ScorePirate
MENU
AT A GLANCE

In short: Carson (8-1) at Lincoln (4-5), August 21, 2026 (CIF-SS high school football). Final: Lincoln 31, Carson 35. The full report has the projection, unit grades, storylines, pregame notes, Big Game Watch, series history, season stats and both rosters.

SCOREPIRATE MATCHUP REPORT ·
CARSON (AWAY) AT LINCOLN (HOME)
CARSON 27.3  —  26.6 LINCOLN
CARSON 51.2% FAVORITES

Share this matchup Preview image Stats card (JPG)Instagram story
UNIT INDEX — GRADE (YDS VS AVG)
TEAMPASS ORUSH OPASS DRUSH D
CARSON67.6 (+24.2)81.7 (+75.0)80.9 (-51.3)85.5 (-82.2)
LINCOLN86.6 (+85.2)88.8 (+108.7)89.2 (-71.5)90.9 (-100.9)
CARSON AT LINCOLN
ADVANCED STATS PREVIEW · 2026 SEASON
RANKS VS CIF Los Angeles City Section / CIF San Diego Section · 178 teams DOWNLOAD CARD AS PDFDOWNLOAD AS JPEG
WIN PROB
51.2%
PROJ PTS
27.3
·
SP STRENGTH INDEX··
UNIT INDEX··
OFF··
DEF··
POINTS / GAME··
OFF··
DEF··
YARDS / GAME··
PASS··
RUSH··
YARDS ALLOWED / G··
PASS··
RUSH··
YARDS / PLAY··
OFF··
DEF··
TURNOVER MARGIN··
TAKEAWAYS··
GIVEAWAYS··
SACKS / GAME··
DEF MADE··
OFF ALLOWED··
PLAY CALLS (OFF)·
RUSH·
PLAYS FACED (DEF)·
RUSH·
CARS OFF VS LINC DEF
··RUSH YDS / G··
··YDS / CARRY··
··PASS YDS / G··
··YDS / ATTEMPT··
··POINTS / G··
··RUSH O / RUSH D INDEX··
··PASS O / PASS D INDEX··
··TURNOVERS LOST / FORCED··
··SACKS ALLOWED / MADE··
LINC OFF VS CARS DEF
··RUSH YDS / G··
··YDS / CARRY··
··PASS YDS / G··
··YDS / ATTEMPT··
··POINTS / G··
··RUSH O / RUSH D INDEX··
··PASS O / PASS D INDEX··
··TURNOVERS LOST / FORCED··
··SACKS ALLOWED / MADE··
WIN PROB
48.8%
PROJ PTS
26.6
·
··SP STRENGTH INDEX
··UNIT INDEX
··OFF
··DEF
··POINTS / GAME
··OFF
··DEF
··YARDS / GAME
··PASS
··RUSH
··YARDS ALLOWED / G
··PASS
··RUSH
··YARDS / PLAY
··OFF
··DEF
··TURNOVER MARGIN
··TAKEAWAYS
··GIVEAWAYS
··SACKS / GAME
··DEF MADE
··OFF ALLOWED
·PLAY CALLS (OFF)
·RUSH
·PLAYS FACED (DEF)
·RUSH

Rank chips: 1 = best in the pool; blue strong, red weak. Yardage and efficiency use games with a full box score on file; points and turnovers use every played game. Unit Index = opponent-adjusted 0-100 league percentile.

SCHEDULE STRENGTH

Carson has been tested more: its schedule to date ranks #1 in the pool against #8 for Lincoln. The harder road from here belongs to Carson (#1 vs #3).

Carson

Schedule so far · 1 = hardest
#1 of 77
avg opponent rating 6.7 over 9 games · 8 vs top-25 CIF Los Angeles City Section / CIF San Diego Section
Schedule ahead · 1 = hardest
#1 of 69
avg opponent rating 19.5 over 1 games · 1 vs top-25
Toughest game played
Lincoln
#1 in CIF Los Angeles City Section / CIF San Diego Section · Aug 21 · W 35-31
Toughest game ahead
Mary Star Of The Sea
#2 in CIF Los Angeles City Section / CIF San Diego Section · Oct 30
@Lincoln
W 35-31
@Dorsey
W 31-8
Palos Ve…
L 20-35
@Long Bea…
W 17-14
@North
W 48-14
Gardena
W 57-0
@Banning
W 41-3
@Narbonne
W 60-0
San Pedro
W 35-0
Mary Sta…
Each bar is one opponent, placed by where its rating ranks in this pool (tall and red = top 10; short and green = bottom half). Hatched bars are games still to play; the dashed line is today.

Lincoln

Schedule so far · 1 = hardest
#8 of 91
avg opponent rating 21.9 over 9 games · 8 vs top-25 CIF Los Angeles City Section / CIF San Diego Section
Schedule ahead · 1 = hardest
#3 of 88
avg opponent rating 31.0 over 1 games · 1 vs top-25
Toughest game played
Mission Viejo
#1 in CIF Los Angeles City Section / CIF San Diego Section · Sep 11 · L 0-56
Toughest game ahead
Cathedral Catholic
#3 in CIF Los Angeles City Section / CIF San Diego Section · Oct 30
Carson
L 31-35
@Pacifica
L 27-52
Leuzinger
W 59-0
@Mission …
L 0-56
@Arbor Vi…
L 41-56
@San Marc…
L 6-7
St Augus…
W 43-15
Point Lo…
W 31-17
@Mission …
W 42-2
@Cathedra…
Each bar is one opponent, placed by where its rating ranks in this pool (tall and red = top 10; short and green = bottom half). Hatched bars are games still to play; the dashed line is today.
PROJECTION COMPONENTS
COMPONENTPOINTSWEIGHTCONTRIBUTION
Strength+0.8228%+0.23
Efficiency-5.6824%-1.34
Own Margin+11.7523%+2.71
Head To Head+5.4920%+1.11
Common Opponents-12.325%-0.57
Garbage Time Margin--0%+0.00
EPA Efficiency--0%+0.00
What if he’s out?

Mark players out to re-project this game. Each value is how much of the margin that player is worth, from this season's data (his share of his team's win shares). Estimates — your selections change only your view.

PROJECTED TEAM YARDAGE
CATEGORYTEAMPROJECTED
PassingCARSON87.9
PassingLINCOLN138.6
RushingCARSON114.9
RushingLINCOLN104.0
TotalCARSON202.8
TotalLINCOLN242.6
PROJECTED BOX SCORE
CARSON — PASSING
PLAYERC/ATTCOMP %YDSYPATDINTQBR
CHRIS FIELDS III9.4/16.257.9%87.95.41.20.5122.3
CARSON — RUSHING
PLAYERCARYDSYPCTD
CHRIS FIELDS III14.171.05.01.0
ERIC MYERS6.825.43.70.2
TYTUS SALAGI5.318.53.50.2
TOTALS26.2114.94.41.5
CARSON — RECEIVING
PLAYERRECYDSYPCTD
NATHAN WILLIAMS2.025.112.50.4
DARREN PANTON1.524.016.20.3
JORDIN DANIEL1.720.912.30.2
NICK SANDOVAL1.017.817.80.1
TOTALS6.287.914.21.0
LINCOLN — PASSING
PLAYERC/ATTCOMP %YDSYPATDINTQBR
ANDRE JACKSON6.8/12.753.3%96.07.61.40.5146.8
XAVIER CRUZ3.6/6.654.3%42.76.50.40.1123.5
TOTALS10.3/19.253.6%138.67.21.80.6138.9
LINCOLN — RUSHING
PLAYERCARYDSYPCTD
CALEB WILLIAMS18.562.93.40.9
ERIC MILLER3.521.16.10.1
XAVIER CRUZ5.020.04.00.3
TOTALS26.9104.03.91.4
LINCOLN — RECEIVING
PLAYERRECYDSYPCTD
DAREYEN BRIDGES4.066.616.60.9
JAEVEYION ALLEN2.947.616.40.4
COURTNEY MILLER-THOMPSON1.624.415.30.3
TOTALS8.5138.616.31.6
PREGAME NOTES

The first meeting between these two hinged on a single stat: Carson's yards per play allowed. The Colts allowed 8.5 yards per play (381 yards on 45 snaps) against Lincoln on 8/21, well above their 6.0 mark in every other game this season. Despite that, Carson won the game 35-31. Carson got away with it once; counting on that again would be a risk.

The first meeting between these two hinged on a single stat: Lincoln's passing. The Hornets averaged 10.3 yards per pass attempt (237 yards on 23 attempts) against Carson on 8/21, well above their 7.6 mark in every other game this season. Despite that, Lincoln lost the game 35-31. Lincoln won that battle and still lost, so the passing edge alone won't be enough a second time.

No team in Section has scored more over the last 5 games than Carson. Carson averaged 25.8 points per game over its first 4 games (3-1), #20 in Section during that period. In the 5 games since that slow start (5-0), the Colts have averaged 48.2 points per game, an 87% rise, #1 in Section during that stretch. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Carson's last 5 opponents have averaged 30.4 points per game, a #56 scoring defense in Section on the season, against 16.6 points per game, #12 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (30.4 points per game), Carson scored 58% more than those defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 5 opponents average a rating that would rank #16 in Section, well below the first 4 (#1), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. On the season, Carson ranks #6 in Section in scoring. Lincoln's defense sits in the middle of the pack, #61 in Section (26.7 points per game). Carson is 7-0 this season when it scores 27 or more, and 1-1 when it doesn't.

The Carson ball security of late is barely reminiscent of the one that began the season. The Colts committed 1.0 giveaways per game over their first 4 games (3-1), #21 in Section over that period. In the 5 games since that slow start (5-0), Carson has committed 0.2 giveaways per game, an 80% drop, #1 in Section over that timeframe. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Carson's last 5 opponents have averaged 0.8 per game, a #58 defense in Section on the season, against 1.7 per game, #22 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (0.8 per game), Carson turned it over 74% less than those defenses usually force. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 5 opponents average a rating that would rank #16 in Section, well below the first 4 (#1), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. On the season, the Colts rank #10 in Section in giveaways. That form gets a real test against Lincoln, whose defense ranks #19 in Section (1.8 per game).

Something changed for Lincoln's defense after the first 5 games of the season. Lincoln allowed 39.8 points per game over its first 5 games (1-4), #85 in Section over that span. Over the stretch of 4 games that followed (3-1), the Hornets have allowed 10.2 points per game, a 74% drop, #9 in Section in that timeframe. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Lincoln's last 4 opponents have averaged 27.7 points per game, a #38 offense in Section on the season, against 33.4 points per game, #14 for the first 5. Measured against those opponents' norms (27.7 points per game), Lincoln held those offenses 63% below what they usually score. On the season, Lincoln ranks #61 in Section in scoring defense. That form gets a real test against Carson, whose offense ranks #6 in Section (38.2 points per game). Lincoln is 4-2 this season when it holds opponents under 39, and 0-3 when it doesn't.

One of Carson's most reliable areas lately has been its offense. Carson averaged 6.1 yards per play (1,176 yards on 194 snaps) over its first 4 games (3-1), #45 in Section in that window. In the 5 games since that slow start (5-0), the Colts have averaged 10.5 yards per play (2,035 yards on 194 snaps), a 73% rise, #6 in Section during that time. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Carson's last 5 opponents have averaged 9.1 yards per play, a #54 defense in Section on the season, against 6.0 yards per play, #7 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (9.1 yards per play), Carson gained 16% more per snap than those defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 5 opponents average a rating that would rank #16 in Section, well below the first 4 (#1), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. On the season, Carson ranks #27 in Section in yards per play. Lincoln's defense sits in the middle of the pack, #34 in Section (6.3 yards per play).

MILESTONE WATCH

Carson

  • Kingston Sula needs 2 tackles for 50 (averaging 6.9 a game)

Lincoln

  • Ryan George needs 1 tackle for 100 (averaging 11.0 a game)
  • Jamari Sherell needs 1 tackle for 75 (averaging 8.2 a game)
  • Seth Fanua needs 7 tackles for 125 (averaging 13.1 a game)
  • Siosi Tuavao needs 6 tackles for 75 (averaging 7.7 a game)
  • Devin Davis needs 4 tackles for 50 (averaging 5.1 a game)
  • Jaeveyion Allen needs 8 tackles for 100 (averaging 10.2 a game)
STORYLINES

The turnover battle has the potential to swing this matchup, with the recent returns favoring Carson. Carson forced 1.0 takeaways per game over its first 4 games (3-1), #38 in Section in that timeframe. In the 5 games since that slow start (5-0), the Colts have forced 2.4 takeaways per game, a 140% rise, #4 in Section in that window. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Carson's last 5 opponents have averaged 1.2 per game, a #33 offense in Section on the season, against 1.0 per game, #27 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (1.2 per game), Carson forced 100% more turnovers than those offenses usually give up. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 5 opponents average a rating that would rank #16 in Section, well below the first 4 (#1), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. Meanwhile, Lincoln's ball security has been middle of the pack in recent weeks. The Hornets have committed 1.2 giveaways per game over their last 5 games (3-2), #39 in Section during that time. Those games came against some of the better defenses in Section (1.7 per game on the season, which would rank #26). Against those norms, Lincoln turned it over 27% less than those defenses usually force. Overall, those opponents average an SP Strength Index rating that would rank #13 in Section, a strong slate. Lincoln offers Carson a fair measuring stick for whether the trend is real.

If there's one number to watch in this matchup, it's Carson's scoring defense. Carson allowed 20.4 points per game over its first 5 games (4-1), #26 in Section through those games. Over the stretch of 4 games that followed (4-0), the Colts have allowed 0.8 points per game, a 96% drop, #1 in Section through that stretch. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Carson's last 4 opponents have averaged 21.5 points per game, a #41 offense in Section on the season, against 26.9 points per game, #26 for the first 5. Measured against those opponents' norms (21.5 points per game), Carson held those offenses 97% below what they usually score. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 4 opponents average a rating that would rank #18 in Section, well below the first 5 (#2), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. Conversely, Lincoln's offense has been one of Section's better units in recent weeks. The Hornets have averaged 30.5 points per game over their last 4 games (3-1), #29 in Section over that stretch. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of scoring defenses in Section (23.9 points per game on the season, which would rank #52). Against those norms, Lincoln scored 27% more than those defenses usually allow. Overall, those opponents average an SP Strength Index rating that would rank #15 in Section, a strong slate. Something has to give when Carson's surging defense meets one of Section's better units in Lincoln's.

Carson averaged 5.2 yards per carry (665 yards on 127 rushes) over its first 4 games (3-1), #46 in Section within that period. Few teams started slower in this department, and few have turned it around as sharply since. In the 5 games since that slow start (5-0), the Colts have averaged 10.2 yards per carry (1,195 yards on 117 rushes), a 95% rise, #9 in Section across those games. The schedule deserves some of the credit: Carson's last 5 opponents have averaged 7.9 yards per carry, a #42 run defense in Section on the season, against 5.1 yards per carry, #8 for the first 4. Measured against those opponents' norms (7.9 yards per carry), Carson ran for 29% more per carry than those run defenses usually allow. The level of competition matters too: in ScorePirate's SP Strength Index, the last 5 opponents average a rating that would rank #16 in Section, well below the first 4 (#1), so the recent production comes against lower-level teams overall. Conversely, Lincoln's run defense has been one of Section's better units in recent weeks. The Hornets have allowed 4.5 yards per carry (618 yards on 137 rushes) over their last 5 games (3-2), #17 in Section during those games. Those games came against a middle-of-the-pack set of rushing attacks in Section (5.5 yards per carry on the season, which would rank #52). Against those norms, Lincoln held those rushing attacks 17% below their usual yards per carry. Overall, those opponents average an SP Strength Index rating that would rank #13 in Section, a strong slate. Something has to give when Carson's surging ground game meets one of Section's better units in Lincoln's.

SERIES HISTORY — CAR vs LIN
Prep this game in Stat BoothCARSON team sheetLINCOLN team sheet
TIDBITS (23 found)

• Club Carson has gone 25 straight games committing fewer than 3 turnovers (November 15, 2024 through October 23, 2026), going 19-6 over that stretch, a school-record 25 straight in the 6 seasons on record.

• Club Lincoln has gone 11 straight games forcing 1+ turnover (November 21, 2025 through October 23, 2026), going 5-6 over that stretch, matching the program record of 11 straight on record.

• Club Carson is 20-0 all time when scoring 40+ points in the games on file (20 such games).

• Club Carson has won 6 straight, and a win would make it 7 in a row. The last time they won 7 or more in a row was 2025, a run of 8.

• Club Lincoln is 32-2 all time when scoring 40+ points. Lincoln's last loss when scoring 40+ points was September 18, 2026 against Arbor View (L, 41-56).

• Club Carson is 28-2 all time when averaging 7.0+ yards per play. Carson's last loss when averaging 7.0+ yards per play was August 23, 2025 against Villa Park (L, 22-26).

• Club Lincoln is 26-1 all time when holding the opponent under 100 rushing yards. Lincoln's last loss when holding the opponent under 100 rushing yards was August 24, 2024 against Arbor View (L, 44-45).

• Club Carson is 8-1 entering play against Lincoln, a start the program has had 1 time before in 6 seasons on record -- most recently 2023, which finished 10-2.

• Club Carson has gone 9 straight games rushing for 100+ yards (August 21, 2026 through October 23, 2026), going 8-1 over that stretch, the program's longest such streak since 2025 (12 games).

• Club Lincoln has gone 5 straight games averaging 5.0+ yards per carry (September 18, 2026 through October 23, 2026), going 3-2 over that stretch, the program's longest such streak since 2026 (10 games).

• Club Carson has gone 6 straight games averaging 5.0+ yards per carry (September 11, 2026 through October 23, 2026), going 6-0 over that stretch, the program's longest such streak since 2025 (10 games).

• Series Carson leads the all-time series with Lincoln 1-0, across 1 meetings dating to 2026.

• Player Seth Fanua has gone 9 straight games making 10 or more tackles, the longest such streak of his career.

• Club Carson has scored 136 points over its last 3 games (45.3 a game, October 9, 2026 through October 23, 2026) -- its 5th-highest 3-game total on record; the most is 176, from September 8, 2023 through September 21, 2023.

• Player Jaeveyion Allen has 293 receiving yards over his last 3 games (97.7 a game, October 9, 2026 through October 23, 2026) -- his most in a 3-game stretch on record.

• Player Nathan Williams has 5 touchdown catches over his last 3 games (1.7 a game, October 2, 2026 through October 16, 2026) -- his most in a 3-game stretch on record.

• Player Jaeveyion Allen has 52 tackles over his last 5 games (10.4 a game, September 18, 2026 through October 23, 2026) -- his most in a 5-game stretch on record.

• Player Chris Fields Iii has gone 4 straight games throwing a touchdown pass, the 3rd-longest such streak of his career. He also had a career-best streak of 13 straight games throwing a touchdown pass, during the 2025 season.

• Player Cam Joy has 54 tackles over his last 6 games (9.0 a game, September 11, 2026 through October 23, 2026) -- his most in a 6-game stretch on record.

• Player Kingston Sula has gone 3 straight games recording a sack, the 2nd-longest such streak of his career. He also had a career-best streak of 5 straight games recording a sack, during the 2025 season.

• Player Andre Jackson has gone 5 straight games throwing a touchdown pass, the longest such streak of his career.

• Player Chris Fields Iii has 543 rushing yards over his last 5 games (108.6 a game, September 11, 2026 through October 16, 2026) -- his most in a 5-game stretch since the 559 he had from October 30, 2025 through December 6, 2025.

• Player Xavier Cruz has gone 2 straight games throwing a touchdown pass, the longest such streak of his career.

CAR — STAT LEADERS
FULL ROSTER ↓
OFFENSE
PASSING LEADER
1227PASS YDS
C-ATT89-129
COMP%69.0%
YPA9.5
TD16
INT3
QBR185.2
RUSHING LEADER
287RUSH YDS
CAR49
YPC5.9
RUSH TD3
REC7
REC YDS78
YPR11.1
REC TD1
RUSHING LEADER
171RUSH YDS
CAR34
YPC5.0
RUSH TD1
REC1
REC YDS8
YPR8.0
REC TD0
RECEIVING LEADER
283REC YDS
REC14
YPR20.2
REC TD3
RECEIVING LEADER
268REC YDS
REC13
YPR20.6
REC TD2
DEFENSE
TACKLES LEADER
52TCKL
TFL4
SACKS2
INT0
PD3
FF2
TACKLES LEADER
51TCKL
TFL5
SACKS3
INT3
PD1
FF2
TACKLES LEADER
48TCKL
TFL12
SACKS7
INT0
PD3
FF0
TFL LEADER
7TFL
TCKL20
SACKS0
INT0
PD1
FF0
Aj Umoh6 GMS
TFL LEADER
5.5TFL
TCKL23
SACKS0
INT1
PD2
FF0
SACKS LEADER
2SACKS
TCKL21
TFL5
INT0
PD2
FF1
SACKS LEADER
2SACKS
TCKL7
TFL2
INT0
PD0
FF0
INTERCEPTIONS LEADER
2INT
TCKL6
TFL0
SACKS0
PD1
FF1
LIN — STAT LEADERS
FULL ROSTER ↓
OFFENSE
PASSING LEADER
1005PASS YDS
C-ATT68-120
COMP%56.7%
YPA8.4
TD15
INT5
QBR159.9
RUSHING LEADER
405RUSH YDS
CAR84
YPC4.8
RUSH TD6
REC1
REC YDS7
YPR7.0
REC TD0
RUSHING LEADER
264RUSH YDS
CAR30
YPC8.8
RUSH TD1
REC1
REC YDS11
YPR11.0
REC TD0
RECEIVING LEADER
794REC YDS
REC54
YPR14.7
REC TD11
RECEIVING LEADER
637REC YDS
REC45
YPR14.2
REC TD5
DEFENSE
TACKLES LEADER
118TCKL
TFL20
SACKS4
INT0
PD0
FF0
TACKLES LEADER
99TCKL
TFL5
SACKS2
INT2
PD1
FF0
TACKLES LEADER
92TCKL
TFL2
SACKS1
INT2
PD5
FF2
TFL LEADER
9TFL
TCKL74
SACKS2
INT0
PD1
FF2
TFL LEADER
8TFL
TCKL32
SACKS0
INT0
PD0
FF2
SACKS LEADER
4SACKS
TCKL69
TFL6
INT0
PD0
FF3
SACKS LEADER
2SACKS
TCKL55
TFL5
INT0
PD0
FF0
INTERCEPTIONS LEADER
3INT
TCKL60
TFL1
SACKS0
PD6
FF0
SEASON OUTLOOK

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 2)

--- CARSON ---

RECORD TO DATEMOST LIKELY FINALPROJECTED RECORD
Overall8-1 so far9-1 (68%)8.7-1.3
League4-0 so far4-0 (100%)4.0-0.0

--- LINCOLN ---

RECORD TO DATEMOST LIKELY FINALPROJECTED RECORD
Overall4-5 so far4-6 (54%)4.5-5.5
League2-0 so far2-0 (100%)2.0-0.0
TALKING POINTS (14 storylines)
CAR IS LIKELIEST TO BEAT LIN IF...

• CAR forces 1+ takeaways (.999), and has won 6 straight when doing so

• CAR averages 7.0+ yards per play (.999), and has won 5 straight when doing so

• CAR rushes for 150+ yards (.999), and has won 5 straight when doing so

LIN IS LIKELIEST TO BEAT CAR IF...

• LIN forces 2+ takeaways (.999), and has won 4 straight when doing so

• LIN holds CAR under 100 rushing yards (.999), and has won 3 straight when doing so

• LIN averages 7.0+ yards per play (.750), and has won 3 straight when doing so

• CAR's defense has averaged 1.0 points allowed per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 11.7 points allowed per game. (-91%)

• CAR's offense has averaged 0.2 giveaways per game over their last 5 games. Their 9-game average is 0.6 giveaways per game. (-64%)

• CAR's defense has averaged 3.2 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 5-game average is 8.6 YPA. (-63%)

• CAR's offense has exceeded 5.0 YPC in 6 straight games (09/11/2026-10/23/2026), going 6-0 over that stretch.

• CAR's defense has averaged 47.0 rush yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 5-game average is 116.6 rush yards per game. (-60%)

• LIN's defense has averaged 11.3 points allowed per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 26.7 points allowed per game. (-57%)

• LIN is 4-1 (.800) when it wins the turnover battle

• CAR's defense has averaged 127.0 total yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 5-game average is 275.8 total yards per game. (-54%)

• LIN's offense has averaged 238.0 rush yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 156.3 rush yards per game. (+52%)

MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 3)

CAR -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(top 4 of 4 scored; vs 2142 cached team(s))

#SIDECONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRKSCORE
1OFFYPP 6+8-01.00040.5W80.862
2OFFTurnovers < 27-1.87540.9W50.370
3OFFTurnovers < 38-1.88938.2W60.334
4OFFRush Yds 100+8-1.88938.2W60.094

LIN -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS

(top 3 of 3 scored; vs 2142 cached team(s))

#SIDECONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRKSCORE
1OFFTurnovers < 34-4.50034.2W30.730
2OFFRush Yds 100+4-4.50035.0W30.670
3DEFTurnovers 1+4-5.44426.7W30.238
OPPONENT STRENGTH (best-effort)

(full explanation: Appendix, Note 4)

CAR: 1 of 9 game(s) came against a tracked opponent; that opponent's own win% averaged .444 across those game(s).

LIN: 1 of 9 game(s) came against a tracked opponent; that opponent's own win% averaged .889 across those game(s).

WIN %: TWO-CONDITION COMBINATIONS (5 found, min 4 Gms each)

(of 15 combinations tried per team -- a combination is only shown when at least 4 real games on file satisfy both conditions at once)

--- CAR ---

CONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRK
CAR rushes for 100+ yards and is held under 200 passing yards6-1.85732.4W4
CAR averages 6.0+ yards per play behind 150+ rushing yards5-0.99935.2W5
CAR averages 5.0+ yards per carry on its way to 150+ rushing yards5-0.99935.2W5
CAR averages 6.0+ yards per play while committing zero giveaways5-0.99946.2W5

--- LIN ---

CONDITIONRECWIN%PPGSTRK
LIN averages 8.0+ yards per attempt while throwing for 200+ yards2-3.40040.2W1
WIN % -- TAB-SEPARATED
TeamConditionRecordWin%PPG
CARRush Yds 100+ & Pass Yds < 2006-1.85732.4
CARYPP 6.0+ & Rush Yds 150+5-0.99935.2
CARYPC 5.0+ & Rush Yds 150+5-0.99935.2
CARYPP 6.0+ & Turnovers < 15-0.99946.2
LINYPA 8.0+ & Pass Yds 200+2-3.40040.2
PREGAME NOTES

The next meeting brings together Carson (8-1 this season) and Lincoln (4-5). Carson leads the recent series 1-0 over the last 1 meetings. In the most recent meeting, on August 21, 2026, Carson held on 35-31.

In the process of winning 6 of its last 7 entering play, Carson's ball security has been the team's calling card (committed no more than one giveaway in 5 straight games, 5-0 in that stretch). That carried into last time out, the Colts handling San Pedro 35-0. In the process of winning 4 of its last 7 entering play, Lincoln's pass rush has been the soft spot (recorded fewer than 3 sacks in 3 of its last 5, 3-2 in that stretch). The Hornets won anyway last time out, handling Mission Bay 42-2.

The matchup within the matchup pairs Carson's pass protection with Lincoln's pass rush. Carson's pass protection has been playing at a high level over the Colts' last 5 games. The offensive line has kept the quarterback clean in 3 of the 5 games while averaging 1.2 sacks allowed per game (including a low of 0 in that span vs. Dorsey). That is 33% below the Colts' baseline of 1.8 per game over the 19 games prior — a clear drop; the Colts have gone 4-1 in that stretch. The matchup when the two meet lines up in Carson's favor. Lincoln's pass rush has been a real vulnerability over the Hornets' last 5 games. The defense has recorded fewer than 3 sacks in 3 of the 5 games while averaging 1.7 sacks per game (including a low of 0 in that span vs. San Marcos). That is 41% below the Hornets' baseline of 2.9 per game over the 31 games prior — a dramatic drop; the Hornets have gone 3-2 in that stretch.

STORYLINES

STRENGTH VS. WEAKNESS — Carson's rushing offense has been playing at a high level over the Colts' last 5 games. The ground game has eclipsed 200 rushing yards in 3 of the 5 games while averaging 239.0 rushing yards per game (including a high of 363 in that span vs. Banning). That is 29% above the Colts' baseline of 184.8 yards per game over the 29 games prior — a clear jump; the Colts have gone 5-0 in that stretch. The matchup when the two meet lines up in Carson's favor. Lincoln's rush defense has been a real vulnerability over the Hornets' last 10 games, dating back to last season. The defense has conceded 100+ rushing yards in 7 of the 10 games while averaging 139.3 rushing yards allowed per game (including a high of 248 in that span vs. Carson). That is 44% above the Hornets' baseline of 96.9 yards per game over the 21 games prior — a dramatic jump; the Hornets have gone 4-6 in that stretch.

ONE-SIDED — Carson has taken the ball away 12 times in the Colts' last 5 games — the Colts have gone 5-0 in that stretch. When the two meet, that trend meets Lincoln. Lincoln has averaged 0.8 per game on the other side of that matchup across its games on file.

ONE-SIDED — Carson's pass defense has been playing at a high level over the Colts' last 7 games, dating back to last season. The defense has held its opponents under 200 passing yards in 5 of the 7 games while averaging 113.9 passing yards allowed per game (including a low of 0 in that span vs. Kennedy). That is 33% below the Colts' baseline of 171.2 yards per game over the 15 games prior — a clear drop; the Colts have gone 5-2 in that stretch. When the two meet, that trend meets Lincoln. Lincoln has averaged 202.3 yards per game on the other side of that matchup across its games on file.

ONE-SIDED — Lincoln's rushing offense has been a real vulnerability over the Hornets' last 7 games. The ground game has failed to reach 200 rushing yards in 5 of the 7 games while averaging 160.9 rushing yards per game (including a low of 32 in that span vs. Mission Viejo). That is 35% below the Hornets' baseline of 248.6 yards per game over the 29 games prior — a dramatic drop; the Hornets have gone 4-3 in that stretch. When the two meet, that trend meets Carson. Carson has averaged 120.5 yards per game on the other side of that matchup across its games on file.

CAR — OFFENSE (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+7-01.00039.4W7
YPA < 8.01-1.50034.0W1
Pass Yds 200+2-01.00058.5W2
Pass Yds < 2006-1.85732.4W4
Rush Yds 100+8-1.88938.2W6
Rush Yds < 100--------
Rush Yds 150+5-01.00035.2W5
Rush Yds < 1503-1.75042.0W2
YPC 5.0+7-01.00041.9W7
YPC < 5.01-1.50025.5L1
YPP 6.0+8-01.00040.5W8
YPP < 6.00-1.00020.0L1
YPP 7.0+5-01.00048.2W5
YPP < 7.03-1.75025.8W1
Turnovers 1+3-1.75028.2W2
Turnovers < 15-01.00046.2W5
Turnovers 2+1-01.00017.0W1
Turnovers > 2--------
LIN — OFFENSE (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+2-3.40040.2W1
YPA < 8.02-2.50019.8W2
Pass Yds 200+2-3.40040.2W1
Pass Yds < 2002-2.50019.8W2
Rush Yds 100+4-4.50035.0W3
Rush Yds < 1000-1.0000.0L1
Rush Yds 150+2-01.00042.5W2
Rush Yds < 1502-5.28627.9W1
YPC 5.0+4-3.57136.1W3
YPC < 5.00-2.00013.5L2
YPP 6.0+4-3.57139.1W3
YPP < 6.00-2.0003.0L2
YPP 7.0+3-1.75043.8W3
YPP < 7.01-4.20021.0W1
Turnovers 1+2-4.33326.5W2
Turnovers < 12-1.66740.3W2
Turnovers 2+0-2.00016.5L2
Turnovers > 20-1.0006.0L1
CAR — DEFENSE (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+2-1.66726.7W1
YPA < 8.02-01.0004.0W2 4 games without this stat on file
Pass Yds 200+2-01.00022.5W2
Pass Yds < 2002-1.66714.3W1 4 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 100+2-1.66726.7W1
Rush Yds < 1002-01.0004.0W2 4 games without this stat on file
Rush Yds 150+0-1.00035.0L1
Rush Yds < 1504-01.00013.2W4 4 games without this stat on file
YPC 5.0+1-1.50033.0L1
YPC < 5.03-01.0007.3W3 4 games without this stat on file
YPP 6.0+2-1.66726.7W1
YPP < 6.02-01.0004.0W2 4 games without this stat on file
YPP 7.0+2-1.66726.7W1
YPP < 7.02-01.0004.0W2 4 games without this stat on file
Turnovers 1+6-01.0006.5W6
Turnovers < 12-1.66722.0W1
Turnovers 2+6-01.0006.5W6
Turnovers > 22-01.0007.0W2
LIN — DEFENSE (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPGSTRK
YPA 8.0+1-4.20043.2W1
YPA < 8.03-1.7506.0W2
Pass Yds 200+1-3.25045.2W1
Pass Yds < 2003-2.60011.8W2
Rush Yds 100+1-5.16736.8W1
Rush Yds < 1003-01.0006.3W3
Rush Yds 150+1-4.20042.8W1
Rush Yds < 1503-1.7506.5W2
YPC 5.0+2-4.33338.5W2
YPC < 5.02-1.6673.0W1
YPP 6.0+2-4.33338.5W2
YPP < 6.02-1.6673.0W1
YPP 7.0+1-3.25045.2W1
YPP < 7.03-2.60011.8W2
Turnovers 1+4-5.44426.7W3
Turnovers < 1--------
Turnovers 2+4-01.0008.5W4
Turnovers > 23-01.0006.3W3
CAR — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Scores <10------
Scores 10-191-01.00017.0
Scores 20-290-1.00020.0
Scores 30-393-01.00033.7
Scores 40+4-01.00051.5
CAR — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Allows <105-01.0002.2
Allows 10-192-01.00014.0
Allows 20-29------
Allows 30-391-1.50033.0
Allows 40+------
LIN — OFFENSE SCORING SITUATION (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Scores <100-2.0003.0
Scores 10-19------
Scores 20-290-1.00027.0
Scores 30-391-1.50031.0
Scores 40+3-1.75046.2
LIN — DEFENSE SCORING SITUATION (9 Gms)
SPLITRECWIN%PPG
Allows <102-1.6673.0
Allows 10-192-01.00016.0
Allows 20-29------
Allows 30-390-1.00035.0
Allows 40+0-3.00054.7
ON THE BRINK

CARSON

• CARSON has pitched a shutout in 2 straight games (10/16/26–10/23/26). It has not reached 3 straight in the last 4 years of games on file (2023-present).

• CARSON has scored 30+ in 5 straight games (9/18/26–10/23/26). It has not reached 6 straight in the last 4 years of games on file (2023-present).

• CARSON has held the opponent under 14 in 4 straight games (10/2/26–10/23/26). It has not reached 5 straight in the last 4 years of games on file (2023-present).

• CARSON has won by 20+ in 5 straight games (9/18/26–10/23/26). It has not won by 20+ in 6 straight since 10/9/25–11/29/25 (2025).

LINCOLN

• LINCOLN has forced 2+ turnovers in 3 straight games (10/9/26–10/23/26). It has not forced 2+ turnovers in 4 straight since 8/17/23–9/15/23 (2023).

• LINCOLN has held the opponent under 100 rushing in 2 straight games (10/16/26–10/23/26). It has not held the opponent under 100 rushing in 3 straight since 8/24/24–9/6/24 (2024). It has reached 3 straight 2 times in the last 4 years and has reached a high of 6 straight (2023) in that span.

• LINCOLN has won 3 straight (10/9/26–10/23/26). It has not won 4 straight since 9/19/25–10/17/25 (2025). It has reached 4 straight 3 times in the last 4 years and has won a high of 13 straight (2025) in that span.

• LINCOLN has scored 30+ in 3 straight games (10/9/26–10/23/26). It has not scored 30+ in 4 straight since 9/19/25–11/21/25 (2025). It has reached 4 straight 2 times in the last 4 years and has reached a high of 11 straight (2023) in that span.

TAB-SEPARATED (paste into a spreadsheet)
TeamSideSplitGamesRecordWin%PPGStrk
CAROFFENSEYPA 8.0+77-01.00039.4W7
CAROFFENSEYPA < 8.021-1.50034.0W1
CAROFFENSEPass Yds 200+22-01.00058.5W2
CAROFFENSEPass Yds < 20076-1.85732.4W4
CAROFFENSERush Yds 100+98-1.88938.2W6
CAROFFENSERush Yds 150+55-01.00035.2W5
CAROFFENSERush Yds < 15043-1.75042.0W2
CAROFFENSEYPC 5.0+77-01.00041.9W7
CAROFFENSEYPC < 5.021-1.50025.5L1
CAROFFENSEYPP 6.0+88-01.00040.5W8
CAROFFENSEYPP < 6.010-1.00020.0L1
CAROFFENSEYPP 7.0+55-01.00048.2W5
CAROFFENSEYPP < 7.043-1.75025.8W1
CAROFFENSETurnovers 1+43-1.75028.2W2
CAROFFENSETurnovers < 155-01.00046.2W5
CAROFFENSETurnovers 2+11-01.00017.0W1
CAROFFENSEScores 10-1911-01.00017.0W1
CAROFFENSEScores 20-2910-1.00020.0L1
CAROFFENSEScores 30-3933-01.00033.7W3
CAROFFENSEScores 40+44-01.00051.5W4
CARDEFENSEYPA 8.0+32-1.66726.7W1
CARDEFENSEYPA < 8.022-01.0004.0W2
CARDEFENSEPass Yds 200+22-01.00022.5W2
CARDEFENSEPass Yds < 20032-1.66714.3W1
CARDEFENSERush Yds 100+32-1.66726.7W1
CARDEFENSERush Yds < 10022-01.0004.0W2
CARDEFENSERush Yds 150+10-1.00035.0L1
CARDEFENSERush Yds < 15044-01.00013.2W4
CARDEFENSEYPC 5.0+21-1.50033.0L1
CARDEFENSEYPC < 5.033-01.0007.3W3
CARDEFENSEYPP 6.0+32-1.66726.7W1
CARDEFENSEYPP < 6.022-01.0004.0W2
CARDEFENSEYPP 7.0+32-1.66726.7W1
CARDEFENSEYPP < 7.022-01.0004.0W2
CARDEFENSETurnovers 1+66-01.0006.5W6
CARDEFENSETurnovers < 132-1.66722.0W1
CARDEFENSETurnovers 2+66-01.0006.5W6
CARDEFENSETurnovers > 222-01.0007.0W2
CARDEFENSEAllows <1055-01.0002.2W5
CARDEFENSEAllows 10-1922-01.00014.0W2
CARDEFENSEAllows 30-3921-1.50033.0L1
LINOFFENSEYPA 8.0+52-3.40040.2W1
LINOFFENSEYPA < 8.042-2.50019.8W2
LINOFFENSEPass Yds 200+52-3.40040.2W1
LINOFFENSEPass Yds < 20042-2.50019.8W2
LINOFFENSERush Yds 100+84-4.50035.0W3
LINOFFENSERush Yds < 10010-1.0000.0L1
LINOFFENSERush Yds 150+22-01.00042.5W2
LINOFFENSERush Yds < 15072-5.28627.9W1
LINOFFENSEYPC 5.0+74-3.57136.1W3
LINOFFENSEYPC < 5.020-2.00013.5L2
LINOFFENSEYPP 6.0+74-3.57139.1W3
LINOFFENSEYPP < 6.020-2.0003.0L2
LINOFFENSEYPP 7.0+43-1.75043.8W3
LINOFFENSEYPP < 7.051-4.20021.0W1
LINOFFENSETurnovers 1+62-4.33326.5W2
LINOFFENSETurnovers < 132-1.66740.3W2
LINOFFENSETurnovers 2+20-2.00016.5L2
LINOFFENSETurnovers > 210-1.0006.0L1
LINOFFENSEScores <1020-2.0003.0L2
LINOFFENSEScores 20-2910-1.00027.0L1
LINOFFENSEScores 30-3921-1.50031.0W1
LINOFFENSEScores 40+43-1.75046.2W2
LINDEFENSEYPA 8.0+51-4.20043.2W1
LINDEFENSEYPA < 8.043-1.7506.0W2
LINDEFENSEPass Yds 200+41-3.25045.2W1
LINDEFENSEPass Yds < 20053-2.60011.8W2
LINDEFENSERush Yds 100+61-5.16736.8W1
LINDEFENSERush Yds < 10033-01.0006.3W3
LINDEFENSERush Yds 150+51-4.20042.8W1
LINDEFENSERush Yds < 15043-1.7506.5W2
LINDEFENSEYPC 5.0+62-4.33338.5W2
LINDEFENSEYPC < 5.032-1.6673.0W1
LINDEFENSEYPP 6.0+62-4.33338.5W2
LINDEFENSEYPP < 6.032-1.6673.0W1
LINDEFENSEYPP 7.0+41-3.25045.2W1
LINDEFENSEYPP < 7.053-2.60011.8W2
LINDEFENSETurnovers 1+94-5.44426.7W3
LINDEFENSETurnovers 2+44-01.0008.5W4
LINDEFENSETurnovers > 233-01.0006.3W3
LINDEFENSEAllows <1032-1.6673.0W1
LINDEFENSEAllows 10-1922-01.00016.0W2
LINDEFENSEAllows 30-3910-1.00035.0L1
LINDEFENSEAllows 40+30-3.00054.7L3
STREAKS: CAR (combined OFFENSE+DEFENSE)
SIDESPLITSTREAKDATESRECORD
OFFENSERush Yds 100+9 games08/21/2026 - 10/23/20268-1
OFFENSEYPC 5.0+6 games09/11/2026 - 10/23/20266-0
OFFENSEYPP 6.0+6 games09/11/2026 - 10/23/20266-0
OFFENSEYPP 7.0+5 games09/18/2026 - 10/23/20265-0
OFFENSEYPA 8.0+4 games10/02/2026 - 10/23/20264-0
STREAKS: LIN (combined OFFENSE+DEFENSE)
SIDESPLITSTREAKDATESRECORD
DEFENSETurnovers 1+9 games08/21/2026 - 10/23/20264-5
OFFENSERush Yds 100+5 games09/18/2026 - 10/23/20263-2
OFFENSEYPC 5.0+5 games09/18/2026 - 10/23/20263-2
OFFENSEYPP 6.0+3 games10/09/2026 - 10/23/20263-0
DEFENSETurnovers 2+3 games10/09/2026 - 10/23/20263-0
STREAKS — ALL TEAMS
TeamSideSplitStreakDatesRecord
CAROFFENSERush Yds 100+9 games08/21/2026 - 10/23/20268-1
CAROFFENSEYPC 5.0+6 games09/11/2026 - 10/23/20266-0
CAROFFENSEYPP 6.0+6 games09/11/2026 - 10/23/20266-0
CAROFFENSEYPP 7.0+5 games09/18/2026 - 10/23/20265-0
CAROFFENSEYPA 8.0+4 games10/02/2026 - 10/23/20264-0
LINDEFENSETurnovers 1+9 games08/21/2026 - 10/23/20264-5
LINOFFENSERush Yds 100+5 games09/18/2026 - 10/23/20263-2
LINOFFENSEYPC 5.0+5 games09/18/2026 - 10/23/20263-2
LINOFFENSEYPP 6.0+3 games10/09/2026 - 10/23/20263-0
LINDEFENSETurnovers 2+3 games10/09/2026 - 10/23/20263-0
MATCHUP CONFLICT POINTS: CAR vs LIN

Each pair of rows above is tinted by the gap between the two teams' win% in that scenario, judged for the HOME team (the bottom row):

GRAY = negligible gap (.000-.050)

PURPLE = solid gap (.051-.150)

GREEN = big gap (.151+), favoring the home team

RED = big gap (.151+), against the home team

CAR OFFENSE vs LIN DEFENSE

100 RUSH YDS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CAROFFOVER98-1.88938.2W6
LINDEFOVER61-5.16736.8W1
150 RUSH YDS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CAROFFOVER55-01.00035.2W5
LINDEFOVER51-4.20042.8W1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CAROFFUNDER43-1.75042.0W2
LINDEFUNDER43-1.7506.5W2
YPC 5.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CAROFFOVER77-01.00041.9W7
LINDEFOVER62-4.33338.5W2
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CAROFFUNDER21-1.50025.5L1
LINDEFUNDER32-1.6673.0W1
YPA 8.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CAROFFOVER77-01.00039.4W7
LINDEFOVER51-4.20043.2W1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CAROFFUNDER21-1.50034.0W1
LINDEFUNDER43-1.7506.0W2
200 PASS YDS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CAROFFOVER22-01.00058.5W2
LINDEFOVER41-3.25045.2W1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CAROFFUNDER76-1.85732.4W4
LINDEFUNDER53-2.60011.8W2
0 TURNOVERS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CAROFFOVER43-1.75028.2W2
LINDEFOVER94-5.44426.7W3
2+ TURNOVERS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CAROFFOVER11-01.00017.0W1
LINDEFOVER44-01.0008.5W4
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CAROFFUNDER87-1.87540.9W5
LINDEFUNDER50-5.00041.2L5
>2 TURNOVERS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CAROFFUNDER98-1.88938.2W6
LINDEFUNDER61-5.16736.8W1
YPP 6.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CAROFFOVER88-01.00040.5W8
LINDEFOVER62-4.33338.5W2
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CAROFFUNDER10-1.00020.0L1
LINDEFUNDER32-1.6673.0W1
YPP 7.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CAROFFOVER55-01.00048.2W5
LINDEFOVER41-3.25045.2W1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CAROFFUNDER43-1.75025.8W1
LINDEFUNDER53-2.60011.8W2

LIN OFFENSE vs CAR DEFENSE

100 RUSH YDS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFOVER32-1.66726.7W1
LINOFFOVER84-4.50035.0W3
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFUNDER22-01.0004.0W2
LINOFFUNDER10-1.0000.0L1
150 RUSH YDS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFOVER10-1.00035.0L1
LINOFFOVER22-01.00042.5W2
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFUNDER44-01.00013.2W4
LINOFFUNDER72-5.28627.9W1
YPC 5.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFOVER21-1.50033.0L1
LINOFFOVER74-3.57136.1W3
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFUNDER33-01.0007.3W3
LINOFFUNDER20-2.00013.5L2
YPA 8.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFOVER32-1.66726.7W1
LINOFFOVER52-3.40040.2W1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFUNDER22-01.0004.0W2
LINOFFUNDER42-2.50019.8W2
200 PASS YDS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFOVER22-01.00022.5W2
LINOFFOVER52-3.40040.2W1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFUNDER32-1.66714.3W1
LINOFFUNDER42-2.50019.8W2
0 TURNOVERS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFZERO32-1.66722.0W1
LINOFFZERO32-1.66740.3W2
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFOVER66-01.0006.5W6
LINOFFOVER62-4.33326.5W2
2+ TURNOVERS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFOVER66-01.0006.5W6
LINOFFOVER20-2.00016.5L2
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFUNDER32-1.66722.0W1
LINOFFUNDER74-3.57135.3W3
>2 TURNOVERS
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFOVER22-01.0007.0W2
LINOFFOVER10-1.0006.0L1
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFUNDER76-1.85713.0W4
LINOFFUNDER84-4.50034.2W3
YPP 6.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFOVER32-1.66726.7W1
LINOFFOVER74-3.57139.1W3
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFUNDER22-01.0004.0W2
LINOFFUNDER20-2.0003.0L2
YPP 7.0
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFOVER32-1.66726.7W1
LINOFFOVER43-1.75043.8W3
TMSIDESPLITGMREC.WIN%PPGSTRK
CARDEFUNDER22-01.0004.0W2
LINOFFUNDER51-4.20021.0W1

(moved to the Appendix, Data Export 1, to keep this section shorter -- the full spreadsheet-paste table is there unchanged)

NOTABLE TRENDS (23 of 23 found, team |deviation| >= 20%, matchup |deviation| >= 20%)

CAR OFFENSE

CAR's offense has averaged 0.2 giveaways per game over their last 5 games. Their 9-game average is 0.6 giveaways per game. (-64%)

CAR's offense has averaged 12.2 YPP over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 8.8 YPP. (+38%)

CAR's offense has averaged 13.5 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 9.9 YPA. (+37%)

CAR's offense has averaged 10.7 YPC over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 8.0 YPC. (+35%)

CAR's offense has averaged 48.2 points scored per game over their last 5 games. Their 9-game average is 38.2 points scored per game. (+26%)

CAR's offense has averaged 259.7 rush yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 206.7 rush yards per game. (+26%)

LIN OFFENSE

LIN's offense has averaged 238.0 rush yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 156.3 rush yards per game. (+52%)

LIN's offense has averaged 0.7 giveaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 1.0 giveaways per game. (-33%)

LIN's offense has averaged 38.7 points scored per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 31.1 points scored per game. (+24%)

LIN's offense has averaged 429.0 total yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 345.7 total yards per game. (+24%)

CAR DEFENSE

CAR's defense has averaged 1.0 points allowed per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 11.7 points allowed per game. (-91%)

CAR's defense has averaged 3.2 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 5-game average is 8.6 YPA. (-63%)

CAR's defense has averaged 47.0 rush yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 5-game average is 116.6 rush yards per game. (-60%)

CAR's defense has averaged 127.0 total yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 5-game average is 275.8 total yards per game. (-54%)

CAR's defense has averaged 3.1 YPP over their last 3 games. Their 5-game average is 6.4 YPP. (-51%)

CAR's defense has averaged 80.0 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 5-game average is 159.2 pass yards per game. (-50%)

CAR's defense has averaged 2.9 YPC over their last 3 games. Their 5-game average is 4.8 YPC. (-39%)

CAR's defense has averaged 2.4 takeaways per game over their last 5 games. Their 9-game average is 1.8 takeaways per game. (+35%)

LIN DEFENSE

LIN's defense has averaged 11.3 points allowed per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 26.7 points allowed per game. (-57%)

LIN's defense has averaged 2.7 takeaways per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 1.8 takeaways per game. (+50%)

LIN's defense has averaged 5.0 YPA over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 7.0 YPA. (-28%)

LIN's defense has averaged 134.3 pass yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 184.7 pass yards per game. (-27%)

LIN's defense has averaged 245.3 total yards per game over their last 3 games. Their 9-game average is 318.2 total yards per game. (-23%)

(moved to the Appendix, Data Export 2, to keep this section shorter -- the full spreadsheet-paste table is there unchanged)

APPENDIX

Full-length explanations and full-size data exports for the shortened notes and relocated tables referenced throughout this report, numbered in the order their pointers appear above.

Explanatory Notes

Note 1 -- GAME PROJECTION -- FULL DETAIL (report pages 1-2)

Library-native projection: computed directly from the game library (slate_projection.SlateEngine), not the Excel workbook engine. This section does not yet include: an outside Strength Index cross-check (computer/CCCAA rankings -- workbook-only).

Note 2 -- SEASON OUTLOOK

Every remaining game is projected from schedule-adjusted ratings; already-played games carry their real result. Records are simulated distributions, not a single guess -- MOST LIKELY FINAL is the single most probable record and its own probability, PROJECTED RECORD is the season's expected win total expressed in record form (an average across every simulated outcome, so it can land on a fraction of a game).

Note 3 -- MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS -- how a number is scored

Every split this report computes is scored on how strong the number is and how much it sets this team apart from its opponent and the rest of the field, and the top 5 per team are listed. A condition needs at least 8 occurrences to count.

Note 4 -- OPPONENT STRENGTH (best-effort) -- why this is often empty

Only meaningful for a game against an opponent who is ALSO a tracked team on this workbook -- with just a couple of teams tracked, that's rare (mainly a direct matchup between them, if this run covers both); every other opponent has no win% on file here at all, so most of a team's schedule simply has no strength data to show.

Full Data Exports

Data Export 1 -- MATCHUP CONFLICTS — TAB-SEPARATED (13 columns)

Team1Side1Split1Record1Win%1PPG1Team2Side2Split2Record2Win%2PPG2Relevance
LINOFFENSERush Yds 150+2-01.00042.5CARDEFENSERush Yds < 1504-01.00013.21.000
CAROFFENSERush Yds 100+8-1.88938.2LINDEFENSERush Yds < 1003-01.0006.30.889
CAROFFENSEYPA 8.0+7-01.00039.4LINDEFENSEYPA < 8.03-1.7506.00.750
CAROFFENSERush Yds 150+5-01.00035.2LINDEFENSERush Yds < 1503-1.7506.50.750
LINOFFENSEYPP 7.0+3-1.75043.8CARDEFENSEYPP < 7.02-01.0004.00.750
LINOFFENSERush Yds < 1502-5.28627.9CARDEFENSERush Yds 150+0-1.00035.00.714
CAROFFENSEYPP < 6.00-1.00020.0LINDEFENSEYPP 6.0+2-4.33338.50.667
CAROFFENSEYPP 6.0+8-01.00040.5LINDEFENSEYPP < 6.02-1.6673.00.667
CAROFFENSEYPC 5.0+7-01.00041.9LINDEFENSEYPC < 5.02-1.6673.00.667
LINOFFENSETurnovers < 12-1.66740.3CARDEFENSETurnovers 1+6-01.0006.50.667
LINOFFENSEYPP < 6.00-2.0003.0CARDEFENSEYPP 6.0+2-1.66726.70.667
LINOFFENSERush Yds < 1000-1.0000.0CARDEFENSERush Yds 100+2-1.66726.70.667
CAROFFENSEPass Yds < 2006-1.85732.4LINDEFENSEPass Yds 200+1-3.25045.20.607
CAROFFENSEYPP 7.0+5-01.00048.2LINDEFENSEYPP < 7.03-2.60011.80.600
LINOFFENSEYPA 8.0+2-3.40040.2CARDEFENSEYPA < 8.02-01.0004.00.600
CAROFFENSEPass Yds 200+2-01.00058.5LINDEFENSEPass Yds < 2003-2.60011.80.600
LINOFFENSEYPC 5.0+4-3.57136.1CARDEFENSEYPC < 5.03-01.0007.30.571
LINOFFENSEYPP 6.0+4-3.57139.1CARDEFENSEYPP < 6.02-01.0004.00.571
CAROFFENSETurnovers < 15-01.00046.2LINDEFENSETurnovers 1+4-5.44426.70.556
CAROFFENSERush Yds < 1503-1.75042.0LINDEFENSERush Yds 150+1-4.20042.80.550
LINOFFENSERush Yds 100+4-4.50035.0CARDEFENSERush Yds < 1002-01.0004.00.500
CAROFFENSEYPP < 7.03-1.75025.8LINDEFENSEYPP 7.0+1-3.25045.20.500
LINOFFENSEPass Yds < 2002-2.50019.8CARDEFENSEPass Yds 200+2-01.00022.50.500
LINOFFENSEYPC < 5.00-2.00013.5CARDEFENSEYPC 5.0+1-1.50033.00.500
LINOFFENSEYPP < 7.01-4.20021.0CARDEFENSEYPP 7.0+2-1.66726.70.467
LINOFFENSETurnovers 1+2-4.33326.5CARDEFENSETurnovers < 12-1.66722.00.333
CAROFFENSEYPA < 8.01-1.50034.0LINDEFENSEYPA 8.0+1-4.20043.20.300
LINOFFENSEPass Yds 200+2-3.40040.2CARDEFENSEPass Yds < 2002-1.66714.30.267
CAROFFENSEYPC < 5.01-1.50025.5LINDEFENSEYPC 5.0+2-4.33338.50.167
LINOFFENSEYPA < 8.02-2.50019.8CARDEFENSEYPA 8.0+2-1.66726.70.167

Data Export 2 -- TRENDS — TAB-SEPARATED (10 columns)

TeamSideTypeStatOpponentWindow/MeetingsValueBaselineGamesBaselineAvgDeviation
CARDEFENSEteamPass Yardslast 380.05159.2-49.7%
CARDEFENSEteamPointslast 31.0911.7-91.4%
CAROFFENSEteamPointslast 548.2938.2+26.1%
CARDEFENSEteamRush Yardslast 347.05116.6-59.7%
CAROFFENSEteamRush Yardslast 3259.79206.7+25.6%
CARDEFENSEteamTotal Yardslast 3127.05275.8-54.0%
CARDEFENSEteamTurnoverslast 52.491.8+35.0%
CAROFFENSEteamTurnoverslast 50.290.6-64.0%
CARDEFENSEteamYPAlast 33.258.6-62.8%
CAROFFENSEteamYPAlast 313.599.9+37.0%
CARDEFENSEteamYPClast 32.954.8-39.1%
CAROFFENSEteamYPClast 310.798.0+34.9%
CARDEFENSEteamYPPlast 33.156.4-51.3%
CAROFFENSEteamYPPlast 312.298.8+38.4%
LINDEFENSEteamPass Yardslast 3134.39184.7-27.3%
LINDEFENSEteamPointslast 311.3926.7-57.5%
LINOFFENSEteamPointslast 338.7931.1+24.3%
LINOFFENSEteamRush Yardslast 3238.09156.3+52.2%
LINDEFENSEteamTotal Yardslast 3245.39318.2-22.9%
LINOFFENSEteamTotal Yardslast 3429.09345.7+24.1%
LINDEFENSEteamTurnoverslast 32.791.8+50.0%
LINOFFENSEteamTurnoverslast 30.791.0-33.3%
LINDEFENSEteamYPAlast 35.097.0-28.4%
CAR — ROSTER (47) 26-27
#NAMEPOSCLASS
QUARTERBACKS
1CHRIS FIELDS III
PASS 89/129 · 69.0% · 1,227 YDS · 9.5 YPA · 16 TD · 3 INT · 153.4/G
RUSH 84 CAR · 742 YDS · 8.8 YPC · 12 TD · 92.8/G
QBSr.
RUNNING BACKS
7ERIC MYERS
RUSH 34 CAR · 171 YDS · 5.0 YPC · 1 TD · 34.2/G
REC 1 REC · 8 YDS · 8.0 YPC · 0 TD · 1.6/G
RBSr.
11AJ UMOH
RUSH 8 CAR · 48 YDS · 6.0 YPC · 0 TD · 8.0/G
DEF 23 TKL · 3.8 TKL/G · 6 TFL · 0.5 SACKS · 1 INT
RBSr.
32TION MARSHALL
RUSH 1 CAR · 26 YDS · 26.0 YPC · 0 TD · 26.0/G
FBSr.
RECEIVERS & TIGHT ENDS
3MICHAEL O'DELL
PASS 0/1 · 0.0% · 0 YDS · 0.0 YPA · 0 TD · 0 INT · 0.0/G
REC 1 REC · 36 YDS · 36.0 YPC · 0 TD · 4.5/G
DEF 18 TKL · 2.2 TKL/G · 2 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 1 INT
WRSr.
5NICK SANDOVAL
REC 13 REC · 268 YDS · 20.6 YPC · 2 TD · 89.3/G
WRSr.
6NATHAN WILLIAMS
REC 23 REC · 221 YDS · 9.6 YPC · 6 TD · 27.6/G
WRSr.
8DARREN PANTON
REC 14 REC · 283 YDS · 20.2 YPC · 3 TD · 35.4/G
DEF 9 TKL · 1.1 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
WRSr.
14JORDIN DANIEL
REC 18 REC · 198 YDS · 11.0 YPC · 3 TD · 28.3/G
WRSr.
18ANDRE JACKSON
RUSH 2 CAR · 20 YDS · 10.0 YPC · 0 TD · 10.0/G
WRSo.
21ZACHARY BROCK
RUSH 2 CAR · 38 YDS · 19.0 YPC · 2 TD · 9.5/G
DEF 8 TKL · 2.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.5 SACKS · 0 INT
WRSr.
24JORGE VALENCIA
PASS 0/1 · 0.0% · 0 YDS · 0.0 YPA · 0 TD · 0 INT · 0.0/G
REC 1 REC · 25 YDS · 25.0 YPC · 1 TD · 12.5/G
WRJr.
DEFENSIVE LINE
4KINGSTON SULA
DEF 48 TKL · 6.9 TKL/G · 12 TFL · 7.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DEJr.
16RYAN DIXON
DEF 7 TKL · 1.4 TKL/G · 2 TFL · 1.5 SACKS · 0 INT
DESr.
23JAYLEN COX
RUSH 2 CAR · 21 YDS · 10.5 YPC · 1 TD · 7.0/G
DEF 22 TKL · 7.3 TKL/G · 5 TFL · 1.5 SACKS · 1 INT
DTSr.
28KAYLEN CAPERS
DEF 11 TKL · 3.7 TKL/G · 4 TFL · 0.5 SACKS · 0 INT
DEJr.
45ENZO FRANKLIN
DEF 5 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 1 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DTFr.
55DESHONDRE "ANTHONY" PURVIS
DEF 20 TKL · 2.5 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DTSr.
65TRENT AFUSIA
DEF 4 TKL · 1.3 TKL/G · 2 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DTJr.
95CHRISTOPHER TAYLOR
DEF 20 TKL · 3.3 TKL/G · 7 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DTJr.
LINEBACKERS
9PRESTON LEOMITI
RUSH 1 CAR · 14 YDS · 14.0 YPC · 0 TD · 1.8/G
DEF 52 TKL · 6.5 TKL/G · 4 TFL · 2.5 SACKS · 0 INT
MLBSr.
10JAYDEN TUIOTI
DEF 21 TKL · 3.0 TKL/G · 5 TFL · 2.0 SACKS · 0 INT
OLBSr.
12DERRIC MYERS
DEF 51 TKL · 6.4 TKL/G · 5 TFL · 3.0 SACKS · 3 INT
OLBJr.
19SYNCERE BAKER-ROSS
RUSH 22 CAR · 166 YDS · 7.5 YPC · 1 TD · 23.7/G
REC 9 REC · 141 YDS · 15.7 YPC · 0 TD · 20.1/G
DEF 3 TKL · 0.4 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
OLBSo.
25TUKI IFOPO LEIATO
DEF 12 TKL · 2.0 TKL/G · 1 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
MLBFr.
31MATTHEW SAUSAU
RUSH 5 CAR · 17 YDS · 3.4 YPC · 0 TD · 8.5/G
LBJr.
DEFENSIVE BACKS
0BENNIE SAULTER
DEF 19 TKL · 3.2 TKL/G · 2 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBJr.
2TYTUS SALAGI
RUSH 49 CAR · 287 YDS · 5.9 YPC · 3 TD · 41.0/G
REC 7 REC · 78 YDS · 11.1 YPC · 1 TD · 11.1/G
DEF 4 TKL · 0.6 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
SJr.
13DESHAWN WHITE
DEF 12 TKL · 1.5 TKL/G · 1 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 1 INT
DBJr.
15ADYN HURST
DEF 3 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBSr.
22OSCAR O'DELL
DEF 6 TKL · 1.5 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 2 INT
DBFr.
27TEEJAY HAMILTON
DEF 6 TKL · 1.5 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBJr.
29MYLES SMITH
DEF 4 TKL · 2.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DBFr.
ON STAT SHEETS, NOT ON THE POSTED ROSTER
--K. VIVAO
DEF 6 TKL · 6.0 TKL/G · 2 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
----
LIN — ROSTER (69) 26-27
#NAMEPOSCLASS
QUARTERBACKS
8ANDRE JACKSON
PASS 68/120 · 56.7% · 1,005 YDS · 8.4 YPA · 15 TD · 5 INT · 111.7/G
RUSH 21 CAR · 115 YDS · 5.5 YPC · 0 TD · 12.8/G
QBJr.
18XAVIER CRUZ
PASS 56/97 · 57.7% · 699 YDS · 7.2 YPA · 6 TD · 1 INT · 87.4/G
RUSH 42 CAR · 245 YDS · 5.8 YPC · 4 TD · 30.6/G
REC 2 REC · 7 YDS · 3.5 YPC · 0 TD · 0.9/G
QBJr.
RUNNING BACKS
13ERIC MILLER
RUSH 30 CAR · 264 YDS · 8.8 YPC · 1 TD · 44.0/G
REC 1 REC · 11 YDS · 11.0 YPC · 0 TD · 1.8/G
RBSo.
19DILLAN DURRUTHY-FAULKNER
RUSH 16 CAR · 66 YDS · 4.1 YPC · 2 TD · 22.0/G
DEF 3 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
RBJr.
34JOJO HAMILTON
RUSH 6 CAR · 19 YDS · 3.2 YPC · 0 TD · 6.3/G
DEF 1 TKL · 0.3 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
RBJr.
RECEIVERS & TIGHT ENDS
2DAREYEN BRIDGES
RUSH 7 CAR · 97 YDS · 13.9 YPC · 1 TD · 10.8/G
REC 54 REC · 794 YDS · 14.7 YPC · 11 TD · 88.2/G
DEF 14 TKL · 1.6 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 1 INT
WRSr.
11KYMANI BELL
REC 8 REC · 132 YDS · 16.5 YPC · 3 TD · 33.0/G
WRFr.
16SAMIR RAMSEY
REC 4 REC · 32 YDS · 8.0 YPC · 0 TD · 10.7/G
WRSr.
OFFENSIVE LINE
69FAMOUS FIATOA
DEF 10 TKL · 3.3 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
OLJr.
79GABRIEL MONTENEGRO
DEF 13 TKL · 3.2 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
TSo.
DEFENSIVE LINE
30SIOSI TUAVAO
DEF 69 TKL · 7.7 TKL/G · 6 TFL · 4.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DESr.
32HEJIPSON SAINT FLEUR
DEF 9 TKL · 4.5 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLSo.
41NEHEMIAH AUSTIN
DEF 6 TKL · 2.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLJr.
47ANDREW TAPIA
DEF 25 TKL · 6.2 TKL/G · 2 TFL · 0.5 SACKS · 0 INT
DEJr.
50JAMARI SHERELL
DEF 74 TKL · 8.2 TKL/G · 9 TFL · 2.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DTSr.
55MICHAEL WARE
DEF 45 TKL · 5.6 TKL/G · 3 TFL · 2.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DLJr.
66JEFFREY ADAMS
DEF 32 TKL · 8.0 TKL/G · 8 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
DTJr.
LINEBACKERS
5SETH FANUA
DEF 118 TKL · 13.1 TKL/G · 20 TFL · 4.0 SACKS · 0 INT
OLBSr.
6RYAN GEORGE
DEF 99 TKL · 11.0 TKL/G · 5 TFL · 2.0 SACKS · 2 INT
LBJr.
31STEVEN MOORE
DEF 2 TKL · 2.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
LBJr.
42TJ TAFILELE
DEF 59 TKL · 7.4 TKL/G · 2 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 1 INT
LBJr.
DEFENSIVE BACKS
0CAM JOY
RUSH 8 CAR · 24 YDS · 3.0 YPC · 0 TD · 3.0/G
DEF 67 TKL · 8.4 TKL/G · 1 TFL · 1.0 SACKS · 0 INT
SSr.
1JAEVEYION ALLEN
REC 45 REC · 637 YDS · 14.2 YPC · 5 TD · 70.8/G
DEF 92 TKL · 10.2 TKL/G · 2 TFL · 1.0 SACKS · 2 INT
CBSr.
10DEVIN DAVIS
REC 2 REC · 34 YDS · 17.0 YPC · 1 TD · 3.8/G
DEF 46 TKL · 5.1 TKL/G · 1 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 1 INT
CBFr.
15DAVON DUNN
RUSH 5 CAR · 159 YDS · 31.8 YPC · 1 TD · 17.7/G
REC 7 REC · 83 YDS · 11.9 YPC · 1 TD · 9.2/G
DEF 60 TKL · 6.7 TKL/G · 1 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 3 INT
FSFr.
20KHALIL PHILLIPS
DEF 17 TKL · 3.4 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
FSFr.
21MARCELIS TUCKER
DEF 1 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
CBSo.
26BOSTYN PENA
DEF 1 TKL · 1.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
CBSr.
28LAMAR LONG JR.
DEF 3 TKL · 1.5 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
CBJr.
OTHER / UNLISTED POSITION
27JEREMIAH BAGLEY
RUSH 3 CAR · 13 YDS · 4.3 YPC · 0 TD · 6.5/G
DEF 1 TKL · 0.5 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
--Fr.
35JAMAAL WILLIAMS
DEF 3 TKL · 3.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
--So.
64JAYLEN LARKINS
DEF 8 TKL · 2.0 TKL/G · 0 TFL · 0.0 SACKS · 0 INT
--Jr.
Report Produced by ScorePirate | Commitment and offer data sourced from 247Sports | GENERATED 10/29/2026 09:34