ScorePirate
MENU
AT A GLANCE

In short: Poteet Aggies high school football (Poteet, TX), 2026 season: 2-6. Last game: W 47-14 vs Crystal City on October 23, 2026. Next: at Natalia, October 30, 2026. Schedule and results, player season stats, stat leaders, unit grades, ScorePirate ranking and the game-by-game log.

ScorePirate Individual Team Report
POTEET 2-6
2026 SEASON
AT A GLANCE — AS OF 10/31/2026
RECORD2-6 this season
LAST GAMEW 47-14 vs CRYSTAL CITY
NEXT GAMEHONDO (11/06/2026)
UNIT GRADESPass Off 75.6 · Rush Off 32.5 · Pass Def 23.7 · Rush Def 13.8
NUMBERS TO NOTE
#1133
SP Strength Index (of 1252)
2-6
2026 record
-17.1
avg scoring margin, pts/gm
UNIT INDEX — GRADE (YDS VS AVG)
TEAMPASS ORUSH OPASS DRUSH D
POTEET75.6 (+45)32.5 (-49)23.7 (+36)13.8 (+87)
HEAD-TO-HEAD GAME LOG

STORYLINES

Next: at Natalia, Fri 30 Oct. Matchup report: Poteet at Natalia.

The turnover battle could decide Poteet's next game, against Natalia, and the recent returns favor Poteet. Poteet forced 0.5 takeaways per game over its first 4 games (1-3), #957 in section in that timeframe. In the 4 games since that slow start (1-3), the Aggies have forced 1.5 takeaways per game, a 200% rise, #376 in section in that window. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Poteet's last 4 opponents have averaged 1.3 per game, a #683 offense in section on the season, against 1.1 per game, #478 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (1.3 per game), Poteet forced 14% more turnovers than those offenses usually give up. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #783 in section, well above the first 4 (#1044), which makes the improvement more impressive. Conversely, Natalia's ball security has been one of section's better units in recent weeks. The Mustangs have committed 0.0 giveaways per game over their last 4 games (0-4), #1 in section during that time. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of defenses in section (1.0 per game on the season, which would rank #728). Against those norms, Natalia turned it over 100% less than those defenses usually force. Something has to give when Poteet's surging defense meets one of section's better units in Natalia's.

The number to watch when Poteet meets Natalia is Poteet's scoring. Poteet averaged 27.0 points per game over its first 3 games (1-2), #647 in section through those games. In the 5 games since that hot start (1-4), the Aggies have averaged 19.8 points per game, a 27% drop, #919 in section through that stretch. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Poteet's last 5 opponents have averaged 30.1 points per game, a #693 scoring defense in section on the season, against 34.3 points per game, #861 for the first 3. Measured against those opponents' norms (30.1 points per game), Poteet scored 34% less than those defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 5 opponents average a rating that would rank #815 in section, well above the first 3 (#1076), so the dip has come against better teams overall. Poteet was held to 14 points or fewer 3 times in those games, including 0 against Carrizo Springs on 9/18. Meanwhile, Natalia's defense has struggled in recent weeks. The Mustangs have allowed 48.8 points per game over their last 5 games (1-4), #1117 in section over that stretch. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of offenses in section (30.2 points per game on the season, which would rank #575). Against those norms, Natalia allowed 61% more than those offenses usually score. Overall, those opponents average an SP Strength Index rating that would rank #758 in section, a lower level of competition. Both units come in looking to get right, and whichever does first may decide the game.

NOTES

Poteet's ground game looks better on paper, but one afternoon is doing a lot of the work. Poteet averaged 5.9 yards per carry (1,096 yards on 187 rushes) on the season, #517 in section, but that number is boosted by a 267-yard game on 23 rushes against Somerset Academy Collegiate on 9/11. In all other games, Poteet is at 5.1 yards per carry (829 yards on 164 rushes), a figure that would rank #741 in section. Context matters here: Somerset Academy Collegiate's run defense ranks among the weakest in section (8.0 yards per carry, #1049 of 1234), so that game says more about the opponent than about the unit itself. Natalia's run defense (8.3 yards per carry, #1077 of 1234) gives Poteet a real chance to look like the season line again.

The biggest shift in Poteet's season has come in its ball security. The Aggies committed 2.2 giveaways per game over their first 4 games (1-3), #1042 in section within that period. In the 4 games since that slow start (1-3), Poteet has committed 1.0 giveaways per game, a 56% drop, #416 in section across those games. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Poteet's last 4 opponents have averaged 0.9 per game, a #905 defense in section on the season, against 1.7 per game, #304 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (0.9 per game), Poteet turned it over 16% more than those defenses usually force. So the improvement is real, but it still trails what those opponents usually give up. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #783 in section, well above the first 4 (#1044), which makes the improvement more impressive. On the season, the Aggies rank #877 in section in giveaways. The trend lines up well against Natalia, whose defense ranks just #1084 of 1234 (0.5 per game).

Poteet averaged 6.7 yards per pass attempt (835 yards on 125 attempts) over its first 4 games (1-3), #655 in section during those games. Few teams started slower in this department, and few have turned it around as sharply since. In the 4 games since that slow start (1-3), the Aggies have averaged 10.0 yards per pass attempt (859 yards on 86 attempts), a 50% rise, #258 in section during that period. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 9.4 yards per attempt on the season. Measured against those opponents' norms (9.4 yards per attempt), Poteet threw for 7% more per attempt than those pass defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #783 in section, well above the first 4 (#1044), which makes the improvement more impressive. On the season, Poteet ranks #513 in section in passing. The trend lines up well against Natalia, whose pass defense ranks just #1140 of 1234 (11.8 yards per attempt).

Poteet's offense has come a long way since the season's early weeks. The Aggies averaged 6.3 yards per play (1,373 yards on 219 snaps) over their first 4 games (1-3), #612 in section during that stretch. In the 4 games since that slow start (1-3), Poteet has averaged 7.9 yards per play (1,417 yards on 179 snaps), a 26% rise, #300 in section over that period. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Poteet's last 4 opponents have averaged 7.5 yards per play, a #820 defense in section on the season, against 8.2 yards per play, #964 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (7.5 yards per play), Poteet gained 6% more per snap than those defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #783 in section, well above the first 4 (#1044), which makes the improvement more impressive. On the season, the Aggies rank #479 in section in yards per play. The trend lines up well against Natalia, whose defense ranks just #1129 of 1234 (9.6 yards per play).

Something changed for Poteet's defense after its first 3 games. Poteet allowed 34.0 points per game over its first 3 games (1-2), #841 in section over that timeframe. In the 5 games since that hot start (1-4), the Aggies have allowed 43.0 points per game, a 26% rise, #1017 in section over that span. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Poteet's last 5 opponents have averaged 31.1 points per game, a #551 offense in section on the season, against 24.1 points per game, #825 for the first 3. Measured against those opponents' norms (31.1 points per game), Poteet allowed 38% more than those offenses usually score. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 5 opponents average a rating that would rank #815 in section, well above the first 3 (#1076), so the dip has come against better teams overall. On the season, Poteet ranks #1018 in section in scoring defense. Natalia's offense sits in the middle of the pack, #867 in section (22.1 points per game). Poteet is 2-0 this season when it holds opponents under 23, and 0-6 when it doesn't.

TIDBITS (2 found)

• Club The last time Poteet went a game holding the opponent under 150 rushing yards was September 26, 2025 against Marion (L, 20-50). Since then Poteet has gone 14 straight games allowing 150+ rushing yards, a school-record 14 straight in the 5 seasons on record.

• Club Poteet has gone 4 straight games committing fewer than 3 turnovers (September 25, 2026 through October 23, 2026), going 1-3 over that stretch, a school-record 4 straight in the 5 seasons on record.

MILESTONE WATCH

Poteet

  • Zakary Rice needs 107 passing yards for 1,500 (averaging 199.0 a game)
  • Arian Bosquez needs 9 tackles for 50 (averaging 13.7 a game)
  • Adam Bedolla needs 5 tackles for 50 (averaging 6.4 a game)
POT — STAT LEADERS
OFFENSE
PASSING LEADER
809PASS YDS
C-ATT54-121
COMP%44.6%
YPA6.7
TD8
INT4
QBR116.0
RUSHING LEADER
228RUSH YDS
CAR39
YPC5.8
RUSH TD1
REC7
REC YDS122
YPR17.4
REC TD2
RUSHING LEADER
64RUSH YDS
CAR10
YPC6.4
RUSH TD2
REC0
REC YDS0
YPR--
REC TD0
RECEIVING LEADER
355REC YDS
REC19
YPR18.7
REC TD3
RECEIVING LEADER
223REC YDS
REC14
YPR15.9
REC TD3
DEFENSE
TACKLES LEADER
41TCKL
TFL2
SACKS0
INT0
PD0
FF0
TACKLES LEADER
26TCKL
TFL3
SACKS1
INT0
PD0
FF0
TACKLES LEADER
21TCKL
TFL1
SACKS0
INT0
PD0
FF0
TFL LEADER
3TFL
TCKL8
SACKS2
INT0
PD0
FF1
TFL LEADER
2TFL
TCKL7
SACKS0
INT0
PD0
FF0
INTERCEPTIONS LEADER
1INT
TCKL8
TFL0
SACKS0
PD3
FF0
POT — WHAT CHANGED THIS WEEK

From the games on file through Oct 23.

REMAINING SCHEDULE

Most likely finish 3-7 · realistic range 2-8 to 4-6

Remaining schedule: 814th hardest of 1095 in the TX section (average opponent strength -7.6).

DateOpponentSP rankWin chance
10/30at Natalia#1057 of 125242%
11/06vs Hondo#656 of 125224%

Win chances are the site's own game projections where one is on file, otherwise the SP Strength Index gap with a small home edge. The realistic range covers 80% of outcomes (10th to 90th percentile).

Printable team sheetProgram historyOpen in Stat BoothWidget for your site
POT — PLAYER SEASON STATS — 2026

Every player with a stat on file, listed only where he has one. Open the arrow beside a name for his game-by-game line. Stats through the Oct 23 game; last updated Oct 31; roster and numbers checked Oct 27.

Click a column heading to sort. MIN hides players below that many attempts.
PASSING
NOPLAYERGPC/ATTCOMP %YDSYPATDINTQBR
2ZAKARY RICE795/18750.8%1,3937.4136129.9
7JONAH MARTINEZ72/450.0%266.500104.6
TEAM TOTALS797/19150.8%1,4197.4136129.4
RUSHING
NOPLAYERGPCARYDSYPCTD
7JONAH MARTINEZ7573035.32
2ZAKARY RICE7622944.72
5MIGUEL GARCIA7301565.23
21MASON MENDOZA711544.90
4KADEN HAMMONDS723015.01
10ARIAN BOSQUEZ3144.00
TEAM TOTALS71638415.28
RECEIVING
NOPLAYERGPRECYDSYPRTD
4KADEN HAMMONDS73868918.18
6LEVI CUMPIAN72231014.13
11MATTHEW HERRERA61317413.40
7JONAH MARTINEZ71214612.22
21MASON MENDOZA745012.50
1MICHAEL URIBE144310.80
5MIGUEL GARCIA7155.00
8ADAM BEDOLLA7144.00
22ANGEL SALAZAR5111.00
23ELI GARSES6100.00
TEAM TOTALS7971,42214.713
DEFENSE
NOPLAYERGPTCKLTFLSACKSINTINT YDSPDFF
9ALEX CHIMALHUA762510001
21MASON MENDOZA753300001
8ADAM BEDOLLA745100031
10ARIAN BOSQUEZ341200000
33ADRIAN GARZA740200000
11MATTHEW HERRERA635200001
7JONAH MARTINEZ7321014000
23ELI GARSES621640011
6LEVI CUMPIAN719001060
56ELI ALFARO717200000
54JAKE CASAREZ317100000
5MIGUEL GARCIA716000020
17IZAHYA BRISENO614000000
25JACOB RODRIGUEZ714000000
22ANGEL SALAZAR513210001
76JOSH BETANCOURT510200000
34ZORIAN CHINCARINI29000000
77TY STEWART68100000
16JAYVYN MALDANADO27000000
3JEFFERY MENDOZA46000011
20JERMIE HERNANDEZ36000000
15CODY MORE24000000
66JUAN ANGUIANO13200000
4KADEN HAMMONDS72000000
12MAX SERROS22000000
1MICHAEL URIBE12000000
40BRYAN MARQUEZ21000000
63NOAH BOSQUEZ11000000
50RUBEN NUNEZ21000000
55SEBASTIAN LAMBARDIA11000000
64WILEY SWAN11000000
TEAM TOTALS7503326240137
PROGRAM SNAPSHOT: POT

PROGRAM RECORD

SEASONRECORDPFPAPPG
20226-523724121.5
20230-10503585.0
20242-820032920.0
20252-915543514.1
20262-618031722.5
2022-2612-3816.4

UIL 3A Division 1 · District 14

2026 district standings · full page · all Texas districts
#TeamDistOvrRankProj.Dist. ptsNext
1DEVINE5-07-141 / 4081 (6.4-0.6)280-5710/30 vs HONDO
2JOURDANTON5-06-252 / 5432 (6.3-0.7)206-8910/30 vs LYTLE
3HONDO4-15-359 / 6563 (5.2-1.8)162-8110/30 vs DEVINE
4CARRIZO SPRINGS3-34-577 / 9444 (3.7-3.3)184-14211/06 vs NATALIA
5LYTLE1-42-696 / 11238 (1.3-5.7)155-24210/30 vs JOURDANTON
6POTEET1-42-697 / 11337 (1.4-5.6)99-21510/30 vs NATALIA
7NATALIA1-42-690 / 10575 (2.0-5.0)119-24410/30 vs POTEET
8CRYSTAL CITY1-53-684 / 9976 (1.7-5.3)102-23711/06 vs LYTLE
Top 4 in the district make the playoffs (line under 4th). Ordered by district record, then overall record and district point margin; UIL tiebreakers (head-to-head) are applied by the district, not here. Rank = SP Strength Index place in the classification / in Texas. Proj. = projected district finish and record, playing out each remaining district game by the two teams' ratings. From the 2026 results on file · UIL 3A Division 1 rankings · player leaders.
POT — 2026 SEASON SCHEDULE
DATEOPPONENTSITERESULTSCOREWIN%
08/28KENEDYvsL12-57
09/03BRACKENRIDGEatL27-45
09/11SOMERSET ACADEMY COLLEGIATEatW42-0
09/18CARRIZO SPRINGSvsL0-50
09/25LYTLEatL33-58
10/09DEVINEvsL6-47
10/16JOURDANTONatL13-46
10/23CRYSTAL CITYvsW47-14
10/30NATALIAatPROJ27-3141.7%
11/06HONDOvsPROJ9-463.5%
SEASON TO DATE2-62 REMAINING

SEASON OUTLOOK

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 1)

RECORD TO DATEMOST LIKELY FINALPROJECTED RECORD
Overall2-6 so far2-8 (49%)2.6-7.4
League1-4 so far1-4 (100%)1.0-4.0
POT — 2026 OVERALL AVERAGES
SPLITGPPPGOPP PPGYPGOPP YPGPLAYS/GOPP PLAYS/G
OVERALL822.539.6348.8386.049.844.8
HOME416.242.0260.0395.750.542.3
ROAD428.837.2437.5371.549.048.5

PPG/OPP PPG use every played game on file. YPG/PLAYS-PER-GAME columns only ever come from games with a full box score on file, which can be a smaller sample than GP -- see the coverage note below when that's the case for this team.

POT — 2026 TEAM GAME LOG
DATEOPPONENTRESULTPASS YDSRUSH YDSTOTAL YDSPASS ALWRUSH ALWTOTAL ALWSACKS ALWSACKSDEF INTTO FORCEDTO MAR
8/28vs. KenedyL 12-57143481912122704820100-4
9/3@ BrackenridgeL 27-45184169353--------0000
9/11@ Somerset Academy CollegiateW 42-0303267570--------2000
9/18vs. Carrizo SpringsL 0-5020554259492092582012-3
9/25@ LytleL 33-58275255530136452588------0-2
10/9vs. DevineL 6-479152143157290447------10
10/16@ JourdantonL 13-46166131297--155155------00
10/23vs. Crystal CityW 47-14327120447------------5+4
AVERAGES211.8137.0348.8138.5275.2386.01.00.80.21.0-5 (season)

Averages use only games with that number on file (defense 5/8, sacks/INT 4/8, sacks allowed 2/8 games). SACKS ALW comes from the opponent's box score; TO FORCED is takeaways; TO MAR is takeaways minus giveaways, and its bottom cell is the season total. Dashes mean not on file.

UNIT INDEX

Pass Offense: grade 75.6/100 (+45 yds/gm vs average)

Rush Offense: grade 32.5/100 (-49 yds/gm vs average)

Pass Defense: grade 23.7/100 (+36 yds/gm vs average)

Rush Defense: grade 13.8/100 (+87 yds/gm vs average)

Unit grades: 0-100 league percentile, adjusted for the opponents faced.

OPPONENT TRACKER

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 2)

DATESITEOPPONENTTHEIR RECORDTHEIR PPG
2026-10-30atNATALIA2-622.1
2026-11-06vsHONDO5-324.5

LAST YEAR

POT finished 2025 at 2-9. Made the playoffs (1 postseason game(s) on file; exact round/result not available). Notable win: 13-0 over LYTLE (LYTLE finished 40% that season). Toughest loss: 34-36 to COLE (2-point margin).

LAST SEASON: POT — 2025 GAME LOG
DATEOPPONENTRESULTRECORDPFPATOT YDSYDS ALLOWED
2025-08-29BANDERAL0-1052N/AN/A
2025-09-05KARNES CITYL0-2635N/AN/A
2025-09-12GEORGE WESTL0-31448N/AN/A
2025-09-19PEARSALLW1-3147N/AN/A
2025-09-26MARIONL1-42050N/A527
2025-10-10LYTLEW2-4130N/AN/A
2025-10-17CRYSTAL CITYL2-51255N/AN/A
2025-10-24JOURDANTONL2-6645N/AN/A
2025-10-31COLEL2-73436N/AN/A
2025-11-07HONDOL2-82258N/AN/A
2025-11-13LLANOL2-91449N/AN/A
TOTALS11 GMS2-92-9155435N/A527 (1)

"N/A" stands in for a box score that does not have stats entered. A total followed by a count in parentheses covers only the games with that stat on file.

TALKING POINTS (15 storylines)
POT HAS PERFORMED BEST THIS DATA SET WHEN...

• POT averages 8.0+ yards per attempt (.750)

• POT averages 6.0+ yards per play (.600)

• POT commits fewer than 2 giveaways (.500)

• POT forces 2+ takeaways (.667)

• POT's defense has averaged 2.0 takeaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 1.1 takeaways per game. (+80%)

• POT's offense has averaged 0.7 giveaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 1.7 giveaways per game. (-61%)

• POT's defense has averaged 114.0 pass yards per game over their last 5 games. Their 6-game average is 196.3 pass yards per game. (-42%)

• POT averages 7.5+ yards per attempt (POT's own median) (.600)

• POT averages 7.1+ yards per play (POT's own median) (.600)

• POT's offense has averaged 101.0 rush yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 145.0 rush yards per game. (-30%)

• POT's offense has averaged 24.0 points scored per game over their last 7 games. Their 29-game average is 18.4 points scored per game. (+30%)

• POT's offense has failed to reach 150 rush yds in 3 straight games (10/09/2026-10/23/2026), going 1-2 over that stretch.

• POT's defense has averaged 301.0 total yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 7-game average is 400.3 total yards per game. (-25%)

• POT is 3-3 (.500) in games decided by 8 points or fewer

• POT's offense has averaged 4.4 YPC over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 5.8 YPC. (-23%)

MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 3)

POT -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(top 1 of 1 scored; vs 344 cached team(s))

#SIDECONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRKSCORE
1DEFTurnovers < 32-6.25041.4L40.500
WIN %: TWO-CONDITION COMBINATIONS (1 found, min 4 Gms each)

(of 15 combinations tried per team -- a combination is only shown when at least 4 real games on file satisfy both conditions at once)

--- POT ---

CONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRK
POT averages 5.0+ yards per carry on its way to 150+ rushing yards2-2.50034.2L1
WIN % -- TAB-SEPARATED
TeamConditionRecordWin%PPG
POTYPC 5.0+ & Rush Yds 150+2-2.50034.2
POT — OFFENSE — 2024-26 (29 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+3-1.75039.2W1
YPA < 8.00-5.00011.6L5 20 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+2-2.50030.5W1
Pass Yds < 2001-4.20018.6L4 20 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+3-3.50032.8W1
Rush Yds < 1000-3.0006.0L3 20 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+2-2.50034.2L1
Rush Yds < 1501-4.20015.6W1 20 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+2-3.40030.0L2
YPC < 5.01-3.25016.2W1 20 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+3-2.60034.0W1
YPP < 6.00-4.00011.2L4 20 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+3-2.60034.0W1
YPP < 7.00-4.00011.2L4 20 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+2-5.28621.9W1
Turnovers < 11-2.33327.3L1 19 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 2+0-4.00016.2L4 19 games without this stat on file
Turnovers > 20-3.00010.7L3 19 games without this stat on file
POT — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2024-26 (29 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Scores <100-7.0004.7
Scores 10-192-8.20013.7
Scores 20-290-6.00023.2
Scores 30-392-2.50034.2
Scores 40+2-01.00044.5
POT — OFFENSE — 2026 (8 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+2-1.66740.7W1
YPA < 8.00-5.00011.6L5
Pass Yds 200+2-2.50030.5W1
Pass Yds < 2000-4.00014.5L4
Rush Yds 100+2-3.40032.4W1
Rush Yds < 1000-3.0006.0L3
Rush Yds 150+1-2.33334.0L1
Rush Yds < 1501-4.20015.6W1
YPC 5.0+1-3.25028.8L2
YPC < 5.01-3.25016.2W1
YPP 6.0+2-2.50033.8W1
YPP < 6.00-4.00011.2L4
YPP 7.0+2-2.50033.8W1
YPP < 7.00-4.00011.2L4
Turnovers 1+1-4.20019.6W1
Turnovers < 11-2.33327.3L1
Turnovers 2+0-3.00015.0L3
Turnovers > 20-2.0006.0L2
POT — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2026 (8 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Scores <100-2.0003.0
Scores 10-190-2.00012.5
Scores 20-290-1.00027.0
Scores 30-390-1.00033.0
Scores 40+2-01.00044.5
POT — DEFENSE — 2024-26 (29 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+1-4.20048.0L4
YPA < 8.0-------- 24 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+1-2.33345.0L2
Pass Yds < 2000-3.00051.7L3 23 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+1-6.14348.0L6
Rush Yds < 100-------- 22 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+0-5.00051.6L5
Rush Yds < 1501-1.50039.0L1 22 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+0-5.00052.4L5
YPC < 5.01-1.50037.0L1 22 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+1-5.16748.3L5
YPP < 6.00-1.00046.0L1 22 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+0-5.00052.4L5
YPP < 7.01-1.50037.0L1 22 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+2-2.50034.8W1
Turnovers < 11-4.20041.2L2 20 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 2+2-1.66730.7W1 20 games without this stat on file
Turnovers > 21-01.00014.0W1 20 games without this stat on file
POT — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2024-26 (29 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Allows <103-01.0002.3
Allows 10-191-1.50016.5
Allows 20-291-3.25027.5
Allows 30-391-3.25036.0
Allows 40+0-16.00049.2
POT — DEFENSE — 2026 (8 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+0-3.00054.0L3
YPA < 8.0-------- 5 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+0-1.00057.0L1
Pass Yds < 2000-3.00051.7L3 4 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+0-5.00051.6L5
Rush Yds < 100-------- 3 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+0-5.00051.6L5
Rush Yds < 150-------- 3 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+0-4.00053.0L4
YPC < 5.00-1.00046.0L1 3 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+0-4.00053.0L4
YPP < 6.00-1.00046.0L1 3 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+0-4.00053.0L4
YPP < 7.00-1.00046.0L1 3 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+1-2.33337.0W1
Turnovers < 11-4.20041.2L2
Turnovers 2+1-1.50032.0W1
Turnovers > 21-01.00014.0W1
POT — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2026 (8 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Allows <101-01.0000.0
Allows 10-191-01.00014.0
Allows 20-29------
Allows 30-39------
Allows 40+0-6.00050.5
TAB-SEPARATED (paste into a spreadsheet)
TeamSideSplitGamesRecordWin%PPGStrk
POTOFFENSEYPA 8.0+43-1.75039.2W1
POTOFFENSEYPA < 8.050-5.00011.6L5
POTOFFENSEPass Yds 200+42-2.50030.5W1
POTOFFENSEPass Yds < 20051-4.20018.6L4
POTOFFENSERush Yds 100+63-3.50032.8W1
POTOFFENSERush Yds < 10030-3.0006.0L3
POTOFFENSERush Yds 150+42-2.50034.2L1
POTOFFENSERush Yds < 15051-4.20015.6W1
POTOFFENSEYPC 5.0+52-3.40030.0L2
POTOFFENSEYPC < 5.041-3.25016.2W1
POTOFFENSEYPP 6.0+53-2.60034.0W1
POTOFFENSEYPP < 6.040-4.00011.2L4
POTOFFENSEYPP 7.0+53-2.60034.0W1
POTOFFENSEYPP < 7.040-4.00011.2L4
POTOFFENSETurnovers 1+72-5.28621.9W1
POTOFFENSETurnovers < 131-2.33327.3L1
POTOFFENSETurnovers 2+40-4.00016.2L4
POTOFFENSETurnovers > 230-3.00010.7L3
POTOFFENSEScores <1070-7.0004.7L7
POTOFFENSEScores 10-19102-8.20013.7L4
POTOFFENSEScores 20-2960-6.00023.2L6
POTOFFENSEScores 30-3942-2.50034.2L2
POTOFFENSEScores 40+22-01.00044.5W2
POTDEFENSEYPA 8.0+51-4.20048.0L4
POTDEFENSEPass Yds 200+31-2.33345.0L2
POTDEFENSEPass Yds < 20030-3.00051.7L3
POTDEFENSERush Yds 100+71-6.14348.0L6
POTDEFENSERush Yds 150+50-5.00051.6L5
POTDEFENSERush Yds < 15021-1.50039.0L1
POTDEFENSEYPC 5.0+50-5.00052.4L5
POTDEFENSEYPC < 5.021-1.50037.0L1
POTDEFENSEYPP 6.0+61-5.16748.3L5
POTDEFENSEYPP < 6.010-1.00046.0L1
POTDEFENSEYPP 7.0+50-5.00052.4L5
POTDEFENSEYPP < 7.021-1.50037.0L1
POTDEFENSETurnovers 1+42-2.50034.8W1
POTDEFENSETurnovers < 151-4.20041.2L2
POTDEFENSETurnovers 2+32-1.66730.7W1
POTDEFENSETurnovers > 211-01.00014.0W1
POTDEFENSEAllows <1033-01.0002.3W3
POTDEFENSEAllows 10-1921-1.50016.5W1
POTDEFENSEAllows 20-2941-3.25027.5W1
POTDEFENSEAllows 30-3941-3.25036.0L3
POTDEFENSEAllows 40+160-16.00049.2L16
STREAKS: POT (combined OFFENSE+DEFENSE)
SIDESPLITSTREAKDATESRECORD
OFFENSERush Yds < 1503 games10/09/2026 - 10/23/20261-2
STREAKS — ALL TEAMS
TeamSideSplitStreakDatesRecord
POTOFFENSERush Yds < 1503 games10/09/2026 - 10/23/20261-2
NOTABLE TRENDS (7 of 7 found, team |deviation| >= 20%, matchup |deviation| >= 20%)

POT OFFENSE

POT's offense has averaged 0.7 giveaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 1.7 giveaways per game. (-61%)

POT's offense has averaged 101.0 rush yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 145.0 rush yards per game. (-30%)

POT's offense has averaged 24.0 points scored per game over their last 7 games. Their 29-game average is 18.4 points scored per game. (+30%)

POT's offense has averaged 4.4 YPC over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 5.8 YPC. (-23%)

POT DEFENSE

POT's defense has averaged 2.0 takeaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 1.1 takeaways per game. (+80%)

POT's defense has averaged 114.0 pass yards per game over their last 5 games. Their 6-game average is 196.3 pass yards per game. (-42%)

POT's defense has averaged 301.0 total yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 7-game average is 400.3 total yards per game. (-25%)

(moved to the Appendix, Data Export 1, to keep this section shorter -- the full spreadsheet-paste table is there unchanged)

APPENDIX

Full-length explanations and full-size data exports for the shortened notes and relocated tables referenced throughout this report, numbered in the order their pointers appear above.

Explanatory Notes

Note 1 -- SEASON OUTLOOK

Every remaining game is projected from schedule-adjusted ratings; already-played games carry their real result. Records are simulated distributions, not a single guess -- MOST LIKELY FINAL is the single most probable record and its own probability, PROJECTED RECORD is the season's expected win total expressed in record form (an average across every simulated outcome, so it can land on a fraction of a game).

Note 2 -- OPPONENT TRACKER -- why some cards have no record shown

Only meaningful for an opponent who is ALSO a tracked team in the library -- an opponent with no games on file here at all shows the date and site alone.

Note 3 -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS -- how a number is scored

Every split this report computes is scored on how strong the number is and how much it sets this team apart from its opponent and the rest of the field, and the top 5 per team are listed. A condition needs at least 8 occurrences to count.

Full Data Exports

Data Export 1 -- TRENDS — TAB-SEPARATED (10 columns)

TeamSideTypeStatOpponentWindow/MeetingsValueBaselineGamesBaselineAvgDeviation
POTDEFENSEteamPass Yardslast 5114.06196.3-41.9%
POTOFFENSEteamPointslast 724.02918.4+30.1%
POTOFFENSEteamRush Yardslast 3101.09145.0-30.3%
POTDEFENSEteamTotal Yardslast 3301.07400.3-24.8%
POTDEFENSEteamTurnoverslast 32.091.1+80.0%
POTOFFENSEteamTurnoverslast 30.7101.7-60.8%
POTOFFENSEteamYPClast 34.495.8-23.0%
Report Produced by ScorePirate | Commitment and offer data sourced from 247Sports | GENERATED 10/31/2026 09:19