ScorePirate
MENU
AT A GLANCE

In short: Compton (9-1) at Centennial (5-4), October 23, 2026 (CIF-SS high school football). Final: Centennial 6, Compton 47. The full report has the projection, unit grades, storylines, pregame notes, Big Game Watch, series history, season stats and both rosters.

SCOREPIRATE MATCHUP REPORT ·
COMPTON (AWAY) AT CENTENNIAL (HOME)
COMPTON 47.4  —  3.9 CENTENNIAL
COMPTON 98.4% FAVORITES

Share this matchup Preview image Stats card (JPG)Instagram story
⚠ COMPTON OFFENSIVE STATS FOR 10/23/2026 GAME @ CENTENNIAL* MISSING
⚠ CENTENNIAL OFFENSIVE STATS FOR 10/23/2026 GAME VS. COMPTON MISSING
⚠ CENTENNIAL OFFENSIVE STATS FOR 10/09/2026 GAME @ CABRILLO* MISSING
⚠ CENTENNIAL OFFENSIVE STATS FOR 10/02/2026 GAME VS. COMPTON EARLY COLLEGE* MISSING
⚠ CENTENNIAL OFFENSIVE STATS FOR 09/24/2026 GAME VS. MANUAL ARTS MISSING
⚠ CENTENNIAL OFFENSIVE STATS FOR 09/18/2026 GAME @ HAWTHORNE MISSING
⚠ CENTENNIAL OFFENSIVE STATS FOR 09/11/2026 GAME @ WEST MISSING
⚠ CENTENNIAL OFFENSIVE STATS FOR 09/04/2026 GAME @ PENINSULA MISSING
⚠ CENTENNIAL OFFENSIVE STATS FOR 08/28/2026 GAME @ BEVERLY HILLS MISSING
⚠ CENTENNIAL OFFENSIVE STATS FOR 08/21/2026 GAME VS. MARK KEPPEL MISSING
Figures are subject to change when the box score posts.
UNIT INDEX — GRADE (YDS VS AVG)
TEAMPASS ORUSH OPASS DRUSH D
COMPTON34.4 (-46.4)54.3 (-1.2)90.7 (-76.4)77.5 (-60.7)
CENTENNIAL39.6 (-36.3)10.0 (-115.1)21.8 (+39.0)24.5 (+52.0)
COMPTON AT CENTENNIAL
ADVANCED STATS PREVIEW · 2026 SEASON
RANKS VS CIF Southern Section · 432 teams DOWNLOAD CARD AS PDFDOWNLOAD AS JPEG
WIN PROB
98.4%
PROJ PTS
47.4
·
SP STRENGTH INDEX··
UNIT INDEX··
OFF··
DEF··
POINTS / GAME··
OFF··
DEF··
YARDS / GAME··
PASS··
RUSH··
YARDS ALLOWED / G··
PASS··
RUSH··
YARDS / PLAY··
OFF··
DEF··
TURNOVER MARGIN··
TAKEAWAYS··
GIVEAWAYS··
SACKS / GAME··
DEF MADE··
OFF ALLOWED··
PLAY CALLS (OFF)·
RUSH·
PLAYS FACED (DEF)·
RUSH·
COMP OFF VS CENT DEF
··RUSH YDS / G··
··YDS / CARRY··
··PASS YDS / G··
··YDS / ATTEMPT··
··POINTS / G··
··RUSH O / RUSH D INDEX··
··PASS O / PASS D INDEX··
··TURNOVERS LOST / FORCED··
··SACKS ALLOWED / MADE··
CENT OFF VS COMP DEF
··RUSH YDS / G··
··YDS / CARRY··
··PASS YDS / G··
··YDS / ATTEMPT··
··POINTS / G··
··RUSH O / RUSH D INDEX··
··PASS O / PASS D INDEX··
··TURNOVERS LOST / FORCED··
··SACKS ALLOWED / MADE··
WIN PROB
1.6%
PROJ PTS
3.9
·
··SP STRENGTH INDEX
··UNIT INDEX
··OFF
··DEF
··POINTS / GAME
··OFF
··DEF
··YARDS / GAME
··PASS
··RUSH
··YARDS ALLOWED / G
··PASS
··RUSH
··YARDS / PLAY
··OFF
··DEF
··TURNOVER MARGIN
··TAKEAWAYS
··GIVEAWAYS
··SACKS / GAME
··DEF MADE
··OFF ALLOWED
·PLAY CALLS (OFF)
·RUSH
·PLAYS FACED (DEF)
·RUSH

N/A: no box-score data on file yet for CENTENNIAL in this window — those categories fill in as games are scored.

Rank chips: 1 = best in the pool; blue strong, red weak. Yardage and efficiency use games with a full box score on file; points and turnovers use every played game. Unit Index = opponent-adjusted 0-100 league percentile.

PROJECTION COMPONENTS
COMPONENTPOINTSWEIGHTCONTRIBUTION
Common Opponents+18.1031%+5.54
Strength+25.8027%+6.93
Own Margin+16.8522%+3.63
Head To Head+29.0721%+6.10
Efficiency+38.030%+0.00
Garbage Time Margin--0%+0.00
EPA Efficiency--0%+0.00
What if he’s out?

Mark players out to re-project this game. Each value is how much of the margin that player is worth, from this season's data (his share of his team's win shares). Estimates — your selections change only your view.

PROJECTED TEAM YARDAGE
CATEGORYTEAMPROJECTED
PassingCOMPTON144.8
PassingCENTENNIAL72.1
RushingCOMPTON239.7
RushingCENTENNIAL60.2
TotalCOMPTON384.5
TotalCENTENNIAL132.2
PROJECTED BOX SCORE
COMPTON — PASSING
PLAYERC/ATTCOMP %YDSYPATDINTQBR
DONNIE JOHNSON III7.0/13.452.0%127.99.51.80.4171.0
ISAAC ZAZUETA0.9/1.851.6%17.09.40.20.0158.0
TOTALS7.9/15.252.0%144.89.52.00.4169.4
COMPTON — RUSHING
PLAYERCARYDSYPCTD
EDWARD RIVERA11.4156.813.72.3
NATE WILLARD6.649.47.50.5
TREVON FAIR2.733.512.60.4
TOTALS20.7239.711.63.3
COMPTON — RECEIVING
PLAYERRECYDSYPCTD
EDWARD RIVERA3.358.518.00.7
RONNIE MIXON2.739.614.70.5
ASHTON MARTIN1.524.917.10.4
JAY'ROME NORWOOD2.121.710.50.2
TOTALS9.5144.815.31.8
PREGAME NOTES

The Compton defense of late is barely reminiscent of the one that began the season. Compton allowed 16.0 points per game over its first 6 games (5-1), #90 in CIF-SS within that period. Over the stretch of 4 games that followed (4-0), the Tarbabes have allowed 6.5 points per game, a 59% drop, #20 in CIF-SS across those games. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Compton's last 4 opponents have averaged 20.6 points per game, a #271 offense in CIF-SS on the season, against 17.6 points per game, #318 for the first 6. Measured against those opponents' norms (20.6 points per game), Compton held those offenses 68% below what they usually score. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #357 in CIF-SS, well below the first 6 (#271), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. On the season, Compton ranks #30 in CIF-SS in scoring defense. Centennial's offense sits in the middle of the pack, #179 in CIF-SS (26.3 points per game).

Something changed for Compton's offense after the first 7 games of the season. The Tarbabes averaged 31.6 points per game over their first 7 games (6-1), #100 in CIF-SS during those games. Over the stretch of 3 games that followed (3-0), Compton has averaged 51.0 points per game, a 62% rise, #11 in CIF-SS during that period. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 32.8 points per game on the season. Measured against those opponents' norms (32.1 points per game), Compton scored 59% more than those defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 3 opponents average a rating that would rank #371 in CIF-SS, well below the first 7 (#274), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. On the season, the Tarbabes rank #45 in CIF-SS in scoring. Centennial's defense sits in the middle of the pack, #236 in CIF-SS (25.4 points per game). Compton is 8-0 this season when it scores 26 or more, and 1-1 when it doesn't.

Compton's defense has stopped creating turnovers as the season has developed. Compton forced 2.2 takeaways per game over its first 4 games (4-0), #44 in CIF-SS during that stretch. In the 6 games since that hot start (5-1), the Tarbabes have forced 1.4 takeaways per game, a 38% drop, #162 in CIF-SS over that period. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Compton's last 6 opponents have averaged 1.6 per game, a #291 offense in CIF-SS on the season, against 1.8 per game, #326 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (1.6 per game), Compton forced 13% fewer turnovers than those offenses usually give up. On the season, Compton ranks #74 in CIF-SS in takeaways. Centennial's ball security, #348 of 404 (2.0 per game), could be the get-right matchup Compton needs.

Centennial allowed 29.8 points per game over its first 5 games (3-2), #301 in CIF-SS over that timeframe. Few teams started slower in this department, and few have turned it around as sharply since. Over the stretch of 4 games that followed (2-2), the Apaches have allowed 20.0 points per game, a 33% drop, #150 in CIF-SS over that span. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 19.0 points per game on the season. Overall, though, those opponents have been lower-level teams: their average SP Strength Index rating would rank just #367 in CIF-SS. Only Compton broke through in that span, putting up 47 on 10/23. On the season, Centennial ranks #236 in CIF-SS in scoring defense. That form gets a real test against Compton, whose offense ranks #45 in CIF-SS (37.4 points per game). Centennial is 5-1 this season when it holds opponents under 38, and 0-3 when it doesn't.

One of Compton's most reliable areas lately has been its ground game. The Tarbabes averaged 8.3 yards per carry (687 yards on 83 rushes) over their first 4 games (4-0), #41 in CIF-SS in that timeframe. In the 6 games since that slow start (5-1), Compton has averaged 10.5 yards per carry (873 yards on 83 rushes), a 27% rise, #11 in CIF-SS in that window. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 8.1 yards per carry on the season. Measured against those opponents' norms (8.0 yards per carry), Compton ran for 32% more per carry than those run defenses usually allow. Overall, though, those opponents have been lower-level teams: their average SP Strength Index rating would rank just #332 in CIF-SS. On the season, the Tarbabes rank #16 in CIF-SS in rushing. Centennial's run defense sits in the middle of the pack, #234 in CIF-SS (6.0 yards per carry).

MILESTONE WATCH

Compton

  • Edward Rivera needs 1 rushing touchdown for 15 (averaging 1.6 a game)
  • Jay'Rome Norwood needs 9 tackles for 75 (averaging 8.2 a game)
STORYLINES

The turnover battle has the potential to swing this matchup, with the recent returns favoring Centennial. Compton committed 0.5 giveaways per game over its first 4 games (4-0), #27 in CIF-SS in that timeframe. In the 6 games since that hot start (5-1), the Tarbabes have committed 1.8 giveaways per game, a 260% rise, #309 in CIF-SS in that window. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Compton's last 6 opponents have averaged 0.9 per game, a #300 defense in CIF-SS on the season, against 0.7 per game, #338 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (0.9 per game), Compton turned it over 97% more than those defenses usually force. Meanwhile, Centennial's defense has struggled in recent weeks. The Apaches have forced 0.0 takeaways per game over their last 6 games (3-3), #393 in CIF-SS during that time. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of offenses in CIF-SS (1.2 per game on the season, which would rank #177). Against those norms, Centennial forced 100% fewer turnovers than those offenses usually give up. Overall, those opponents average an SP Strength Index rating that would rank #349 in CIF-SS, a lower level of competition. Both units come in looking to get right, and whichever does first may decide the game.

If there's one number to watch in this matchup, it's Centennial's scoring. Centennial averaged 16.5 points per game over its first 4 games (2-2), #307 in CIF-SS through those games. In the 5 games since that slow start (3-2), the Apaches have averaged 34.2 points per game, a 107% rise, #88 in CIF-SS through that stretch. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 30.8 points per game on the season. Measured against those opponents' norms (31.8 points per game), Centennial scored 8% more than those defenses usually allow. Overall, though, those opponents have been lower-level teams: their average SP Strength Index rating would rank just #369 in CIF-SS. Conversely, Compton's defense has been one of CIF-SS's better units in recent weeks. The Tarbabes have allowed 13.4 points per game over their last 5 games (4-1), #55 in CIF-SS over that stretch. Those games came against some of the weaker offenses in CIF-SS (20.0 points per game on the season, which would rank #278). Against those norms, Compton held those offenses 33% below what they usually score. Overall, those opponents average an SP Strength Index rating that would rank #334 in CIF-SS, a lower level of competition. Something has to give when Centennial's surging offense meets one of CIF-SS's better units in Compton's. Centennial is 4-2 this season when it scores 13 or more, and 1-2 when it doesn't.

SERIES HISTORY — COM vs CEN
Prep this game in Stat BoothCOMPTON team sheetCENTENNIAL team sheet
TIDBITS (16 found)

• Club The last time Centennial went a game rushing for 150+ yards was November 8, 2013 against Lawndale (L, 18-20). Since then Centennial has gone 56 straight games being held under 150 rushing yards, a school-record 56 straight in the 22 seasons on record.

• Club Compton is 58-1 all time when scoring 40+ points. Compton's last loss when scoring 40+ points was October 14, 2016 against Lakewood (L, 64-80).

• Club The last time Centennial went a game averaging 8.0+ yards per attempt was October 22, 2021 against Morningside (W, 30-24). Since then Centennial has gone 45 straight games being held under 8.0 yards per attempt, a school-record 45 straight in the 22 seasons on record.

• Club Compton has won 4 straight, and a win would make it 5 in a row. The last time they won 5 or more in a row was 2026, a run of 5.

• Player Edward Rivera has gone 6 straight games running for a touchdown, the longest such streak of his career.

• Club The last time Centennial went a game allowing 200+ passing yards was October 10, 2025 against Brentwood School (L, 0-33). Since then Centennial has gone 12 straight games holding the opponent under 200 passing yards, a school-record 12 straight in the 22 seasons on record.

• Player Edward Rivera has 468 rushing yards over his last 3 games (156.0 a game, October 2, 2026 through October 16, 2026) -- his most in a 3-game stretch on record.

• Club Compton is 9-1 entering play against Centennial, its first 9-1 start through 10 games in the 23 seasons on record.

• Club Centennial is 13-0 all time when scoring 40+ points in the games on file (13 such games).

• Player Donnie Johnson Iii has 7 touchdown passes over his last 3 games (2.3 a game, October 2, 2026 through October 16, 2026) -- his most in a 3-game stretch on record.

• Club Centennial has scored 141 points over its last 4 games (35.2 a game, September 24, 2026 through October 23, 2026) -- its 5th-highest 4-game total on record; the most is 161, from November 12, 2010 through October 7, 2011.

• Series This week's meeting is the 5th time in 17 all-time meetings in which one of the two teams enters unbeaten — in 2024, Compton entered 1-0 (Compton won 47-12) and in 2025, Compton entered 1-0 (Compton won 56-7).

• Player Ashton Martin has 3 touchdown catches over his last 3 games (1.0 a game, October 2, 2026 through October 16, 2026) -- his most in a 3-game stretch on record.

• Player Jay'rome Norwood has 3 sacks over his last 3 games (1.0 a game, September 25, 2026 through October 16, 2026) -- his most in a 3-game stretch on record.

• Player Jay'rome Norwood has 24 tackles over his last 3 games (8.0 a game, September 25, 2026 through October 16, 2026) -- his most in a 3-game stretch since the 26 he had from August 27, 2026 through September 11, 2026.

• Series Compton leads the all-time series with Centennial 11-5, across 16 meetings dating to 2009, and has won 9 straight in the series -- most recently 47-6 on October 23, 2026.

COM — STAT LEADERS
FULL ROSTER ↓
OFFENSE
PASSING LEADER
1055PASS YDS
C-ATT64-127
COMP%50.4%
YPA8.3
TD15
INT8
QBR146.6
RUSHING LEADER
1006RUSH YDS
CAR81
YPC12.4
RUSH TD14
REC14
REC YDS350
YPR25.0
REC TD8
RUSHING LEADER
138RUSH YDS
CAR12
YPC11.5
RUSH TD1
REC1
REC YDS49
YPR49.0
REC TD0
RECEIVING LEADER
211REC YDS
REC13
YPR16.2
REC TD3
RECEIVING LEADER
171REC YDS
REC10
YPR17.1
REC TD3
DEFENSE
TACKLES LEADER
66TCKL
TFL13
SACKS3
INT0
PD4
FF1
TACKLES LEADER
51TCKL
TFL2
SACKS1
INT0
PD1
FF1
TACKLES LEADER
29TCKL
TFL9
SACKS2
INT0
PD1
FF0
TFL LEADER
12TFL
TCKL27
SACKS3
INT0
PD0
FF0
TFL LEADER
7TFL
TCKL27
SACKS1
INT0
PD0
FF0
SACKS LEADER
2SACKS
TCKL14
TFL4
INT0
PD0
FF0
SACKS LEADER
2SACKS
TCKL14
TFL4
INT0
PD0
FF0
INTERCEPTIONS LEADER
2INT
TCKL20
TFL4
SACKS0
PD1
FF1
COMPTON — 2026 SEASON SCHEDULE
DATEOPPONENTSITERESULTSCOREWIN%
08/20JORDANatW41-13
08/27ORANGE VISTAatW28-21
09/04BISHOP ALEMANYvsW18-15
09/11GARDENAvsW63-0
09/18NARBONNEatW34-6
09/25WOODROW WILSONvsL7-41
10/02DOMINGUEZvsW30-6
10/09COMPTON EARLY COLLEGEatW56-0
10/16CABRILLOvsW50-14
10/23CENTENNIALatW47-6
SEASON RESULT9-1MISSED PLAYOFFS

Season complete at 9-1 with no games on file beyond a normal 10-game regular season -- read as no postseason appearance. This library still has no playoff-round/bracket source, so this label comes from game count alone, not a confirmed bracket result.

SEASON OUTLOOK

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 2)

--- CENTENNIAL ---

RECORD TO DATEMOST LIKELY FINALPROJECTED RECORD
Overall5-4 so far5-5 (75%)5.3-4.7
League1-1 so far1-1 (100%)1.0-1.0
COLLEGE BOUND

COM (1)

PLAYERPOSCLASSCOMMITTED TORATING
#5 EDWARD RIVERAATHSr.Sacramento State3-star

Commitments per 247Sports, limited to players on each team's current roster.

TALKING POINTS (14 storylines)
COM IS LIKELIEST TO BEAT CEN IF...

• COM averages 7.0+ yards per play (.999), and has won 6 straight when doing so

• COM rushes for 150+ yards (.999), and has won 6 straight when doing so

• COM forces 2+ takeaways (.999), and has won 5 straight when doing so

• COM's offense has averaged 19.9 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 11.7 YPA. (+70%)

• COM's offense has averaged 18.5 YPP over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 11.1 YPP. (+67%)

• COM's offense has averaged 17.6 YPC over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 10.8 YPC. (+63%)

• COM's offense has averaged 209.0 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 131.1 pass yards per game. (+59%)

• COM's defense has averaged 6.7 points allowed per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 12.2 points allowed per game. (-45%)

• COM's offense has averaged 1.8 giveaways per game over their last 5 games. Their 9-game average is 1.2 giveaways per game. (+43%)

• COM's offense has averaged 51.0 points scored per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 37.4 points scored per game. (+36%)

• CEN's offense has averaged 34.2 points scored per game over their last 5 games. Their 9-game average is 26.3 points scored per game. (+30%)

• COM's offense has averaged 385.0 total yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 304.4 total yards per game. (+26%)

• CEN is 3-1 (.750) at home

• COM averages 11.8+ yards per carry (COM's own median) (.999)

• COM averages 9.5+ yards per play (COM's own median) (.999)

MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 3)

COM -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(top 5 of 5 scored; vs 982 cached team(s))

#SIDECONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRKSCORE
1OFFTurnovers < 38-01.00040.0W80.900
2OFFRush Yds 100+8-01.00040.0W80.893
3OFFYPC 5+8-01.00040.0W80.841
4DEFTurnovers 1+8-1.88912.9W30.279
5OFFPass Yds < 2007-1.87534.6W20.191
OPPONENT STRENGTH (best-effort)

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 4)

COM: 1 of 10 game(s) came against a tracked opponent; that opponent's own win% averaged .556 across those game(s).

CEN: 2 of 9 game(s) came against a tracked opponent; that opponent's own win% averaged .900 across those game(s).

WIN %: TWO-CONDITION COMBINATIONS (5 found, min 4 Gms each)

(of 15 combinations tried per team -- a combination is only shown when at least 4 real games on file satisfy both conditions at once)

--- COM ---

CONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRK
COM rushes for 100+ yards and is held under 200 passing yards7-0.99938.6W7
COM averages 5.0+ yards per carry on its way to 150+ rushing yards6-0.99937.2W6
COM averages 6.0+ yards per play behind 150+ rushing yards5-0.99941.0W5
COM rushes for 150+ yards but commits 2+ giveaways4-0.99933.0W4
COM averages 6.0+ yards per play while committing zero giveaways4-0.99947.0W4
WIN % -- TAB-SEPARATED
TeamConditionRecordWin%PPG
COMRush Yds 100+ & Pass Yds < 2007-0.99938.6
COMYPC 5.0+ & Rush Yds 150+6-0.99937.2
COMYPP 6.0+ & Rush Yds 150+5-0.99941.0
COMRush Yds 150+ & Turnovers 2+4-0.99933.0
COMYPP 6.0+ & Turnovers < 14-0.99947.0
PREGAME NOTES

The next meeting brings together Compton (9-1 this season) and Centennial (5-4). The SP Strength Index has Compton at #177 and Centennial at #363 of 431 in the CIF-Southern Section. Compton leads the recent series 5-0 over the last 5 meetings. In the most recent meeting, on October 23, 2026, Compton pulled away 47-6.

In the process of winning 6 of its last 7 entering play, Compton's pass defense has been the team's calling card (held its opponents under 200 passing yards in 5 straight games, 4-1 in that stretch). That carried into last time out, the Tarbabes handling Centennial 47-6. Having dropped 4 of its last 7 entering play, Centennial's pass protection has been the team's calling card (conceded at least 1 sack in 6 of its last 10, 4-6 in that stretch). Last time out, though, the Apaches fell to Compton 47-6.

The matchup within the matchup pairs Compton's takeaway production with Centennial's ball security. Compton has taken the ball away 17 times in the Tarbabes' last 10 games, dating back to last season — the Tarbabes have gone 8-2 in that stretch. They'll face a stiff test when the two meet. Centennial has turned the ball over only 16 times in the Apaches' last 10 games, dating back to last season — the Apaches have gone 5-5 in that stretch. Compton has historically had its way in this matchup: 2.3 takeaways per game across its last 3 meetings with Centennial, against 1.1 versus everyone else in the same span.

STORYLINES

ONE-SIDED — Compton's pass defense has been playing at a high level over the Tarbabes' last 5 games. The defense has held its opponents under 200 passing yards in 5 straight games, averaging 103.4 passing yards allowed per game (including a low of 23 in that span vs. Dominguez). That is 42% below the Tarbabes' baseline of 176.9 yards per game over the 14 games prior — a dramatic drop; the Tarbabes have gone 4-1 in that stretch. When the two meet, that trend meets Centennial. Centennial has averaged 202.2 yards per game on the other side of that matchup across its games on file.

ONE-SIDED — Centennial's pass protection has been playing at a high level over the Apaches' last 10 games, dating back to last season. Despite keeping the quarterback clean in only 4 of the 10 games, the offensive line has averaged 1.1 sacks allowed per game (including a low of 0 in that span vs. Heritage Christian). That is 52% below the Apaches' baseline of 2.3 per game over the 7 games prior — a dramatic drop; the Apaches have gone 4-6 in that stretch. When the two meet, that trend meets Compton.

ONE-SIDED — Compton's rushing offense has been playing at a high level over the Tarbabes' last 7 games. Despite eclipsing 200 rushing yards in only 3 of the 7 games, the ground game has averaged 178.3 rushing yards per game (including a high of 284 in that span vs. Dominguez). That is 57% above the Tarbabes' baseline of 113.9 yards per game over the 21 games prior — a dramatic jump; the Tarbabes have gone 6-1 in that stretch. When the two meet, that trend meets Centennial. Centennial has averaged 190.5 yards per game on the other side of that matchup across its games on file.

ONE-SIDED — Compton's rush defense has been playing at a high level over the Tarbabes' last 10 games, dating back to last season. Despite holding its opponents under 100 rushing yards in only 4 of the 10 games, the defense has averaged 121.4 rushing yards allowed per game (including a low of 17 in that span vs. Rancho Dominguez). That is 46% below the Tarbabes' baseline of 223.9 yards per game over the 9 games prior — a dramatic drop; the Tarbabes have gone 4-6 in that stretch. When the two meet, that trend meets Centennial. Centennial has averaged 124.2 yards per game on the other side of that matchup across its games on file.

COM — OFFENSE (10 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+4-01.00050.8W4
YPA < 8.04-1.80024.8W1 1 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+1-01.00050.0W1
Pass Yds < 2007-1.87534.6W2 1 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+8-01.00040.0W8
Rush Yds < 1000-1.0007.0L1 1 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+6-01.00037.2W6
Rush Yds < 1502-1.66734.7W1 1 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+8-01.00040.0W8
YPC < 5.00-1.0007.0L1 1 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+7-01.00043.1W7
YPP < 6.01-1.50012.5L1 1 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+6-01.00043.5W6
YPP < 7.02-1.66722.0L1 1 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+4-1.80027.8W2
Turnovers < 14-01.00047.0W4 1 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 2+4-1.80027.8W2 1 games without this stat on file
Turnovers > 20-1.0007.0L1 1 games without this stat on file
CEN — OFFENSE (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+--------
YPA < 8.0-------- 9 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+--------
Pass Yds < 200-------- 9 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+--------
Rush Yds < 100-------- 9 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+--------
Rush Yds < 150-------- 9 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+--------
YPC < 5.0-------- 9 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+--------
YPP < 6.0-------- 9 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+--------
YPP < 7.0-------- 9 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+2-01.00047.0W2
Turnovers < 10-1.00014.0L1 6 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 2+2-01.00047.0W2 6 games without this stat on file
Turnovers > 21-01.00038.0W1 6 games without this stat on file
COM — DEFENSE (10 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+1-1.50023.5L1
YPA < 8.02-01.00013.5W2 6 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+--------
Pass Yds < 2004-1.80017.4W1 5 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+1-1.50023.5W1
Rush Yds < 1002-01.00013.5W2 6 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+0-1.00041.0L1
Rush Yds < 1503-01.00011.0W3 6 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+1-1.50023.5L1
YPC < 5.02-01.00013.5W2 6 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+1-1.50023.5L1
YPP < 6.02-01.00013.5W2 6 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+1-1.50023.5L1
YPP < 7.02-01.00013.5W2 6 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+8-1.88912.9W3
Turnovers < 1-------- 1 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 2+5-01.0008.4W5 1 games without this stat on file
Turnovers > 22-01.0006.5W2 1 games without this stat on file
CEN — DEFENSE (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+0-1.00050.0L1
YPA < 8.02-01.00013.5W2 6 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+--------
Pass Yds < 2002-1.66725.7W1 6 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+1-1.50038.5L1
Rush Yds < 1001-01.0000.0W1 6 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+0-1.00050.0L1
Rush Yds < 1502-01.00013.5W2 6 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+1-1.50038.5L1
YPC < 5.01-01.0000.0W1 6 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+1-1.50038.5L1
YPP < 6.01-01.0000.0W1 6 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+0-1.00050.0L1
YPP < 7.02-01.00013.5W2 6 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+--------
Turnovers < 12-1.66725.7W1 6 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 2+-------- 6 games without this stat on file
Turnovers > 2-------- 6 games without this stat on file
COM — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION (10 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Scores <100-1.0007.0
Scores 10-191-01.00018.0
Scores 20-291-01.00028.0
Scores 30-392-01.00032.0
Scores 40+5-01.00051.4
COM — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION (10 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Allows <105-01.0003.6
Allows 10-193-01.00014.0
Allows 20-291-01.00021.0
Allows 30-39------
Allows 40+0-1.00041.0
CEN — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Scores <101-1.5004.0
Scores 10-190-2.00013.0
Scores 20-290-1.00028.0
Scores 30-392-01.00034.0
Scores 40+2-01.00053.5
CEN — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Allows <103-01.0000.0
Allows 10-19------
Allows 20-292-01.00027.0
Allows 30-390-1.00033.0
Allows 40+0-3.00047.3
ON THE BRINK

COMPTON

• COMPTON has won by 20+ in 4 straight games (10/2/26–10/23/26). It has not reached 5 straight in the last 4 years of games on file (2023-present).

• COMPTON has scored 30+ in 4 straight games (10/2/26–10/23/26). It has not reached 5 straight in the last 4 years of games on file (2023-present).

• COMPTON has scored 40+ in 3 straight games (10/9/26–10/23/26). It has not reached 4 straight in the last 4 years of games on file (2023-present).

• COMPTON has won 4 straight (10/2/26–10/23/26). It has not won 5 straight since 8/20/26–9/18/26 (2026).

CENTENNIAL

• CENTENNIAL has allowed 30+ in 2 straight games (10/9/26–10/23/26). It has not allowed 30+ in 3 straight since 10/10/25–10/24/25 (2025). It has reached 3 straight 4 times in the last 4 years.

TAB-SEPARATED (paste into a spreadsheet)
TeamSideSplitGamesRecordWin%PPGStrk
COMOFFENSEYPA 8.0+44-01.00050.8W4
COMOFFENSEYPA < 8.054-1.80024.8W1
COMOFFENSEPass Yds 200+11-01.00050.0W1
COMOFFENSEPass Yds < 20087-1.87534.6W2
COMOFFENSERush Yds 100+88-01.00040.0W8
COMOFFENSERush Yds < 10010-1.0007.0L1
COMOFFENSERush Yds 150+66-01.00037.2W6
COMOFFENSERush Yds < 15032-1.66734.7W1
COMOFFENSEYPC 5.0+88-01.00040.0W8
COMOFFENSEYPC < 5.010-1.0007.0L1
COMOFFENSEYPP 6.0+77-01.00043.1W7
COMOFFENSEYPP < 6.021-1.50012.5L1
COMOFFENSEYPP 7.0+66-01.00043.5W6
COMOFFENSEYPP < 7.032-1.66722.0L1
COMOFFENSETurnovers 1+54-1.80027.8W2
COMOFFENSETurnovers < 144-01.00047.0W4
COMOFFENSETurnovers 2+54-1.80027.8W2
COMOFFENSETurnovers > 210-1.0007.0L1
COMOFFENSEScores <1010-1.0007.0L1
COMOFFENSEScores 10-1911-01.00018.0W1
COMOFFENSEScores 20-2911-01.00028.0W1
COMOFFENSEScores 30-3922-01.00032.0W2
COMOFFENSEScores 40+55-01.00051.4W5
COMDEFENSEYPA 8.0+21-1.50023.5L1
COMDEFENSEYPA < 8.022-01.00013.5W2
COMDEFENSEPass Yds < 20054-1.80017.4W1
COMDEFENSERush Yds 100+21-1.50023.5W1
COMDEFENSERush Yds < 10022-01.00013.5W2
COMDEFENSERush Yds 150+10-1.00041.0L1
COMDEFENSERush Yds < 15033-01.00011.0W3
COMDEFENSEYPC 5.0+21-1.50023.5L1
COMDEFENSEYPC < 5.022-01.00013.5W2
COMDEFENSEYPP 6.0+21-1.50023.5L1
COMDEFENSEYPP < 6.022-01.00013.5W2
COMDEFENSEYPP 7.0+21-1.50023.5L1
COMDEFENSEYPP < 7.022-01.00013.5W2
COMDEFENSETurnovers 1+98-1.88912.9W3
COMDEFENSETurnovers 2+55-01.0008.4W5
COMDEFENSETurnovers > 222-01.0006.5W2
COMDEFENSEAllows <1055-01.0003.6W5
COMDEFENSEAllows 10-1933-01.00014.0W3
COMDEFENSEAllows 20-2911-01.00021.0W1
COMDEFENSEAllows 40+10-1.00041.0L1
CENOFFENSETurnovers 1+22-01.00047.0W2
CENOFFENSETurnovers < 110-1.00014.0L1
CENOFFENSETurnovers 2+22-01.00047.0W2
CENOFFENSETurnovers > 211-01.00038.0W1
CENOFFENSEScores <1021-1.5004.0L1
CENOFFENSEScores 10-1920-2.00013.0L2
CENOFFENSEScores 20-2910-1.00028.0L1
CENOFFENSEScores 30-3922-01.00034.0W2
CENOFFENSEScores 40+22-01.00053.5W2
CENDEFENSEYPA 8.0+10-1.00050.0L1
CENDEFENSEYPA < 8.022-01.00013.5W2
CENDEFENSEPass Yds < 20032-1.66725.7W1
CENDEFENSERush Yds 100+21-1.50038.5L1
CENDEFENSERush Yds < 10011-01.0000.0W1
CENDEFENSERush Yds 150+10-1.00050.0L1
CENDEFENSERush Yds < 15022-01.00013.5W2
CENDEFENSEYPC 5.0+21-1.50038.5L1
CENDEFENSEYPC < 5.011-01.0000.0W1
CENDEFENSEYPP 6.0+21-1.50038.5L1
CENDEFENSEYPP < 6.011-01.0000.0W1
CENDEFENSEYPP 7.0+10-1.00050.0L1
CENDEFENSEYPP < 7.022-01.00013.5W2
CENDEFENSETurnovers < 132-1.66725.7W1
CENDEFENSEAllows <1033-01.0000.0W3
CENDEFENSEAllows 20-2922-01.00027.0W2
CENDEFENSEAllows 30-3910-1.00033.0L1
CENDEFENSEAllows 40+30-3.00047.3L3
STREAKS — ALL TEAMS
TeamSideSplitStreakDatesRecord
MATCHUP CONFLICT POINTS: COM vs CEN

Each pair of rows above is tinted by the gap between the two teams' win% in that scenario, judged for the HOME team (the bottom row):

GRAY = negligible gap (.000-.050)

PURPLE = solid gap (.051-.150)

GREEN = big gap (.151+), favoring the home team

RED = big gap (.151+), against the home team

COM OFFENSE vs CEN DEFENSE

100 RUSH YDS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMOFFOVER88-01.00040.0W8
CENDEFOVER21-1.50038.5L1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMOFFUNDER10-1.0007.0L1
CENDEFUNDER11-01.0000.0W1
150 RUSH YDS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMOFFOVER66-01.00037.2W6
CENDEFOVER10-1.00050.0L1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMOFFUNDER32-1.66734.7W1
CENDEFUNDER22-01.00013.5W2
YPC 5.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMOFFOVER88-01.00040.0W8
CENDEFOVER21-1.50038.5L1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMOFFUNDER10-1.0007.0L1
CENDEFUNDER11-01.0000.0W1
YPA 8.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMOFFOVER44-01.00050.8W4
CENDEFOVER10-1.00050.0L1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMOFFUNDER54-1.80024.8W1
CENDEFUNDER22-01.00013.5W2
200 PASS YDS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMOFFUNDER87-1.87534.6W2
CENDEFUNDER32-1.66725.7W1
0 TURNOVERS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMOFFZERO44-01.00047.0W4
CENDEFZERO32-1.66725.7W1
2+ TURNOVERS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMOFFUNDER44-01.00047.0W4
CENDEFUNDER32-1.66725.7W1
>2 TURNOVERS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMOFFUNDER88-01.00040.0W8
CENDEFUNDER32-1.66725.7W1
YPP 6.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMOFFOVER77-01.00043.1W7
CENDEFOVER21-1.50038.5L1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMOFFUNDER21-1.50012.5L1
CENDEFUNDER11-01.0000.0W1
YPP 7.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMOFFOVER66-01.00043.5W6
CENDEFOVER10-1.00050.0L1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMOFFUNDER32-1.66722.0L1
CENDEFUNDER22-01.00013.5W2

CEN OFFENSE vs COM DEFENSE

0 TURNOVERS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMDEFOVER98-1.88912.9W3
CENOFFOVER22-01.00047.0W2
2+ TURNOVERS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMDEFOVER55-01.0008.4W5
CENOFFOVER22-01.00047.0W2
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMDEFUNDER43-1.75018.5W1
CENOFFUNDER10-1.00014.0L1
>2 TURNOVERS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMDEFOVER22-01.0006.5W2
CENOFFOVER11-01.00038.0W1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
COMDEFUNDER76-1.85714.7W3
CENOFFUNDER21-1.50035.0W1

(moved to the Appendix, Data Export 1, to keep this section shorter -- the full spreadsheet-paste table is there unchanged)

NOTABLE TRENDS (9 of 9 found, team |deviation| >= 20%, matchup |deviation| >= 20%)

COM OFFENSE

COM's offense has averaged 19.9 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 11.7 YPA. (+70%)

COM's offense has averaged 18.5 YPP over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 11.1 YPP. (+67%)

COM's offense has averaged 17.6 YPC over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 10.8 YPC. (+63%)

COM's offense has averaged 209.0 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 131.1 pass yards per game. (+59%)

COM's offense has averaged 1.8 giveaways per game over their last 5 games. Their 9-game average is 1.2 giveaways per game. (+43%)

COM's offense has averaged 51.0 points scored per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 37.4 points scored per game. (+36%)

COM's offense has averaged 385.0 total yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 304.4 total yards per game. (+26%)

CEN OFFENSE

CEN's offense has averaged 34.2 points scored per game over their last 5 games. Their 9-game average is 26.3 points scored per game. (+30%)

COM DEFENSE

COM's defense has averaged 6.7 points allowed per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 12.2 points allowed per game. (-45%)

(moved to the Appendix, Data Export 2, to keep this section shorter -- the full spreadsheet-paste table is there unchanged)

APPENDIX

Full-length explanations and full-size data exports for the shortened notes and relocated tables referenced throughout this report, numbered in the order their pointers appear above.

Explanatory Notes

Note 1 -- GAME PROJECTION -- FULL DETAIL (report pages 1-2)

Library-native projection: computed directly from the game library (slate_projection.SlateEngine), not the Excel workbook engine. This section does not yet include: an outside Strength Index cross-check (computer/CCCAA rankings -- workbook-only).

Note 2 -- SEASON OUTLOOK

Every remaining game is projected from schedule-adjusted ratings; already-played games carry their real result. Records are simulated distributions, not a single guess -- MOST LIKELY FINAL is the single most probable record and its own probability, PROJECTED RECORD is the season's expected win total expressed in record form (an average across every simulated outcome, so it can land on a fraction of a game).

Note 3 -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS -- how a number is scored

Every split this report computes is scored on four weighted criteria and the top 5 per team are listed. In Cooper's own weighting order: (1) the WIN% attached to the condition, counted only when the condition has occurred at least 8 times -- a smaller sample is dropped outright, not discounted; (2) the PPG attached to it, with higher better on offense and lower better on defense, and each side normalized against its own kind so a defensive number competes with defensive numbers rather than against scoring averages; (3) how far the number sits from the OPPONENT's on the same condition, across win%, PPG and how often the condition happens at all; and (4) where it falls among every other team previously run through this workbook and cached. Criteria 1 and 2 measure how strong a number is; 3 and 4 measure how much it distinguishes this team. Weights: win_pct 40%, ppg 27%, matchup 20%, pool 13%. See important_numbers.py.

Note 4 -- OPPONENT STRENGTH (best-effort) -- why this is often empty

Only meaningful for a game against an opponent who is ALSO a tracked team on this workbook -- with just a couple of teams tracked, that's rare (mainly a direct matchup between them, if this run covers both); every other opponent has no win% on file here at all, so most of a team's schedule simply has no strength data to show.

Full Data Exports

Data Export 1 -- MATCHUP CONFLICTS — TAB-SEPARATED (13 columns)

Team1Side1Split1Record1Win%1PPG1Team2Side2Split2Record2Win%2PPG2Relevance
COMOFFENSERush Yds 100+8-01.00040.0CENDEFENSERush Yds < 1001-01.0000.01.000
COMOFFENSEYPC 5.0+8-01.00040.0CENDEFENSEYPC < 5.01-01.0000.01.000
COMOFFENSERush Yds 150+6-01.00037.2CENDEFENSERush Yds < 1502-01.00013.51.000
COMOFFENSEYPP 6.0+7-01.00043.1CENDEFENSEYPP < 6.01-01.0000.01.000
COMOFFENSEYPP 7.0+6-01.00043.5CENDEFENSEYPP < 7.02-01.00013.51.000
COMOFFENSEYPA 8.0+4-01.00050.8CENDEFENSEYPA < 8.02-01.00013.51.000
CENOFFENSETurnovers < 10-1.00014.0COMDEFENSETurnovers 1+8-1.88912.90.889
COMOFFENSEYPA < 8.04-1.80024.8CENDEFENSEYPA 8.0+0-1.00050.00.800
COMOFFENSEPass Yds 200+1-01.00050.0CENDEFENSEPass Yds < 2002-1.66725.70.667
COMOFFENSERush Yds < 1502-1.66734.7CENDEFENSERush Yds 150+0-1.00050.00.667
COMOFFENSEYPP < 7.02-1.66722.0CENDEFENSEYPP 7.0+0-1.00050.00.667
COMOFFENSERush Yds < 1000-1.0007.0CENDEFENSERush Yds 100+1-1.50038.50.500
COMOFFENSEYPC < 5.00-1.0007.0CENDEFENSEYPC 5.0+1-1.50038.50.500
COMOFFENSETurnovers 1+4-1.80027.8CENDEFENSETurnovers < 12-1.66725.70.467
COMOFFENSEYPP < 6.01-1.50012.5CENDEFENSEYPP 6.0+1-1.50038.50.000

Data Export 2 -- TRENDS — TAB-SEPARATED (10 columns)

TeamSideTypeStatOpponentWindow/MeetingsValueBaselineGamesBaselineAvgDeviation
CENOFFENSEteamPointslast 534.2926.3+29.9%
COMOFFENSEteamPass Yardslast 3209.09131.1+59.4%
COMDEFENSEteamPointslast 36.71012.2-45.4%
COMOFFENSEteamPointslast 351.01037.4+36.4%
COMOFFENSEteamTotal Yardslast 3385.09304.4+26.5%
COMOFFENSEteamTurnoverslast 51.891.2+43.2%
COMOFFENSEteamYPAlast 319.9911.7+70.2%
COMOFFENSEteamYPClast 317.6910.8+62.5%
COMOFFENSEteamYPPlast 318.5911.1+66.8%
COM — ROSTER (92) 26-27
#NAMEPOSCLASS
QUARTERBACKS
0DONNIE JOHNSON III
PASS 64/127 · 50.4% · 1,055 YDS · 8.3 YPA · 15 TD · 8 INT · 117.2/G
RUSH 35 CAR · 159 YDS · 4.5 YPC · 1 TD · 17.7/G
DEF 2 TKL · 0.2 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
QBJr.
15NATHANIEL RAMIREZ
PASS 2/3 · 66.7% · 65 YDS · 21.7 YPA · 1 TD · 1 INT · 65.0/G
QBFr.
RUNNING BACKS
5EDWARD RIVERA
RUSH 81 CAR · 1,006 YDS · 12.4 YPC · 14 TD · 111.8/G
REC 14 REC · 350 YDS · 25.0 YPC · 8 TD · 38.9/G
DEF 20 TKL · 2.2 TKL/G · 4 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 2 INT
RBSr.
21JAYDEN AMOS
RUSH 12 CAR · 138 YDS · 11.5 YPC · 1 TD · 27.6/G
REC 1 REC · 49 YDS · 49.0 YPC · 0 TD · 9.8/G
DEF 4 TKL · 0.8 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
RBSo.
RECEIVERS & TIGHT ENDS
11EILIJAH TURNER
REC 2 REC · 81 YDS · 40.5 YPC · 1 TD · 16.2/G
DEF 5 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
WRSr.
12ASHTON MARTIN
REC 10 REC · 171 YDS · 17.1 YPC · 3 TD · 28.5/G
DEF 3 TKL · 0.5 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
WRSo.
14CHRISTOPHER FOSTER
REC 1 REC · 15 YDS · 15.0 YPC · 1 TD · 15.0/G
WRSo.
19DMONTAE GIBSON
REC 5 REC · 52 YDS · 10.4 YPC · 0 TD · 7.4/G
DEF 10 TKL · 1.4 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 2 INT
WRSr.
28ISAAC ZAZUETA
PASS 1/2 · 50.0% · 60 YDS · 30.0 YPA · 1 TD · 0 INT · 30.0/G
DEF 1 TKL · 0.5 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
WRSo.
33DESEAN MCKOY
DEF 2 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
WRSo.
OFFENSIVE LINE
60PHYNE GRAY
DEF 2 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 1 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
OLSr.
67KAYDEN ROMERO
DEF 1 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
OLJr.
69ANGEL VALENCIA
DEF 2 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
OLJr.
DEFENSIVE LINE
8TYLER GRANT
DEF 29 TKL · 4.1 TKL/G · 9 TFL · 2.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DESr.
22DEVIN SMITH
DEF 5 TKL · 1.7 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DEJr.
34FIAFIA NOA
RUSH 1 CAR · 0 YDS · 0.0 YPC · 0 TD · 0.0/G
DEF 15 TKL · 2.1 TKL/G · 3 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DESo.
42MALCOLM FALLS
RUSH 1 CAR · 0 YDS · 0.0 YPC · 0 TD · 0.0/G
DEF 13 TKL · 1.9 TKL/G · 3 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 1 INT
DEJr.
51NICOLAS HOGAN
DEF 14 TKL · 2.3 TKL/G · 4 TFL · 2.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLSo.
53TRIISTEN LACARAN
DEF 1 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 1 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLSo.
61LARRY MCNEIL
DEF 1 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 1 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLJr.
64SAUILEONE MALIETUFA
DEF 13 TKL · 2.6 TKL/G · 3 TFL · 1.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLSo.
66ANDRE MAYO
DEF 27 TKL · 3.9 TKL/G · 12 TFL · 3.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLJr.
99PRINCETEN FITIAO-LACARAN
DEF 3 TKL · 1.5 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLFr.
LINEBACKERS
1JAY'ROME NORWOOD
REC 13 REC · 136 YDS · 10.5 YPC · 1 TD · 17.0/G
DEF 66 TKL · 8.2 TKL/G · 13 TFL · 3.0 SACKS · 0 INT
LBSr.
7KALIJAH HOLMES
REC 1 REC · 23 YDS · 23.0 YPC · 0 TD · 7.7/G
DEF 27 TKL · 9.0 TKL/G · 7 TFL · 1.0 SACKS · 0 INT
LBSr.
10JORDAN CURTIS
DEF 6 TKL · 2.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 1 INT
LBSr.
32LANDYN SHEPPARD
RUSH 1 CAR · 0 YDS · 0.0 YPC · 0 TD · 0.0/G
DEF 14 TKL · 3.5 TKL/G · 3 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
LBFr.
44TA'KAI MCKNIGHT
DEF 51 TKL · 5.7 TKL/G · 2 TFL · 1.0 SACKS · 0 INT
LBJr.
DEFENSIVE BACKS
2JAKORI CLINTON
REC 2 REC · 62 YDS · 31.0 YPC · 0 TD · 7.8/G
DEF 20 TKL · 2.5 TKL/G · 2 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBSo.
4RONNIE MIXON
REC 13 REC · 211 YDS · 16.2 YPC · 3 TD · 26.4/G
DEF 5 TKL · 0.6 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBSr.
6TASAI PARKER
DEF 10 TKL · 1.7 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 1 INT
DBSr.
9TREVON FAIR
RUSH 7 CAR · 33 YDS · 4.7 YPC · 1 TD · 8.2/G
REC 4 REC · 39 YDS · 9.8 YPC · 0 TD · 9.8/G
DEF 9 TKL · 2.2 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBJr.
13MAKYIH BROWN
DEF 5 TKL · 2.5 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBJr.
20RAY'SHAWN MCDANIEL
DEF 9 TKL · 2.2 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBJr.
23ANTHONY HERNANDEZ-LOPEZ
DEF 3 TKL · 1.5 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBSr.
26MARSHAWN KIMMONS
DEF 19 TKL · 2.7 TKL/G · 2 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBFr.
31QUINCY KEATON
DEF 3 TKL · 1.5 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBSo.
40CADEN BENNETT
DEF 2 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBSo.
SPECIAL TEAMS
29AXEL FLORES
DEF 2 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
KJr.
Report Produced by ScorePirate | Commitment and offer data sourced from 247Sports | GENERATED 10/26/2026 11:03