ScorePirate
MENU
AT A GLANCE

In short: Cambridge Bears high school football (Milton, GA), 2026 season: 5-4. Last game: W 17-13 vs St. Pius X Catholic on October 23, 2026. Next: at Blessed Trinity, November 6, 2026. Schedule and results, player season stats, stat leaders, unit grades, ScorePirate ranking and the game-by-game log.

ScorePirate Individual Team Report
CAMBRIDGE
CAMBRIDGE 5-4
2026 SEASON
CAMBRIDGE
AT A GLANCE — AS OF 10/31/2026
RECORD5-4 this season
LAST GAMEW 17-13 vs ST. PIUS X CATHOLIC
NEXT GAMEBLESSED TRINITY (11/06/2026)
UNIT GRADESPass Off 75.8 · Rush Off 41.7 · Pass Def 52.5 · Rush Def 46.0
ENROLLMENT1,747 STUDENTS (2022-23) · PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL
NUMBERS TO NOTE
#188
SP Strength Index (of 471)
5-4
2026 record
-6.4
avg scoring margin, pts/gm
UNIT INDEX — GRADE (YDS VS AVG)
TEAMPASS ORUSH OPASS DRUSH D
CAMBRIDGE75.8 (+46)41.7 (-28)52.5 (-7)46.0 (+4)
HEAD-TO-HEAD GAME LOG

STORYLINES

Next: at Blessed Trinity, Fri 6 Nov. Matchup report: Cambridge at Blessed Trinity.

The number to watch when Cambridge meets Blessed Trinity is Cambridge's scoring. Cambridge averaged 16.5 points per game over its first 4 games (1-3), #344 in section in that timeframe. In the 5 games since that slow start (4-1), the Bears have averaged 29.2 points per game, a 77% rise, #185 in section in that window. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Cambridge's last 5 opponents have averaged 26.8 points per game, a #274 scoring defense in section on the season, against 22.9 points per game, #196 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (26.8 points per game), Cambridge scored 9% more than those defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 5 opponents average a rating that would rank #205 in section, well below the first 4 (#73), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. Conversely, Blessed Trinity's defense has been one of section's better units in recent weeks. The Titans have allowed 14.0 points per game over their last 5 games (5-0), #69 in section during that time. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of offenses in section (26.6 points per game on the season, which would rank #203). Against those norms, Blessed Trinity held those offenses 47% below what they usually score. Something has to give when Cambridge's surging offense meets one of section's better units in Blessed Trinity's.

Cambridge allowed 8.8 yards per play (1,527 yards on 173 snaps) over its first 4 games (1-3), #424 in section through those games. Few teams started slower in this department, and few have turned it around as sharply since. In the 5 games since that slow start (4-1), the Bears have allowed 5.7 yards per play (1,038 yards on 183 snaps), a 36% drop, #114 in section through that stretch. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Cambridge's last 5 opponents have averaged 6.2 yards per play, a #250 offense in section on the season, against 8.0 yards per play, #83 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (6.2 yards per play), Cambridge held those offenses 9% below their usual yards per snap. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 5 opponents average a rating that would rank #205 in section, well below the first 4 (#73), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. Meanwhile, Blessed Trinity's offense has been middle of the pack in recent weeks. The Titans have averaged 7.4 yards per play (1,704 yards on 230 snaps) over their last 5 games (5-0), #165 in section over that stretch. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of defenses in section (6.9 yards per play on the season, which would rank #271). Against those norms, Blessed Trinity gained 8% more per snap than those defenses usually allow. Blessed Trinity offers Cambridge a fair measuring stick for whether the trend is real.

NOTES

The biggest shift in Cambridge's season has come in its passing game. Cambridge averaged 6.2 yards per pass attempt (440 yards on 71 attempts) over its first 3 games (0-3), #284 in section within that period. In the 6 games since that slow start (5-1), the Bears have averaged 11.0 yards per pass attempt (1,221 yards on 111 attempts), a 78% rise, #67 in section across those games. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Cambridge's last 6 opponents have averaged 9.2 yards per attempt, a #345 pass defense in section on the season, against 8.0 yards per attempt, #239 for the first 3. Measured against those opponents' norms (9.2 yards per attempt), Cambridge threw for 19% more per attempt than those pass defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 6 opponents average a rating that would rank #195 in section, well below the first 3 (#56), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. On the season, Cambridge ranks #128 in section in passing. Blessed Trinity's pass defense sits in the middle of the pack, #175 in section (7.4 yards per attempt).

Cambridge's defense has come a long way since the season's early weeks. The Bears allowed 47.7 points per game over their first 3 games (0-3), #455 in section during those games. In the 6 games since that slow start (5-1), Cambridge has allowed 21.2 points per game, a 56% drop, #179 in section during that period. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Cambridge's last 6 opponents have averaged 26.7 points per game, a #199 offense in section on the season, against 36.2 points per game, #78 for the first 3. Measured against those opponents' norms (26.7 points per game), Cambridge held those offenses 21% below what they usually score. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 6 opponents average a rating that would rank #195 in section, well below the first 3 (#56), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. Only Marist broke through in that span, putting up 38 on 10/9. On the season, the Bears rank #335 in section in scoring defense. That form gets a real test against Blessed Trinity, whose offense ranks #68 in section (37.2 points per game). Cambridge is 5-0 this season when it holds opponents under 38, and 0-4 when it doesn't.

Something changed for Cambridge's run defense after its first 4 games. Cambridge allowed 7.1 yards per carry (789 yards on 111 rushes) over its first 4 games (1-3), #380 in section during that stretch. In the 5 games since that slow start (4-1), the Bears have allowed 5.2 yards per carry (628 yards on 121 rushes), a 27% drop, #158 in section over that period. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Cambridge's last 5 opponents have averaged 5.1 yards per carry, a #272 rushing attack in section on the season, against 6.8 yards per carry, #105 for the first 4. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 5 opponents average a rating that would rank #205 in section, well below the first 4 (#73), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. On the season, Cambridge ranks #282 in section in run defense. Blessed Trinity's ground game sits in the middle of the pack, #225 in section (5.5 yards per carry).

Cambridge's offense has gained more yards per snap as the season has worn on. The Bears averaged 5.6 yards per play (872 yards on 155 snaps) over their first 3 games (0-3), #275 in section over that timeframe. In the 6 games since that slow start (5-1), Cambridge has averaged 6.9 yards per play (2,099 yards on 306 snaps), a 22% rise, #198 in section over that span. The schedule doesn't explain it: the opponents in both stretches have averaged about 6.6 yards per play on the season. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 6 opponents average a rating that would rank #195 in section, well below the first 3 (#56), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. On the season, the Bears rank #225 in section in yards per play. That form gets a real test against Blessed Trinity, whose defense ranks #42 in section (5.0 yards per play).

Cambridge's ground game has bogged down on the ground as the season has progressed. Cambridge averaged 5.1 yards per carry (432 yards on 84 rushes) over its first 3 games (0-3), #246 in section in that timeframe. In the 6 games since that hot start (5-1), the Bears have averaged 4.5 yards per carry (878 yards on 195 rushes), a 12% drop, #322 in section in that window. The schedule has a lot to do with it: Cambridge's last 6 opponents have averaged 4.9 yards per carry, a #119 run defense in section on the season, against 5.5 yards per carry, #199 for the first 3. Measured against those opponents' norms (4.9 yards per carry), Cambridge ran for 8% less per carry than those run defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 6 opponents average a rating that would rank #195 in section, well below the first 3 (#56), which makes the dip harder to excuse. On the season, Cambridge ranks #323 in section in rushing. It won't get any easier against Blessed Trinity, whose run defense ranks #9 in section (3.1 yards per carry).

TIDBITS (3 found)

• Club Cambridge has won 2 straight, and a win would make it 3 in a row. The last time they won 3 or more in a row was 2026, a run of 3.

• Club The last time Cambridge went a game forcing 3+ turnovers was August 22, 2025 against Johns Creek (W, 56-0). Since then Cambridge has gone 19 straight games forcing fewer than 3 turnovers, a school-record 19 straight in the 5 seasons on record.

• Club Cambridge is 17-0 all time when scoring 40+ points in the games on file (17 such games).

SCHEDULE STRENGTH

Cambridge has played one of the toughest schedules in the pool so far (#60 of 466), and what is left is one of the toughest slates (#13 of 331).

Schedule so far · 1 = hardest
#60 of 466
avg opponent rating 10.3 over 9 games · 2 vs top-25 GA section
Schedule ahead · 1 = hardest
#13 of 331
avg opponent rating 27.3 over 1 games · 1 vs top-25
Toughest game played
Brookwood
#4 in GA section · Aug 13 · L 7-52
Toughest game ahead
Blessed Trinity
#17 in GA section · Nov 6
Brookwood
L 7-52
Woodstock
L 20-38
@Milton
L 21-53
Denmark
W 18-13
@Centenni…
W 28-22
Sprayber…
W 38-27
@Marist
L 14-38
Chattaho…
W 49-14
St Pius …
W 17-13
@Blessed …
Each bar is one opponent, placed by where its rating ranks in this pool (tall and red = top 10; short and green = bottom half). Hatched bars are games still to play; the dashed line is today.
CAM — STAT LEADERS
OFFENSE
M. Turk5 GMS
PASSING LEADER
767PASS YDS
C-ATT60-103
COMP%58.3%
YPA7.4
TD5
INT2
QBR132.9
RUSHING LEADER
384RUSH YDS
CAR87
YPC4.4
RUSH TD3
REC14
REC YDS115
YPR8.2
REC TD0
RUSHING LEADER
36RUSH YDS
CAR1
YPC36.0
RUSH TD0
REC0
REC YDS0
YPR--
REC TD0
RECEIVING LEADER
190REC YDS
REC15
YPR12.7
REC TD0
RECEIVING LEADER
183REC YDS
REC9
YPR20.3
REC TD1
DEFENSE
C. Wade4 GMS
TACKLES LEADER
31TCKL
TFL0
SACKS0
INT1
PD2
FF0
TACKLES LEADER
28TCKL
TFL2
SACKS0
INT0
PD0
FF1
TACKLES LEADER
22TCKL
TFL1
SACKS0
INT0
PD0
FF0
TFL LEADER
1TFL
TCKL13
SACKS1
INT0
PD0
FF0
TFL LEADER
1TFL
TCKL18
SACKS1
INT0
PD1
FF0
SACKS LEADER
1SACKS
TCKL3
TFL1
INT0
PD0
FF0
INTERCEPTIONS LEADER
1INT
TCKL8
TFL0
SACKS0
PD0
FF0
CAM — WHAT CHANGED THIS WEEK

From the games on file through Sep 18.

REMAINING SCHEDULE

Most likely finish 5-5 · realistic range 5-5 to 5-5

Remaining schedule: 7th hardest of 387 in the GA section (average opponent strength 27.3).

DateOpponentSP rankWin chance
11/06at Blessed Trinity#17 of 4713%

Win chances are the site's own game projections where one is on file, otherwise the SP Strength Index gap with a small home edge. The realistic range covers 80% of outcomes (10th to 90th percentile).

Printable team sheetProgram historyOpen in Stat BoothWidget for your site
CAM — PLAYER SEASON STATS — 2026

Every player with a stat on file, listed only where he has one. Open the arrow beside a name for his game-by-game line. Stats through the Sep 18 game; last updated Sep 30.

Click a column heading to sort. MIN hides players below that many attempts.
PASSING
NOPLAYERGPC/ATTCOMP %YDSYPATDINTQBR
M. TURK560/10358.3%7677.452132.9
W. COUSINO15/5100.0%10821.620413.4
K. KERSHAW11/333.3%10.30036.1
TEAM TOTALS566/11159.5%8767.972143.0
RUSHING
NOPLAYERGPCARYDSYPCTD
B. MALONE5873844.43
M. TURK5472856.12
J. WILLIAMS113636.00
K. BRAUN25183.60
D. COKER3591.80
J. OREFICE5492.20
J. HIGDON41-1-1.00
K. KERSHAW11-12-12.00
C. WALLACE11-19-19.00
TEAM TOTALS51527094.75
RECEIVING
NOPLAYERGPRECYDSYPRTD
J. OREFICE51519012.70
C. CLARK3918320.31
P. BROGDON51315011.51
B. MALONE5141158.20
C. ROLLE569515.83
J. HIGDON468914.80
H. BLEVINS114444.01
W. POWELL311010.00
TEAM TOTALS56587613.56
DEFENSE
NOPLAYERGPTCKLTFLSACKSINTINT YDSPDFF
C. WADE431001020
J. TAYLOR428200001
F. MASSEY322100000
J. SANDERS418110010
C. PHILLIPS414000001
C. HOUSE413110000
J. OREFICE510000010
E. JOHNSON39000000
L. HAVARD29000000
C. STOVALL48001000
L. HUFFMAN25100000
W. POWELL35000000
J. RECH24000000
K. HAAG24000000
L. BARRETT14000000
K. BRAUN23110000
M. HILL23000000
K. BIERMANN12100000
B. HIGDON12000000
D. OWENS12000000
C. CLARK31100000
C. ROLLE51000001
C. SHERMAN11000000
D. LASOFF11000000
J. HIGDON41000000
L. BRITT11000000
TEAM TOTALS5202932043
PROGRAM SNAPSHOT: CAM

PROGRAM RECORD

SEASONRECORDPFPAPPG
20229-344921437.4
20236-522827420.7
202410-345333334.8
20259-343027935.8
20265-421227023.6
2022-2639-1831.1
CAM — 2026 SEASON SCHEDULE
DATEOPPONENTSITERESULTSCOREWIN%
08/13BROOKWOODvsL7-52
08/28WOODSTOCKvsL20-38
09/04MILTONatL21-53
09/11DENMARKvsW18-13
09/18CENTENNIALatW28-22
10/02SPRAYBERRYvsW38-27
10/09MARISTatL14-38
10/16CHATTAHOOCHEEvsW49-14
10/23ST. PIUS X CATHOLICvsW17-13
11/06BLESSED TRINITYatPROJ7-443.3%
SEASON TO DATE5-41 REMAINING

SEASON OUTLOOK

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 1)

RECORD TO DATEMOST LIKELY FINALPROJECTED RECORD
Overall5-4 so far5-5 (96%)5.0-5.0
League4-1 so far4-1 (100%)4.0-1.0
CAM — 2026 OVERALL AVERAGES
SPLITGPPPGOPP PPGYPGOPP YPGPLAYS/GOPP PLAYS/G
OVERALL923.630.0330.1320.651.244.5
HOME624.826.2344.0298.349.745.3
ROAD321.037.7302.3387.554.342.0

PPG/OPP PPG use every played game on file. YPG/PLAYS-PER-GAME columns only ever come from games with a full box score on file, which can be a smaller sample than GP -- see the coverage note below when that's the case for this team.

CAM — 2026 TEAM GAME LOG
DATEOPPONENTRESULTPASS YDSRUSH YDSTOTAL YDSPASS ALWRUSH ALWTOTAL ALWSACKS ALWSACKSDEF INTTO FORCEDTO MAR
8/13vs. BrookwoodL 7-5268851531662113772100-1
8/28vs. WoodstockL 20-3810025435414923938820020
9/4@ MiltonL 21-53272933653491885371011+1
9/11vs. DenmarkW 18-13218156374741512250211+1
9/18@ CentennialW 28-222181213391061322381001-1
10/2vs. SprayberryW 38-2721917038965305370------10
10/9@ MaristL 14-3815647203------------0-3
10/16vs. ChattahoocheeW 49-1418327746089101190------2+2
10/23vs. St. Pius X CatholicW 17-1322710733415090240------1+1
AVERAGES184.6145.6330.1143.5177.1320.61.20.60.41.00 (season)

Averages use only games with that number on file (defense 8/9, sacks/INT 5/9, sacks allowed 5/9 games). SACKS ALW comes from the opponent's box score; TO FORCED is takeaways; TO MAR is takeaways minus giveaways, and its bottom cell is the season total. Dashes mean not on file.

UNIT INDEX

Pass Offense: grade 75.8/100 (+46 yds/gm vs average)

Rush Offense: grade 41.7/100 (-28 yds/gm vs average)

Pass Defense: grade 52.5/100 (-7 yds/gm vs average)

Rush Defense: grade 46.0/100 (+4 yds/gm vs average)

Unit grades: 0-100 league percentile, adjusted for the opponents faced.

OPPONENT TRACKER

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 2)

DATESITEOPPONENTTHEIR RECORDTHEIR PPG
2026-11-06atBLESSED TRINITY8-037.2

LAST YEAR

CAM finished 2025 at 9-3. Made the playoffs (2 postseason game(s) on file; exact round/result not available). Notable win: 24-21 over OLA (OLA finished 82% that season). Toughest loss: 14-30 to DENMARK (16-point margin).

LAST SEASON: CAM — 2025 GAME LOG
DATEOPPONENTRESULTRECORDPFPATOT YDSYDS ALLOWED
2025-08-15POPEW1-0450N/AN/A
2025-08-22JOHNS CREEKW2-056032311
2025-08-29CREEKVIEWW3-0357N/AN/A
2025-09-05DENMARKL3-11430N/AN/A
2025-09-12CALHOUNW4-15242N/AN/A
2025-09-26EAST COWETAW5-14521N/AN/A
2025-10-03WESTMINSTERW6-14614N/AN/A
2025-10-10CENTENNIALW7-1357N/AN/A
2025-10-24KELLL7-21845N/AN/A
2025-10-31BLESSED TRINITYW8-23128N/AN/A
2025-11-14OLAW9-22421N/AN/A
2025-11-21CENTRALL9-32964N/AN/A
TOTALS12 GMS9-39-3430279323 (1)11 (1)

"N/A" stands in for a box score that does not have stats entered. A total followed by a count in parentheses covers only the games with that stat on file.

TALKING POINTS (15 storylines)
CAM HAS PERFORMED BEST THIS DATA SET WHEN...

• CAM averages 8.0+ yards per attempt (.875), and has won 5 straight when doing so

• CAM rushes for 100+ yards (.875), and has won 5 straight when doing so

• CAM averages 6.0+ yards per play (.875), and has won 5 straight when doing so

• CAM holds its opponents under 8.0 yards per attempt (.999), and has won 5 straight when doing so

• CAM's defense has averaged 16.9 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 10.2 YPA. (+65%)

• CAM averages 10.8+ yards per attempt (CAM's own median) (.999)

• CAM holds its opponents under 7.8 yards per attempt (CAM's own median) (.999)

• CAM holds its opponents under 127.5 passing yards (CAM's own median) (.999)

• CAM holds its opponents under 141.5 rushing yards (CAM's own median) (.999)

• CAM holds its opponents under 5.1 yards per carry (CAM's own median) (.999)

• CAM's defense has averaged 3.5 YPC over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 5.6 YPC. (-37%)

• CAM's defense has averaged 95.5 rush yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 149.5 rush yards per game. (-36%)

• CAM's defense has averaged 102.5 pass yards per game over their last 5 games. Their 10-game average is 145.9 pass yards per game. (-30%)

• CAM's defense has averaged 33.4 points allowed per game over their last 10 games. Their 34-game average is 25.9 points allowed per game. (+29%)

• CAM's defense has averaged 215.0 total yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 295.4 total yards per game. (-27%)

MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 3)

CAM -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(top 5 of 8 scored; vs 315 cached team(s))

#SIDECONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRKSCORE
1OFFRush Yds 100+7-1.87534.6W50.880
2OFFYPP 6+7-1.87534.6W50.790
3OFFYPA 8+7-1.87534.8W50.770
4DEFTurnovers 1+7-2.77821.6W50.715
5DEFPass Yds < 2006-2.75022.4W50.669
WIN %: TWO-CONDITION COMBINATIONS (6 found, min 4 Gms each)

(of 15 combinations tried per team -- a combination is only shown when at least 4 real games on file satisfy both conditions at once)

--- CAM ---

CONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRK
CAM averages 6.0+ yards per play behind 150+ rushing yards5-1.83338.7W3
CAM averages 8.0+ yards per attempt while throwing for 200+ yards5-1.83328.8W4
CAM averages 5.0+ yards per carry on its way to 150+ rushing yards3-1.75044.0W1
CAM holds its opponents under 150 rushing yards and under 200 passing yards4-0.99912.2W4
CAM holds its opponents under 5.0 yards per carry and under 150 rushing yards4-0.99910.2W4
CAM averages 6.0+ yards per play while committing zero giveaways4-0.99933.8W4
WIN % -- TAB-SEPARATED
TeamConditionRecordWin%PPG
CAMYPP 6.0+ & Rush Yds 150+5-1.83338.7
CAMYPA 8.0+ & Pass Yds 200+5-1.83328.8
CAMYPC 5.0+ & Rush Yds 150+3-1.75044.0
CAMRush Yds < 150 & Pass Yds < 2004-0.99912.2
CAMYPC < 5.0 & Rush Yds < 1504-0.99910.2
CAMYPP 6.0+ & Turnovers < 14-0.99933.8
CAM — OFFENSE — 2024-26 (34 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+7-1.87534.8W5
YPA < 8.00-3.00013.7L3 23 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+5-1.83328.8W4
Pass Yds < 2002-3.40029.2W1 23 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+7-1.87534.6W5
Rush Yds < 1000-3.00014.0L3 23 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+5-1.83338.7W3
Rush Yds < 1502-3.40017.4W1 23 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+3-1.75044.0W1
YPC < 5.04-3.57120.4W1 23 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+7-1.87534.6W5
YPP < 6.00-3.00014.0L3 23 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+4-1.80042.8W2
YPP < 7.03-3.50017.5W1 23 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+3-3.50027.2L1
Turnovers < 14-1.80031.2W3 23 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 2+2-2.50029.5L1 23 games without this stat on file
Turnovers > 20-1.00014.0L1 23 games without this stat on file
CAM — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2024-26 (34 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Scores <100-1.0007.0
Scores 10-192-5.28615.6
Scores 20-292-4.33324.3
Scores 30-399-01.00034.3
Scores 40+11-01.00047.6
CAM — OFFENSE — 2026 (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+5-1.83328.5W5
YPA < 8.00-3.00013.7L3
Pass Yds 200+4-1.80024.4W4
Pass Yds < 2001-3.25022.5W1
Rush Yds 100+5-1.83328.3W5
Rush Yds < 1000-3.00014.0L3
Rush Yds 150+3-1.75031.2W3
Rush Yds < 1502-3.40017.4W1
YPC 5.0+1-1.50034.5W1
YPC < 5.04-3.57120.4W1
YPP 6.0+5-1.83328.3W5
YPP < 6.00-3.00014.0L3
YPP 7.0+2-1.66735.7W2
YPP < 7.03-3.50017.5W1
Turnovers 1+2-3.40021.4L1
Turnovers < 13-1.75026.2W3
Turnovers 2+1-2.33320.7L1
Turnovers > 20-1.00014.0L1
CAM — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2026 (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Scores <100-1.0007.0
Scores 10-192-1.66716.3
Scores 20-291-2.33323.0
Scores 30-391-01.00038.0
Scores 40+1-01.00049.0
CAM — DEFENSE — 2024-26 (34 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+2-3.40034.0W1
YPA < 8.05-01.00015.2W5 24 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+1-1.50033.5L1
Pass Yds < 2006-2.75022.4W5 24 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+4-3.57131.3W4
Rush Yds < 1003-01.0009.0W3 24 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+2-3.40036.6W2
Rush Yds < 1505-01.00012.6W5 24 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+3-3.50034.2W3
YPC < 5.04-01.00010.2W4 24 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+4-3.57130.0W3
YPP < 6.03-01.00012.0W3 24 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+2-2.50033.0W1
YPP < 7.05-1.83319.0W4 24 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+7-2.77821.6W5
Turnovers < 10-2.00045.0L2 23 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 2+2-1.66717.3W1 23 games without this stat on file
Turnovers > 21-01.0000.0W1 23 games without this stat on file
CAM — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2024-26 (34 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Allows <105-01.0002.8
Allows 10-197-01.00013.9
Allows 20-297-2.77824.0
Allows 30-393-3.50035.8
Allows 40+2-5.28648.6
CAM — DEFENSE — 2026 (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+1-3.25039.0W1
YPA < 8.04-01.00019.0W4 1 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+0-1.00053.0L1
Pass Yds < 2005-2.71425.6W5 1 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+4-3.57131.3W4
Rush Yds < 1001-01.00013.0W1 1 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+2-3.40036.6W2
Rush Yds < 1503-01.00016.3W3 1 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+3-3.50034.2W3
YPC < 5.02-01.00013.5W2 1 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+3-3.50032.7W3
YPP < 6.02-01.00018.0W2 1 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+1-2.33339.3W1
YPP < 7.04-1.80022.8W4 1 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+5-2.71425.7W5
Turnovers < 10-2.00045.0L2
Turnovers 2+1-1.50026.0W1
Turnovers > 2--------
CAM — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION — 2026 (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Allows <10------
Allows 10-193-01.00013.3
Allows 20-292-01.00024.5
Allows 30-390-2.00038.0
Allows 40+0-2.00052.5
TAB-SEPARATED (paste into a spreadsheet)
TeamSideSplitGamesRecordWin%PPGStrk
CAMOFFENSEYPA 8.0+87-1.87534.8W5
CAMOFFENSEYPA < 8.030-3.00013.7L3
CAMOFFENSEPass Yds 200+65-1.83328.8W4
CAMOFFENSEPass Yds < 20052-3.40029.2W1
CAMOFFENSERush Yds 100+87-1.87534.6W5
CAMOFFENSERush Yds < 10030-3.00014.0L3
CAMOFFENSERush Yds 150+65-1.83338.7W3
CAMOFFENSERush Yds < 15052-3.40017.4W1
CAMOFFENSEYPC 5.0+43-1.75044.0W1
CAMOFFENSEYPC < 5.074-3.57120.4W1
CAMOFFENSEYPP 6.0+87-1.87534.6W5
CAMOFFENSEYPP < 6.030-3.00014.0L3
CAMOFFENSEYPP 7.0+54-1.80042.8W2
CAMOFFENSEYPP < 7.063-3.50017.5W1
CAMOFFENSETurnovers 1+63-3.50027.2L1
CAMOFFENSETurnovers < 154-1.80031.2W3
CAMOFFENSETurnovers 2+42-2.50029.5L1
CAMOFFENSETurnovers > 210-1.00014.0L1
CAMOFFENSEScores <1010-1.0007.0L1
CAMOFFENSEScores 10-1972-5.28615.6W1
CAMOFFENSEScores 20-2962-4.33324.3W1
CAMOFFENSEScores 30-3999-01.00034.3W9
CAMOFFENSEScores 40+1111-01.00047.6W11
CAMDEFENSEYPA 8.0+52-3.40034.0W1
CAMDEFENSEYPA < 8.055-01.00015.2W5
CAMDEFENSEPass Yds 200+21-1.50033.5L1
CAMDEFENSEPass Yds < 20086-2.75022.4W5
CAMDEFENSERush Yds 100+74-3.57131.3W4
CAMDEFENSERush Yds < 10033-01.0009.0W3
CAMDEFENSERush Yds 150+52-3.40036.6W2
CAMDEFENSERush Yds < 15055-01.00012.6W5
CAMDEFENSEYPC 5.0+63-3.50034.2W3
CAMDEFENSEYPC < 5.044-01.00010.2W4
CAMDEFENSEYPP 6.0+74-3.57130.0W3
CAMDEFENSEYPP < 6.033-01.00012.0W3
CAMDEFENSEYPP 7.0+42-2.50033.0W1
CAMDEFENSEYPP < 7.065-1.83319.0W4
CAMDEFENSETurnovers 1+97-2.77821.6W5
CAMDEFENSETurnovers < 120-2.00045.0L2
CAMDEFENSETurnovers 2+32-1.66717.3W1
CAMDEFENSETurnovers > 211-01.0000.0W1
CAMDEFENSEAllows <1055-01.0002.8W5
CAMDEFENSEAllows 10-1977-01.00013.9W7
CAMDEFENSEAllows 20-2997-2.77824.0W6
CAMDEFENSEAllows 30-3963-3.50035.8L3
CAMDEFENSEAllows 40+72-5.28648.6L4
STREAKS — ALL TEAMS
TeamSideSplitStreakDatesRecord
NOTABLE TRENDS (8 of 8 found, team |deviation| >= 20%, matchup |deviation| >= 20%)

CAM OFFENSE

CAM's offense has averaged 24.1 points scored per game over their last 10 games. Their 34-game average is 32.2 points scored per game. (-25%)

CAM's offense has averaged 4.1 YPC over their last 7 games. Their 11-game average is 5.2 YPC. (-21%)

CAM DEFENSE

CAM's defense has averaged 16.9 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 10.2 YPA. (+65%)

CAM's defense has averaged 3.5 YPC over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 5.6 YPC. (-37%)

CAM's defense has averaged 95.5 rush yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 149.5 rush yards per game. (-36%)

CAM's defense has averaged 102.5 pass yards per game over their last 5 games. Their 10-game average is 145.9 pass yards per game. (-30%)

CAM's defense has averaged 33.4 points allowed per game over their last 10 games. Their 34-game average is 25.9 points allowed per game. (+29%)

CAM's defense has averaged 215.0 total yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 10-game average is 295.4 total yards per game. (-27%)

(moved to the Appendix, Data Export 1, to keep this section shorter -- the full spreadsheet-paste table is there unchanged)

APPENDIX

Full-length explanations and full-size data exports for the shortened notes and relocated tables referenced throughout this report, numbered in the order their pointers appear above.

Explanatory Notes

Note 1 -- SEASON OUTLOOK

Every remaining game is projected from schedule-adjusted ratings; already-played games carry their real result. Records are simulated distributions, not a single guess -- MOST LIKELY FINAL is the single most probable record and its own probability, PROJECTED RECORD is the season's expected win total expressed in record form (an average across every simulated outcome, so it can land on a fraction of a game).

Note 2 -- OPPONENT TRACKER -- why some cards have no record shown

Only meaningful for an opponent who is ALSO a tracked team in the library -- an opponent with no games on file here at all shows the date and site alone.

Note 3 -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS -- how a number is scored

Every split this report computes is scored on how strong the number is and how much it sets this team apart from its opponent and the rest of the field, and the top 5 per team are listed. A condition needs at least 8 occurrences to count.

Full Data Exports

Data Export 1 -- TRENDS — TAB-SEPARATED (10 columns)

TeamSideTypeStatOpponentWindow/MeetingsValueBaselineGamesBaselineAvgDeviation
CAMDEFENSEteamPass Yardslast 5102.510145.9-29.7%
CAMDEFENSEteamPointslast 1033.43425.9+28.8%
CAMOFFENSEteamPointslast 1024.13432.2-25.2%
CAMDEFENSEteamRush Yardslast 395.510149.5-36.1%
CAMDEFENSEteamTotal Yardslast 3215.010295.4-27.2%
CAMDEFENSEteamYPAlast 316.91010.2+65.2%
CAMDEFENSEteamYPClast 33.5105.6-36.8%
CAMOFFENSEteamYPClast 74.1115.2-21.0%
Report Produced by ScorePirate | Commitment and offer data sourced from 247Sports | GENERATED 10/31/2026 09:10