In short: Poteet Aggies high school football (Poteet, TX), 2026 season: 2-6. Last game: W 47-14 vs Crystal City on October 23, 2026. Next: at Natalia, October 30, 2026. Schedule and results, player season stats, stat leaders, unit grades, ScorePirate ranking and the game-by-game log.
| RECORD | 2-6 this season |
| LAST GAME | W 47-14 vs CRYSTAL CITY |
| NEXT GAME | HONDO (11/06/2026) |
| UNIT GRADES | Pass Off 75.6 · Rush Off 32.5 · Pass Def 23.7 · Rush Def 13.8 |
| TEAM | PASS O | RUSH O | PASS D | RUSH D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POTEET | 75.6 (+45) | 32.5 (-49) | 23.7 (+36) | 13.8 (+87) |
Next: at Natalia, Fri 30 Oct. Matchup report: Poteet at Natalia.
The turnover battle could decide Poteet's next game, against Natalia, and the recent returns favor Poteet. Poteet forced 0.5 takeaways per game over its first 4 games (1-3), #957 in section in that timeframe. In the 4 games since that slow start (1-3), the Aggies have forced 1.5 takeaways per game, a 200% rise, #376 in section in that window. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Poteet's last 4 opponents have averaged 1.3 per game, a #683 offense in section on the season, against 1.1 per game, #478 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (1.3 per game), Poteet forced 14% more turnovers than those offenses usually give up. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #783 in section, well above the first 4 (#1044), which makes the improvement more impressive. Conversely, Natalia's ball security has been one of section's better units in recent weeks. The Mustangs have committed 0.0 giveaways per game over their last 4 games (0-4), #1 in section during that time. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of defenses in section (1.0 per game on the season, which would rank #728). Against those norms, Natalia turned it over 100% less than those defenses usually force. Something has to give when Poteet's surging defense meets one of section's better units in Natalia's.
The number to watch when Poteet meets Natalia is Poteet's scoring. Poteet averaged 27.0 points per game over its first 3 games (1-2), #647 in section through those games. In the 5 games since that hot start (1-4), the Aggies have averaged 19.8 points per game, a 27% drop, #919 in section through that stretch. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Poteet's last 5 opponents have averaged 30.1 points per game, a #693 scoring defense in section on the season, against 34.3 points per game, #861 for the first 3. Measured against those opponents' norms (30.1 points per game), Poteet scored 34% less than those defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 5 opponents average a rating that would rank #815 in section, well above the first 3 (#1076), so the dip has come against better teams overall. Poteet was held to 14 points or fewer 3 times in those games, including 0 against Carrizo Springs on 9/18. Meanwhile, Natalia's defense has struggled in recent weeks. The Mustangs have allowed 48.8 points per game over their last 5 games (1-4), #1117 in section over that stretch. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of offenses in section (30.2 points per game on the season, which would rank #575). Against those norms, Natalia allowed 61% more than those offenses usually score. Overall, those opponents average an SP Strength Index rating that would rank #758 in section, a lower level of competition. Both units come in looking to get right, and whichever does first may decide the game.
Poteet's ground game looks better on paper, but one afternoon is doing a lot of the work. Poteet averaged 5.9 yards per carry (1,096 yards on 187 rushes) on the season, #517 in section, but that number is boosted by a 267-yard game on 23 rushes against Somerset Academy Collegiate on 9/11. In all other games, Poteet is at 5.1 yards per carry (829 yards on 164 rushes), a figure that would rank #741 in section. Context matters here: Somerset Academy Collegiate's run defense ranks among the weakest in section (8.0 yards per carry, #1049 of 1234), so that game says more about the opponent than about the unit itself. Natalia's run defense (8.3 yards per carry, #1077 of 1234) gives Poteet a real chance to look like the season line again.
The biggest shift in Poteet's season has come in its ball security. The Aggies committed 2.2 giveaways per game over their first 4 games (1-3), #1042 in section within that period. In the 4 games since that slow start (1-3), Poteet has committed 1.0 giveaways per game, a 56% drop, #416 in section across those games. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Poteet's last 4 opponents have averaged 0.9 per game, a #905 defense in section on the season, against 1.7 per game, #304 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (0.9 per game), Poteet turned it over 16% more than those defenses usually force. So the improvement is real, but it still trails what those opponents usually give up. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #783 in section, well above the first 4 (#1044), which makes the improvement more impressive. On the season, the Aggies rank #877 in section in giveaways. The trend lines up well against Natalia, whose defense ranks just #1084 of 1234 (0.5 per game).
Poteet averaged 6.7 yards per pass attempt (835 yards on 125 attempts) over its first 4 games (1-3), #655 in section during those games. Few teams started slower in this department, and few have turned it around as sharply since. In the 4 games since that slow start (1-3), the Aggies have averaged 10.0 yards per pass attempt (859 yards on 86 attempts), a 50% rise, #258 in section during that period. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 9.4 yards per attempt on the season. Measured against those opponents' norms (9.4 yards per attempt), Poteet threw for 7% more per attempt than those pass defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #783 in section, well above the first 4 (#1044), which makes the improvement more impressive. On the season, Poteet ranks #513 in section in passing. The trend lines up well against Natalia, whose pass defense ranks just #1140 of 1234 (11.8 yards per attempt).
Poteet's offense has come a long way since the season's early weeks. The Aggies averaged 6.3 yards per play (1,373 yards on 219 snaps) over their first 4 games (1-3), #612 in section during that stretch. In the 4 games since that slow start (1-3), Poteet has averaged 7.9 yards per play (1,417 yards on 179 snaps), a 26% rise, #300 in section over that period. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Poteet's last 4 opponents have averaged 7.5 yards per play, a #820 defense in section on the season, against 8.2 yards per play, #964 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (7.5 yards per play), Poteet gained 6% more per snap than those defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #783 in section, well above the first 4 (#1044), which makes the improvement more impressive. On the season, the Aggies rank #479 in section in yards per play. The trend lines up well against Natalia, whose defense ranks just #1129 of 1234 (9.6 yards per play).
Something changed for Poteet's defense after its first 3 games. Poteet allowed 34.0 points per game over its first 3 games (1-2), #841 in section over that timeframe. In the 5 games since that hot start (1-4), the Aggies have allowed 43.0 points per game, a 26% rise, #1017 in section over that span. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Poteet's last 5 opponents have averaged 31.1 points per game, a #551 offense in section on the season, against 24.1 points per game, #825 for the first 3. Measured against those opponents' norms (31.1 points per game), Poteet allowed 38% more than those offenses usually score. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 5 opponents average a rating that would rank #815 in section, well above the first 3 (#1076), so the dip has come against better teams overall. On the season, Poteet ranks #1018 in section in scoring defense. Natalia's offense sits in the middle of the pack, #867 in section (22.1 points per game). Poteet is 2-0 this season when it holds opponents under 23, and 0-6 when it doesn't.
• Club The last time Poteet went a game holding the opponent under 150 rushing yards was September 26, 2025 against Marion (L, 20-50). Since then Poteet has gone 14 straight games allowing 150+ rushing yards, a school-record 14 straight in the 5 seasons on record.
• Club Poteet has gone 4 straight games committing fewer than 3 turnovers (September 25, 2026 through October 23, 2026), going 1-3 over that stretch, a school-record 4 straight in the 5 seasons on record.
From the games on file through Oct 23.
Every player with a stat on file, listed only where he has one. Open the arrow beside a name for his game-by-game line. Stats through the Oct 23 game; last updated Oct 31; roster and numbers checked Oct 27.
| PASSING | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | C/ATT | COMP % | YDS | YPA | TD | INT | QBR |
| 2 | ZAKARY RICE | 7 | 95/187 | 50.8% | 1,393 | 7.4 | 13 | 6 | 129.9 |
| 7 | JONAH MARTINEZ | 7 | 2/4 | 50.0% | 26 | 6.5 | 0 | 0 | 104.6 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 7 | 97/191 | 50.8% | 1,419 | 7.4 | 13 | 6 | 129.4 | |
| RUSHING | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | CAR | YDS | YPC | TD |
| 7 | JONAH MARTINEZ | 7 | 57 | 303 | 5.3 | 2 |
| 2 | ZAKARY RICE | 7 | 62 | 294 | 4.7 | 2 |
| 5 | MIGUEL GARCIA | 7 | 30 | 156 | 5.2 | 3 |
| 21 | MASON MENDOZA | 7 | 11 | 54 | 4.9 | 0 |
| 4 | KADEN HAMMONDS | 7 | 2 | 30 | 15.0 | 1 |
| 10 | ARIAN BOSQUEZ | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 7 | 163 | 841 | 5.2 | 8 | |
| RECEIVING | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | REC | YDS | YPR | TD |
| 4 | KADEN HAMMONDS | 7 | 38 | 689 | 18.1 | 8 |
| 6 | LEVI CUMPIAN | 7 | 22 | 310 | 14.1 | 3 |
| 11 | MATTHEW HERRERA | 6 | 13 | 174 | 13.4 | 0 |
| 7 | JONAH MARTINEZ | 7 | 12 | 146 | 12.2 | 2 |
| 21 | MASON MENDOZA | 7 | 4 | 50 | 12.5 | 0 |
| 1 | MICHAEL URIBE | 1 | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 0 |
| 5 | MIGUEL GARCIA | 7 | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 |
| 8 | ADAM BEDOLLA | 7 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 |
| 22 | ANGEL SALAZAR | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 |
| 23 | ELI GARSES | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 7 | 97 | 1,422 | 14.7 | 13 | |
| DEFENSE | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | PLAYER | GP | TCKL | TFL | SACKS | INT | INT YDS | PD | FF |
| 9 | ALEX CHIMALHUA | 7 | 62 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | MASON MENDOZA | 7 | 53 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 8 | ADAM BEDOLLA | 7 | 45 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| 10 | ARIAN BOSQUEZ | 3 | 41 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | ADRIAN GARZA | 7 | 40 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | MATTHEW HERRERA | 6 | 35 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 7 | JONAH MARTINEZ | 7 | 32 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | ELI GARSES | 6 | 21 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 6 | LEVI CUMPIAN | 7 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| 56 | ELI ALFARO | 7 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 54 | JAKE CASAREZ | 3 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | MIGUEL GARCIA | 7 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 17 | IZAHYA BRISENO | 6 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | JACOB RODRIGUEZ | 7 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | ANGEL SALAZAR | 5 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 76 | JOSH BETANCOURT | 5 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | ZORIAN CHINCARINI | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 77 | TY STEWART | 6 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | JAYVYN MALDANADO | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | JEFFERY MENDOZA | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 20 | JERMIE HERNANDEZ | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | CODY MORE | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 66 | JUAN ANGUIANO | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | KADEN HAMMONDS | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | MAX SERROS | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | MICHAEL URIBE | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 40 | BRYAN MARQUEZ | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 63 | NOAH BOSQUEZ | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 50 | RUBEN NUNEZ | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 55 | SEBASTIAN LAMBARDIA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 64 | WILEY SWAN | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 7 | 503 | 32 | 6 | 2 | 40 | 13 | 7 | |
PROGRAM RECORD
| SEASON | RECORD | PF | PA | PPG |
| 2022 | 6-5 | 237 | 241 | 21.5 |
| 2023 | 0-10 | 50 | 358 | 5.0 |
| 2024 | 2-8 | 200 | 329 | 20.0 |
| 2025 | 2-9 | 155 | 435 | 14.1 |
| 2026 | 2-6 | 180 | 317 | 22.5 |
| 2022-26 | 12-38 | 16.4 |
| # | Team | Dist | Ovr | Rank | Proj. | Dist. pts | Next |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DEVINE | 5-0 | 7-1 | 41 / 408 | 1 (6.4-0.6) | 280-57 | 10/30 vs HONDO |
| 2 | JOURDANTON | 5-0 | 6-2 | 52 / 543 | 2 (6.3-0.7) | 206-89 | 10/30 vs LYTLE |
| 3 | HONDO | 4-1 | 5-3 | 59 / 656 | 3 (5.2-1.8) | 162-81 | 10/30 vs DEVINE |
| 4 | CARRIZO SPRINGS | 3-3 | 4-5 | 77 / 944 | 4 (3.7-3.3) | 184-142 | 11/06 vs NATALIA |
| 5 | LYTLE | 1-4 | 2-6 | 96 / 1123 | 8 (1.3-5.7) | 155-242 | 10/30 vs JOURDANTON |
| 6 | POTEET | 1-4 | 2-6 | 97 / 1133 | 7 (1.4-5.6) | 99-215 | 10/30 vs NATALIA |
| 7 | NATALIA | 1-4 | 2-6 | 90 / 1057 | 5 (2.0-5.0) | 119-244 | 10/30 vs POTEET |
| 8 | CRYSTAL CITY | 1-5 | 3-6 | 84 / 997 | 6 (1.7-5.3) | 102-237 | 11/06 vs LYTLE |
| DATE | OPPONENT | SITE | RESULT | SCORE | WIN% |
| 08/28 | KENEDY | vs | L | 12-57 | |
| 09/03 | BRACKENRIDGE | at | L | 27-45 | |
| 09/11 | SOMERSET ACADEMY COLLEGIATE | at | W | 42-0 | |
| 09/18 | CARRIZO SPRINGS | vs | L | 0-50 | |
| 09/25 | LYTLE | at | L | 33-58 | |
| 10/09 | DEVINE | vs | L | 6-47 | |
| 10/16 | JOURDANTON | at | L | 13-46 | |
| 10/23 | CRYSTAL CITY | vs | W | 47-14 | |
| 10/30 | NATALIA | at | PROJ | 27-31 | 41.7% |
| 11/06 | HONDO | vs | PROJ | 9-46 | 3.5% |
| SEASON TO DATE | 2-6 | 2 REMAINING |
SEASON OUTLOOK
(full explanation: Appendix, Note 1)
| RECORD TO DATE | MOST LIKELY FINAL | PROJECTED RECORD | |
| Overall | 2-6 so far | 2-8 (49%) | 2.6-7.4 |
| League | 1-4 so far | 1-4 (100%) | 1.0-4.0 |
| SPLIT | GP | PPG | OPP PPG | YPG | OPP YPG | PLAYS/G | OPP PLAYS/G |
| OVERALL | 8 | 22.5 | 39.6 | 348.8 | 386.0 | 49.8 | 44.8 |
| HOME | 4 | 16.2 | 42.0 | 260.0 | 395.7 | 50.5 | 42.3 |
| ROAD | 4 | 28.8 | 37.2 | 437.5 | 371.5 | 49.0 | 48.5 |
PPG/OPP PPG use every played game on file. YPG/PLAYS-PER-GAME columns only ever come from games with a full box score on file, which can be a smaller sample than GP -- see the coverage note below when that's the case for this team.
| DATE | OPPONENT | RESULT | PASS YDS | RUSH YDS | TOTAL YDS | PASS ALW | RUSH ALW | TOTAL ALW | SACKS ALW | SACKS | DEF INT | TO FORCED | TO MAR |
| 8/28 | vs. Kenedy | L 12-57 | 143 | 48 | 191 | 212 | 270 | 482 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -4 |
| 9/3 | @ Brackenridge | L 27-45 | 184 | 169 | 353 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9/11 | @ Somerset Academy Collegiate | W 42-0 | 303 | 267 | 570 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9/18 | vs. Carrizo Springs | L 0-50 | 205 | 54 | 259 | 49 | 209 | 258 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -3 |
| 9/25 | @ Lytle | L 33-58 | 275 | 255 | 530 | 136 | 452 | 588 | -- | -- | -- | 0 | -2 |
| 10/9 | vs. Devine | L 6-47 | 91 | 52 | 143 | 157 | 290 | 447 | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 0 |
| 10/16 | @ Jourdanton | L 13-46 | 166 | 131 | 297 | -- | 155 | 155 | -- | -- | -- | 0 | 0 |
| 10/23 | vs. Crystal City | W 47-14 | 327 | 120 | 447 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 5 | +4 |
| AVERAGES | 211.8 | 137.0 | 348.8 | 138.5 | 275.2 | 386.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.0 | -5 (season) |
Averages use only games with that number on file (defense 5/8, sacks/INT 4/8, sacks allowed 2/8 games). SACKS ALW comes from the opponent's box score; TO FORCED is takeaways; TO MAR is takeaways minus giveaways, and its bottom cell is the season total. Dashes mean not on file.
UNIT INDEX
Pass Offense: grade 75.6/100 (+45 yds/gm vs average)
Rush Offense: grade 32.5/100 (-49 yds/gm vs average)
Pass Defense: grade 23.7/100 (+36 yds/gm vs average)
Rush Defense: grade 13.8/100 (+87 yds/gm vs average)
Unit grades: 0-100 league percentile, adjusted for the opponents faced.
OPPONENT TRACKER
(full explanation: Appendix, Note 2)
| DATE | SITE | OPPONENT | THEIR RECORD | THEIR PPG |
| 2026-10-30 | at | NATALIA | 2-6 | 22.1 |
| 2026-11-06 | vs | HONDO | 5-3 | 24.5 |
LAST YEAR
POT finished 2025 at 2-9. Made the playoffs (1 postseason game(s) on file; exact round/result not available). Notable win: 13-0 over LYTLE (LYTLE finished 40% that season). Toughest loss: 34-36 to COLE (2-point margin).
| DATE | OPPONENT | RESULT | RECORD | PF | PA | TOT YDS | YDS ALLOWED |
| 2025-08-29 | BANDERA | L | 0-1 | 0 | 52 | N/A | N/A |
| 2025-09-05 | KARNES CITY | L | 0-2 | 6 | 35 | N/A | N/A |
| 2025-09-12 | GEORGE WEST | L | 0-3 | 14 | 48 | N/A | N/A |
| 2025-09-19 | PEARSALL | W | 1-3 | 14 | 7 | N/A | N/A |
| 2025-09-26 | MARION | L | 1-4 | 20 | 50 | N/A | 527 |
| 2025-10-10 | LYTLE | W | 2-4 | 13 | 0 | N/A | N/A |
| 2025-10-17 | CRYSTAL CITY | L | 2-5 | 12 | 55 | N/A | N/A |
| 2025-10-24 | JOURDANTON | L | 2-6 | 6 | 45 | N/A | N/A |
| 2025-10-31 | COLE | L | 2-7 | 34 | 36 | N/A | N/A |
| 2025-11-07 | HONDO | L | 2-8 | 22 | 58 | N/A | N/A |
| 2025-11-13 | LLANO | L | 2-9 | 14 | 49 | N/A | N/A |
| TOTALS | 11 GMS | 2-9 | 2-9 | 155 | 435 | N/A | 527 (1) |
"N/A" stands in for a box score that does not have stats entered. A total followed by a count in parentheses covers only the games with that stat on file.
• POT averages 8.0+ yards per attempt (.750)
• POT averages 6.0+ yards per play (.600)
• POT commits fewer than 2 giveaways (.500)
• POT forces 2+ takeaways (.667)
• POT's defense has averaged 2.0 takeaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 1.1 takeaways per game. (+80%)
• POT's offense has averaged 0.7 giveaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 1.7 giveaways per game. (-61%)
• POT's defense has averaged 114.0 pass yards per game over their last 5 games. Their 6-game average is 196.3 pass yards per game. (-42%)
• POT averages 7.5+ yards per attempt (POT's own median) (.600)
• POT averages 7.1+ yards per play (POT's own median) (.600)
• POT's offense has averaged 101.0 rush yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 145.0 rush yards per game. (-30%)
• POT's offense has averaged 24.0 points scored per game over their last 7 games. Their 29-game average is 18.4 points scored per game. (+30%)
• POT's offense has failed to reach 150 rush yds in 3 straight games (10/09/2026-10/23/2026), going 1-2 over that stretch.
• POT's defense has averaged 301.0 total yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 7-game average is 400.3 total yards per game. (-25%)
• POT is 3-3 (.500) in games decided by 8 points or fewer
• POT's offense has averaged 4.4 YPC over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 5.8 YPC. (-23%)
(full explanation: Appendix, Note 3)
POT -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS
(top 1 of 1 scored; vs 344 cached team(s))
| # | SIDE | CONDITION | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK | SCORE |
| 1 | DEF | Turnovers < 3 | 2-6 | .250 | 41.4 | L4 | 0.500 |
(of 15 combinations tried per team -- a combination is only shown when at least 4 real games on file satisfy both conditions at once)
--- POT ---
| CONDITION | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK |
| POT averages 5.0+ yards per carry on its way to 150+ rushing yards | 2-2 | .500 | 34.2 | L1 |
| Team | Condition | Record | Win% | PPG |
| POT | YPC 5.0+ & Rush Yds 150+ | 2-2 | .500 | 34.2 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK | |
| YPA 8.0+ | 3-1 | .750 | 39.2 | W1 | |
| YPA < 8.0 | 0-5 | .000 | 11.6 | L5 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| Pass Yds 200+ | 2-2 | .500 | 30.5 | W1 | |
| Pass Yds < 200 | 1-4 | .200 | 18.6 | L4 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 100+ | 3-3 | .500 | 32.8 | W1 | |
| Rush Yds < 100 | 0-3 | .000 | 6.0 | L3 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 150+ | 2-2 | .500 | 34.2 | L1 | |
| Rush Yds < 150 | 1-4 | .200 | 15.6 | W1 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| YPC 5.0+ | 2-3 | .400 | 30.0 | L2 | |
| YPC < 5.0 | 1-3 | .250 | 16.2 | W1 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 6.0+ | 3-2 | .600 | 34.0 | W1 | |
| YPP < 6.0 | 0-4 | .000 | 11.2 | L4 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 7.0+ | 3-2 | .600 | 34.0 | W1 | |
| YPP < 7.0 | 0-4 | .000 | 11.2 | L4 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers 1+ | 2-5 | .286 | 21.9 | W1 | |
| Turnovers < 1 | 1-2 | .333 | 27.3 | L1 | 19 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers 2+ | 0-4 | .000 | 16.2 | L4 | 19 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers > 2 | 0-3 | .000 | 10.7 | L3 | 19 games without this stat on file |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG |
| Scores <10 | 0-7 | .000 | 4.7 |
| Scores 10-19 | 2-8 | .200 | 13.7 |
| Scores 20-29 | 0-6 | .000 | 23.2 |
| Scores 30-39 | 2-2 | .500 | 34.2 |
| Scores 40+ | 2-0 | 1.000 | 44.5 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK |
| YPA 8.0+ | 2-1 | .667 | 40.7 | W1 |
| YPA < 8.0 | 0-5 | .000 | 11.6 | L5 |
| Pass Yds 200+ | 2-2 | .500 | 30.5 | W1 |
| Pass Yds < 200 | 0-4 | .000 | 14.5 | L4 |
| Rush Yds 100+ | 2-3 | .400 | 32.4 | W1 |
| Rush Yds < 100 | 0-3 | .000 | 6.0 | L3 |
| Rush Yds 150+ | 1-2 | .333 | 34.0 | L1 |
| Rush Yds < 150 | 1-4 | .200 | 15.6 | W1 |
| YPC 5.0+ | 1-3 | .250 | 28.8 | L2 |
| YPC < 5.0 | 1-3 | .250 | 16.2 | W1 |
| YPP 6.0+ | 2-2 | .500 | 33.8 | W1 |
| YPP < 6.0 | 0-4 | .000 | 11.2 | L4 |
| YPP 7.0+ | 2-2 | .500 | 33.8 | W1 |
| YPP < 7.0 | 0-4 | .000 | 11.2 | L4 |
| Turnovers 1+ | 1-4 | .200 | 19.6 | W1 |
| Turnovers < 1 | 1-2 | .333 | 27.3 | L1 |
| Turnovers 2+ | 0-3 | .000 | 15.0 | L3 |
| Turnovers > 2 | 0-2 | .000 | 6.0 | L2 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG |
| Scores <10 | 0-2 | .000 | 3.0 |
| Scores 10-19 | 0-2 | .000 | 12.5 |
| Scores 20-29 | 0-1 | .000 | 27.0 |
| Scores 30-39 | 0-1 | .000 | 33.0 |
| Scores 40+ | 2-0 | 1.000 | 44.5 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK | |
| YPA 8.0+ | 1-4 | .200 | 48.0 | L4 | |
| YPA < 8.0 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 24 games without this stat on file |
| Pass Yds 200+ | 1-2 | .333 | 45.0 | L2 | |
| Pass Yds < 200 | 0-3 | .000 | 51.7 | L3 | 23 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 100+ | 1-6 | .143 | 48.0 | L6 | |
| Rush Yds < 100 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 22 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 150+ | 0-5 | .000 | 51.6 | L5 | |
| Rush Yds < 150 | 1-1 | .500 | 39.0 | L1 | 22 games without this stat on file |
| YPC 5.0+ | 0-5 | .000 | 52.4 | L5 | |
| YPC < 5.0 | 1-1 | .500 | 37.0 | L1 | 22 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 6.0+ | 1-5 | .167 | 48.3 | L5 | |
| YPP < 6.0 | 0-1 | .000 | 46.0 | L1 | 22 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 7.0+ | 0-5 | .000 | 52.4 | L5 | |
| YPP < 7.0 | 1-1 | .500 | 37.0 | L1 | 22 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers 1+ | 2-2 | .500 | 34.8 | W1 | |
| Turnovers < 1 | 1-4 | .200 | 41.2 | L2 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers 2+ | 2-1 | .667 | 30.7 | W1 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers > 2 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 14.0 | W1 | 20 games without this stat on file |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG |
| Allows <10 | 3-0 | 1.000 | 2.3 |
| Allows 10-19 | 1-1 | .500 | 16.5 |
| Allows 20-29 | 1-3 | .250 | 27.5 |
| Allows 30-39 | 1-3 | .250 | 36.0 |
| Allows 40+ | 0-16 | .000 | 49.2 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG | STRK | |
| YPA 8.0+ | 0-3 | .000 | 54.0 | L3 | |
| YPA < 8.0 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 5 games without this stat on file |
| Pass Yds 200+ | 0-1 | .000 | 57.0 | L1 | |
| Pass Yds < 200 | 0-3 | .000 | 51.7 | L3 | 4 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 100+ | 0-5 | .000 | 51.6 | L5 | |
| Rush Yds < 100 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 3 games without this stat on file |
| Rush Yds 150+ | 0-5 | .000 | 51.6 | L5 | |
| Rush Yds < 150 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 3 games without this stat on file |
| YPC 5.0+ | 0-4 | .000 | 53.0 | L4 | |
| YPC < 5.0 | 0-1 | .000 | 46.0 | L1 | 3 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 6.0+ | 0-4 | .000 | 53.0 | L4 | |
| YPP < 6.0 | 0-1 | .000 | 46.0 | L1 | 3 games without this stat on file |
| YPP 7.0+ | 0-4 | .000 | 53.0 | L4 | |
| YPP < 7.0 | 0-1 | .000 | 46.0 | L1 | 3 games without this stat on file |
| Turnovers 1+ | 1-2 | .333 | 37.0 | W1 | |
| Turnovers < 1 | 1-4 | .200 | 41.2 | L2 | |
| Turnovers 2+ | 1-1 | .500 | 32.0 | W1 | |
| Turnovers > 2 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 14.0 | W1 |
| SPLIT | REC | WIN% | PPG |
| Allows <10 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 0.0 |
| Allows 10-19 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 14.0 |
| Allows 20-29 | -- | -- | -- |
| Allows 30-39 | -- | -- | -- |
| Allows 40+ | 0-6 | .000 | 50.5 |
| Team | Side | Split | Games | Record | Win% | PPG | Strk |
| POT | OFFENSE | YPA 8.0+ | 4 | 3-1 | .750 | 39.2 | W1 |
| POT | OFFENSE | YPA < 8.0 | 5 | 0-5 | .000 | 11.6 | L5 |
| POT | OFFENSE | Pass Yds 200+ | 4 | 2-2 | .500 | 30.5 | W1 |
| POT | OFFENSE | Pass Yds < 200 | 5 | 1-4 | .200 | 18.6 | L4 |
| POT | OFFENSE | Rush Yds 100+ | 6 | 3-3 | .500 | 32.8 | W1 |
| POT | OFFENSE | Rush Yds < 100 | 3 | 0-3 | .000 | 6.0 | L3 |
| POT | OFFENSE | Rush Yds 150+ | 4 | 2-2 | .500 | 34.2 | L1 |
| POT | OFFENSE | Rush Yds < 150 | 5 | 1-4 | .200 | 15.6 | W1 |
| POT | OFFENSE | YPC 5.0+ | 5 | 2-3 | .400 | 30.0 | L2 |
| POT | OFFENSE | YPC < 5.0 | 4 | 1-3 | .250 | 16.2 | W1 |
| POT | OFFENSE | YPP 6.0+ | 5 | 3-2 | .600 | 34.0 | W1 |
| POT | OFFENSE | YPP < 6.0 | 4 | 0-4 | .000 | 11.2 | L4 |
| POT | OFFENSE | YPP 7.0+ | 5 | 3-2 | .600 | 34.0 | W1 |
| POT | OFFENSE | YPP < 7.0 | 4 | 0-4 | .000 | 11.2 | L4 |
| POT | OFFENSE | Turnovers 1+ | 7 | 2-5 | .286 | 21.9 | W1 |
| POT | OFFENSE | Turnovers < 1 | 3 | 1-2 | .333 | 27.3 | L1 |
| POT | OFFENSE | Turnovers 2+ | 4 | 0-4 | .000 | 16.2 | L4 |
| POT | OFFENSE | Turnovers > 2 | 3 | 0-3 | .000 | 10.7 | L3 |
| POT | OFFENSE | Scores <10 | 7 | 0-7 | .000 | 4.7 | L7 |
| POT | OFFENSE | Scores 10-19 | 10 | 2-8 | .200 | 13.7 | L4 |
| POT | OFFENSE | Scores 20-29 | 6 | 0-6 | .000 | 23.2 | L6 |
| POT | OFFENSE | Scores 30-39 | 4 | 2-2 | .500 | 34.2 | L2 |
| POT | OFFENSE | Scores 40+ | 2 | 2-0 | 1.000 | 44.5 | W2 |
| POT | DEFENSE | YPA 8.0+ | 5 | 1-4 | .200 | 48.0 | L4 |
| POT | DEFENSE | Pass Yds 200+ | 3 | 1-2 | .333 | 45.0 | L2 |
| POT | DEFENSE | Pass Yds < 200 | 3 | 0-3 | .000 | 51.7 | L3 |
| POT | DEFENSE | Rush Yds 100+ | 7 | 1-6 | .143 | 48.0 | L6 |
| POT | DEFENSE | Rush Yds 150+ | 5 | 0-5 | .000 | 51.6 | L5 |
| POT | DEFENSE | Rush Yds < 150 | 2 | 1-1 | .500 | 39.0 | L1 |
| POT | DEFENSE | YPC 5.0+ | 5 | 0-5 | .000 | 52.4 | L5 |
| POT | DEFENSE | YPC < 5.0 | 2 | 1-1 | .500 | 37.0 | L1 |
| POT | DEFENSE | YPP 6.0+ | 6 | 1-5 | .167 | 48.3 | L5 |
| POT | DEFENSE | YPP < 6.0 | 1 | 0-1 | .000 | 46.0 | L1 |
| POT | DEFENSE | YPP 7.0+ | 5 | 0-5 | .000 | 52.4 | L5 |
| POT | DEFENSE | YPP < 7.0 | 2 | 1-1 | .500 | 37.0 | L1 |
| POT | DEFENSE | Turnovers 1+ | 4 | 2-2 | .500 | 34.8 | W1 |
| POT | DEFENSE | Turnovers < 1 | 5 | 1-4 | .200 | 41.2 | L2 |
| POT | DEFENSE | Turnovers 2+ | 3 | 2-1 | .667 | 30.7 | W1 |
| POT | DEFENSE | Turnovers > 2 | 1 | 1-0 | 1.000 | 14.0 | W1 |
| POT | DEFENSE | Allows <10 | 3 | 3-0 | 1.000 | 2.3 | W3 |
| POT | DEFENSE | Allows 10-19 | 2 | 1-1 | .500 | 16.5 | W1 |
| POT | DEFENSE | Allows 20-29 | 4 | 1-3 | .250 | 27.5 | W1 |
| POT | DEFENSE | Allows 30-39 | 4 | 1-3 | .250 | 36.0 | L3 |
| POT | DEFENSE | Allows 40+ | 16 | 0-16 | .000 | 49.2 | L16 |
| SIDE | SPLIT | STREAK | DATES | RECORD |
| OFFENSE | Rush Yds < 150 | 3 games | 10/09/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 1-2 |
| Team | Side | Split | Streak | Dates | Record |
| POT | OFFENSE | Rush Yds < 150 | 3 games | 10/09/2026 - 10/23/2026 | 1-2 |
POT OFFENSE
POT's offense has averaged 0.7 giveaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 1.7 giveaways per game. (-61%)
POT's offense has averaged 101.0 rush yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 145.0 rush yards per game. (-30%)
POT's offense has averaged 24.0 points scored per game over their last 7 games. Their 29-game average is 18.4 points scored per game. (+30%)
POT's offense has averaged 4.4 YPC over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 5.8 YPC. (-23%)
POT DEFENSE
POT's defense has averaged 2.0 takeaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 1.1 takeaways per game. (+80%)
POT's defense has averaged 114.0 pass yards per game over their last 5 games. Their 6-game average is 196.3 pass yards per game. (-42%)
POT's defense has averaged 301.0 total yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 7-game average is 400.3 total yards per game. (-25%)
(moved to the Appendix, Data Export 1, to keep this section shorter -- the full spreadsheet-paste table is there unchanged)
Full-length explanations and full-size data exports for the shortened notes and relocated tables referenced throughout this report, numbered in the order their pointers appear above.
Explanatory Notes
Note 1 -- SEASON OUTLOOK
Every remaining game is projected from schedule-adjusted ratings; already-played games carry their real result. Records are simulated distributions, not a single guess -- MOST LIKELY FINAL is the single most probable record and its own probability, PROJECTED RECORD is the season's expected win total expressed in record form (an average across every simulated outcome, so it can land on a fraction of a game).
Note 2 -- OPPONENT TRACKER -- why some cards have no record shown
Only meaningful for an opponent who is ALSO a tracked team in the library -- an opponent with no games on file here at all shows the date and site alone.
Note 3 -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS -- how a number is scored
Every split this report computes is scored on how strong the number is and how much it sets this team apart from its opponent and the rest of the field, and the top 5 per team are listed. A condition needs at least 8 occurrences to count.
Full Data Exports
Data Export 1 -- TRENDS — TAB-SEPARATED (10 columns)
| Team | Side | Type | Stat | Opponent | Window/Meetings | Value | BaselineGames | BaselineAvg | Deviation |
| POT | DEFENSE | team | Pass Yards | last 5 | 114.0 | 6 | 196.3 | -41.9% | |
| POT | OFFENSE | team | Points | last 7 | 24.0 | 29 | 18.4 | +30.1% | |
| POT | OFFENSE | team | Rush Yards | last 3 | 101.0 | 9 | 145.0 | -30.3% | |
| POT | DEFENSE | team | Total Yards | last 3 | 301.0 | 7 | 400.3 | -24.8% | |
| POT | DEFENSE | team | Turnovers | last 3 | 2.0 | 9 | 1.1 | +80.0% | |
| POT | OFFENSE | team | Turnovers | last 3 | 0.7 | 10 | 1.7 | -60.8% | |
| POT | OFFENSE | team | YPC | last 3 | 4.4 | 9 | 5.8 | -23.0% |