4 · Rush Off 56.4 · Pass Def 64.1 · Rush Def 71.7 |
| TEAM | PASS O | RUSH O | PASS D | RUSH D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CROSBY | 63.4 (+14) | 56.4 (+4) | 64.1 (-24) | 71.7 (-47) |
Next: vs Atascocita, Fri 30 Oct. Matchup report: Atascocita at Crosby.
The number to watch when Crosby meets Atascocita is Crosby's scoring. Crosby averaged 20.4 points per game over its first 5 games (2-3), #922 in section in that timeframe. Over the stretch of 3 games that followed (2-1), the Cougars have averaged 42.0 points per game, a 106% rise, #278 in section in that window. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Crosby's last 3 opponents have averaged 35.8 points per game, a #911 scoring defense in section on the season, against 20.5 points per game, #264 for the first 5. Measured against those opponents' norms (35.8 points per game), Crosby scored 17% more than those defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 3 opponents average a rating that would rank #491 in section, well below the first 5 (#148), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. Conversely, Atascocita's defense has been one of section's better units in recent weeks. The Eagles have allowed 16.3 points per game over their last 3 games (2-1), #255 in section during that time. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of offenses in section (29.9 points per game on the season, which would rank #596). Against those norms, Atascocita held those offenses 45% below what they usually score. Something has to give when Crosby's surging offense meets one of section's better units in Atascocita's. Crosby is 4-2 this season when it scores 19 or more, and 0-2 when it doesn't.
The turnover battle could decide Crosby's next game, against Atascocita, and the recent returns favor Atascocita. Crosby forced 2.8 takeaways per game over its first 4 games (2-2), #45 in section through those games. In the 4 games since that hot start (2-2), the Cougars have forced 1.0 takeaways per game, a 64% drop, #597 in section through that stretch. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 1.2 per game on the season. Measured against those opponents' norms (1.2 per game), Crosby forced 20% fewer turnovers than those offenses usually give up. Overall, those opponents have been strong teams: their average SP Strength Index rating would rank #276 in section. Conversely, Atascocita's ball security has been one of section's better units in recent weeks. The Eagles have committed 1.0 giveaways per game over their last 4 games (2-2), #404 in section over that stretch. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of defenses in section (1.0 per game on the season, which would rank #724). Overall, those opponents average an SP Strength Index rating that would rank #252 in section, a strong slate. Unless Crosby's defense rediscovers its early form, the edge in this matchup belongs to Atascocita.
The biggest shift in Crosby's season has come in its ground game. Crosby averaged 4.9 yards per carry (553 yards on 112 rushes) over its first 5 games (2-3), #726 in section within that period. Over the stretch of 3 games that followed (2-1), the Cougars have averaged 8.5 yards per carry (726 yards on 85 rushes), a 73% rise, #146 in section across those games. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Crosby's last 3 opponents have averaged 5.8 yards per carry, a #558 run defense in section on the season, against 4.8 yards per carry, #261 for the first 5. Measured against those opponents' norms (5.8 yards per carry), Crosby ran for 47% more per carry than those run defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 3 opponents average a rating that would rank #491 in section, well below the first 5 (#148), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. On the season, Crosby ranks #395 in section in rushing. Atascocita's run defense sits in the middle of the pack, #391 in section (5.3 yards per carry).
Crosby's pass defense from the opening weeks has gone missing since. The Cougars allowed 6.4 yards per pass attempt (542 yards on 85 attempts) over their first 3 games (2-1), #375 in section during those games. In the 5 games since that hot start (2-3), Crosby has allowed 10.4 yards per pass attempt (1,073 yards on 103 attempts), a 63% rise, #923 in section during that period. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 8.3 yards per attempt on the season. Measured against those opponents' norms (8.4 yards per attempt), Crosby allowed 24% more per attempt than those passing attacks usually gain. Overall, those opponents have been strong teams: their average SP Strength Index rating would rank #213 in section. On the season, the Cougars rank #730 in section in pass defense. Atascocita's passing game sits in the middle of the pack, #483 in section (8.2 yards per attempt).
Something changed for Crosby's defense after its first 3 games. Crosby allowed 5.2 yards per play (931 yards on 178 snaps) over its first 3 games (2-1), #244 in section during that stretch. In the 5 games since that hot start (2-3), the Cougars have allowed 7.9 yards per play (1,932 yards on 245 snaps), a 51% rise, #840 in section over that period. The schedule doesn't excuse it: the last 5 opponents have been softer, averaging 6.4 yards per play, a #617 offense in section on the season, against 7.1 yards per play, #465 for the first 3. Measured against those opponents' norms (6.4 yards per play), Crosby allowed 23% more per snap than those offenses usually gain. Overall, those opponents have been strong teams: their average SP Strength Index rating would rank #213 in section. On the season, Crosby ranks #589 in section in yards per play allowed. Atascocita's offense sits in the middle of the pack, #578 in section (6.6 yards per play).
The Cougars averaged 5.5 yards per play (1,474 yards on 268 snaps) over their first 5 games (2-3), #794 in section over that timeframe. Few teams started slower in this department, and few have turned it around as sharply since. Over the stretch of 3 games that followed (2-1), Crosby has averaged 8.0 yards per play (1,223 yards on 153 snaps), a 45% rise, #296 in section over that span. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Crosby's last 3 opponents have averaged 7.1 yards per play, a #730 defense in section on the season, against 5.7 yards per play, #253 for the first 5. Measured against those opponents' norms (7.1 yards per play), Crosby gained 12% more per snap than those defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 3 opponents average a rating that would rank #491 in section, well below the first 5 (#148), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. On the season, the Cougars rank #626 in section in yards per play. Atascocita's defense sits in the middle of the pack, #455 in section (6.4 yards per play).
Crosby's run defense has been gashed on the ground as the season has progressed. Crosby allowed 4.2 yards per carry (389 yards on 93 rushes) over its first 3 games (2-1), #240 in section in that timeframe. In the 5 games since that hot start (2-3), the Cougars have allowed 6.0 yards per carry (859 yards on 142 rushes), a 45% rise, #605 in section in that window. The schedule doesn't excuse it: the last 5 opponents have been softer, averaging 4.8 yards per carry, a #786 rushing attack in section on the season, against 6.5 yards per carry, #401 for the first 3. Measured against those opponents' norms (4.8 yards per carry), Crosby allowed 25% more per carry than those rushing attacks usually gain. Overall, those opponents have been strong teams: their average SP Strength Index rating would rank #213 in section. On the season, Crosby ranks #398 in section in run defense. Atascocita's ground game sits in the middle of the pack, #646 in section (5.4 yards per carry).
• Club Crosby has gone 4 straight games forcing fewer than 3 turnovers (September 25, 2026 through October 23, 2026), going 2-2 over that stretch, matching the program record of 4 straight on record.
• Club Crosby is 17-2 all time when scoring 40+ points. Crosby's last loss when scoring 40+ points was November 22, 2024 against La Porte (L, 41-43).
• Club Crosby is 11-1 all time when averaging 7.0+ yards per play. Crosby's last loss when averaging 7.0+ yards per play was October 23, 2026 against Summer Creek (L, 24-30).
• Player Adam Sloan has 4 sacks over his last 3 games (1.2 a game, September 11, 2026 through September 25, 2026) -- his most in a 3-game stretch on record.
• Player Adam Sloan has 29 tackles over his last 3 games (9.7 a game, September 11, 2026 through September 25, 2026) -- his most in a 3-game stretch since the 30 he had from November 14, 2025 through September 4, 2026.
• Player Lott Robison has never had a game rushing for 100+ yards for Crosby, over a 26-game career on record. His career high is 75, set September 4, 2026 against Barbers Hill (L, 20-45).
• Player Lott Robison has gone 5 straight games without throwing for 200+ yards. The last time he threw for 200+ yards was November 14, 2025 against A\u0026m Consolidated (L, 26-27) — 215 passing yards.
From the games on file through Sep 25.
Every player with a stat on file, listed only where he has one. Open the arrow beside a name for his game-by-game line. Stats through the Sep 25 game; last updated Sep 30; roster and numbers checked Sep 13.
| PASSING | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | C/ATT | COMP % | YDS | YPA | TD | INT | QBR |
| 12 | LOTT ROBISON | 5 | 70/116 | 60.3% | 701 | 6.0 | 3 | 4 | 112.7 |
| 18 | JAYDEN HAMILTON | 5 | 20/38 | 52.6% | 215 | 5.7 | 0 | 0 | 100.2 |
| 84 | KEONDRE HEBERT | 3 | 1/1 | 100.0% | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 0 | 142.0 |
| C. LEATH | 4 | 0/1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| TEAM TOTALS | 5 | 91/156 | 58.3% | 921 | 5.9 | 3 | 4 | 109.1 | |
| RUSHING | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | CAR | YDS | YPC | TD |
| 12 | LOTT ROBISON | 5 | 30 | 245 | 8.2 | 5 |
| 1 | AYDEN WORTHINGTON | 5 | 40 | 162 | 4.0 | 1 |
| 24 | OWEN MORRIS | 5 | 20 | 76 | 3.8 | 2 |
| 29 | TRISTON WILLIAMS | 4 | 14 | 30 | 2.1 | 0 |
| 18 | JAYDEN HAMILTON | 5 | 5 | 19 | 3.8 | 1 |
| 84 | KEONDRE HEBERT | 3 | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 0 |
| 2 | JOSHUA JACKSON | 5 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 5 | 112 | 553 | 4.9 | 9 | |
| RECEIVING | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | REC | YDS | YPR | TD |
| 5 | JOSIAH JORDAN | 5 | 21 | 309 | 14.7 | 2 |
| 8 | DYLAN MURPHY | 5 | 21 | 188 | 9.0 | 1 |
| C. LEATH | 4 | 4 | 66 | 16.5 | 0 | |
| 14 | KADEN ROBISON | 3 | 6 | 62 | 10.3 | 0 |
| 1 | AYDEN WORTHINGTON | 5 | 14 | 59 | 4.2 | 0 |
| 84 | KEONDRE HEBERT | 3 | 2 | 51 | 25.5 | 0 |
| 24 | OWEN MORRIS | 5 | 9 | 48 | 5.3 | 0 |
| 17 | JACKSON DAILEY | 3 | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 0 |
| R. BASS | 3 | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 0 | |
| 29 | TRISTON WILLIAMS | 4 | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 0 |
| 32 | MILTON JOHNSON | 3 | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 0 |
| E. JONES | 3 | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | |
| 15 | MAISON MORROW | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
| 16 | ELI GONZALEZ | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 5 | 92 | 920 | 10.0 | 3 | |
| DEFENSE | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | TCKL | TFL | SACKS | INT | INT YDS | PD | FF |
| 10 | ADAM SLOAN | 5 | 50 | 6 | 3.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 7 | SIRR SOILEAU | 5 | 38 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 2 | JOSHUA JACKSON | 5 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | CAMRUN TAYLOR | 4 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | BRENDAN NEAL | 5 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | CAMERON SONIER | 5 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 44 | CADE WAINWRIGHT | 5 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | ADRIAN BLUEITT | 5 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | JAYLON CURRETTE | 5 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | CARTER MATTHEWS | 5 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 57 | ISAAC RIVERA | 4 | 9 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | JACE MANYOSE | 3 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 90 | NERIYAN HARRIS | 5 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | JA'KYRRIS SIMMONS | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | MAJOR TERRELL | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | COY PAINE | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| E. JONES | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 65 | JAVERY ALLEN | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 94 | MYKEL MOREAU | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| C. JACOBSON | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| D. GARRETT | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 8 | DYLAN MURPHY | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | JACKSON DAILEY | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | JOSIAH JORDAN | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | KADEN ROBISON | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | MILTON JOHNSON | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 51 | NOAH MURRIN | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 5 | 273 | 25 | 12.5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | |
PROGRAM RECORD
| SEASON | RECORD | PF | PA | PPG |
| 2022 | 6-5 | 355 | 348 | 32.3 |
| 2023 | 2-8 | 271 | 375 | 27.1 |
| 2024 | 10-2 | 461 | 181 | 38.4 |
| 2025 | 5-6 | 371 | 230 | 33.7 |
| 2026 | 4-4 | 228 | 239 | 28.5 |
| 2022-26 | 27-25 | 32.4 |
2 state final losses
| YEAR | HONOR |
| 2020 | UIL STATE 5A D2 RUNNER-UP (lost to Aledo 56-21) |
| 1960 | UIL STATE 1A RUNNER-UP (lost to Albany 20-0) |
State championship games and title-game MVPs: UIL Fall Almanac 2025-26. League finishes: no league schedule on file yet, so none is claimed.
| # | Team | Dist | Ovr | Rank | Proj. | Dist. pts | Next |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KING | 5-0 | 7-1 | 3 / 5 | 1 (6.8-0.2) | 262-72 | 10/29 vs SUMMER CREEK |
| 2 | NORTH SHORE | 4-1 | 7-2 | 15 / 31 | 2 (5.9-1.1) | 183-69 | 10/30 vs CHANNELVIEW |
| 3 | SUMMER CREEK | 4-1 | 5-3 | 31 / 71 | 3 (4.5-2.5) | 222-66 | 10/29 vs KING |
| 4 | ATASCOCITA | 3-2 | 5-3 | 16 / 32 | 4 (4.5-2.5) | 154-91 | 10/30 vs CROSBY |
| 5 | CROSBY | 2-3 | 4-4 | 77 / 244 | 5 (2.9-4.1) | 129-165 | 10/30 vs ATASCOCITA |
| 6 | KINGWOOD | 1-4 | 3-5 | 120 / 428 | 7 (1.6-5.4) | 132-201 | 10/30 vs HUMBLE |
| 7 | HUMBLE | 1-4 | 2-6 | 124 / 469 | 6 (1.7-5.3) | 67-189 | 10/30 vs KINGWOOD |
| 8 | CHANNELVIEW | 0-5 | 0-8 | 233 / 1034 | 8 (0.0-7.0) | 20-316 | 10/30 vs NORTH SHORE |
| DATE | OPPONENT | SITE | RESULT | SCORE | WIN% |
| 08/28 | DAYTON | at | W | 45-15 | |
| 09/04 | BARBERS HILL | at | L | 20-45 | |
| 09/11 | FORT BEND MARSHALL | vs | W | 34-14 | |
| 09/18 | NORTH SHORE | vs | L | 0-58 | |
| 09/25 | KING | at | L | 3-45 | |
| 10/02 | CHANNELVIEW | vs | W | 65-3 | |
| 10/08 | KINGWOOD | at | W | 37-29 | |
| 10/23 | SUMMER CREEK | vs | L | 24-30 | |
| 10/30 | ATASCOCITA | vs | PROJ | 28-32 | 43.4% |
| 11/07 | HUMBLE | at | PROJ | 30-25 | 59.6% |
| SEASON TO DATE | 4-4 | 2 REMAINING |
SEASON OUTLOOK
(full explanation: Appendix, Note 1)
| RECORD TO DATE | MOST LIKELY FINAL | PROJECTED RECORD | |
| Overall | 4-4 so far | 5-5 (52%) | 5.1-4.9 |
| League | 2-3 so far | 2-3 (100%) | 2.0-3.0 |
| SPLIT | GP | PPG | OPP PPG | YPG | OPP YPG | PLAYS/G | OPP PLAYS/G |
| OVERALL | 8 | 28.5 | 29.9 | 337.1 | 409.0 | 52.6 | 60.4 |
| HOME | 4 | 30.8 | 26.2 | 339.0 | 410.7 | 51.2 | 58.0 |
| ROAD | 4 | 26.2 | 33.5 | 335.2 | 407.8 | 54.0 | 62.2 |
PPG/OPP PPG use every played game on file. YPG/PLAYS-PER-GAME columns only ever come from games with a full box score on file, which can be a smaller sample than GP -- see the coverage note below when that's the case for this team.
| DATE | OPPONENT | RESULT | PASS YDS | RUSH YDS | TOTAL YDS | PASS ALW | RUSH ALW | TOTAL ALW | SACKS ALW | SACKS | DEF INT | TO FORCED | TO MAR |
| 8/28 | @ Dayton | W 45-15 | 207 | 109 | 316 | 170 | 124 | 294 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | +4 |
| 9/4 | @ Barbers Hill | L 20-45 | 216 | 186 | 402 | 172 | 246 | 418 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -2 |
| 9/11 | vs. Fort Bend Marshall | W 34-14 | 176 | 149 | 325 | 200 | 19 | 219 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 | +1 |
| 9/18 | vs. North Shore | L 0-58 | 109 | 65 | 174 | 312 | 341 | 653 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | +3 |
| 9/25 | @ King | L 3-45 | 213 | 44 | 257 | 270 | 213 | 483 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 |
| 10/2 | vs. Channelview | W 65-3 | 153 | 230 | 383 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 2 | +2 |
| 10/8 | @ Kingwood | W 37-29 | 160 | 206 | 366 | 280 | 156 | 436 | -- | -- | -- | 0 | 0 |
| 10/23 | vs. Summer Creek | L 24-30 | 184 | 290 | 474 | 211 | 149 | 360 | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -2 |
| AVERAGES | 177.2 | 159.9 | 337.1 | 230.7 | 178.3 | 409.0 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 1.9 | +4 (season) |
Averages use only games with that number on file (defense 7/8, sacks/INT 5/8, sacks allowed 5/8 games). SACKS ALW comes from the opponent's box score; TO FORCED is takeaways; TO MAR is takeaways minus giveaways, and its bottom cell is the season total. Dashes mean not on file.
UNIT INDEX
Pass Offense: grade 63.4/100 (+14 yds/gm vs average)
Rush Offense: grade 56.4/100 (+4 yds/gm vs average)
Pass Defense: grade 64.1/100 (-24 yds/gm vs average)
Rush Defense: grade 71.7/100 (-47 yds/gm vs average)
Unit grades: 0-100 league percentile, adjusted for the opponents faced.
OPPONENT TRACKER
(full explanation: Appendix, Note 2)
| DATE | SITE | OPPONENT | THEIR RECORD | THEIR PPG |
| 2026-10-30 | vs | ATASCOCITA | 5-3 | 28.8 |
| 2026-11-07 | at | HUMBLE | 2-6 | 19.2 |
LAST YEAR
CRO finished 2025 at 5-6. Made the playoffs (1 postseason game(s) on file; exact round/result not available). Notable win: 39-30 over FRIENDSWOOD (FRIENDSWOOD finished 55% that season). Toughest loss: 26-27 to A\U0026M CONSOLIDATED (1-point margin).
| DATE | OPPONENT | RESULT | RECORD | PF | PA | TOT YDS | YDS ALLOWED |
| 2025-08-29 | DAYTON | L | 0-1 | 20 | 28 | 294 | 320 |
| 2025-09-05 | IOWA COLONY | L | 0-2 | 17 | 42 | 278 | 254 |
| 2025-09-12 | FORT BEND MARSHALL | L | 0-3 | 14 | 17 | 254 | 183 |
| 2025-09-26 | PASADENA | W | 1-3 | 69 | 6 | 379 | N/A |
| 2025-10-03 | FRIENDSWOOD | W | 2-3 | 39 | 30 | 274 | 18 |
| 2025-10-10 | KINGWOOD PARK | W | 3-3 | 52 | 7 | 532 | N/A |
| 2025-10-16 | FORT BEND KEMPNER | W | 4-3 | 57 | 0 | 342 | 104 |
| 2025-10-24 | LA PORTE | L | 4-4 | 21 | 28 | 332 | 475 |
| 2025-10-31 | PORTER | W | 5-4 | 49 | 14 | 561 | 228 |
| 2025-11-07 | ANGLETON | L | 5-5 | 7 | 31 | 173 | 377 |
| 2025-11-14 | A\U0026M CONSOLIDATED | L | 5-6 | 26 | 27 | 309 | 316 |
| TOTALS | 11 GMS | 5-6 | 5-6 | 371 | 230 | 3728 | 2275 (9) |
"N/A" stands in for a box score that does not have stats entered. A total followed by a count in parentheses covers only the games with that stat on file.
• CRO rushes for 100+ yards (.800), but most recently lost to Summer Creek when doing so
• CRO averages 5.0+ yards per carry (.833), but most recently lost to Summer Creek when doing so
• CRO averages 7.0+ yards per play (.917), but most recently lost to Summer Creek when doing so
• CRO holds its opponents under 5.0 yards per carry (.786), but most recently lost to Summer Creek when doing so
• CRO's defense has averaged 268.2 pass yards per game over their last 5 games. Their 25-game average is 141.3 pass yards per game. (+90%)
• CRO's defense has averaged 483.0 total yards per game over their last 5 games. Their 25-game average is 306.0 total yards per game. (+58%)
• CRO's defense has averaged 33.0 points allowed per game over their last 5 games. Their 31-game average is 21.0 points allowed per game. (+57%)
• CRO's offense has averaged 9.8 YPC over their last 3 games. Their 29-game average is 6.3 YPC. (+57%)
• CRO is 18-5 (.783) in games decided by more than 8 points
• CRO's defense has averaged 1.0 takeaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 28-game average is 2.0 takeaways per game. (-50%)
• CRO's defense has averaged 11.2 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 24-game average is 7.5 YPA. (+49%)
• CRO's offense has averaged 242.0 rush yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 29-game average is 165.0 rush yards per game. (+47%)
• CRO is 9-1 (.900) when it wins the turnover battle
• CRO's defense has averaged 7.9 YPP over their last 5 games. Their 25-game average is 5.6 YPP. (+41%)
• CRO averages 6.1+ yards per carry (CRO's own median) (.867)
(full explanation: Appendix, Note 3)
CRO -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS
(top 5 of 35 scored; vs 792 cached team(s))
| # | SIDE | CONDITION | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK | SCORE |
| 1 | OFF | YPA 8+ | 7-1 | .875 | 53.2 | W1 | 0.841 |
| 2 | OFF | YPP 7+ | 11-1 | .917 | 49.1 | L1 | 0.835 |
| 3 | OFF | Rush Yds 150+ | 13-2 | .867 | 45.3 | L1 | 0.780 |
| 4 | DEF | Turnovers 3+ | 8-1 | .889 | 19.4 | L1 | 0.755 |
| 5 | DEF | YPC < 5 | 11-3 | .786 | 16.0 | L1 | 0.745 |
(of 15 combinations tried per team -- a combination is only shown when at least 4 real games on file satisfy both conditions at once)
--- CRO ---
| CONDITION | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK |
| CRO averages 5.0+ yards per carry on its way to 150+ rushing yards | 13-2 | .867 | 45.3 | L1 |
| CRO rushes for 100+ yards and is held under 200 passing yards | 12-2 | .857 | 41.6 | L1 |
| CRO averages 6.0+ yards per play behind 150+ rushing yards | 11-2 | .846 | 47.2 | L1 |
| CRO holds its opponents under 5.0 yards per carry and under 150 rushing yards | 9-3 | .750 | 14.7 | L1 |
| CRO holds its opponents under 6.0 yards per play while forcing 2+ takeaways | 9-2 | .818 | 13.7 | W4 |
| CRO holds its opponents under 150 rushing yards and under 200 passing yards | 8-2 | .800 | 13.2 | W4 |
| CRO holds its opponents under 8.0 yards per attempt and under 5.0 yards per carry | 8-2 | .800 | 11.6 | W4 |
| CRO holds its opponents under 150 rushing yards while forcing 2+ takeaways | 8-2 | .800 | 13.2 | W4 |
| CRO holds its opponents under 6.0 yards per play and under 100 rushing yards | 7-2 | .778 | 14.6 | W4 |
| CRO rushes for 150+ yards but stays under 8.0 yards per attempt | 6-2 | .750 | 34.9 | L1 |
| CRO averages 6.0+ yards per play while committing zero giveaways | 5-0 | .999 | 51.0 | W5 |
| CRO averages 8.0+ yards per attempt while throwing for 200+ yards | 3-1 | .750 | 49.0 | L1 |
| CRO throws for 200+ yards despite being held under 100 rushing yards | 0-4 | .000 | 15.0 | L4 |
| Team | Condition | Record | Win% | PPG |
| CRO | YPC 5.0+ & Rush Yds 150+ | 13-2 | .867 | 45.3 |
| CRO | Rush Yds 100+ & Pass Yds < 200 | 12-2 | .857 | 41.6 |
| CRO | YPP 6.0+ & Rush Yds 150+ | 11-2 | .846 | 47.2 |
| CRO | YPC < 5.0 & Rush Yds < 150 | 9-3 | .750 | 14.7 |
| CRO | YPP < 6.0 & Turnovers 2+ | 9-2 | .818 | 13.7 |
| CRO | Rush Yds < 150 & Pass Yds < 200 | 8-2 | .800 | 13.2 |
| CRO | YPA < 8.0 & YPC < 5.0 | 8-2 | .800 | 11.6 |
| CRO | Rush Yds < 150 & Turnovers 2+ | 8-2 | .800 | 13.2 |
| CRO | YPP < 6.0 & Rush Yds < 100 | 7-2 | .778 | 14.6 |
| CRO | Rush Yds 150+ & YPA < 8.0 | 6-2 | .750 | 34.9 |
| CRO | YPP 6.0+ & Turnovers < 1 | 5-0 | .999 | 51.0 |
| CRO | YPA 8.0+ & Pass Yds 200+ | 3-1 | .750 | 49.0 |
| CRO | Pass Yds 200+ & Rush Yds < 100 | 0-4 | .000 | 15.0 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK | |
| YPA 8.0+ | 7-1 | .875 | 53.2 | W1 | |
| YPA < 8.0 | 11-10 | .524 | 26.3 | L1 | 2 games without this stat on file |
| Pass Yds 200+ | 4-6 | .400 | 31.6 | L2 | |
| Pass Yds < 200 | 14-5 | .737 | 34.9 | L1 | 2 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 100+ | 16-4 | .800 | 41.9 | L1 | |
| Rush Yds < 100 | 2-7 | .222 | 15.7 | L7 | 2 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 150+ | 13-2 | .867 | 45.3 | L1 | |
| Rush Yds < 150 | 5-9 | .357 | 21.4 | L2 | 2 games without this stat on file |
| YPC 5.0+ | 15-3 | .833 | 43.2 | L1 | |
| YPC < 5.0 | 3-8 | .273 | 18.3 | L5 | 2 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 6.0+ | 12-3 | .800 | 45.3 | L1 | |
| YPP < 6.0 | 6-8 | .429 | 21.4 | L2 | 2 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 7.0+ | 11-1 | .917 | 49.1 | L1 | |
| YPP < 7.0 | 7-10 | .412 | 22.9 | L2 | 2 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers 1+ | 6-5 | .545 | 29.8 | L2 | |
| Turnovers < 1 | 5-1 | .833 | 42.5 | W2 | 14 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers 2+ | 3-4 | .429 | 23.6 | L2 | 14 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers > 2 | 1-3 | .250 | 17.8 | L3 | 14 games without this stat on file |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG |
| Scores <10 | 0-4 | .000 | 4.5 |
| Scores 10-19 | 0-2 | .000 | 15.5 |
| Scores 20-29 | 2-5 | .286 | 23.3 |
| Scores 30-39 | 5-0 | 1.000 | 36.4 |
| Scores 40+ | 12-1 | .923 | 51.2 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK |
| YPA 8.0+ | 1-0 | 1.000 | 65.0 | W1 |
| YPA < 8.0 | 3-4 | .429 | 23.3 | L1 |
| Pass Yds 200+ | 1-2 | .333 | 22.7 | L2 |
| Pass Yds < 200 | 3-2 | .600 | 32.0 | L1 |
| Rush Yds 100+ | 4-2 | .667 | 37.5 | L1 |
| Rush Yds < 100 | 0-2 | .000 | 1.5 | L2 |
| Rush Yds 150+ | 2-2 | .500 | 36.5 | L1 |
| Rush Yds < 150 | 2-2 | .500 | 20.5 | L2 |
| YPC 5.0+ | 4-2 | .667 | 37.5 | L1 |
| YPC < 5.0 | 0-2 | .000 | 1.5 | L2 |
| YPP 6.0+ | 3-2 | .600 | 38.2 | L1 |
| YPP < 6.0 | 1-2 | .333 | 12.3 | L2 |
| YPP 7.0+ | 3-1 | .750 | 42.8 | L1 |
| YPP < 7.0 | 1-3 | .250 | 14.2 | L2 |
| Turnovers 1+ | 1-3 | .250 | 20.2 | L2 |
| Turnovers < 1 | 3-1 | .750 | 36.8 | W2 |
| Turnovers 2+ | 1-3 | .250 | 20.2 | L2 |
| Turnovers > 2 | 0-3 | .000 | 15.7 | L3 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG |
| Scores <10 | 0-2 | .000 | 1.5 |
| Scores 10-19 | -- | -- | -- |
| Scores 20-29 | 0-2 | .000 | 22.0 |
| Scores 30-39 | 2-0 | 1.000 | 35.5 |
| Scores 40+ | 2-0 | 1.000 | 55.0 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK | |
| YPA 8.0+ | 4-6 | .400 | 31.2 | L1 | |
| YPA < 8.0 | 9-5 | .643 | 14.9 | W2 | 7 games without this stat on file |
| Pass Yds 200+ | 3-3 | .500 | 31.5 | L1 | |
| Pass Yds < 200 | 11-8 | .579 | 19.1 | L1 | 6 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 100+ | 7-9 | .438 | 26.2 | L1 | |
| Rush Yds < 100 | 7-2 | .778 | 14.6 | W4 | 6 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 150+ | 5-8 | .385 | 28.8 | W1 | |
| Rush Yds < 150 | 9-3 | .750 | 14.7 | L1 | 6 games without this stat on file |
| YPC 5.0+ | 3-8 | .273 | 29.7 | L7 | |
| YPC < 5.0 | 11-3 | .786 | 16.0 | L1 | 6 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 6.0+ | 4-7 | .364 | 31.5 | L1 | |
| YPP < 6.0 | 10-4 | .714 | 14.6 | W2 | 6 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 7.0+ | 3-5 | .375 | 32.4 | L5 | |
| YPP < 7.0 | 11-6 | .647 | 17.2 | L1 | 6 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers 1+ | 15-11 | .577 | 20.2 | L1 | |
| Turnovers < 1 | 2-0 | 1.000 | 27.5 | W2 | 3 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers 2+ | 14-4 | .778 | 16.6 | W1 | 3 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers > 2 | 8-1 | .889 | 19.4 | L1 | 3 games without this stat on file |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG |
| Allows <10 | 7-0 | 1.000 | 2.3 |
| Allows 10-19 | 8-2 | .800 | 14.7 |
| Allows 20-29 | 3-3 | .500 | 27.2 |
| Allows 30-39 | 1-2 | .333 | 30.3 |
| Allows 40+ | 0-5 | .000 | 46.6 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK | |
| YPA 8.0+ | 1-4 | .200 | 41.4 | L1 | |
| YPA < 8.0 | 2-0 | 1.000 | 14.5 | W2 | 1 games without this stat on file |
| Pass Yds 200+ | 2-3 | .400 | 35.2 | L1 | |
| Pass Yds < 200 | 1-1 | .500 | 30.0 | L1 | 1 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 100+ | 2-4 | .333 | 37.0 | L1 | |
| Rush Yds < 100 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 14.0 | W1 | 1 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 150+ | 1-3 | .250 | 44.2 | W1 | |
| Rush Yds < 150 | 2-1 | .667 | 19.7 | L1 | 1 games without this stat on file |
| YPC 5.0+ | 0-3 | .000 | 49.3 | L3 | |
| YPC < 5.0 | 3-1 | .750 | 22.0 | L1 | 1 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 6.0+ | 1-4 | .200 | 41.4 | L1 | |
| YPP < 6.0 | 2-0 | 1.000 | 14.5 | W2 | 1 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 7.0+ | 0-3 | .000 | 49.3 | L3 | |
| YPP < 7.0 | 3-1 | .750 | 22.0 | L1 | 1 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers 1+ | 3-4 | .429 | 30.0 | L1 | |
| Turnovers < 1 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 29.0 | W1 | |
| Turnovers 2+ | 3-1 | .750 | 22.5 | W1 | |
| Turnovers > 2 | 2-1 | .667 | 29.0 | L1 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG |
| Allows <10 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 3.0 |
| Allows 10-19 | 2-0 | 1.000 | 14.5 |
| Allows 20-29 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 29.0 |
| Allows 30-39 | 0-1 | .000 | 30.0 |
| Allows 40+ | 0-3 | .000 | 49.3 |
CROSBY
• CROSBY has rushed for 200+ in 3 straight games (10/2/26–10/23/26). It has not rushed for 200+ in 4 straight since 9/13/24–10/18/24 (2024).
| Team | Side | Split | Games | Record | Win% | PPG | Strk |
| CRO | OFFENSE | YPA 8.0+ | 8 | 7-1 | .875 | 53.2 | W1 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | YPA < 8.0 | 21 | 11-10 | .524 | 26.3 | L1 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | Pass Yds 200+ | 10 | 4-6 | .400 | 31.6 | L2 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | Pass Yds < 200 | 19 | 14-5 | .737 | 34.9 | L1 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | Rush Yds 100+ | 20 | 16-4 | .800 | 41.9 | L1 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | Rush Yds < 100 | 9 | 2-7 | .222 | 15.7 | L7 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | Rush Yds 150+ | 15 | 13-2 | .867 | 45.3 | L1 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | Rush Yds < 150 | 14 | 5-9 | .357 | 21.4 | L2 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | YPC 5.0+ | 18 | 15-3 | .833 | 43.2 | L1 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | YPC < 5.0 | 11 | 3-8 | .273 | 18.3 | L5 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | YPP 6.0+ | 15 | 12-3 | .800 | 45.3 | L1 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | YPP < 6.0 | 14 | 6-8 | .429 | 21.4 | L2 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | YPP 7.0+ | 12 | 11-1 | .917 | 49.1 | L1 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | YPP < 7.0 | 17 | 7-10 | .412 | 22.9 | L2 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | Turnovers 1+ | 11 | 6-5 | .545 | 29.8 | L2 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | Turnovers < 1 | 6 | 5-1 | .833 | 42.5 | W2 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | Turnovers 2+ | 7 | 3-4 | .429 | 23.6 | L2 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | Turnovers > 2 | 4 | 1-3 | .250 | 17.8 | L3 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | Scores <10 | 4 | 0-4 | .000 | 4.5 | L4 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | Scores 10-19 | 2 | 0-2 | .000 | 15.5 | L2 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | Scores 20-29 | 7 | 2-5 | .286 | 23.3 | L5 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | Scores 30-39 | 5 | 5-0 | 1.000 | 36.4 | W5 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | Scores 40+ | 13 | 12-1 | .923 | 51.2 | W6 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | YPA 8.0+ | 10 | 4-6 | .400 | 31.2 | L1 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | YPA < 8.0 | 14 | 9-5 | .643 | 14.9 | W2 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | Pass Yds 200+ | 6 | 3-3 | .500 | 31.5 | L1 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | Pass Yds < 200 | 19 | 11-8 | .579 | 19.1 | L1 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | Rush Yds 100+ | 16 | 7-9 | .438 | 26.2 | L1 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | Rush Yds < 100 | 9 | 7-2 | .778 | 14.6 | W4 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | Rush Yds 150+ | 13 | 5-8 | .385 | 28.8 | W1 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | Rush Yds < 150 | 12 | 9-3 | .750 | 14.7 | L1 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | YPC 5.0+ | 11 | 3-8 | .273 | 29.7 | L7 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | YPC < 5.0 | 14 | 11-3 | .786 | 16.0 | L1 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | YPP 6.0+ | 11 | 4-7 | .364 | 31.5 | L1 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | YPP < 6.0 | 14 | 10-4 | .714 | 14.6 | W2 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | YPP 7.0+ | 8 | 3-5 | .375 | 32.4 | L5 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | YPP < 7.0 | 17 | 11-6 | .647 | 17.2 | L1 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | Turnovers 1+ | 26 | 15-11 | .577 | 20.2 | L1 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | Turnovers < 1 | 2 | 2-0 | 1.000 | 27.5 | W2 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | Turnovers 2+ | 18 | 14-4 | .778 | 16.6 | W1 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | Turnovers > 2 | 9 | 8-1 | .889 | 19.4 | L1 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | Allows <10 | 7 | 7-0 | 1.000 | 2.3 | W7 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | Allows 10-19 | 10 | 8-2 | .800 | 14.7 | W3 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | Allows 20-29 | 6 | 3-3 | .500 | 27.2 | W1 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | Allows 30-39 | 3 | 1-2 | .333 | 30.3 | L2 |
| CRO | DEFENSE | Allows 40+ | 5 | 0-5 | .000 | 46.6 | L5 |
| SIDE | SPLIT | STREAK | DATES | RECORD |
| OFFENSE | Pass Yds < 200 | 3 games | 10/02/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 2-1 |
| OFFENSE | Rush Yds 100+ | 3 games | 10/02/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 2-1 |
| OFFENSE | Rush Yds 150+ | 3 games | 10/02/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 2-1 |
| OFFENSE | YPC 5.0+ | 3 games | 10/02/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 2-1 |
| OFFENSE | YPP 6.0+ | 3 games | 10/02/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 2-1 |
| OFFENSE | YPP 7.0+ | 3 games | 10/02/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 2-1 |
| Team | Side | Split | Streak | Dates | Record |
| CRO | OFFENSE | Pass Yds < 200 | 3 games | 10/02/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 2-1 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | Rush Yds 100+ | 3 games | 10/02/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 2-1 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | Rush Yds 150+ | 3 games | 10/02/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 2-1 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | YPC 5.0+ | 3 games | 10/02/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 2-1 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | YPP 6.0+ | 3 games | 10/02/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 2-1 |
| CRO | OFFENSE | YPP 7.0+ | 3 games | 10/02/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 2-1 |
CRO OFFENSE
CRO's offense has averaged 9.8 YPC over their last 3 games. Their 29-game average is 6.3 YPC. (+57%)
CRO's offense has averaged 242.0 rush yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 29-game average is 165.0 rush yards per game. (+47%)
CRO's offense has averaged 8.5 YPP over their last 3 games. Their 29-game average is 6.8 YPP. (+25%)
CRO's offense has averaged 25.8 points scored per game over their last 5 games. Their 31-game average is 34.2 points scored per game. (-25%)
CRO's offense has averaged 407.7 total yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 29-game average is 328.2 total yards per game. (+24%)
CRO's offense has averaged 1.0 giveaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 17-game average is 1.3 giveaways per game. (-23%)
CRO's offense has averaged 196.2 pass yards per game over their last 20 games. Their 29-game average is 163.2 pass yards per game. (+20%)
CRO DEFENSE
CRO's defense has averaged 268.2 pass yards per game over their last 5 games. Their 25-game average is 141.3 pass yards per game. (+90%)
CRO's defense has averaged 483.0 total yards per game over their last 5 games. Their 25-game average is 306.0 total yards per game. (+58%)
CRO's defense has averaged 33.0 points allowed per game over their last 5 games. Their 31-game average is 21.0 points allowed per game. (+57%)
CRO's defense has averaged 1.0 takeaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 28-game average is 2.0 takeaways per game. (-50%)
CRO's defense has averaged 11.2 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 24-game average is 7.5 YPA. (+49%)
CRO's defense has averaged 7.9 YPP over their last 5 games. Their 25-game average is 5.6 YPP. (+41%)
CRO's defense has averaged 6.1 YPC over their last 5 games. Their 25-game average is 4.6 YPC. (+33%)
CRO's defense has averaged 214.8 rush yards per game over their last 5 games. Their 25-game average is 164.7 rush yards per game. (+30%)
(moved to the Appendix, Data Export 1, to keep this section shorter -- the full spreadsheet-paste table is there unchanged)
Full-length explanations and full-size data exports for the shortened notes and relocated tables referenced throughout this report, numbered in the order their pointers appear above.
Explanatory Notes
Note 1 -- SEASON OUTLOOK
Every remaining game is projected from schedule-adjusted ratings; already-played games carry their real result. Records are simulated distributions, not a single guess -- MOST LIKELY FINAL is the single most probable record and its own probability, PROJECTED RECORD is the season's expected win total expressed in record form (an average across every simulated outcome, so it can land on a fraction of a game).
Note 2 -- OPPONENT TRACKER -- why some cards have no record shown
Only meaningful for an opponent who is ALSO a tracked team in the library -- an opponent with no games on file here at all shows the date and site alone.
Note 3 -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS -- how a number is scored
Every split this report computes is scored on how strong the number is and how much it sets this team apart from its opponent and the rest of the field, and the top 5 per team are listed. A condition needs at least 8 occurrences to count.
Full Data Exports
Data Export 1 -- TRENDS — TAB-SEPARATED (10 columns)
| Team | Side | Type | Stat | Opponent | Window/Meetings | Value | BaselineGames | BaselineAvg | Deviation |
| CRO | DEFENSE | team | Pass Yards | last 5 | 268.2 | 25 | 141.3 | +89.8% | |
| CRO | OFFENSE | team | Pass Yards | last 20 | 196.2 | 29 | 163.2 | +20.2% | |
| CRO | DEFENSE | team | Points | last 5 | 33.0 | 31 | 21.0 | +57.4% | |
| CRO | OFFENSE | team | Points | last 5 | 25.8 | 31 | 34.2 | -24.5% | |
| CRO | DEFENSE | team | Rush Yards | last 5 | 214.8 | 25 | 164.7 | +30.4% | |
| CRO | OFFENSE | team | Rush Yards | last 3 | 242.0 | 29 | 165.0 | +46.7% | |
| CRO | DEFENSE | team | Total Yards | last 5 | 483.0 | 25 | 306.0 | +57.8% | |
| CRO | OFFENSE | team | Total Yards | last 3 | 407.7 | 29 | 328.2 | +24.2% | |
| CRO | DEFENSE | team | Turnovers | last 3 | 1.0 | 28 | 2.0 | -50.0% | |
| CRO | OFFENSE | team | Turnovers | last 3 | 1.0 | 17 | 1.3 | -22.7% | |
| CRO | DEFENSE | team | YPA | last 3 | 11.2 | 24 | 7.5 | +49.4% | |
| CRO | DEFENSE | team | YPC | last 5 | 6.1 | 25 | 4.6 | +32.6% | |
| CRO | OFFENSE | team | YPC | last 3 | 9.8 | 29 | 6.3 | +56.7% | |
| CRO | DEFENSE | team | YPP | last 5 | 7.9 | 25 | 5.6 | +40.9% | |
| CRO | OFFENSE | team | YPP | last 3 | 8.5 | 29 | 6.8 | +24.7% |
The program's index across 5 seasons on file -- 7.6 in 2022 to 12.6 in 2026.
These graphs were chosen by the program from this season's most notable numbers. Build your own -- any stat against any other, for any mix of teams, seasons or players, with a JPEG download -- in the Graph Builder.
